Displaying posts published in

September 2012

THEY ARE KILLING US BECAUSE WE ARE INFIDELS: DIANA WEST

http://www.dianawest.net/Home/tabid/36/EntryId/2239/-Theyre-Killing-Us-Because-Were-Infidels.aspx Paul Sperry rakes the Pentagon response to jihad inside the wire — more “sensitivity” training — in the New York Post this week (must have been Prince Talal’s day off). Top officials believe culturally offensive behavior is the motivation behind the killings, so it’s stepped up Islamic sensitivity training for our troops. “Top officials” […]

JOHN BERNARD; HOW MANY MORE US SERVICEMEN NEED TO BE SACRIFICED AAT THE ALTAR OF ARROGANCE AND POLITICAL CONVENIENCE?

http://letthemfight.blogspot.com/
In the past few days and in the midst of the murderous jubilation expressed by the Muslim communities throughout the Middle East for their new found Arab “Sprung” freedom, insider attacks number 37 and 38 reaped the religion of peace and our government, six more ISAF and American dead, two British Soldiers killed in an attack on Camp Bastion and some $150,000,000.00 worth of equipment including six Harriers destroyed and two severely damaged.

Not a bad five day’s work for Allah’s “peaceful worshippers”!

Of course the single most outrageous act of the week was the pre-planned, coordinated attack on our Embassy Staff in Benghazi which yielded another four completely unnecessary American deaths; an attack this administration, as of this writing still refuses to acknowledge as a pre-planned, coordinated attack.

Some clarification is in order at this point. Let’s define what elements define a “coordinated attack”:

1. The use of combined arms, ie small arms fire (rifles), rocket assisted direct fire weapons (RPG’s), indirect fire weapons (Mortars).

2. The assignment of individuals to specific elements of the attack:

a. Base Fire Element which provides, preparatory and suppressing fires – Mortars combined with machine guns, rockets and small arms are used to soften the target and render defenders inoperable.

b. A Maneuver element – a lightly armed unit(rifles, RPG’s, light machine guns), whose principle responsibility is to carry the attack to the enemy and engage them, one on one.

3. Rehearsal – Practice, Discussion, Intelligence coordination and dry runs to insure all individuals and elements understand their responsibilities and most important, the disposition of the other elements in relation to each other and the target.

Any coordinated attack that contained the two first elements would have been rehearsed for reasons that should be obvious even to a complete novice. The Base of Fire Element which is designed to soften up a target can be deadly if not coordinated with the Maneuver Element. This means a pre-designed communications/signal plan telling the Base of Fire when to cease fire, or shift to make a safe avenue of approach for the Maneuver Element.

AWR HAWKINS: US STATE DEPT. CONSIDERS RELEASING BLIND SHEIK TO EGYPT

US State Dept. Considers Releasing Blind Sheikh to Egypt http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/09/18/US-State-Dept-To-Considers-Releasing-Blind-Sheikh-For-Humanitarian-and-Health-Reasons The US State Department is actively negotiating with Egyptian President Morsi’s government about transferring Omar Abdel-Rahman from US custody to Egyptian custody. Rahman, also known as “the Blind Sheikh,” is currently serving a life sentence in the US for his role in the 1993 World […]

LE FIGARO: DIVERSITY NOW NEW HEBDO CARTOONS WILL MOCK ISLAM AS WELL AS ORTHODOX JEWS SEE NOTE

Le Figaro story on Charlie Hebdo– Will the Orthodox Jews riot, burn cars and storm the Bastille?….rsk

http://www.lefigaro.fr/actualite-france/2012/09/18/01016-20120918ARTFIG00616–charlie-hebdo-caricature-a-nouveau-mahomet.php

“Charlie Hebdo Mohammed cartoon again”

The satirical weekly is published in its issue of Wednesday cartoons of the Prophet in daring positions. The government feared further violence.

