CAL THOMAS: MORE GOVERNMENT…LESS INDEPENDENCE
http://townhall.com/columnists/CalThomas/2010/03/04/losing_our_independence?page=full
“The more we come to rely on government, the fewer freedoms we will enjoy. Government will start dictating what we can own, eat and drive, how much of our money they will let us keep, how we run our businesses, how many — if any — guns we can own, and what we may and may not say. Oh, wait! They are already doing that.”
As more Americans, especially the unemployed, come to rely on government to take care of them, we risk losing our independence.
The Washington Times reports American reliance on government is at an all-time high. This is not our Founders’ America. We seem to have declined from a “can-do” spirit, to “can’t do” — at least without government — and soon, unless we change our ways, “won’t do.”
Our forebears practiced self-reliance, living within one’s means and helping neighbors. Much of our modern economy is built on overspending, satisfying desires, pretense, envy, greed, and a sense of entitlement. Politicians who do not wish to disabuse us of such things keep seeking ways to prop up the falling house of cards. Who is brave enough tell us we can’t go on living — and spending — like this?
Sen. Jim Bunning (R-KY) has temporarily replaced Dick Cheney as the Darth Vader of America. His one-man blockade of unemployment and COBRA benefits stems from his belief that we can’t keep spending money we don’t have and that any extension of unemployment benefits should be paid for. Big media and liberal Democrats, many of whom denounced the far smaller Bush administration deficits, pilloried him. Having made his point on fiscal responsibility, late Tuesday, Bunning agreed to allow a vote on extending unemployment benefits, highway construction funding and spending on other federal programs. In return, Senate leaders agreed to allow votes on amendments Bunning will introduce to cut enough spending in other areas to pay for it all.
In The Washington Times story, Harm Bandholz, an economist at Unicredit Markets, told writer Patrice Hill that our massive shift from self-reliance to dependence on government may have been essential in order to have promoted last year’s economic revival, but he says it has merely delayed an ultimate day of reckoning for consumers “who went too far into debt to maintain their lifestyles during the boom years.” This is not only the story of many individuals; but the story of state and federal governments that go on spending sprees during the good times and hike taxes and engage in “painful spending cuts” during lean years.
But back to Sen. Bunning’s point, a point made by Democrats when they invoke “pay-go,” by which they mean new spending must be paid for (but not old spending), either with tax increases or spending cuts, which never seems to quite work out. The best we can hope from politicians is for them to cut rates on spending increases. Even that is criticized when Republicans try it. “What about the children?” is the predictable and phony lament.
Our financial woes become clear when today’s total U.S. debt is compared with total debt during the Great Depression. Patrice Hill writes, “As a result of record U.S. government borrowing, total debt in the United States has soared to an all-time high of 370 percent of yearly economic output, far exceeding its peak of 300 percent during the Great Depression.”
“We were neck deep in the big muddy,” sang Pete Seeger about the Vietnam War, “and the big fool said to push on.” The Obama-Reid-Pelosi wing doesn’t care how high the water or how deep the mud. They’re pushing on toward more debt and greater dependence on government. When Sen. Bunning says we can’t, or we’ll sink, he is vilified. Those who wrongly told us we could ford this river of debt — Democrats and Republicans — should be the ones taking heat. Ultimately, though, too many of us got ourselves into the muck because we believed the advertisers and marketers — and politicians — confusing real needs with wants.
The more we come to rely on government, the fewer freedoms we will enjoy. Government will start dictating what we can own, eat and drive, how much of our money they will let us keep, how we run our businesses, how many — if any — guns we can own, and what we may and may not say. Oh, wait! They are already doing that.
To preserve freedom we must fight for it. Bondage comes when we refuse to fight and are satisfied with the king’s largesse. That foul odor coming from Washington is the frog in the kettle coming to a boil.
Comments are closed.
