GUY MILLIERE: THE ISLAMIC SYMPATHIES OF OBAMA…SEE NOTE PLEASE
http://www.dreuz.info/2012/08/les-sympathies-islamiques-dobama/
THE TRANSLATION IS FROM GOOGLE
Those who doubt the Islamic sympathies of Barack Obama should pay attention to the meal breaking the fast of Ramadan that he hosted at the White House last Friday night.
Were invited all the ambassadors of member countries of the Organization of Islamic Conference in Washington, without exception, the two Muslim congressmen, Andre Carson (I do not know his Muslim name, taken from his conversion) and Keith Ellison, all Muslim members of the Obama administration (and there are some numbers, starting with Dalia Mogahed, “head of religious dialogue with Obama, a fervent supporter of sharia, crafter of rapprochement between the U.S. State Department and the Muslim Brotherhood, and Huma Abeidin, first assistant of the same Hillary Clinton State Department, former Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs, the organization itself linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and co-led by Omar Abdullah and she Nasseef, former President of the Muslim World League, Rabita Trust’s founder, dissolved after it was discovered by U.S. law that funded jihadist terrorism).
During the dinner, Obama reiterated his comments on the enormous contributions of Islam in the United States since its founding and has emphasized that Thomas Jefferson was reading the “Holy Koran”, and organized the first dinner breaking the young in the White House, here more than two hundred years. Obama reconstructs the history, and he lies about Thomas Jefferson, who had summoned the ambassador of Tripoli, Rahman Adja, the U.S. delegation to the United States just born in London, asking for explanations of the acts of piracies from the Algerian coast, and which resulted in the sacking of U.S. commercial ships, had offered him to dinner (without it being a meal break young) and had been awarded him by a Koran, according to Ambassador, would allow him to understand why Muslims feel legitimate to practice robbery against vessels not Muslims. Obama did not say that Thomas Jefferson was an admirer of Islam or had converted, but it was not very far.
I know that Obama was a practicing Muslim until the age of twenty years, which did not prevent him from touching multiple drugs), but still: there is nothing surprising in this Obama lane Erdogan princpal his partner and confidant in the Middle East and is a sympathetic look on Mohamed Morsi, soon an official visit to the White House where he will explain to Obama that he is serving to organize in the Egyptian army by using the pretext of the terrorist attack against Israel here just in Sinai will advance “democracy” in Islamic Egypt.
Those who understand the Islamist sympathies Obama understand his action, and I have already explained here (I will return in detail in my forthcoming book, The Obama disaster): ever since their foundation, the Muslim Brotherhood had gained political power, and now have the power in Morocco, although the king is still there, Tunisia, Libya (with some tricks that deceive useless idiots), Egypt (Morsi which actually advance his pawns), Yemen , Turkey (where the AKP positions very close to those of the Muslim Brotherhood and plays the role of party “friend”).
After long hesitation, Barack Obama seems to err on the side of the Muslim Brotherhood in Syria, too, without getting involved in a civil war that has left ramp up: this does not mean a quick end to the conflict so far (I have already written). In addition to the Muslim Brotherhood, ever more radical faction, al Qaeda in particular, have had such an influence (I explain in my next book why eliminate bin Laden was not an anti al Qaeda), since are at the heart of the Sunni uprising Syrian, have bases in Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan, Afghanistan (the Afghan government “friend” of the United States is also trying to lean towards positions not very friendly to the West), Libya, and the young Islamic Republic of Azawad in northern Mali, for using all the weapons arsenals of Gaddafi came through the great liberating intervention that BHL was the prophet.
Those who understand the Islamist sympathies will understand that Obama has chosen as a balance between on the one hand Al Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood, and Iran on the other hand, even angry Saudi leaders. As we explain, Daniel Pipes and me in the face of radical Islam, Saudi Arabia is a fundamentalist and fundamentalist Islam spreads, but it is not a country and distrusts jihadist Muslim Brotherhood, and more of Al Qaeda.
Those who understand will understand that Obama intends to curb Iran’s strict, but no case had hit him or bring down the regime led by Ayatollah Khamenei. Obama, for nearly four years, has avoided any measure of effective sanction against the Iranian regime. He should be in a position to consider electorally absolutely desperate to strike Iran, and even then, I doubt he would. It means, I have already written, let Iran go to the gates of nuclear power, to advance to the next stage (regional denuclearization request).
Those who understand will understand that lorsqu’Obama embraces Israeli leaders, he is a “kiss of death” worthy of the Mafia, to fool the rich American Jews in a position to fund and meet the fools left (redundant) as Alan Dershowitz (who calls to vote for Obama in November): Israel, if Obama is elected, will benefit from a less hostile Congress and Obama in new allies like India.
This refers to the question posed to the Israeli government against the nuclearization of Iran.
I do not know if the Israeli government intends to strike or not, and if I knew I would not say. I just write that this is a very difficult choice to make: there is little time left before it’s too late and that Israel must live with a nuclear Iran, but it is reasonable to ask whether Israel can live with Iran’s nuclear program.
A ringfenced Iran would not attack Israel, I said, but rely on the rationality of Khamenei (the real decision maker) is counting on something that does not really exist: Khamenei is not a fully rational actor: a Reuel Marc Gerecht article in the latest issue of the Weekly Standard, The Most Dangerous Man in the World gives the details.
Netanyahu does not ignore the dark plans of Obama (regional denuclearization, desire for recognition of a “Palestinian state” in the “1967 borders”).
An Israeli strike against Iran would lead probably to a wider war, and inevitably oblige the U.S. to get involved. I wrote a window of opportunity existed before November 6, puisqu’Obama Israel can not let go before the election, but I think appropriate to refine my point: a strike before November 6, could also enhance the chances Obama re-election. The multiple emissaries sent by Obama to Israel to ask the Israeli government to wait and do nothing for the time sent a message of hostility to any keystroke, but if strikes were taking place anyway, Obama could occur alongside Israel temporarily, and count on the fact that the American electorate, when the country is at war, does not change the “commander”, shows that the electoral history.
Then, just after a strike on Nov. 6? Other issue? I noted: Iran will support Assad to the end, the effects of conflict and Syria are just beginning to be felt, they could undercut Iran and cause multiple side effects.
One last point: the Israeli left-wing press in recent days has shown a very grave irresponsibility, and demonstrated that the Israeli left could border on treason. Newspapers such as Haaretz gave possible dates for Israeli strike against Iran, which is equivalent to do everything to thwart Israeli action and to provide information to Iran. In addition to the dates of strikes, these newspapers have claimed unveil elements of Israeli strategy for possible strikes: it borders on treason. In the past, when Israel was faced with the danger and difficult decisions, a united front was facing the danger. The Israeli left has lost virtually any chance of winning elections by having defended the policy which proved deleterious, and should it pass the tension on positions ranging deleterious behavior in the direction I have described, I think she would bear a stigma for a long time. The stigma seemed to be emerging in recent days.
Reproduction allowed and strongly encouraged, with the following statement and the link below:
© Guy Milliere for www.Dreuz.info
Comments are closed.
