From the KGB to Gaza: How Soviet ‘Active Measures’ Still Manipulate the West by Pierre Rehov

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21908/kgb-russia-soviets-palestinians

What some now call the “pro-Palestine movement” in the West is, in many respects, the residue of decades of KGB-backed manipulation. The cultural self-hatred, moral relativism, and selective outrage that dominate today’s progressive circles were seeded by Soviet strategists who understood that eroding Western confidence from within could be more decisive than any tank battalion.

Between June 2015 and May 2017, Facebook identified roughly $100,000 in advertising spending tied to Russian operators — around 3,000 ads and 470 fake accounts. These “false amplifiers” were not fringe experiments; they were coordinated tools to manipulate American discourse around the most sensitive of issues: race, violence and justice.

Algorithms that reward outrage over truth became Moscow’s best allies. Viral posts spread disinformation with an efficiency no Cold War-era propaganda organ could ever have matched. Silicon Valley unwittingly handed Russia the perfect conduit for digital warfare.

What began with the KGB’s creation and sponsorship of radical Palestinian organizations has evolved into a kaleidoscope of identity-based movements that serve the same destabilizing purpose.

The Muslim Brotherhood, Iran’s revolutionary regime, and the emirate of Qatar eagerly seized onto the momentum of Soviet-inspired subversion.

By turning every regional or global grievance into an indictment of the Jewish state, they perpetuated the Soviet narrative while adding their own religious zealotry.

The moral relativism of progressive elites, the selective outrage of campus radicals, and the obsessive fixation on “Palestine” are not organic: they are the downstream effects of decades of collaboration between Moscow’s active measures and Islamist subversion, turbocharged by Qatari money and Iranian militancy.

In 1984, Yuri Bezmenov, a former Soviet KGB officer turned defector, issued a chilling warning to the West. As a specialist in the USSR’s propaganda and subversion, he revealed how Moscow’s “active measures” were designed not only to mislead but to fundamentally destabilize societies from within. The West, convinced that victory in the Cold War would be purely military or economic, ignored his words. Yet Bezmenov understood what few in Washington or Brussels could grasp: the battlefield was psychological, cultural and moral.

Only a little more than decade later, Russian strategist Alexander Dugin gave these methods a new intellectual scaffolding. In his 1997 book The Foundations of Geopolitics: The Geopolitical Future of Russia, Dugin argued that the path to weakening the United States and NATO lay in fomenting chaos inside America’s borders — igniting racial and social conflict, seeding distrust of institutions, and nurturing separatist or extremist movements. His program was nothing less than a blueprint for dismantling the West by exploiting its own fractures.

The Soviet–Palestinian Nexus

These ideas did not emerge in a vacuum. Already during the Cold War, the KGB had cultivated deep ties with Palestinian terrorist factions, trained operatives who were providing disinformation, and weaponizing the Arab-Israeli conflict for Soviet purposes. The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), along with splinter groups, were not merely perpetrating anti-Israel terrorism: the PLO was a Soviet proxy, deployed both to weaken the Jewish state and inject anti-Israel and anti-Western ideology into Europe and America.

The Murder of Charlie Kirk Was Not a George Floyd Moment Charlie Kirk’s murder sparked peaceful resolve, not riots—sharply contrasting the violence, destruction, and radical agendas unleashed after George Floyd’s death. By Victor Davis Hanson

https://amgreatness.com/2025/09/18/the-murder-of-charlie-kirk-was-not-a-george-floyd-moment/

Just days after the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the left is working overtime to hide the truth and create fantasies about his death.

Specifically, leftists alleged that conservatives were going to “pounce” on the death to wage protests and boost radical agendas in the manner of what followed George Floyd’s death.

Here are some of the lies that such a ridiculous narrative entails.

One, Charlie Kirk is not conservatives’ George Floyd. There were no mass riots after his death of the sort that followed Floyd’s demise.

Floyd’s death was used by the left to justify five months of rioting, arson, murder, looting, and attacking police officers.

The postmortem respect for Kirk’s singular life was not characterized by $2 billion in property damage, the torching of a police precinct, a federal courthouse, and an iconic church, 35 deaths, and 1,500 injured law-enforcement officers.

