EDWARD CLINE: MUSLIMS AND SELF SACRIFICE
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/muslims-and-self-sacrifice
What drives Muslims to want to settle in countries that are Dar al-Harb (the enemy’s land) or Dar al-Kufr (land of unbelief)? What makes them want to live among the infidels?
Muslims and Self-Sacrifice
Last March I discussed the Muslim state of mind in “The Pathological Roots of Islam.” This time around I explore the reason that drives ordinary Muslims to want to immigrate to Western nations, when it means having to deal with infidels “lower than pigs and apes.”
On the occasion of the Australian raids on homes after discovery of a plot to behead a random Australian, that is, a non-Muslim, playing the Muslim-persecution-race-religion card, a Muslim whined that:
When asked why police had targeted his brother [Kawa], he said he had no idea.
“I dunno, I got a lot of anger. It’s a war on Islam just because we grow our beards. They want to label us as a terrorist, or supporters of IS, whatever, that’s up to you.” he said.
He later said he believed Kawa may have been targeted because he hung around with “hot heads”.
Another Muslim complained and warned, in the Daily Telegraph:
A MUSLIM leader chose the hallowed steps of Lakemba’s War Memorial to preach outrage and condemnation over the anti-terror raids across Sydney.
In front of 300 angry protesters, controversial Hizt ut-Tahrir spokesman Uthman Badar warned of a growing anger within the Islamic ¬community and said it was time to stop the victimization. “We are tired of being made scapegoats. The government is the terrorist,” he declared to the gathering, many waving anti-government placards.
One must ask oneself this question: If Muslims regard non-Muslims as filthy kaffirs and the lowest of all creatures they’d really rather not be anywhere near, why do they wish to surround themselves with them by immigrating to – or rather, by invading and colonizing, too often by a nation’s invitation – a country full of them, where they must deal with them daily and not in a beheading way (at first), either? Is it the higher standard of living? Is it the welfare? Is it for jobs? A “better life”? I think those are just flash card reasons.
What exactly is a kaffir? Islam Stack Exchange, a website for enquiring Muslims, provides an authoritative answer:
My understanding of the term kafir is that it refers to a person who literally rejects God’s authority.
So while even the most blatant polytheist would still be mushrik, he would not (necessarily) be kafir.
It’s not until the message has been relayed to him and he refuses to accept it that he would be labelled kafir.
However, it seems the common use of the word kafir, at least nowadays, is to refer to anybody who is non-Muslim, regardless of whether or not they’re familiar with God’s message and His commands.
What is the actual meaning of this term in the primary sources? As in, when the Qur’an and the hadiths refer to the kuffar (or ayuhal kafireen) which interpretation is more correct?
I think the real reason why Muslims want to rub shoulders with us is that Islam inculcates a psychosis in Muslims that allows them to endure the “detested ones” while putting down roots for “the cause,” which is basically to subjugate and/or kill kaffirs. They don’t even need to think about it, not clearly, it’s just a fuzzy state of mind that will in many eventually blossom into action. Their remaining silent about the atrocities their brethren are committing across town or across an ocean, or denying that ISIS and Al Qaeda and Hamas and Hezbollah and all the other Islamic gangs have nothing to do with Islam, nonetheless still makes them culpable.
Of course, this is just a natural query looking for a logical causal-connection in Muslim behavior, but in a tentative answer one will not find any logic, just as one won’t find clean, rational logic in Sharia law or in the Koran. I don’t think the Muslim Brotherhood master-plan types even care how their lower-ranking Muslims think or behave, as long as to go to the West to plant seeds and play victim or minority or loud-mouthed advocate — in short, to act as a spreading, slow-acting poison in Western culture, which has weakened itself with multiculturalism and political correctness and moral relativism. These maladies didn’t exist in, say, 19th Britain, so such a “master plan” wouldn’t have worked there or even in France.
