The Museum of Jewish Heritage Needs to Remember Its Own Mission By Samuel J. Abrams
The Museum of Jewish Heritage in Lower Manhattan overlooks the harbor of New York with Ellis Island and the Statue of Liberty in the distance. From the grounds, visitors are reminded of potent American symbols and values that drew so many to this nation’s shore before and after the Shoah. And one of the most sacred American values for those “yearning to breathe free” is that of open and unrestricted expression — the ability to question, debate, and disagree without state threat. So the entire Jewish community should be appalled over organizers’ claims that the museum banned Florida governor Ron DeSantis from speaking at the Tikvah Fund’s upcoming Jewish Leadership Conference, which was intended to host a variety of writers, politicians, and thought leaders to talk about conservative ideas that “can help strengthen the Jewish people, the Jewish nation, and the American civic future.” This move is a direct contradiction of the museum’s very mission and Jewish tradition.
The Tikvah Fund is a philanthropic organization established to support the “intellectual, religious, and political leaders of the Jewish people and the Jewish State,” and it invests in a wide range of educational initiatives around the world with a particular focus on teaching young Jews about Jewish history and civilization. The organization has hosted a conference at the museum in the past and was set to host another meeting on June 12, with DeSantis set to speak about the thriving Jewish community in the Sunshine State. According to Tikvah Fund organizers writing in the Wall Street Journal, Governor DeSantis did not “align with the museum’s values and its message of inclusivity,” and organizers were told that either the governor could be disinvited, or the event would not be welcome at the museum.
This position is simply unacceptable. It should be noted that the Museum of Jewish Heritage has disputed the claims, calling its decision a “logistical” one and saying, “No one was banned or cancelled.” But if the Tikvah account is even mostly accurate, the museum’s board and staff need a lesson in history and speech.
The very mission of the museum, which the institution describes as “crucial,” is to educate “diverse visitors about Jewish life before, during, and after the Holocaust.” One of the most horrifying facets of life in Germany during Hitler’s power grab and eventual turn to genocide was the fact that books were burned, dissent was silenced, and people who disagreed with those in power lived in fear. Free expression was stamped out, with Hitler explicitly and repeatedly purging communities that could challenge his worldview.
The historical period the museum showcases is the prime example of how silencing divergent views and limiting dialogue can lead to dangerous political times. Thus, it should be an institution that embraces differences and promotes viewpoint diversity so all can criticize, question, and understand the views and ideas of others. The museum should be a forum for debate and host progressive, polarizing politicians such as Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez along with the Tikvah conference and conservatives like DeSantis. The museum is certainly a private institution with a public focus and can do what it likes, but a museum with a core focus of Jewish heritage should serve as a model for bringing people of different minds together.
In fact, one of the Jewish community’s greatest attributes is the fact that Jews celebrate difference and disagreement. Debate is such a hallmark of Jewish tradition that some have argued that the Talmud is essentially an “anthology of arguments,” and historical discourse is so prized in Jewish thought that Judaism has sometimes been called a “culture of argument.” The Passover holiday that just ended explicitly celebrates asking tough questions, and it should be no wonder that Jewish leaders regularly invoke the words of Justice Brandeis in his Whitney v. California (1927) concurring opinion: “If there be time to expose through discussion the falsehood and fallacies, to avert the evil by the processes of education, the remedy to be applied is more speech, not enforced silence.” So if some at the Museum of Jewish Heritage dislike the ideas and arguments presented by the conference, they should respond substantively rather than joining the cancel-culture wave that has infected so many facets of society today.
Pressuring the Tikvah Fund was neither a small decision nor something that would have stayed private and behind closed doors. Instead, the museum made an overt political decision — one against its own mission, Jewish values, and America’s sacred tradition of free speech. While the conference may not return to the museum, the institution should issue a strong apology and use this as a teachable moment to reinforce the value of speech to the Jewish community and the nation at large.
Comments are closed.
