EDWARD CLINE: THE VENOM OF THE SPLC
https://ruleofreason.blogspot.com/2018/01/the-venom-of-splc.html
The “Palestinians” are a hate group. Across the board in Gaza and the West Bank and elsewhere, they call for killing Jews and destroying the State of Israel.
The #Resistance is a hate group. It refuses to acknowledge the election of Donald Trump, even to the point of questioning his physical and mental fitness to be President, and includes in that mantra the implied accusation that Dr. Ronny Jackson, who examined Trump, is lying. It is willing to say anything to damage Trump, no matter how irrational and unproven.
Antifa is a hate group. The visual evidence is ample. Masked thugs attack individuals who want to see and hear someone the group disapproves of; destroy property with glee, and calls “fascist” (as though the thugs knew what real “fascists” were in the past) anyone who opposes them. Antifa thugs should take Pogo’s complaint to heart;”We have seen the enemy and he is us.” Not that doing such would give them second thoughts. Their minds are the property of leftist ideology.
Democratic congressmen who oppose President Trump comprise a hate group.
Any group that does not disavow its unremitting, obsessive hatred for Trump is a hate group.
Yet it will not be classified as a “hate group” by the Southern Poverty LawCenter (SPLC). This and other groups get a free pass because they hate Trump and spew their hatred to another level of ranting insanity. My argument is that any government authority that suppresses freedom of speech across the globe is a “hate group,” any group that offers “resistance” to freedom of speech is a “hate group,” any individual who rants irrationality against President Trump is a one-man “hate group” and could said to be in the grip of “Trumpophobia.”
Like the saliva of an IndonesianKomodo dragon injected into a bite victim, the toxin is supposed to cause a fatal and a certain, helpless death. The dragons are attracted to the putrefaction of the bodies of their victims. Much as the Democrats are.
Articles have surfaced that claim that the SPLC is by definition a “hate group” itself, because its chief purpose today is to establish and publish lists of names that hate groups can target for hateful action. This is a charge which cannot be denied by the SPLC. Virtually the only time it makes news headlines today is when it has declared certain individuals – such as Pamela Geller, Richard Spencer, Ayaan Hirsi Ali – and numerous blogs that critique Islam, as “Islamophobes” or as “hate groups.” They commit “hate crimes” and must be sent to the slammer. Never mind that Geller is under a constant fatwa to behead her, that Spencer was poisoned in Iceland, and that Hirsi Ali survived the worst of Sharia for a woman, female genital mutilation.
So, what is a “hate crime”?
A hate crime (also known as a bias-motivated crime or bias crime[1]) is aprejudice-motivated crime, usually violent, which occurs when a perpetrator targets a victim because of his or her membership (or perceived membership) in a certain social group or race.
Examples of such groups can include and are almost exclusively limited to: sex, ethnicity, disability, language, nationality, physical appearance, religion, gender identity or sexual orientation. Non-criminal actions that are motivated by these reasons are often called “bias incidents“.
“Hate crime” generally refers to criminal actswhich are seen to have been motivated by bias against one or more of the social groups listed above, or by bias against their derivatives. Incidents may involve physical assault, damage to property, bullying, harassment, verbal abuse or insults, mate crime or offensive graffiti or letters (hate mail).
What is “Islamophobia”? What is the term’s origin?
Discover the Networks writes:
The term “Islamophobia” was invented and promoted in the early 1990s by the International Institute for Islamic Thought (IIIT), a front group of the Muslim Brotherhood. Former IIIT member Abdur-Rahman Muhammad — who was with that organization when the word was formally created, and who has since rejected IIIT’s ideology — now reveals the original intent behind the concept of Islamophobia: “This loathsome term is nothing more than a thought-terminating cliché conceived in the bowels of Muslim think tanks for the purpose of beating down critics.” In short, in its very origins, “Islamophobia” was a term designed as a weapon to advance a totalitarian cause by stigmatizing critics and silencing them.
The SPLC and its cultural kin would say, “Our hate is legitimate, and justified. It’s for a universal, humanitarian purpose.” In practice and in fact, it is a tool and a weapon to denigrate anyone who questions the “peaceful” ends of Islam, and is who is critical of its totalitarian designs and methods. Anyone who has bothered to examine Islam would almost evidently fear it and not conclude it was just another “belief system.” It would be as much as examining a rattlesnake.
The SPLC apparently is not bothered by being labeled a “hate group.” Leftists are, by their nature, not chagrined or embarrassed by the charge of being totalitarian.
The trick the SPLC plays is to group legitimate criticism with actual hate groups and hope readers do not wonder why Pamela Geller is linked to the likes of the Skinheads, the Neo-Nazis, and the KKK.
The venom of the SPLC suits the MSM because they don’t need to do anything. It fits their agenda. The SPLC has done the “research” for them. If the SPLC says an individual or group is driven by hate, that’s the end of their inquiry, other than perhaps taking a brief glance at the targeted site to confirm that what they see they don’t like and would prefer to see prohibited and outlawed. Facts. Reason. Logic. Cause-and-effect. Syllogisms.
| The Democratic Party |
These are all minefields, and any one, of them, if stepped on by Dems, will explode their arguments and their assumed intellectual acuity (if they possess any), and expose their substance of straw and old rags and habitual dissembling lizards. Dems are “fake persons” and “fake” Congressional representatives. The Dems were in favor of perpetuating slavery during and after the Civil War up to the present. They continue to perpetuate it.
They can always depend on “party-loyalty” for votes.
Comments are closed.
