RUTHFULLY YOURS

Refugees À-Go-Go :Edward Cline

Posted By Ruth King on October 14th, 2016

http://ruleofreason.blogspot.com/

Barack Obama has not said it so openly. He relies on his allies in malice to enunciate it. If there is any “negative” reaction to such racism, then it would redound on his proxies, not on him. But, Hillary agrees and wants to continue his policy. America’s “white” population electorate must not only be disenfranchised or rendered null with a massive influx of Muslim “refugees,” and also with South American illegals, all of whom will suddenly and magically be endowed with the vote, but, if

possible, be “replaced” with the preferred races and rendered a powerless, unrepresented “minority.”

This was Ted Kennedy’s fondest legislative dream. In 1995, the Center for Immigration Studies opined on the consequences of the The Hart-Celler Act of 1965:

The unexpected result has been one of the greatest waves of immigration in the nation’s history — more than 18 million legal immigrants since the law’s passage, over triple the number admitted during the previous 30 years, as well as uncountable millions of illegal immigrants. And the new immigrants are more likely to stay (rather than return home after a time) than those who came around the turn of the century. Moreover, this new, enlarged immigration flow came from countries in Asia and Latin America which heretofore had sent few of their sons and daughters to the United States. And finally, although the average level of education of immigrants has increased somewhat over the past 30 years, the negative gap between their education and that of native-born Americans has increased significantly, creating a mismatch between newcomers and the needs of a modern, high-tech economy…..

The liberalization of immigration policy reflected in the 1965 legislation can be understood as part of the evolutionary trend in federal policy after World War II to end legal discrimination based on race and ethnicity — essentially, the immigration bill was mainly seen as an extension of the civil rights movement, and a symbolic one at that, expected to bring few changes in its wake. [Bolding the report’s]

And, there were a number of noteworthy foot-in-mouth predictions, this one by Rep. Emanuel Celler (D-NY), a sponsor of the bill:

“With the end of discrimination due to place of birth, there will be shifts in countries other than those of northern and western Europe. Immigrants from Asia and Africa will have to compete and qualify in order to get in, quantitatively and qualitatively, which, itself will hold the numbers down. There will not be, comparatively, many Asians or Africans entering this country. .. .Since the people of Africa and Asia have very few relatives here, comparatively few could immigrate [sic] from those countries because they have no family ties in the U.S.” (Congressional Record, Aug. 25, 1965, p. 21812.)

Ted Kennedy then assures everyone that there won’t be deleterious consequences of the new immigration bill. But, being a Kennedy, he could not help but lie:

Senate immigration subcommittee chairman Edward Kennedy (D-MA.) reassured his colleagues and the nation with the following:

“First, our cities will not be flooded with a million immigrants annually. Under the proposed bill, the present level of immigration remains substantially the same … Secondly, the ethnic mix of this country will not be upset … Contrary to the charges in some quarters, [the bill] will not inundate America with immigrants from any one country or area, or the most populated and deprived nations of Africa and Asia … In the final analysis, the ethnic pattern of immigration under the proposed measure is not expected to change as sharply as the critics seem to think.”

Sen. Kennedy concluded by saying,

“The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs.” (U.S. Senate, Subcommittee on Immigration and Naturalization of the Committee on the Judiciary, Washington, D.C., Feb. 10, 1965. pp. 1-3.)

In 1965, there was no ISIS, Muslims were all but invisible, and so were Mexican and South American illegals, and Syria and Iraq may as well have been on the moon. But, knowing how little Kennedy valued any truth, one cannot but imagine that he was hoping for the worst: he, too, wanted to destroy America. He got what he wished for, in the person and policies of Barack Obama.

Now, if we have admitted thousands of Syrian “refugees”-cum-“immigrants,” and among them is a high proportion of passive Islamic supremacists, and another proportion of ISIS infiltrators posing as put-upon sufferers of wartime hardship, what does this bode for the country?

Well, the French may not have the knack for keeping out terrorists, but they have grasped a bit of the problem and have provided us with a foreshadowing of things to come in this country. Bruce Cornibe in his Counter Jihad article of October 11th, “French Terrorism Watch List Overflowing with 15,000 Potential Jihadists,” writes:

Terror watch lists help track potential terrorists, but they are only as good as the validity of the indicators to get on the list, the intelligence on the suspects, the manpower to monitor the highest threats, and the aggressiveness of law enforcement to step in before the radicals act upon their desires. France’s terror watch list with its 15,000 individuals gives insight into the extent of how radical Islam is plaguing one of Europe’s largest countries. The UK’s Express provides some details about the list and some of its failures stating:

French authorities began tracking people on a database in March of 2015 following the Charlie Hebdo attacks and shootings at a kosher market in January of that year that killed 17 people.

