RUTHFULLY YOURS

The month was one of extremes, reminding me of Jim McKay’s signature words about the dozen Olympics he covered: “The thrill of victory. And the agony of defeat.” The month’s news swung between the glory of the Olympics, the tragedy in Parkland, Florida and the return of volatility to Wall Street.

The Olympics showed us at our best, whether in victory or in defeat. For the first time in twenty years, the women’s hockey team won gold. We saw compassion when Brita Sigourney embraced her teammate Annalisa Drew, when the former beat the latter for the bronze in the freestyle skiing halfpipe. The worst of America was seen in Nikolas Cruz, as he shot seventeen people at the Marjory Stoneman Douglas high School in Parkland, Florida. The horrific incident also brought out heroes, like 15-year-old Anthony Borges who took five bullets, while saving 20 classmates and football coach Aaron Feis who died saving students and teacher Scott Beigel who died opening the door of his classroom to let in students. There were others. (See my TOTD, “Another School Shooting,” February 22). I hope we resolve this, without naiveté as to causes and without imposing police-state-like conditions. No one should live in fear, least of all children.

The dog-bites-man story of the month is the continuing saga of Russia meddling in our election. The hypocrisy and hyperventilation by the liberal press reminds one of Claude Rains in “Casablanca” – they were “shocked, shocked” that Russia would meddle in our elections. Of course Russians do. They have for decades. It is what propagandists do. The Kremlin is less interested in outcomes, than in making our democracy appear weak and ineffectual – to sow discord. They have succeeded. Exhibit A, B and C are the front pages of the New York Times and the Washington Post, TV news shows like CNN, MSNBC and Fox News, and late-night comedians like Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert. Meddling served Russia’s purpose: an ineffectual Congress and a polarized people. We have been guilty of the same. Think of Thomas Jefferson’s support for the French Revolution, or the CIA disrupting/influencing elections from South America to South East Asia, or the role of Radio Free Europe during the Cold War. President Obama campaigned against the re-election of Benjamin Netanyahu in 2015 and for Brexit in 2016. Nevertheless, meddling in others’ elections is a violation of international and U.S. law, something we must guard against. If not doing so already, we should deploy our best crypto-security specialists to counter Russian activity.

This is an edited version of a lecture given at the Holy Land Dialogues in Jerusalem last month.

It has become the orthodoxy in the West that freedom, human rights and reason all derive from secularism and that the greatest threat to all these good things is religion.

I want to suggest that the opposite is true. In the service of this orthodoxy, the West is undermining and destroying the very values which it holds most dear as the defining characteristics of a civilised society.

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.
But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

Far from utopia, however, this thinking resulted in something more akin to hell on earth. For the worship of man through reason led straight to totalitarianism. It was reason that would redeem religious superstition and bring about the kingdom of Man on earth. And just like medieval apocalyptic Christian belief, this secular doctrine would also be unchallengeable and heretics would be punished. This kind of fanaticism infused the three great tyrannical movements that were spun out of Enlightenment thinking: the French Revolution, Communism and Fascism.