RUTHFULLY YOURS

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/

All politics are the politics of the future. The one cause that we all champion, regardless of our political orientation, is the cause of the future. All that we fight for is the ability to shape the future.
The fundamental political question is, “Do you believe things are getting better or worse?” Ruling parties tend to answer, “Better”, opposition parties tend to answer, “Worse”. The deeper answer to that question though lies in our perceptions of the past and the future.

The left tends to view the past negatively and future shock positively. It wants change to disrupt the old order of things in order to make way for a new order. It hews to a progressive understanding of history in which we have been getting better with the advance of time, the march of progress mimics evolution as a means of lifting humanity out of the muck and raising it up on ivory towers of reason through a ceaseless process of change.

The right often views the past positively, it sees change as a destroyer that undermines civilization’s accomplishments and threatens to usher in anarchy. It fights to conserve that which is threatened by the entropic winds of change. The conservative worldview is progressive in its own way, but it is the progress of the established order. It sees progress emerging from the accretion of civilization, rather than from the disruption of revolution.

Where the left tends to be unrealistically optimistic about the future, acting like a child running to the edge and jumping off, without remembering all the bumps and bruises before, the right tends to be pessimistic about the future. It tends to be wary of change because it is all too aware of how dangerous change can be.

Youth who do not understand the value of what is around them rush to the left. As they achieve a sense of worth, of the world around them and of their labors, they drift slowly to the right. Age also brings with it a sense of vulnerability. Knowing how you can be hurt, how fragile the thin skin of the body, the fleshy connections and organs dangling within, brings with it a different view of the world. Once you understand that you can lose and that you will lose, then you also understand how important it is to defend what you have left.

The vital mantra of the left is do something for the sake of doing something. Change for the sake of novelty. Action for the sake of action. This carnival drumbeat loses its appeal when you come to understand how dangerous change can be. Personal history becomes national history becomes personal history again as you live through it. Seeing what a mistake change can be as you watch politicians disgraced, causes revealed as fool’s errands and crusades fall apart, is a great teacher of the folly of change for the sake of change.

Reagan’s question, “Are you better off than you were four years ago?” is the fundamental challenge of the conservative that asks whether the change was really worth it. It is the question at the heart of the struggle between the right and the left.

http://www.prudenpolitics.com/newsletter?utm_source=P&P%20Auto%201&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=6774

NORTH KOREA IS THE BEST EXAMPLE OF THE CONSEQUENCES OF AN UNFINISHED WAR…..EISENHOWER WAS INTIMIDATED BY A PUBLIC OUTCRY AGAINST THE WAR AND FINISHED IT WITHOUT A REAL VICTORY OR SURRENDER OR UNIFICATION OF THE NATION….THAT LEFT THE VILE DYNASTY OF KIM IN FIRM CONTROL OF THE NORTH. ALL THE SMILEY VISITS OF MADELEINE HALFBRIGHT, THE IDIOTIC CONCERT OF LORIN MAAZEL, THE PATHETIC EFFORTS OF CONDI RICE AND HILLARY CLINTON HAVE DONE NOTHING TO THWART THE DEVELOPMENT OF NUKES, THEIR MEDDLING IN THE MIDDLE EAST ARMS, AND THEIR THREATS AGAINST A DISARMED AMERICA…..RSK

A boy with his first gun can be as deadly as a sharpshooter with a fruit salad of ribbons across his chest, and President Obama and his generals are treating North Korean crackpottery as a genuine threat to peace and good order. But they’re within their rights to get a kick out of Kim Jong-un’s little-boy tantrums, too.

Kim, even with a large inventory of rusty sabers to rattle, at 29 or 30 still looks like a boy in his first pair of long pants, and with all their wealth and pelf the Kims, grandfather, father and son, should find either a better barber or a bigger bowl. It’s hard for anyone to take seriously a kid with a haircut that bad. (When the satirical newspaper Onion called him “the sexiest man alive,” thousands cheered.)

The North Koreans have a talent for making deadly mischief, blowing up civilian airliners, capturing gunboats, shelling South Korean offshore islands and once, in 1983, dispatching agents to Burma to plant three bombs that exploded and killed 17 visiting South Koreans, including 4 cabinet ministers. Their actual target, the president of South Korea, might have been killed, too, but his motorcade was delayed in traffic and he missed laying a ceremonial wreath. So the little dictator with the jarhead haircut is probably capable of starting a war.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2013/04/educators_and_college_administrators_enemies_no_more.html As the proverbial offal hits the fan, adjunct instructors and their union leaders are understandably panic-stricken as they finally realize the impact of ObamaCare on their livelihoods. Union representatives are now sending their members letters stating that “the Affordable Care Act [aka ObamaCare] has defined full time as anyone working over 30 hours a […]

