Displaying posts categorized under

WORLD NEWS

‘The Blasphemy Business’: The Persecution of Christians, August 2025 by Raymond Ibrahim

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21951/persecution-of-christians-august

“What we see in Africa today is a kind of silent genocide or silent, brutal, savage war that is occurring in the shadows and all too often ignored by the international community… [J]ihadist groups are in a position to take over not one, not two, but several countries in Africa…. It’s very dangerous for the national security of the United States…. Christians are going to be targeted and destroyed.” — Alberto Miguel Fernandez, geopolitical analyst and former U.S. diplomat, Fox News, August 7, 2025, Mozambique.

The Islamic State (ISIS) released a newsletter praising its “mujahideen” [jihadists] for targeting and slaughtering the Christians of Democratic Republic of the Congo and Mozambique mentioned above, and urging followers to replicate these attacks in Europe…. It praises the massacres and beheadings of Christians inside churches, and attacks on Christian communities, all of which left “pools of blood.” It calls on its followers to offer Christians three choices: “If they refuse Islam and the jizyah tax, the third option is murder.” — MEMRI, August 8, 2025, Democratic Republic of Congo.

“Our conquering ancestors ruled with swords, advancing legions and leading the way, until they terrorized the nations of their time, who came to them willingly or unwillingly, surrendering and submissive. This is the truth, and anything beyond it is false.” — ISIS newsletter, reported by MEMRI, August 8, 2025, Democratic Republic of Congo.

The “hearts still ache for revenge against the Christians of Europe. The call is still open to the heroes of Islam to attack them again and invade them in their own backyards and implement the divine rulings against them as their brothers did in Africa, and Allah will surely support those who support Him.” — ISIS newsletter, reported by MEMRI, August 8, 2025, Democratic Republic of Congo.

Below are some of the more notable incidents of the ongoing genocide being carried out against Christians in Nigeria….

“The herdsmen chased and shot at farmers as if they were animals.” — morningstarnews.org, September 1, 2025, Nigeria.

“The culmination of the efforts to stop the [church’s] construction took place on Sunday, July 27, 2025. The construction committee was subjected to a mass lynching by government officials and residents….” — Rev. Puput Yuniatmoko, persecution.org, August 8, 2025, Indonesia.

“While the language of the draft agreement [between Azerbaijan and Armenia] is general in nature, it mentions combating intolerance, racism, and violent extremism. Absent from the list of vices to be countered was religious persecution and ethnic cleansing — longstanding practices of the totalitarian Azerbaijan regime.” — persecution.org, August 14, 2025, Azerbaijan.

“During detention, we were forced to drink water from Lotas [vessels typically used in toilets]. One person would open their mouth while another poured water through the same vessel.” — Zakria John, morningstarnews.org, August 20, 2025, Pakistan.

“Nabeel Masih, a 25-year-old Christian from Lahore, died… after years of neglect, abuse, and lack of crucial medical care. At 16….Masih was accused by a man named Akhtar Ali of posting a blasphemous image on Facebook….Police had the image removed to prevent unrest, erasing the only evidence that could prove whether Masih had posted it. ” — morningstarnews.org, August 20, 2025, Pakistan.

The following are among the abuses and murders inflicted on Christians by Muslims throughout the month of August 2025.

A Renewed Iranian Push for the Nuclear Bomb by Majid Rafizadeh

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21949/iran-push-nuclear-bomb

The Iranian regime is once again racing to acquire nuclear weapons. In doing so, it is turning to Russia and almost certainly looking toward China and North Korea for support. This is an immediate and existential threat to the United States, Israel, and the Free World.

Tehran’s repeated denials are lies, masking a clear and urgent drive to obtain nuclear capability as quickly as possible.

Another urgent question: What would prevent Russia from going beyond civilian cooperation and helping Iran directly in its quest for a nuclear weapon?

If Russia feels cornered by the West over Ukraine, it may see Iran’s nuclear ambitions not as a liability but as a useful bargaining chip and a means to complicate U.S. and Israeli security calculations.

For Iran, the shortcut to a nuclear bomb would not be to build everything from scratch, but to leverage these relationships, just as North Korea once did with Pakistan.

The regime looks at North Korea and sees a model: once Pyongyang secured a nuclear arsenal, its survival was effectively guaranteed.

On top of this strategic calculation is the regime’s enduring ideological goal of wiping Israel off the map. For Tehran, even a single nuclear bomb would carry enormous symbolic and strategic weight.

The United States, Israel, and Europe must not underestimate this danger.

Iran’s regime is racing against time, determined to achieve a capability that will guarantee its survival, give it leverage over its enemies, and help export its revolution.