However that did not prevent the subsequent co-ordinated attacks in Paris in November of last year which killed 130 or the horrifying slaughter of 86 people at the Bastille Day celebrations in Nice in July.

There have been a total of 21 terror attacks across the country since December 2014 sparking widespread anger and a backlash against French president Francois Hollande.

Now Special Forces are said to believe that at least 4,000 of these individuals pose a significant threat to society and are being tracked on a daily basis by the Directorate of Internal Security.

The majority of the people being watched are men aged between 18 and 25 and are said to be “psychologically confused.”

Psychologically confused?? Among other ill-effects of Islam, it can also be responsible for dementia.

Just as Angela Merkel wants to see indigenous Germans replaced with what she must imagine will be a mongrel hybrid of Germans, Middle Easterners, and North Africans (provided enough German women are raped and impregnated by migrants and denied by the new fascist German state the right to an abortion). This is the “social justice” of our warrior “elites.” It is pure undisguised racism.

The Germans have a “final solution” to the problem of Muslim migrant depredations: Fuse Islamic ideology with what is left of Western liberalism. Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble has proposed introducing a “German Islam.” Reuters reported on October 2nd, in “Germany’s finance minister presses for a ‘German Islam‘”:

A veteran ally of Angela Merkel urged Muslims in Germany on Sunday to develop a “German Islam” based on liberalism and tolerance, saying the influx of people seeking refuge, many of them Muslims, is a challenge for mainstream society.

Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble, stepping out of his usual finance remit, urged tolerance, saying the arrival of hundreds of thousands of migrants required a better understanding among Germans of what is important to them and how they want to live.

The arrival of large numbers of refugees has strained communities and led to a rise in far-right violence and attacks on migrant shelters, particularly in eastern Germany.

Schaeuble, a stalwart of Merkel’s Christian Democrats (CDU), said: “Without a doubt, the growing number of Muslims in our country today is a challenge for the open-mindedness of mainstream society.”

In a guest article for conservative paper Welt am Sonntag, he added: “The origin of the majority of refugees means that we will be increasingly dealing with people from quite different cultural circles than previously.”

He acknowledged that sexual attacks by migrants in Cologne and two attacks by migrants claimed by the Islamic State militant group over the summer had soured the mood. “We should not, in this more tense situation, allow an atmosphere to emerge in which well-integrated people in Germany feel alien,” he said.

Despite the rising number of xenophobic attacks in Germany, Schaeuble said he believed the majority of Germans would say: “Yes, we want you to belong to us.”

Perhaps Schaeuble is blind or tone deaf, but he seems to be oblivious to a growing number of Germans who are shouting and demonstrating: “No! We do not want you to belong to us!” Because they know that, in the end, they will belong to the Muslims. Western values and Islamic values are irreconcilable.

“Timmy” Kaine (I call him “Timmy” to indicate his intellectual age), Hillary Clinton’s vice-presidential candidate, is one of the most voluble and vicious Democratic racists. He wouldn’t say what he says below unless Hillary and her staff had first vetted it. “I’m Hillary Clinton, I approved this doofuss’s message.” Infowars reported:

“I’ve never been treated badly in life because of my skin color or my gender,” Kaine told a group of black Baptists in New Orleans. “I think the burden is on those of us who are in the majority — Caucasians. We have to put ourselves in a place where we are the minority.”

The “burden” that Kaine mentions obviously means taking on “white guilt,” despite the fact that – even at the height of slavery – only 1.4% of whites in America owned slaves. White people were also victims of far more brutal and longer lasting oppression under the Barbary slave trade.

Kaine’s desire to see whites become a minority in America is set to be realized in around 30 years because white people are the only group with a higher death rate than birth rate.

Hispanics are growing in number at a pace of around 2.1 percent a year, with blacks growing at 1.3 percent, while whites are only growing at 0.5 percent.

Ann Moreno on Truthfeed also reported Kaine’s moronic meanderings in “Tim Kaine Admits Hillary Plans to “Stick it to White People” Says ‘Whites Need to Submit’”:

In what can only be called a colossal Freudian slip, Hillary’s VP nominee admitted on Thursday that Democratic policies are harmful to white Americans.

Kaine was speaking to a group of black Baptists in New Orleans when he suggested that in order to have “equity” between the races, white people must submit themselves to a state of repression similar to what black Americans have experienced.