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323415304578370910199546982.html?mod=hp_opinion The question of how to fairly and equitably tax capital gains has been a political problem since the modern personal-income tax was adopted in 1913. Actually, this question has been one of the drivers transforming the tax code from its original 14 pages to its current Bibles-long mess. One of the complications, a cause […]

http://pjmedia.com/andrewmccarthy/2013/04/01/purple-hearts-to-hassans-victims/?print=1 The Claim that Awarding Purple Hearts to Hasan’s Victims Would Prejudice His Murder Trial Is Ridiculous What fact do you suppose is better known: (a) that Nidal Hasan has been incarcerated since he killed 13 American soldiers and wounded several others while screaming, “Allahu Akbar!” in the 2009 Fort Hood massacre, or (b) that […]

http://www.israelhayom.com/site/newsletter_opinion.php?id=3883 Jews have finally finished celebrating seven days of Passover, the holiday that marks freedom from Egyptian bondage. This year, because Egyptians are embroiled in their own enslavement at the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood leaders they elected, some of them have been too busy rioting in the streets — and others burning churches — […]

http://www.investigativeproject.org/3966/pentagon-denies-fort-hood-shooting-victims-purple Congressional efforts to secure Purple Hearts for Fort Hood shooting victims have met with failure. Pentagon officials sent a position paper to congressional staffers Friday detailing the military’s opposition. Thirteen people were killed and 32 others were wounded in the 2009 massacre at the Army post. The attack has not been labeled a terrorist […]

JCCWatch.org
Media Advisory
92nd Street Y Hosts Roger Waters, Rock Star Leader of Boycott Israel Movement

UJA-Federation Provides Funds for Pink Floyd Singer to Advocate Boycott of “Criminal” Israel

On April 30, the 92nd St Y will host Roger Waters, lead singer of Pink Floyd, who’s a major figure in the Boycotts, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.
Waters accused Israel of “ethnic cleansing,” “apartheid” and “international crimes” in a speech to the United Nations, and led a boycott against the Israel Philharmonic’s performance at Carnegie Hall. He’s currently attempting to organize his fellow musicians to boycott performing in Israel and succeeded in pressuring Stevie Wonder to cancel a benefit performance for Friends of the Israel Defense Force.
On April 30th, he’ll present “An Evening with Roger Waters” at the 92nd St Y, in which he’ll talk about his life – a life he states is dedicated to attacking Israel through BDS.
“It’s absolutely outrageous that Jewish community funds are going to help Roger Waters spread his anti-Semitic message,” says Richard Allen of JCCWatch.org
“UJA-Federation gives $800,000 to th

http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/04/monarch-in-the-middle/309270/

HE IS ONE OF THE SEVERAL SIRED BY CANNY KING HUSSEIN AND HIS WIVES….QUEEN (MA)NOOR WAS QUITE IN A SNIT WHEN HE WAS CHOSEN INSTEAD OF ONE OF HER PUPS. HE HAS NEITHER THE PLUCK, THE CUNNING OR THE SMARTS OF HIS FATHER WHO MAINTAINED A TOUGH GRIP ON THE PALARABS AND TENTATIVE PEACE AND COOPERATION WITH ISRAEL WITHOUT BENEFIT OF TREATIES….ALL THAT WAS RUINED WHEN HE WAS FORCED TO RELINQUISH ANY SAY IN THE CONTROL AND DESTINY OF WEST BANK ARABS…..RSK
The Modern King in the Arab Spring

AMID THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL TRANSFORMATIONS RESHAPING THE MIDDLE EAST, CAN JORDAN’S ABDULLAH II, THE REGION’S MOST PRO-AMERICAN ARAB LEADER, LIBERALIZE HIS KINGDOM, MODERNIZE ITS ECONOMY, AND SAVE THE COUNTRY FROM CAPTURE BY ISLAMIST RADICALS?
It is still, on occasion, good to be the king.

It is not necessarily good to be the king of a Middle Eastern country that is bereft of oil; nor is it necessarily so wonderful to be the king during the turmoil and uncertainty of the Arab Spring. It is certainly not good to be the king when the mystique that once enveloped your throne is evaporating.

But when a squadron of Black Hawk helicopters is reserved for your use, and when you are the type of king who finds release from the pressures of monarchy by piloting those Black Hawks up and down the length of your sand-covered kingdom—then it is still good to be the king.

One morning last fall, Abdullah II bin Al-Hussein, the fourth Hashemite king of Jordan, rolled up to a helipad situated close to the royal office complex in Al Hummar, on the western edge of the capital, Amman. He stepped out of an armored Mercedes—he drove himself, and drove fast, like he was being chased—and hustled to one of his Black Hawks. The king, who as a young prince served as a commander in the Royal Jordanian special forces, climbed into the pilot’s seat, talked for a moment with his co‑pilot, a trusted member of the Royal Squadron, and lifted off, pointing us in the direction of the rough, unhappy city of Karak, about 80 miles to the south. A second Black Hawk, filled with bodyguards, lifted off a moment later.

The king was flying himself to Karak, which is one of the poorer cities in a distressingly poor country, to have lunch with the leaders of Jordan’s largest tribes, which form the spine of Jordan’s military and political elite. More than half of all Jordanians are of Palestinian origin, with roots on the West Bank of the Jordan River, but the tribal leaders are from the East Bank, and the Hashemite kings have depended on East Bankers to defend the throne since the Hashemites first came to what was then called Transjordan from Mecca almost 100 years ago. This relationship has a coldly transactional quality: in exchange for their support of the royal court, the leaders of the eastern tribes expect the Hashemites to protect their privileges, and to limit the power of the Palestinians. When the Hashemites appear insufficiently attentive, problems inevitably follow.