MELANIE PHILLIPS: ONCE AGAIN THE WEST’S GOLIATH PSYCHOSIS


http://www.thejc.com/comment-and-debate/columnists/120870/wests-goliath-psychosis

Once again, we are living through the hallucinatory, sickening
experience of seeing Israel's morally-elevated defence against
murderous fanatics provoke a global explosion, of Israel-bashing and
naked anti-Jewish hatred, especially in demonstrations across Europe.

For sure, the current war in Gaza has engendered more sympathy than
previous such Israeli military campaigns. More and more people
understand that Israel alone is fighting a murderous Islamic
aggression which threatens themselves, too. People are less inclined
to blame Israel or believe media reports that are often not far off
inflammatory incitement against Israel and the Jewish people.

Many in the intelligentsia frame this conflict as if Israelis are the
war criminals and genocidal Hamas the victims. They uncritically
swallow the Hamas death count, even though it orders all casualties to
be described as "civilians" whereas untold numbers are armed killers.

The Hamas strategy is to maximise civilian deaths and give the widest
circulation to horrific pictures of mutilated children in order to
turn Western opinion against Israel.

What is it that leads so many to demonise Israel?

It works, with commentators spitting venom at Israel as "out of
control", guilty of indiscriminate slaughter and even - obscenely -
"genocide".

Why did the West turn against Israel? The conventional explanation is
that, with the post-1967 "occupation", David turned into Goliath.

But as Joshua Muravchik points out in his new book, Making David into
Goliath: How the World Turned Against Israel, China's oppression of
Tibet didn't produce the same reaction.

Muravchik presents an illuminating analysis to try to explain the
inexplicable. In a nutshell, the Arab and Muslim world set out to bend
the Western mind - and succeeded.

Muravchik records how, in the '60s, the newly-formed PLO terrorist
group learned from Algeria to present the enemy as not only Israel but
also "world imperialism," and the Palestinian cause as a struggle for
liberation. The conflict was redefined from Arabs v Israel to Israel v
Palestinians. The former Arab collaborators of Hitler and Goebbels
were transformed into the comrades of such romanticised figures as Ho
Chi Minh and Che Guevara. Annihilatory Palestinian terrorism became
chic. Giving the Palestinians a state became the holy grail of
enlightened opinion.

The role played by terrorism and the oil weapon, the hijacking of the
UN by the Arab bloc, the malign influence of such figures as the
academic rewriter of Islamic history Edward Said, not to mention the
appalling growth of the Israel-hating Israeli left, all this and more
is part of the story.

I would add the prevailing climate of consequentialism, which means
all that matters is outcomes, regardless of the motivation of those
producing those outcomes. As a result, people look at the imbalance of
casualties between Israel and Gaza and conclude that Israel's actions
must therefore be disproportionate.

And yet, and yet. More than 200,000 have been killed in Syria, some
700 last week alone, not to mention hundreds in Iraq and elsewhere. So
what is it that drives so many to demonise Israel's army - described
by Britain's former commander in Afghanistan Richard Kemp as "the most
moral amy in the history of warfare" - as monstrous and deliberate
child killers?

This thing ultimately defies rational explanation. As Islamist
savagery spreads, the moral depravity of the Western animus against
Israel and the Jews can only be described as a metaphysical psychosis.

Comments are closed.