RUTHFULLY YOURS

A Palestinian attempt to get Israel expelled — totally and permanently — from international soccer was dropped at the last minute [1].

The Palestinian complaint was that Israel is impeding the movement of Palestinian soccer players from the West Bank and Gaza, and that Israel’s own soccer league includes five teams based in Israeli West Bank communities.

Israel, noting that the Palestinian players go through checkpoints and the like because of security concerns, offered a compromise wherein their movement would have been eased. The Palestinian side turned it down flat. At the FIFA convention on Friday, it was only at the last minute that the Palestinian delegation, realizing they would not have won the vote, gave up — for now — the effort to oust Israel.

All that 77 million Turks could collect to donate to Gaza stood at $32 million, or about 40 cents per person.

“This is a clear picture of the AK Party’s true colors… How could you not honor your promise to Gaza?” — Mehmet Gunal, opposition member of parliament.

Underneath its “Pro-Palestinian” mindset, Turkish solidarity with the Palestinians is less related to the Palestinian cause and more to the Islamists’ devotion to the dream of conquest.

Five years ago this week, on May 31, 2010, a Turkish flotilla with hundreds of pro-Palestinian activists aboard sailed toward the Gaza Strip in order to break Israel’s naval blockade. Israel had established the blockade to prevent weapons from being shipped to the Hamas terrorist organization, which rules Gaza and is openly committed to Israel’s destruction.

The Clinton Foundation followed Rahm Emanuel’s adage of never letting a crisis go to waste when Swedish companies faced potential blacklisting over sanctions on doing business with Iran. John Solomon ands Julie Riddell of the Washington Times report:

Bill Clinton’s foundation set up a fundraising arm in Sweden that collected $26 million in donations at the same time that country was lobbying Hillary Rodham Clinton’s State Department to forgo sanctions that threatened its thriving business with Iran, according to interviews and documents obtained by The Washington Times.

The Swedish entity, called the William J. Clinton Foundation Insamlingsstiftelse, was never disclosed to or cleared by State Department ethics officials, even though one of its largest sources of donations was a Swedish government-sanctioned lottery.

As the money flowed to the foundation from Sweden, Mrs. Clinton’s team in Washington declined to blacklist any Swedish firms despite warnings from career officials at the U.S. Embassy in Stockholm that Sweden was growing its economic ties with Iran and potentially undercutting Western efforts to end Tehran’s rogue nuclear program, diplomatic cables show.

This looks exactly like a shakedown racket. And it was not the foundation alone that profited enormously:

Wow!Science mag is publishing a blockbuster paper today, June 4.Oh boy!Get ready to watch yet another big fight about climate change — this time mainly among different groups of climate alarmists.Is there a “pause”?Did global climate really stop warming during the last dozen years, 18 years, or even 40 years, in spite of rising levels of the greenhouse (GH) gas carbon dioxide?

The renowned National Climate Data Center (NCDC), a division of NOAA located in Asheville, NC, claims that the widely reported (and accepted) temperature hiatus (i.e., near-zero trend) is an illusion — just an artifact of data analysis — and that the global climate never really stopped warming.If true, what a blessing that would be for the UN-IPCC — and for climate alarmists generally, who have been under siege to explain the cause of the pause.

Of course, NCDC-NOAA may end up with egg on their collective faces.It does look a little suspicious that NCDC arrived at this earth-shaking “discovery,” after “massaging” its own weather-station data at just the right time, just before the big policy conference in December in Paris is supposed to stop the rise of CO2 from the burning of energy fuels, coal, oil, and gas.

I think she is waiting until the S.S. Hillary goes down and sees herself as the last minute savior. For someone not running she sure is making waves that the media keeps highlighting….rsk

This week the lefty outfits MoveOn.org and Democracy for America announced that they’ve given up trying to persuade Senator Elizabeth Warren to run for President in 2016. Maybe it’s because she doesn’t want to wait that long.

Across the landscape of economic policy, the Massachusetts Democrat is bidding for control of the Obama agenda over the final 19 months of the President’s term. The latest salvo from the Warren ’15 campaign came Tuesday when the Senator lunged for control over the appointments process at the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Ms. Warren was ostensibly sending a letter to SEC Chair Mary Jo White to air various complaints about the latter’s management of the agency. But the 13-page screed, accusing the former prosecutor of broken promises and weak leadership among other alleged offenses, reads like a direct-mail piece from a political fundraising operation. We’d expect kinder words in a Harry Reid letter to Ted Cruz. Adding to the bizarre nature of Tuesday’s campaign literature, we’re told that when Sen. Warren and Chair White have met privately, discussion has been cordial.

