DIANE KEPUS: AMERICAN TEXTBOOKS AND THE LIES THEY TELL
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.11238/pub_detail.asp
The report identified approximately 30 textbooks used in Florida public schools with instances of bias, inaccuracies and purposeful omissions. It alleges that students are being given flawed information about the history of Islam, the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the Middle East, and Islamist extremist threats worldwide. It includes showing over 200 quotations from the list of textbooks that CFNS shows are biased and/or inaccurate.
One example in the report is when a textbook states, “Women, as wives and mothers, have an honored position in Saudi society.” Another article states, “The land now called Palestine consists of Israel, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.”
Dr. Saxton stated, “Although agenda-based campaigns to shape textbook content have existed for some time, the past decade has seen particularly aggressive, intense overt and stealth efforts by proponents of Islam to inject their beliefs into K-12 classrooms via textbooks.”
Recently the Bradley Project on America’s National Identity outlined in its report, “E Pluribus Unum,” a concern that America is in danger of losing a sense of national identity. They call upon educators to move away from highlighting what’s wrong with America over what is right, and to promote a shared sense of American identity rather than emphasize our ethnic, racial and religious differences. It also suggests that we are not doing a good job of teaching students the fundamentals of American history, but we are succeeding in teaching them to be hyper-aware of the divisions among us rather than all that unites us.
So there are two things happening here. We are producing students with the scantest of knowledge of American history and planting in them a distorted vision of what we do give them. It has been suggested we do not even need to teach any American history prior to the year 1865. Why is that? Isn’t America’s history as story of truth and exceptionalism? It is that very exceptionalism our enemies do not want our children to learn. Exceptionalism means were are different, not necessarily better, as in gloating. It does lay out hope and a goal for other countries to achieve. Why else does everyone want to come to America? You do not hear about people moving to Cuba, Iran or Venezuela!
Professor Schweikart shows that photographs and their captions can often be good indicators of whether a history textbook has a point of view. In his chapter on Ronald Reagan, Schweikart shows a photo of the Reagan’s dancing at their inaugural. Here’s his caption: “Historians always attach a caption to a picture such as this that mentions how wealthy the Reagans’ supporters were, or how they ushered in a decade of greed. But all presidents have had grand inaugural balls, and the 1980s witnessed the greatest boom in the nation’s economy for all groups in 60 years, thanks to ‘Reaganomics.'”
So I took a look through the textbook seventh-graders at a school in my area will be using this year to study American history — A History of the US: All the People Since 1945, written by Joy Hakim.
Sure enough, here’s the caption from that textbook under a photo of the Reagans at their inaugural celebration. “Nancy and Ronald Reagan at one of their inauguration parties, held in Washington’s Air and Space Museum. A black-tie, mink, and diamond affair, it was the fanciest, most expensive inauguration in American history, costing five times more than Jimmy Carter’s inaugural had.”
Contrast that with the caption under a photo of the Kennedy’s en route to their inaugural celebration: “President Kennedy and his wife, Jackie, on their way to the inaugural ball. Her glamour nearly stole the show.” (For the record, JFK is in white-tie.)
What about the Clintons’ inaugural celebrations? Here’s how the caption reads under a photo of Bill Clinton playing the saxophone: “Newly elected President Bill Clinton plays his saxophone at one of the Inauguration Night balls. Clinton loves music, especially jazz, and is a strong supporter of music education in public schools.”
More lies: credit given to Mikhail Gorbachev for ending the Cold War and the almost non-existent credit given to Reagan; in the discussion of how communism failed as a political and economic system, the only mention of Ronald Reagan is “trying to keep up with Reagan-era military might have helped do it.” So how and why exactly did communism end? “When the Russian people had had enough, they just threw communism out.” and “Bill Clinton was president when we were still trying to understand new attitudes about morality and sex; the special prosecutor and the press went far beyond the bounds of good taste or legal necessity in describing the president’s relations with a woman who worked in the White House.”
Comments are closed.