Essentially, what Kaine is saying, is that he and Hillary want to turn White Americans into the minority race.

…and her policies will do that, according to him.

Vice President Joe Biden, the Obama administration’s resident “scary clown” also had to flap his gums on the subject of erasing “white supremacy.” Breitbart reported in June 2015 in “Joe Biden: ‘A Good Thing’ When Whites ‘Absolute Minority’ in 2017 (Census Bureau Projects Majority-Minority Nation in 2044):

On Tuesday, Vice President Joe Biden said it will be a “good thing” when whites are an “absolute minority” in America in 2017…..

“By 2017, those of us of European stock will be an absolute minority in the United States of America,” Biden said at a State Department luncheon for Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff. According to pool reports, Biden added that that’s “not a bad thing, that’s a good thing” because it means the country is becoming more diverse….

Biden is reportedly considering a run for the White House and his party’s chances of keeping the White House depend on whether minorities and young voters who made up Obama’s coalition turn out again with the same level of enthusiasm. Recent polling has found that non-white voters are less enthusiastic about the 2016 election than white voters who tend to lean more Republican.

Listen to Biden rattle on with his nonstop “wisdom” about “diversity” and submerging and drowning whites in a multicultural morass.

All of this is linked to the massive immigration into the U.S. of especially Syrian “refugees,” a group of Muslims too likely heavily saturated with ISIS operatives and Muslims sympathetic to ISIS. Patrick Goodenough Family Security Matters writes in his October 2016 column, “12,2587 Syrian Refugees Admitted in FY 2016.“
The administration admitted a total of 12,587 Syrian refugees during the just-ended fiscal year, exceeding the target President Obama declared last fall by 2,587 (20.5 percent).

Of the 12,587, the vast majority are Sunni Muslims – 12,363 (98.2 percent) – while another 103 are identified in State Department Refugee Processing Center data simply as Muslims and a further 20 as Shi’a Muslims.

Sixty-eight of the 12,587 Syrian refugees (0.5 percent) are Christians. They comprise 16 Catholics, eight Orthodox, five Protestants, four Jehovah’s Witnesses, one Greek Orthodox, and 34 refugees self-identified simply as Christians.

The remainder of the Syrian refugees resettled in the U.S. in FY 2016 are 24 Yazidis, eight refugees with religion given as “other,” and one with “no religion….”

All segments of the Syrian population are affected by the devastating civil war, which has witnessed grave atrocities by minorities waged by the Sunni jihadists as well as sectarian-fueled bloodshed involving Sunnis, Shi’a (including Iranian and Hezbollah elements) and adherents of President Bashar al-Assad’s Alawite sect….

Obama has not declared a target figure for Syrian refugee admissions for FY 2017, although a recent report to Congress said the administration “aims to admit a significantly higher number” of Syrian refugees in the new fiscal year than the 10,000 target initially set for FY 2016.

Assistant Secretary of State Anne Richard said last week that even though the department is working with a stipulated target for FY 2017, “this administration has been very clear that we want to bring more Syrians, so my own guidance to our staff is that we want to bring even more than we brought this year.”

Over the course of the conflict that began when small anti-government protests in early 2011 were met with a harsh crackdown by the Assad regime and later widened into a convoluted civil war, the U.S. has resettled a total of 14,460 Syrian refugees – 87 percent of them during FY 2016.
Obama has surpassed his 10,000 Syrian refugee goal. Fred Fleitz of The Center for Security Policy reports:

The Obama administration announced this week that President Obama’s November 2015 pledge to bring 10,000 Syrian refugees to this country has been met. Mr. Fleitz writes:

You may remember the Obama administration assured the American people last year not to worry about the risk from these refugees because processing them would take 18 to 24 months or longer.

I wrote in a November 20, 2015 Fox News.com op-ed that processing of the 10,000 Syrian refugees President Obama agreed to admit late last year probably would be sped up to ensure they arrived while he was still in office and to prevent his successor from blocking these refugees.

This is what happened.  The Obama administration lied again.

State Department officials defended the process to vet Obama’s 10,000 refugees and insisted they are “the most thoroughly-screened group of travelers to the U.S.”  So how did the Obama administration resolve the problem expressed by CIA Director John Brennan in June 2016 when he said in testimony to the Senate Intelligence Committee that ISIS is training operatives and attempting to enter the U.S. through “refugee flows, smuggling routes and legitimate methods of travel?”