The Iranian regime is once again racing to acquire nuclear weapons. In doing so, it is turning to Russia and almost certainly looking toward China and North Korea for support. This is an immediate and existential threat to the United States, Israel, and the Free World.

Tehran’s repeated denials are lies, masking a clear and urgent drive to obtain nuclear capability as quickly as possible.

Earlier this week at the United Nations General Assembly, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian declared that Iran will “never seek to build a nuclear bomb.” Iran’s actions, however, contradict these words. On September 26, Tehran signed a staggering $25 billion nuclear agreement with Russia to construct four nuclear power plants in southern Iran.

DOUGLAS MURRAY: THE WEST MUST LEARN TO SAY NO! VIDEO*******

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77Ku7_LbSnA

Douglas Murray – author of On Democracies and Death Cults – on the cowardice and impotence of Western elites. This is a clip from _The Brendan O’Neill Show_. Watch the full episode here:    • Douglas Murray: Can civilisation survive? …  

Spare us your crocodile tears, Starmer and Corbyn Why the public condolences offered to Jews in the wake of the Manchester atrocity ring so very hollow. Jake Wallis Simons

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/10/03/spare-us-your-crocodile-tears-starmer-and-corbyn/

The experience of being a Jew in Britain over the past two years has been one of trapdoors of depravity. You fall through one on to what you think is firm ground, only to discover that there is always further to fall. Yesterday was a prime example.

The terror attack on a Manchester synagogue was, of course, the sort of shock that changes things forever. This was something that all in the community had feared, yet it had thankfully failed to materialise. In France, yes, there had been attacks like this on many occasions. The attack on Charlie Hebdo, the defenestration of elderly Jews in Paris and Lyon, the anti-Semitic rape last year of a 12-year-old girl. But in Britain, nothing of that nature.

Well, so much for that. Today, it emerged that the community security guards had prevented the attacker from entering the Heaton Park synagogue, at huge personal cost, with one killed and the other seriously injured. Their everyday heroism – as is common with such atrocities – provided a shining light in the darkness that descended at the hands of Jihad al-Shamie.

Yes, nothing will ever be the same for Jews in Britain, if indeed they remain here. As it turned out, however, the attack itself was only the first trapdoor of the depravity.

Before the blood was dry, the condolences came pouring in. What’s wrong with that, I hear you ask? Nothing, I suppose, when the people offering the condolences are genuine. In this case, however, you couldn’t move for disingenuousness and hypocrisy.

Take, for example, a certain Jeremy Corbyn. ‘I am horrified by the news of multiple stabbings at a Manchester synagogue on Yom Kippur’, he posted to his 2.5million followers on X. ‘We must defend a society where people of all faiths can practise their religion in safety and peace.’ This from the man who, a few years ago, referred to the genocidal anti-Semites of Hamas as his ‘friends’.

Nobody can see into Corbyn’s soul of course, if indeed he has one. But many observers found the words ‘crocodile’ and ‘tears’ coming to mind.

Which brings me to his successor. Last week, Sir Keir Starmer was basking in the adulation of Hamas after he recognised a Palestinian state without any preconditions. While this week’s Trump peace plan boxed the jihadis in, Starmer’s policy did the same to Israel.

Pro-Hamas Mob Storms Downing Street After Synagogue Attack If it had been a patriot protest, they’d all be in jail already. by Daniel Greenfield

https://www.frontpagemag.com/pro-hamas-mob-storms-downing-street-after-synagogue-attack/

After the Muslim terrorist attack at a Manchester synagogue on Yom Kippur, PM Keir Starmer made remarks claiming that he’s going to fight “antisemitic hatred”. It might have be more useful to fight Islamic terrorism, but in any case his party’s base would like to go in a very different direction.

As they showed when they showed up as a mob to protest not killing Jews.

Britain has abandoned Jews to this savagery The writing was on the wall long before the horror in Manchester. Tom Slater

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/10/02/britain-has-abandoned-jews-to-this-savagery/

Six minutes. That is all it took for Britain to descend to a new low of infamy, in which Jews are slaughtered at synagogues. A nation whose entire postwar sense of self is bound up with the fight against the Nazis – against militarised anti-Semitism – is now a place where Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar, has become stained in the blood of British Jews, brutally murdered by an assailant dressed all in black.

The attack this morning at the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation Synagogue in Crumpsall, at the heart of the Jewish community in the north of Manchester, is by turns horrific and horrifically predictable. A car rammed into congregants, a scumbag emerged and stabbed two dead, before being ‘neutralised’ by armed police as he tried to smash his way through a window, while wearing what appeared to be a suicide vest but may well have been a grotesque prop to his barbarous performance.

