FOOD FOR THOUGHT- THE NIH AND THE CDC AND DONORS
From Leon K.
Two of the most important medical members of the President s White House Task Force to combat Covid 19 Coronavirus are Dr Anthony Fauci of the NIH and Dr Robert Redfield of the CDC.
Few people are aware of the fact that the NIH and the CDC is each affiliated with a dedicated federally-chartered charitable foundation which accepts donations from third parties and funds some of the NIH and CDC activities. The donors to these foundations (or the “partners” with these foundations for targeted programs) are pharmaceutical companies, bio-science companies, other foundations (e.g., Bill And Melinda Gates Foundation) and others.
There have been questions raised over the years about potential conflicts of interest between certain donors to the foundations and the work of the NIH and the CDC. See attached article. While I would not question the integrity of either Dr Fauci or Dr Redfield, I find the absence of full public disclosure of these affiliations troubling.
This week during a White House session Dr Fauci was unusually upbeat about the preliminary results from trials involving the experimental Gilead Science drug Remdesivir. I hope Dr Fauci s upbeat appraisal is justified but from my reading of the results of the study, it appears that the benefits to the Remdesivir patients over the placebo patients was modest.
It should be noted that Gilead is a contributor to or partner with the charitable foundation which supports the NIH. Dr Fauci has not disclosed this fact at the White House session or at any other public White House press conference over the last few weeks.
I’m guessing, but I bet you dollars-to-donuts that neither Dr Vladimir Zelenko nor Dr Anthony Cardillo , front line physicians who are actively using a Hydroxychloroquin regimen in the battle against Covid 19 Coronavirus, are donors to these foundations.
READ:https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/06/us-lawmakers-want-nih-and-cdc-foundations-say-more-about-donors
U.S. lawmakers want NIH and CDC foundations to say more about donors
A key congressional spending panel has fired a shot across the bow of two federally chartered medical foundations, warning that the way they disclose information about donors may not pass muster. It’s the latest controversy involving the traditionally low-profile foundations, which over the past quarter-century have funneled nearly $2 billion to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for research, clinical trials, training, and educational programs.
Comments are closed.