Instead, thousands of people peacefully joined his Turning Point USA organization and promised to redirect their lives toward peaceful political engagement.

Two, after Kirk’s death, no prominent Republican or conservative is encouraging ongoing mass (and often violent) protests in the manner of high-profile leftists like Kamala Harris.

She blurted out on national television in June 2020, “But they’re not gonna stop. They’re not gonna stop, and this is a movement, I’m telling you. They’re not gonna stop, and everyone beware, because they’re not gonna stop. They’re not gonna stop before Election Day in November, and they’re not gonna stop after Election Day. Everyone should take note of that, on both levels, that they’re not going to let up—and they should not. And we should not.”

No conservatives—like the spouse of Governor Tim Walz—declared of the 2020 arsons, “I could smell the burning tires, and that was a very real thing. I kept the windows open as long as I could because I felt like that was such a touchstone of what was happening.”

Instead, Kirk’s supporters are calling on everyone to express their anger peacefully at the ballot box by registering to vote and showing up for the 2026 midterms.

Three, Charles Kirk was not George Floyd. He was a law-abiding, religiously devout, political organizer, happily married with two children. Kirk was a media figure and head of a huge 501(c)(3) nonprofit whose brand was calmly debating students who disagreed with him.

Floyd should not have died while in police custody. But Floyd’s comorbidities were many. When arrested, he was under the influence of fentanyl and methamphetamine, with a heart condition and recent Covid infection.

He was a career felon, with eight previous criminal convictions, who had in the past staged a violent home-invasion robbery and pointed a knife at the abdomen of one of the female occupants.

Peace and Appeasement Israel now stands accused of genocide for refusing to accept its own annihilation. Yuki Zeman

https://quillette.com/2025/09/17/peace-and-appeasement-hitler-hamas-gaza/

After decades of ruthless militancy and terrorism that culminated in the atrocities committed by Hamas on 7 October, a Palestinian state will be recognised later this month by the governments of France, the UK, and Canada. These Western leaders are eager to appease those who perpetrate anti-Jewish violence because they believe that by doing so they can end decades of bloodshed and war in the Middle East. But this kind of thinking misreads the causes of hatred and aggression in pursuit of peace at all costs, and history demonstrates how dangerous this is.

On 1 April 1933, the Nazis declared a nationwide boycott of Jewish businesses. Days later, the Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service was passed, which forbade the employment of non-Aryan teachers, judges, or physicians. In 1935, the Nuremberg Laws were enacted, which proscribed intermarriage and stripped Jews of German citizenship. By 1938, Jewish children had been pushed out of schools and Jewish doctors were confined to treating Jews. None of these measures required war. All that was needed was ideology, will, organisation, and the silent complicity of observers.

The tightening of the noose during this period was administrative—a litany of forms, laws, decrees, notices, and slogans that turned ordinary doorways into uncrossable thresholds. The path to genocide began with incremental measures that felt reversible until they were not. And then came Kristallnacht, on the night of 9 November 1938, which ended the pretence that anti-Jewish persecution was only a matter of law. Around ninety Jews were murdered and about 30,000 men were arrested and sent to concentration camps. Synagogues were set on fire and Jewish shops were reduced to glittering wreckage. The next morning, people stepped around the shards of broken glass littering the pavement as they walked to work.

And while all of this horror was unfolding, civilised Europe did nothing.

The Battle of Gaza City: it’s time to take sides Why the army of the Jewish State must be victorious over the Islamist hysterics of Hamas. Brendan O’Neill

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/09/17/the-battle-of-gaza-city-its-time-to-take-sides/

‘I judge a man by one thing’, said the early 20th-century English Liberal MP Isaac Foot: ‘Which side would he have liked his ancestors to fight on at Marston Moor?’ He was referring to the Battle of Marston Moor of 1644, during the English Civil War, in which the Parliamentarian side under the command of the radical Lord Fairfax roundly defeated the Royalist side. It was the military victory that propelled these isles towards democracy. I’m starting to feel similarly about the Battle of Gaza City – that you can judge a person by which side they’re taking in this clash between the army of Israel and the neo-fascists of Hamas.

