WHY MASKS? EDWARD CLINE
https://ruleofreason.blogspot.com/2020/07/why-masks.html
The “new normal” is everyone wearing a mask and looking like they are victims of a pandemic of Lock Jaw.
From linda 17 July 17, 2020 in an email about her condition and status.
We have a serious but far from Black Death level infectious disease that has become thoroughly politicized and in all likelihood will remain so for the foreseeable future so long as it is Useful and/or until a Vaccine is produced, which we will likely be required to take on penalty of who knows what. I hope the situation is not so bleak in “red” states, but here in Marxachusetts my life changed forever in the middle of March. 2+2 still = 4. A much bigger, and more important, challenge than the WuFlu itself will be holding firmly to that.
They need to ceaselessly berate and harass people to whip our minds into resignation, to break our spirit, so that we accept the New World Order of being regimented in every aspect of our lives. This is no less violent than Antifa and BLM goons beating someone until he is a writhing, prone pulp. By Polly St. George on video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3yk3xezML8Q&list=PL53b-qznUM5QQc6GNRisYVnOnEJVPmSAq
That is the core purpose of wearing the face masks, to make us invisible to each other, to render everyone into existential and political anonymity.
One blogsite discusses how many Americans are repelled by the mask mandates and oppose them::
“One, it could be the control aversion behavior that one is more averse to the sense of control. They really value the sense of liberty. Whereas another group may value more the sense of connectedness and looking out for your fellow man, so it becomes a lot of where your views lie,” Wright said.
Vogt doesn’t believe the masks are effective outside of operating rooms.
“I think a lot of it has to do with comfort and a lot of it has to do with we don’t believe it’s saving us from any kind of a virus,” Vogt said.
Vogt also says with the new statewide mask mandate, he would refrain from visiting businesses requiring masks.
“I think it’s our right as free citizens to be able to do, dress how we want. If we get to the point that we are telling people to cover their faces, I just feel like we are in a third world country or something. We might as well check out of the United States of America,” Vogt said.
Another blogsite also opposes the wearing of masks for medical, scientific reasons:
“Masks Are Dangerous
There are no experts that will say wearing a cloth mask is safe. Even a short period of wearing them reduces the available Oxygen (O) and increases the amount of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). The Occupational Safety & Health Agencies around the world will confirm the minimum level of oxygen available in the air we breathe should be at least 19.5% and especially with even the slightest exertion. In tests, the Oxygen behind the mask drops to dangerous level of 16%. CO2 should be around 400 parts per million (PPM) but increases to the dangerous level greater than 4000 PPM when wearing a mask. Excess CO2 in your bloodstream may destroy red blood cells which causes further energy loss and poor health since red blood cells are needed to carry oxygen and iron around the body.
Since Oxygen is the most critical element for general health, immune system and cell regeneration you should not wear such masks for more than 10 minutes. ”
It is not merely an abhorrence to being ordered to wear masks, according to this site. It is for scientific and medical reasons.
The ubiquitous and whimsical political reason of forcing Americans to wear masks is advanced by Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, who wants complete control of Americans requiring their universal obedience: She wants to turn the arbitrary, ignorant “mandates” into a law through the CDC and government decree. She wants to lord it over a population of citizens stricken with Lock Jaw. She wants us to acquiesce to the “new norm.” Senator Feinstein also wants compliance, as well, with punishment thrown in to disobedient states. .
There are over a dozen sites that cite reasons for opposing the universal donning of face mssks. So it’s not a “consensus” by any means.
Comments are closed.
