WHAT’S THE NEXT ANTI-SEMITIC LIBEL THE MEDIA WILL “PROVE”….
POLL: What’s The Next Anti-Israel Libel That Media Outlets”Prove”?
Prove is in quotes because, per the Berekeley professor who launched this hatefest, the decades-old incidents have nothing to do with the Swedish organ theft story. It’s a medical ethics disaster – a bunch of messy consent issues and religious sensibilities are involved – but were Palestinians targeted? Scheper-Hughes again: “not by a long shot.”
And yet she choose to give succor to mouth-breathing anti-Jewish bigots because – quote – “the symbolism, you know, of taking skin of the population considered to be the enemy, (is) something, just in terms of its symbolic weight, that has to be reconsidered.” I’m not sure why she didn’t just come out and use the phrase “pound of flesh.”
In any case we’re officially off on another round of organ theft stories. Iranian Press TV has shifted their ongoing blockbuster coverage of the “international Israeli conspiracy to kidnap children and harvest their organs” from the most recent revelation – “Tel Aviv’s plot to import Ukrainian children and harvest their organs” – to Jews who steal Palestinian kids’ organs.
Eventually that’s going to get boring – these kinds of hateful highs only last so long – and so I’m interested what you guys think next “proven” blood libel will be. That there will be a next one is a given. That’s how addicts behave when their buzz wears off. They’ll go looking for new evidence of some new imagined Israeli atrocity. When they don’t find anything genuine – on account of how it exists only in their feverish imagination – they’ll lower their standards for what counts as proof and hold their hatefest anyway. Think of it as not being able to score the good stuff and settling for whatever’s available.
I’ve put up a poll on what you think the next media-legitimized anti-Israel canard is going to be. Justify your vote under this post on the Mere Rhetoric Facebook page, or sound off if you think there’s an option I didn’t include.
Naturally you’ll want to consider why some anti-Israel accusations get traction while other don’t. It doesn’t seem to have anything to do with the tenability of the accusations themselves. Until this recent story broke, “Israeli organ theft” were so untenable that the Swedish reporter who published the original libel was in the process of recanting. But the canards were still in broad circulation. Meanwhile Hamas has been trying to get the world to take notice of Israel’s plot to dump aphrodisiac gum on Gaza for a while. They seem pretty convinced it’s happening. Thus far no journalist has rushed into that particular investigative breach.
International journalists seem to gravitate toward particular kinds of feverish stories. Aphrodisiac gum plus Israeli Jews is a no-go. It just doesn’t have the right feel. Organ theft feels better. But organ theft minus Israeli Jews – as happens in China and the UK – also don’t seem that interesting. With that in mind, here you go:
1.Controlling Global Finance
2.Contaminating Gaza’s Water Supply And Wells
3.Attacking A Church And Desecrating The Host
4.Corrupting German Girls
5.None. They’ll Stick With Organ Theft Indefinitely Because It Feels So Good
VoteView Results
Share ThisPolldaddy.com
Incidentally, the good money’s on water contamination, hearkening back to the vicious well-poisoning libels that launched so many pogroms and killed so many Jews. The Guardian has already floated the canard with an assist from the UN. Of course the actual cause of Gaza groundwater contamination is that PA and Hamas have overpumped the wells, which was already well-known in 2002 and was the subject of a WaPo investigation in 2004. But whatever.
Comments are closed.