As the 98th and 162nd divisions of the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) roll into Gaza City to confront the 3,000 armed anti-Semites of Hamas, a burning question confronts us all: which side are we on? You can say ‘I just want the war to stop’ until you’re blue in the face. You can carry a handbag saying ‘Cease Fire!’ like one of the turbo-smug celebs at the Emmys did. You can call the IDF ‘reckless and appalling’, as did Britain’s new foreign secretary, Yvette Cooper, in an act of snivelling moral perfidy that heaps shame on our nation. None of it will make a blind bit of difference. This battle is as unstoppable as the sunrise tomorrow. Neither the IDF nor Hamas is backing down. So only one question remains: whose victory do you wish for?

The Battle of Gaza City is already one of the most maligned clashes of modern times. Much of the media coverage leaves one with the wholly post-truth impression that the IDF is raiding Gaza City for sport. Or for land. Or in further, feverish pursuit of its curiously unsuccessful ‘genocide’ of the Palestinian people. The other side in the battle – Hamas’s army of apocalyptic Jew-haters – has been virtually invisibilised. We rarely hear of them. It’s as bizarre as if newspapers had reported on the Battle of Raqqa without mentioning ISIS, or the Battle of Berlin without ever saying the word ‘Nazi’.

Anyone who writes, tweets or talks about the Battle of Gaza City without referencing the numerous cells of tooled-up guerrilla fighters lying in wait for the soldiers of the Jewish State is flat-out engaging in misinformation. It’s a kind of wartime censorship to erase one side in a battle – worse, the side that started the war in the first place with its pogrom against the Jews of southern Israel on 7 October 2023. The truth about the Battle of Gaza City is that on one side there are tens of thousands of soldiers from two divisions of the IDF, and on the other an estimated 3,000 Hamas gunmen and their Islamist allies under the command of Izz El-Din al-Haddad.

The Left’s Favorite Quiz: Always the Same Wrong Answers David Manney

https://pjmedia.com/david-manney/2025/09/17/the-lefts-favorite-quiz-always-the-same-wrong-answers-n4943844

The Pop Quiz Nobody Asked For

Somewhere between Nickelodeon, a college lecture hall, and a CNN panel, there exists a pop quiz that never dies: questions don’t change, biased grading, and a predetermined outcome.

Answering with logic, history, or facts results in the professor, or, in this case, the media and activist class scribbling the same word in red ink across the top of the page: Nazi.

The insult isn’t the problem; it’s the sheer laziness of their argument. It’s a verbal equivalent of a raspberry aimed at an empty room.

When political debate is full of words with specific blood-soaked histories, the power of those words evaporates. After calling every political opponent “Hitler” long enough, the memory of who Hitler really was fades.

In the first Incredibles movie, Dash’s mom, Elastigirl, told him that the world says everybody is special. Dash complained that it’s another way of saying nobody is.

Our public discourse has evolved into a giant vocabulary test, where half the class can’t be bothered to open a book, let alone study.

Their written answer in the blank is “fascist,” except that when they spell it, it’s more like “fastfish.”

I know everybody is familiar with the following terms, but if it helps just one person, I will feel swell.

Nazi: The All-Purpose Smear

ABC pulls ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ indefinitely after offensive Charlie Kirk comments By Connor Surmonte and Victor Nava

https://nypost.com/2025/09/17/entertainment/abc-pulls-jimmy-kimmel-live-indefinitely-after-charlie-kirk-comments/

Jimmy Kimmel is taking an involuntary hiatus.

ABC said it is pulling the comedian’s late-night talk show off the air “indefinitely” following his controversial comments about the killing of Charlie Kirk.

“Jimmy Kimmel Live will be pre-empted indefinitely,” an ABC spokesperson confirmed to The Post Wednesday, Sept. 17.

Kimmel, 57, faced backlash after he said Monday night that the “MAGA gang” was trying to score political points off Kirk’s murder after the conservative activist was shot dead on the campus of Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, Sept. 10.

“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang trying to characterize this kid who killed Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them,” Kimmel said during his monologue.

Nexstar Media Group, the major broadcast company that serves as a primary affiliate for ABC, confirmed that it would “preempt” Kimmel’s program in the wake of his remarks.

“The company’s owned and partner television stations affiliated with the ABC Television Network will preempt ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ for the foreseeable future, beginning with tonight’s show,” Nexstar said in a press release.

