RUTHFULLY YOURS

http://www.swtotd.blogspot.com

Democrats are puzzled that their majorities among the working-class, blacks and minorities are shrinking. Why, they wonder, is the Party that long showed concern for working Americans being abandoned by those same people? They have forgotten that political parties are not static entities. Democrats’ current bar-bell approach, with coastal elitists offset by those dependent on government, ignores the vast middle-class. Smugness and complacency have enshrouded their leaders, as they did Republicans half a century earlier.

Political parties change, adapting to demands from their wealthiest backers and noisiest constituents. Prior to the Civil War, abolitionists joined the new Republican Party, while slave-holders were mostly Democrats. But over time, the Party of Lincoln morphed into northeast coastal elitists, while Democrat segregationists of the mid-Twentieth Century south joined with civil rights activists. Now, another change, which has been underway for the past few decades, is reaching a climax. New England, dominated by Republicans in the 1950s and ‘60s, has become – with the exception of New Hampshire – a bastion for Democrats. In the past thirty years, there has been only one New England State that voted for a Republican president, and that was New Hampshire in 2000. In contrast, in the 36 years ending in 1988, Republican presidential candidates won more than twice as many New England states as Democrats.

There is a scene in the Bing Crosby and Danny Kaye 1954 movie White Christmas that captures the image: Entertainers Crosby and Kaye follow two girls (Rosemary Clooney and Vera-Ellen) they had met in Florida to the Columbia Inn in Pine Tree, Vermont, an inn now run by their former World War II commander, General Waverly (Dean Jagger). Because of a lack of snow, Waverly is having a tough time. Crosby and Kaye decide they must do something, something unusual: “What do you think would be a novelty up here in Vermont?” asks Bing Crosby. “Who knows?” replies Danny Kaye. “Perhaps we can dig up a Democrat.” Today Democrats outnumber Republicans in Vermont by more than two and a half to one. However, empirical evidence suggests Republicans are, once again, beginning to narrow the gap.

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/5049614-liberal-business-hate

A horrifying new poll shows 41 percent of American young people find Luigi Mangion’s cowardly assassination of United Healthcare CEO Brian Thompson “acceptable.” How did our youth come to hate corporate America so much?  

I blame Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren and other liberal Democrats who continually vilify American businesses, blaming them for being greedy and corrupt and for taking advantage of American consumers.  

Warren, a senator from Massachusetts, seemed to sympathize with Mangione murdering Thompson, a complete stranger. She told the Huffington Post: “The visceral response from people across this country who feel cheated, ripped off, and threatened by the vile practices of their insurance companies should be a warning to everyone in the healthcare system. This is a warning that if you push people hard enough, they … start to take matters into their own hands.” While she included the obligatory “Violence is never the answer,” it sure sounds like she’s excusing the killer.   

The left is quick to blame right-wing rhetoric for inciting violence; they should admit that their own venomous business-bashing has contributed to one death and could cause more. The New York Post reports that James Harr, founder of a “socialist apparel” brand, has called online for the killing of “titans of greed,” and plans to issue decks of cards with the names and photos of “most wanted CEOs.”   

This rising craziness is the direct result of liberals blaming our big businesses for the terrible hardship brought on by Democrats’ reckless spending, which led to soaring inflation. When rising prices began to devour Americans’ paychecks, angering voters and pummeling Joe Biden’s approval ratings, the president didn’t stop spending; instead, he accused food companies of “ripping off” consumers and playing the public for “suckers.”    

Not to be outdone, during her campaign Vice President Harris accused companies of “nefarious price gouging;” she threatened to “go after bad actors” that she blamed for soaring grocery costs.   

https://thespectator.com/topic/ever-continuing-resolution-congress-doge/

In the 1870s, Gustave Flaubert assembled Le Dictionnaire des idées reçues, a humorous collection of “received ideas” and clichés then current in French society. A new version needs to be produced for contemporary America. As in the original, the humor would often turn on the contradiction or subterfuge implicit in the word or phrase. “Affirmative action” would merit an entry, since it is supposed to be about battling discrimination when in fact it enshrines discrimination in law.

So would the current favorite, “Continuing Resolution” (“CR” among the cognoscenti). The phrase carries the aroma legislative diligence. In fact,…

A “Continuing Resolution” is the fig leaf Congress stitches together in order to conceal, or at least divert attention from, its failure to do its job and provide a fiscally sound budget in a timely manner. It has happened often in recent decades because the self-serving deadbeats we elect to govern us are, well, self-serving deadbeats. Did you know that the last time the United States had a proper budget was 1996? 

The specter of a “government shutdown” is supposed to goad any legislators contemplating a defection from the CR to get back in line. It may not be amiss to note that the phrase “government shutdown” itself deserves a place in our new dictionary of received ideas, since the government never shuts down, more’s the pity. When push comes to shove, those in favor of the CR respond to criticism by shuttering some national parks and some bureaucrats cease even pretending to work. Never mind. The aircraft carriers continue their patrols and the really essential checks, like those that pay congressional salaries, continue to be processed.

https://nypost.com/2024/12/18/opinion/benjamin-weingarten-congress-huge-spending-bill-sneaks-in-a-rescue-for-censors/

Just when Congress seemed poised to strike a blow against the Censorship-Industrial Complex, its 11th-hour maneuvering may have snatched defeat from the jaws of free-speech victory.

Tucked into the 1,547-page continuing resolution now before Congress to fund the government into March is a section titled “Global Engagement Center Extension.”

If not struck, it will prolong the life of a key government censorship cog that had been ticketed for closure.

The State Department recently indicated its plans to shutter the GEC in a court filing.

The department’s announced plan to “realign” the GEC’s staff and funding to other “foreign information manipulation and interference activities” already gave free speech champions pause — but any Deep State concession would have been significant.

GEC was formed to counter foreign propaganda and disinformation campaigns.

But like other parts of the fed-led censorship apparatus, the interagency entity underwent civil rights-eviscerating mission creep, expanding its mandate to suppress the speech of Americans guilty of wrongthink.