The Muslim Brotherhood’s “master-plan,” or “Explanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Group,” written May 22nd, 1991, per the Gates of Vienna and numerous other blog sites, cites:
One of the primary documents [pdf] used in the Holy Land Foundation trial in 2008 was the “Explanatory Memorandum: On the General Strategic Goal for the Group”. It was written on May 22, 1991 by Mohamed Akram, and gave a brief description of the mission of the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States:
The process of settlement is a “Civilization-Jihadist Process” with all the means. The Ikhwan [Muslim Brotherhood] must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and “sabotaging” its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions. […] It is a Muslim’s destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is…
But in the 20th and 21st centuries, such a “master plan” is feasible, and a goodly measure of that feasibility is enabled by the Western refusal to acknowledge the nature, methods and ends of Islam. That “General Strategy” is well-advanced in Europe, not so much in America in spite of our political leadership’s evasion of the issue. And Islam has millions of faith-lobotomized followers to perform those tasks and the footwork. All they need do is “be there” in Dearborn, New York, Los Angeles, Seattle, London, Sydney, Amsterdam, and even in tiny Reykjavik, Iceland, to “be fruitful and multiply,” without even joining a noisy demonstration or carrying signs saying “Behead those who defame Islam.” If Islam is spreading, it is largely the West’s fault; it refuses to recognize Islam as the pestilence it is.
Islam is evil, but evil, as a rule, derives any strength or potency it might claim from a refusal of its victims to recognize that it is anti-life, anti-self, and, in this instance, fundamentally anti-man. Islam requires that men consciously repudiate and discard one’s self-interest. Only self-sacrifice is permitted. It requires that one submit without reservation or question to the arbitrary, capricious, irrational whims of an allegedly omnipotent, omniscient ghost.
Muslims mothers have boasted of being “proud” that their sons successfully exploded suicide vests and killed themselves and others. This is the kind of sacrifice which Western mothers, while they adhere to the Judeo-Christian notion that sacrifices are necessary to preserve a value, are not familiar with. One of the most repulsive and psychotic instances of sacrificing values among Muslims is the “honor killing” of wayward mothers and daughters by their own parents and other relatives.
So, I think that for the average Muslim, there’s an intractable altruist psychosis in his mind that draws him to Western cultures and nations, not for jobs or a higher, healthier standard of living, but because, down deep, he knows there is a good there and it must be despoiled or destroyed because Allah commands it. So, he will endure being engulfed in a sea of filthy kaffirs. The demands of selflessness and unquestioning submission inherent in Islam make it easy for a Muslim to “suffer” so. A Muslim can be content to safely participate in the “insurgency” against the West by being a passive cipher and welfare king (or queen), or engage in mere criminal acts against random Westerners in the Westerners’ own countries (rapes, beheadings, no-go vigilantes, attacking Jews, etc.)
This, in Western parlance, is self-sacrifice, not for a “noble end,” or even to preserve values – but instead to destroy values, by being a negative presence among the good. However, before they commit the final, ultimate self-sacrifice, Muslims first want to sacrifice you. It is a sought-after self-sacrifice which easily metastases into pure nihilism.
* * 30 * *
Edward Cline
Williamsburg, VA
September 2014
Links:
Greenfield article on Australian beheading plot:
http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/australia-isis-beheading-order-kill-a-random-kaffir/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=australia-isis-beheading-order-kill-a-random-kaffir
Pathological Roots of Islam on Rule of Reason :
http://ruleofreason.blogspot.com/2014/03/the-pathological-roots-of-islam.html
Muzzie says Australia persecutes Muslims:
Australia Muslim leader on terror raids: Government “attacking Islam and Muslims”
Muzzie sob story about raid, we grow beards:
http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/police-searching-for-material-linked-to-islamic-state-alqaeda-says-man-targeted-20140918-10ikq4.html
Daily Telegraph Australia on raids:
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/terror-raids-fanatics-plotted-to-behead-an-innocent/story-fni0cx12-1227062152150?nk=02ded16a60133c5732cbb8b5cd0593ea
Islam Watch essay on etymological roots of “kaffir”:
http://www.islam-watch.org/authors/165-jon-mc/1533-horrible-concepts-about-non-muslims-in-islam-part-1-kaffirs-mushrikoon-and-zalimoon.html
Definition of a kaffir:
http://islam.stackexchange.com/questions/1143/what-is-the-definition-of-a-kaffir
Gates of Vienna Brotherhood quotation from Memorandum:
http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2010/08/sabotaging-our-miserable-house.html
Comments are closed.