“Nexstar strongly objects to recent comments made by Mr. Kimmel concerning the killing of Charlie Kirk and will replace the show with other programming in its ABC-affiliated markets,” it continued.

Weaponized Scoops: New Russiagate Documents Expose Media/Government Collusion Declassified FBI files suggest leaks tied to Schiff and Comey allies fueled false Russiagate stories, exposing collusion between officials and favored reporters. By Paul Sperry

https://amgreatness.com/2025/09/17/weaponized-scoops-new-russiagate-documents-expose-media-government-collusion/

This article was originally published by RealClearInvestigations and made available via RealClearWire.

Recently declassified documents indicate that people close to former FBI Director James Comey and Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff were connected to leaks of classified information to prominent reporters designed to portray Donald Trump and his allies as being in league with Russia.

Written in 2017, the FBI documents expose how selected Washington reporters, including Ellen Nakashima of the Washington Post and Michael Schmidt of the New York Times, scored a series of Pulitzer Prize-winning scoops in 2017 by repeating false and inflammatory leaks during President Trump’s first term.

Much of their reporting has been debunked – and shown to be part of a smear campaign by high-ranking officials to undermine Trump, but the identities of those leakers have remained hidden because of the government’s apparent unwillingness to expose its own and the refusal of reporters to identify the people who misled them and the nation.

Although the heavily redacted recent disclosures do not specifically identify the suspected leakers, an RCI analysis of the documents strongly suggests that people close to Comey and Schiff, among others, were feeding the reporters information to advance the Russiagate hoax.

The documents reveal a cascade of misdeeds and failures. These include the effort of government officials to create and leak misleading classified information to favored reporters and the failure of reporters to scrutinize the information they were given before rushing it into print, and the subsequent failure of federal investigators to hold anyone accountable for the breaches of security.

The documents also detail the incestuous nature of media-government relationships inside the D.C. Beltway. In some cases, spouses and friends of government officials and reporters were used to spread damaging misinformation about Trump, making it difficult for federal investigators to follow the trail of illegal disclosures.

“All of these cozy friendships of leakers and leaker recipients, many of whom are married to each other, are precisely why reporters adore hiding their sourcing behind walls of ‘senior administration officials’ or ‘senior U.S. officials’ and associated disguises,” said Tim Graham, director of media analysis for the Media Research Center, a Washington-based journalism watchdog group.

Stu Smith Pro-Palestinian Radicals Target Embassies—Are They Breaking the Law? A new tactic may cross the line from protest into criminality.

https://www.city-journal.org/article/texas-pro-palestinian-encampment-protest-israel-embassy

In August, an encampment sprang up in the heart of Texas as keffiyeh- and black bloc-clad protesters pitched tents on the property of the Israeli consulate in Houston. Soon, the air rang with familiar chants: “There is only one solution, Intifada revolution,” and “Death, death to the IDF.” What followed was a prolonged standoff that stretched well into the night, with officials bringing barricades and even deploying mounted police to clear the scene.

But the most troubling development was not the encampment itself. It was the protesters’ open call for activists in other cities to follow suit. Israeli consulates in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Miami, Los Angeles, New York City, San Francisco, and the embassy in Washington, D.C. may soon face similar encampments. Some diplomatic sites in cities like San Francisco and D.C. already have.

Consulate takeovers are one of the latest tactics of the radical pro-Palestinian activist fringe. But they may run afoul of international agreements and federal law.

Houston’s encampment ended in arrests. In Washington, D.C., however, the Israeli embassy dealt with the so-called Kibbutz encampment, which appeared soon after the self-immolation of Aaron Bushnell, for months. Activists remained outside the embassy 24/7 in rotating shifts, even constructing a megaphone wall to blast chants at the building.

These are not isolated incidents. In recent months, protesters have chained gates and surrounded buildings on diplomatic property. Now they have launched an encampment campaign.

Mark Tapson: Charlie Kirk Ignored at the Emmys If you didn’t hate Hollywood already, now’s a good time to start.

https://www.frontpagemag.com/charlie-kirk-ignored-at-the-emmys/

Not that anyone outside Tinseltown cared or noticed, but the 77th Primetime Emmy Awards took place Sunday night in the wake of Wednesday’s epochal assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk. While the world mourned peaceful, free speech martyr Charlie, Hollywood celebrities – who are ordinarily eager to turn awards shows into political platforms – pointedly made not a single reference to his murder throughout the entire event, much less held a moment of silence.

