RUTHFULLY YOURS

Mr. Baquet was secretly recorded at a staff meeting. A transcript was posted at Slate.com. But he has made similar points publicly. The gist: It’s readers nowadays who pressure newspapers to toe a line. Publishers pine for the era when advertising dollars insulated us from such pressures.

Under fire from its public for an anodyne and accurate headline about Donald Trump after the El Paso shootings, which the paper later changed, Mr. Baquet almost pleaded with his crew: “We are an independent news organization, one of the few remaining. . . . Our readers and some of our staff cheer us when we take on Donald Trump, but they jeer at us when we take on Joe Biden. They sometimes want us to pretend that he was not elected president, but he was elected president.”

If he meant a newspaper’s job is to report the facts and arrange them in a logical fashion regardless of the howling winds of reader prejudice, he’s right. Unfortunately it’s not clear this is what he meant.

To his credit, the Times has been one of a few news organizations that have refrained from labelling Mr. Trump a racist, as if this quality can be factually determined between the lines of his tweets. What Mr. Baquet is up against was illustrated by one of his own reporters, quoted in the Slate transcript saying, “I just feel like racism is in everything. It should be considered in our science reporting, in our culture reporting, in our national reporting.”

Such thinking is why audiences other than the Times’s have become cynical when charges of racism are flung.

But Mr. Baquet also lent credence to an already rampant suspicion that the Times sees its job as imposing a “narrative” (a word he used repeatedly) on the world rather than listening to what the world teaches. After the Russia collusion fiasco, you might think an order of business would be finding out how our politics came to be so roiled by fabricated allegations. All too plainly, Mr. Baquet seemed to suggest that the Times, having failed to deliver the Russia story its readers wanted, must now deliver the Trump racism story they want. “Our readers who want Donald Trump to go away suddenly thought, ‘Holy [bleep], Bob Mueller is not going to do it.’ ”

Is Mr. Trump a racist? I don’t know. Are you? What I do know, and what’s apparent to everyone, is the existence of powerful incentives in American life to level such charges, indeed a delight in doing so. The Times knows this better than most. It can hardly fire anyone without being accused of racism. Of particular note, a 2016 class action claimed not only that the paper is hostile to “older employees of color,” but that it prefers its readers to be “young, white [and] wealthy” too.

Now this is ironic. Multiple Democratic alarums have been sounded lately, including in the Times, about how the racial radicalism of exactly these young white liberals endangers the party’s 2020 chances. But let’s have a moment of realism. Politicians are about politics. Democrats manifestly see race as a winning card. Their presidential candidates even play it against each other. Mr. Trump, or any alternative in our two-party system, has a card too—the resistance of a large part of America to the role being assigned them in the Democrats’ identity-politics melodrama.

A newspaper should tell this story, not serve as one side’s propaganda arm. But also evident in Mr. Baquet’s plea is another fact of life: He, or any editor who is basically an employee of the New York Times ruling family, will be hard-pressed to steer an independent path for the paper when so many of its readers, staff, editors and patrons want it to be a shield of their wokeness. An owner needs to take a hand.

But I thank him for clearing the air on one matter, the notion that advertisers dictate coverage. Which brings me to Elon Musk.

Never mind that he comprehensively missed the point of a column here in April, which criticized certain electric-vehicle mandates precisely because they were unfair to Tesla. What had me chuckling was his tweeted suggestion that this writer and “WSJ in general are sock puppets of big oil.”

Look around. Do you see any big-oil ads? I wish we had more ads of any kind.

For better or worse, newspapers are more dependent than ever on readers to pay our bills. But then Mr. Musk probably knows this. He wouldn’t be tweeting if he didn’t believe the way to influence me is through our readers.