In the U.S. it takes six working days to start a business. In Israel: 34.

Israel is a remarkable country with big problems. The existential threats it faces from abroad are well known; only slightly less so, the troubled relations between the Jewish majority and the (mostly) Arab minority within its own population.

By contrast, most Americans know little about Israel’s economy, and most of what they think they know is shaped by the country’s vibrant high-tech sector. But Israel’s economy is more varied—and its overall performance more troubled—than glowing reports about the latest IT breakthroughs convey.

Put simply, the Israeli economy is an island of innovation in a sea of bureaucracy. “Start Up Nation” faces off against “Can’t Get Started Nation.” The result: The economy is functioning well below developed-world standards, and average families are paying the price.

It isn’t just “Obama’s power grabs.” It’s a revision of the Founders’ original vision.

To the list of questions Hillary Clinton will never answer, add one more: Would a second Clinton presidency continue and expand Barack Obama’s revision of the American system of government that existed from 1789 until 2009?

The central feature of Mr. Obama’s rewrite of what one might call the Founding Fathers’ original vision has been to abolish Congress. Yes, the 535 men and women elected to Congress still show up at the old Capitol building, as they have since November 1800. But once past passage of ObamaCare and Dodd-Frank, the 44th president effectively retired Congress from its historic function. If you put the president behind the wheel of a car in front of the White House to visit Congress, he’d probably get lost.

This is not a joke if you are one of the many million Americans the Re-Founding Father has commanded, via vast executive power, to do what he wants you to do. He did it again last week.

EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy, whose neo-constitutional function is to serve as a primary executor of Mr. Obama’s re-dos, waved into existence a massive expansion of the Clean Water Act. Landowners across America woke up to discover that the EPA has designated ponds, creeks, rivulets, ditches, catch basins and water-filled potholes as subject to what the Clean Water Act originally called “navigable waters.”

Tuscany — Northern and central Italy are not on the southern Mediterranean. But somehow thousands of refugees from Africa, Asia, and the Middle East are everywhere here — as is true of much of the European Union. Some sleep on park benches. Many peddle knock-off electronic goods and counterfeit watches. Angry Italians shoo away refugee beggars from tour groups.

The Greek islands near the coast of Turkey are likewise flooded this summer with dispossessed refugees from countries such as Afghanistan and Syria. Apparently a bankrupt Greek government lacks the resources to patrol its vast coastline. Some beleaguered Greeks assume that thousands of boat people and homeless refugees will eventually leave their makeshift camps and head northward to the wealthier homelands of Greece’s Northern European creditors.

Has the contemptible Laura Kipnis Affair incensed the worm into turning? Our own David French certainly hopes so. “Feminists from Jezebel to The Nation have expressed concern about Kipnis’s treatment,” French wrote on Monday, “and Jonathan Chait has discussed her ordeal as part of his recent campaign against PC.” Indeed,” he continues, “there is a growing wave of leftist dissent against campus intolerance.”

The latest froth in the wave comes today, from “Edward Schlosser, a teacher “at a midsize state school.” “I’m a liberal professor,” Schlosser writes over at the “explainer” website Vox, “and my liberal students terrify me.” Why? Because a considerable number of them have bought hook, line, and sinker into a worldview in which “the feelings of individuals are the primary or even exclusive means through which social issues are understood and discussed,” and, in consequence, any accusations of misconduct that are leveled at academics have become too subjective to be dispassionately analyzed. Chagrined and alarmed by the burgeoning number of inquisitions, Schlosser has been left fretting that were he to be hauled in front of a disciplinary committee, he would likely stand no chance:

Since World War II, America has clearly won only one of five major conflicts: Operation Desert Storm. Korea was a bloody stalemate, Vietnam an “outright military defeat,” and both Afghanistan and Iraq — America’s two longest wars — hardly look like victories. At least that’s the contention of Dominic Tierney, contributing editor at The Atlantic and Swarthmore political science professor. Yesterday, he launched a new book, The Right Way to Lose a War: America in an Age of Unwinnable Conflicts and promoted it with a lengthy Atlantic essay outlining the reasons for American failure abroad.

While I have long taken issue with the notion that the military has truly “lost” its wars, there is no question that most of our postwar conflicts have been much longer than anticipated, less decisive than hoped, and far more costly than promised. In analyzing why, Tierney explains the gap between America and its recent enemies with startling (and refreshing) clarity: “It’s limited war for Americans, and total war for those fighting Americans. The United States has more power; its foes have more willpower.”