Obama officials are trying to reassure Americans that there is little threat from President Obama’s 10,000 Syrian refugees because they claim 78 percent are women and children.  Given that about 72 percent of Syrian refugees arriving in Europe are military-age males, this is difficult to believe.  I believe the administration is playing statistical games in the way it counts these refugees.  There also could be another group of Syrian adult male refugees that the Obama administration plans to quietly admit later, probably after the election.

Admitting poorly-screened female Syrian refugees could allow male ISIS members to immigrate to the United States through “chain-migration” when these women refugees apply to admit male refugees who they claim are husbands or blood relatives.  Without documentation, it will be extremely difficult to confirm these claims.

Lying is par for the course on Obama’s political golf course. I doubt that Hillary Clinton plays even ping-pong, but she is a congenital liar, as well. And what about all those Somali “refugees”? Patrick Goodenough on Family Security Matters reports again in “Almost 100,000 Somali Refugees Admitted to U.S. Since 9/11 and 99.6% were Muslim.”

Almost 100,000 Somali refugees have been resettled in the United States since 9/11, including 8,619 so far during the current fiscal year. The largest number – some 16 percent of the total over the past 15 years – have been resettled in Minnesota, home to the nation’s biggest Somali-American community.

Of the 97,046 Somali refugees admitted to the U.S. since the fall of 2001, 99.6 percent were Muslim, and 28,836 (29.7 percent) were males between the ages of 14 and 50.

In FY 2015 Somalis were the third largest contingent of refugees admitted to the U.S. – 8,858, or 12.6 percent of the total from around the world. Only Burma, with 26.3 percent, and Iraq, with 18.1 percent, accounted for larger groups of refugees arriving in the country.

The biggest influx of Somali refugees over the past 15 years occurred during the FY 2004-2006 period, after which the numbers dwindled before picking up again from FY 2014-2016, State Department Refugee Processing Center data show.

Given the cited numbers above, is the administration really expecting all these “immigrants” to behave themselves and abide by the rule of law and American cultural norm? I don’t think the administration knows or cares. Obama and Hillary just want to subjugate the country and Americans to savagery, more “lone wolf” terrorist attacks which the authorities will do their best to cover up, suppress information, and lie through their teeth about, local and federal authorities, together. And let’s not forget the small-time enablers, such as the mayor of Rutland, Vermont, who has secretly arranged to “resettle” Syrians in his small town, and kept the conspiracy from the town’s residents. Judicial Watch has this startling news: “Judicial Watch: Federal Contractor Tells Local Official to Keep Syria Refugee Plans Secret.”

Judicial Watch today released 128 pages of documents it obtained from the mayor of Rutland, Vermont, showing a concerted effort by the mayor and a number of private organizations to conceal from the public their plans to resettle 100 Syrian refugees into the small southern Vermont town.

The documents include an April 14, 2016, email from Amila Merdzanovic, executive director of the Vermont Refugee Resettlement Program, to Mayor Christopher Louras, in which she wrote:

I want to share with you the concern my HQ has about holding a public forum. If we open it up to anybody and everybody, all sorts of people will come out of woodwork. Anti-immigrant, anti-anything. They suggest that the forum be invite only but make it as wide as possible. Work with faith leaders, United Way, etc… Perhaps, we could go back to the Congregational Church and continue the conversation there.

The mayor and resettlement organizations shrouded the plan in such secrecy that not even the town’s aldermen were informed of what was taking place behind closed doors. The aldermen eventually wrote to the U.S. Department of State protesting the plan and opened an investigation into the mayor’s actions. The State Department has not yet ruled on whether it will resettle refugees in Rutland despite the aldermen’s protest.

Handwritten notes state that the issue was, “Not what can ‘we’ do for ‘them,’ but what the diversity, cultural richness do for the community.” The documents contain detailed discussions of what Rutland will need to provide for the refugees – including housing, jobs, medical care, and places for worship.

Judicial Watch received the documents in response to a Vermont Public Records Law request to the office of Mayor Christopher Louras.

Merdzanovic later told the Boston Globe that the hidden talks were “the right thing to do — to move slowly, keep it to a small circle of people, and then expand.”

Yes, the “right thing to do” – to conform to Clinton’s proposed policy of keeping “everyday Americans”

“unaware and compliant.” But Rutland’s citizens are not complying and they are definitely “aware.”

One can only wonder who are the true enemies of the country: Muslims and their hostile ideology, or government officials on various levels throughout the country and the MSM in collusion with the federal (feral?) government , right down to small town mayors?

Comments are closed.