A little less than a year after the publication of a cartoon of Muhammad that led to the arson of his local recurrence Charlie Hebdo. The new issue of the satirical newspaper, on newsstands Wednesday, contains new caricatures that might make about them. The one stage is indeed an imam pushed in his wheelchair by a rabbi with the title “Untouchables 2: do not laugh!”. The traditional heading “The one that you have escaped”, located on the last page, has two naked cartoons of the Prophet, including one particularly daring. The news channel i-Télé continuous decided not to publish on its antenna, unlike BFMTV.
The government is worried

DAVID GOLDMAN: A MIDDLE EAST WAR

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Front_Page/NI18Aa01.html TEL AVIV – It is hard to remember a moment when the United States’ foreign policy establishment showed as much unanimity as in its horror at the prospect of a unilateral Israeli strike on Iran. In a September 10 report for Georgetown University’s Center for Strategic and International Studies, Anthony Cordesman warns, “A strike […]

The ‘47 Percent’ Flap By William Voegeli see note please

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner#
MOTHER JONES IS A PREDICTABLE LEFTIST RAG…BUT THE CONSERVATIVES SUCH AS WILLIAM KRISTOL AND PEGGY NOONAN WHO JOINED THE BRAYING ASSES IN CRITICIZING ROMNEY ARE FOOLS….RSK

“Here was Romney raw and unplugged — sort of unscripted,” writes David Corn of Mother Jones about the newly released video of Mitt Romney at a Boca Raton fundraising event in May. “With this crowd of fellow millionaires, he apparently felt free to utter what he really believes and would never dare say out in the open.”

It’s not that simple. As citizens become more interested in what our prospective presidents really believe, politicians become more guarded about sharing their beliefs. If everyone wants to look behind the mask, the incentives lead hyper-ambitious but hyper-cautious politicians to wear layers of masks. Corn’s idea that a presidential candidate at a fundraising event is baring his soul is either tendentious, since it helps Corn condemn Romney as a callous plutocrat, or naïve. A more plausible interpretation is that the video finds Romney giving one more speech to one more audience, calibrating, as all politicians must: the message he wants to deliver; the message that particular audience desires and is capable of hearing; and the result he’s hoping for, which is usually votes, but sometimes the investment of money, effort, or enthusiasm.

The contest between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney now features symmetrical embarrassing, surreptitious tapes from fundraisers. Barack Obama’s remarks at a San Francisco fundraiser in April 2008 about the “bitter” people in the small towns of Pennsylvania and the Midwest who “cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations” is one bookend. Romney’s discourse on the “47 percent who are with [Obama], who are dependent upon government, who believe that they are victims, who believe the government has a responsibility to care for them, who believe that they are entitled to health care, to food, to housing, to you-name-it” is the other.

ANDREW McCARTHY: THE SOCIAL COMPACT?

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner As Mike correctly notes, there’s plenty to say about David Brooks’s faulty logic. I’ll stick to one aspect of it. Progressives like Brooks see government as if it were not merely a sentient being but one to whom we could transfer our personal responsibilities — as if there were virtue in spending other people’s […]

Undercover in Ramallah — on The Glazov Gang

Undercover in Ramallah — on The Glazov Gang
by Jamie Glazov
A photographer dresses up as a leftist hippie and journeys inside a death cult. This is his tale.
http://frontpagemag.com/2012/jamie-glazov/undercover-in-ramallah-on-the-glazov-gang/

Muslim Riots Reach Europe Free Speech Under Threat by Soeren Kern

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3350/muslim-riots-europe “We are ready to work with our souls and hearts to fight for our beloved prophet, even if death comes to meet us.” — Sharia4Belgium “I can imagine there would be good reasons to outlaw the film.” German Chancellor Angela Merkel, in a reversal from two years ago, when she said, “Free speech is […]

ELECTIONS ARE COMING: GOP WAR ON WOMEN? NO!…WOMEN WARRIORS

Heather Ann Wilson is a former Republican member of the United States House of Representatives representing New Mexico’s 1st congressional district from 1998 to 2009. She is the first female military veteran elected to a full term in Congress. She is running for the Senate.

http://heatherwilson.com/
HEALTHCARE

I am running for the Senate because I trust people more than I trust government to make the best decisions for themselves and their families. But that is not what we have today with Obamacare. Obamacare does nothing to control the spiraling cost of care. It raises taxes, cuts Medicare, costs more, and gives people less control over their health care decisions.

For the first time in American history, every citizen will be required to purchase a government approved product. If Washington can mandate how people must spend their money, there is no limit to government power. The law is unconstitutional and if it is not thrown out by the Supreme Court, I will fight to make sure it is repealed and replaced.
DEFENSE

The first and most important responsibility of the federal government is to provide for the common defense. A strong military is the best way to keep the peace. Our young men and women in the military should only be sent into harm’s way to protect America’s vital national interests, with clear missions, and with the force necessary to win and come home again.

Three generations of my family have served in uniform. I have spent my adult life serving to protect our country and I will continue to do so in the Senate.