Could there be a starker demonstration of the unbridgeable chasm between American patriots and the out-of-touch, hate-America elites of Hollywood?

Showbiz rags like Deadline and The Wrap are crowing that the awards show drew a four-year viewership high, according to Nielsen data. Keep in mind, however, the salient point that the last four years marked deep plunges in Emmy viewership because Americans are fed up with these privileged haters. Indeed, the 76th ceremony in January 2024 holds the record for the all-time lowest Emmys audience, with just 4.3 million bored viewers worldwide. Hollywood wants desperately to believe that Sunday’s slight uptick is an indication that star power is coming back strong.

It is not. Celebrity endorsements, for example. are worthless now. Failed presidential candidate Kamala Harris discovered this the hard way during her campaign last year, when she desperately passed out big bucks like Halloween candy to buy the support of big-name entertainers such as Beyoncé, Katy Perry, Lizzo, and Oprah Winfrey. Neither they nor dozens of other stars moved the electoral needle one iota for Kamala. The days when politicians – Democrats, anyway – could count on a boost from buddying up with movie stars and pop stars are over, because in recent years progressive celebrities have squandered their influence by displaying open, partisan contempt for more than half the country.

Welcome to Big Brother’s Digital Prison, Part I: Central Bank Digital Currencies by Robert Williams

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21911/central-bank-digital-currencies

“We are talking about a very dystopian future if we allow central banks to issue central bank digital currencies. You know, even if the original designers and heads of central banks who are launching this are super well-meaning, you know, let’s give them the benefit of the doubt, we just know what human nature is like and history is the best guide… I think the power would be abused, if not by the original generation of launchers, then by the next generation…. It will be a completely totalitarian system of such frightening proportions, it’s hard to imagine… The micromanaging decision [about your spending] will then be automated and… you have no right to appeal the algorithm… You just won’t be able to use your money for certain things and then there is nothing that you can do… That by definition ends freedom….” — Richard A. Werner, German economist, 2024,

The Biden administration was actively working towards an American CBDC, but in May 2024, the House of Representatives passed a bill to prevent the Federal Reserve from introducing a CBDC. Shortly after coming into office, President Donald Trump banned the establishment of a CBDC in the United States.

In Europe, the European Union is barreling ahead at full speed towards a central bank digital currency for those EU countries that are part of the eurozone, which includes the majority of EU countries. Yet, the dangers of this euro CBDC are nowhere near being discussed in mainstream European media. Of course, EU leaders stress that Europe must have a CBDC to “adapt to the digital age” – a vapid statement evidently intended to subdue skeptics, and supposedly to protect Europe against “increasing geopolitical fragmentation,” whatever that is, if it is even relevant to digital currencies.

Whatever the excuse, the impending CBDCs appear intended to give governments unlimited power: If the government does not like your speech, off to jail you go – as in the UK, where people are imprisoned for months and years for saying or writing things that the government disagrees with. Meanwhile, real crimes, such as the mass-rape of thousands of children over the past 20 years, in Rotherham and other cities, remain rampant and largely unaddressed.

Unfortunately, none of this is far-fetched. In Canada, during Covid-19 when the truckers went to Ottawa peacefully to protest government pandemic restrictions, then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau simply invoked the Emergencies Act, which allowed the government to force banks to freeze the truckers’ bank accounts. Problem solved.

Agustin Carstens, General Manager of the Bank for International Settlements in Basel, has admitted that CBDCs will give governments total control: “[I]n cash, we don’t know, for example, who is using a $100 bill today; we don’t know who is using a 1000 peso bill today. A key difference with the CBDC is that central bank will have absolute control on the rules and regulations that we determine the use… and we will have the technology to enforce that.”

Your money will no longer be yours, but more like a credit or account that you will have with the government and that you will only have access to on condition that you follow the rules, whatever they might be.

Globalist leaders are working at full speed to introduce central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). A CBDC is a digital currency that is issued directly by a central bank, such as the Federal Reserve in the US, the European Central Bank in the EU’s eurozone, and the Bank of England in the UK.