Words fail me. Because we have failed Jews. The horror in Crumpsall comes after years of anti-Semitism bubbling up from the depths, while the great and good did little more than spray some air freshener, offering warm words about standing with the Jewish community, while doing naff all else. In which Labour continues to prattle on about ‘Islamophobia’ or the ‘racism’ of Nigel Farage’s visa proposals, while the world’s oldest hatred has staged a barbaric comeback on our streets.

Even before 7 October in Israel – the most deadly assault on Jews since the Holocaust, two years ago this week – British Jews could see what was coming. Even before Hamas sent its killers and rapists into kibbutzim and dance parties, even before Western capitals erupted in jubilation about those apocalyptic incursions, British Jews made up 0.5 per cent of the population and a quarter of the victims of religious hate crimes. Jewish pensioners would be suckerpunched in north London. A Jewish cemetery in Kent was desecrated eight times in 10 years. Security around schools and synagogues became a grim fact of British Jewish life. Meanwhile, we had TV debates about whether it was racist for Boris Johnson to mock the burqa, or Adele to wear her hair in braids and wave a Jamaican flag during Notting Hill Carnival. It shames us.

From the League of Nations to the United Nations to Trump Global? Trump, unlike the UN, is brokering cease-fires and curbing threats by wielding U.S. power through trade, leverage, and force—favoring deals over endless wars. By Victor Davis Hanson

https://amgreatness.com/2025/10/02/from-the-league-of-nations-to-the-united-nations-to-trump-global/

Historians traditionally blame the failure of the League of Nations—the post-World War I, Versailles-era dream of President Woodrow Wilson—on many things.

Its membership was small (58 nations). The League’s utopian rhetoric lacked commensurate force.

The postwar ascendant United States refused to join.

The winners of World War I, like France and Britain, were terrified of rearming, while the losers, such as Germany and Austria, were eager to.

Consequently, the League in the mid-1930s allowed fascist powers to make a mockery of the Versailles Treaty. It could never even enforce its own embargoes and sanctions.

Without big power backup, the League soon watched the Axis powers prey on weak nations and start another world war.

In response, the post-World War II United Nations was said to have corrected the impotence of the old League.

The U.S. was now in. Indeed, the UN headquarters were to be in New York.

Almost all the nations of the world—currently 193—eventually joined.

A “Security Council” of the great powers (and former great powers) would “police” the consensus of the General Assembly of all members.

The UN would spin off a host of subordinate globalist projects, such as the World Health Organization, International Criminal Court, and World Bank, to promote peace, law, health, and profit.

Yet the UN’s 80-year record has proved as dismal as the League’s 26 years.

Only half the UN members are free societies and true democracies.

The two greatest threats to world peace—dictatorial Russia and communist China—exercise veto power in the Security Council.

Anti-Semitism is now a UN brand. So are rank corruption and profiteering.

No one expects the UN either to prevent or stop a war.

Aside from serving as a platform for national propaganda, it is increasingly both impotent and toxically anti-Western.

Qatar Must Apologize for Supporting Islamist Terrorist Groups by Khaled Abu Toameh

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21948/qatar-supporting-terrorist-groups

If anyone needs to apologize, it is Qatar, which has long been financing, hosting, and advocating for Hamas and other Islamist terror groups such as the Islamic State (ISIS) and Al-Qaeda.

Qatar, in fact, needs to apologize not only to Israel, but to several Arab countries affected by the Gulf state’s support for Islamist terror groups.

“Qatar is now known as the world’s safe haven for terrorist groups and militia leaders…. Evidence suggests that Qatar has directly armed or financed multiple Islamist groups in the region, undermining U.S. objectives in pivotal countries such as Libya, Egypt, and Syria by pushing those places toward violent extremism.” — US Representative Doug Lamborn, 2015.

Qatar is not – and never was – an impartial mediator in the Hamas-Israel war. As a longtime sponsor of the Muslim Brotherhood and other Islamist terrorist groups, Qatar’s main goal is to ensure that Hamas, possibly under a different guise, continues to play a key role in the Palestinian arena.

People who contend that Qatar might “change,” thanks to the potential incentives of the Abraham Accords, appear afflicted with the same illusions as those who fantasize that the Palestinian Authority will reform. Sadly, the self-interested statements by French President Emmanuel Macron, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese have encouraged the terrorists and their sponsors to have renewed hope that they finally might be able to get rid of Israel, after all.

In its perennial role as both the “arsonist and the firefighter,” as with the Taliban in Afghanistan, there is every reason to assume — unless someone emphatically stops them — that Qatar will set about surreptitiously creating a “Hamas, the Sequel” the minute the weather improves.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has reportedly “apologized” to his Qatari counterpart for violating the Gulf state’s sovereignty in Israel’s September 9 strike against Hamas leaders in Doha. The alleged apology took place in a September 29 phone call arranged by US President Donald J. Trump.

If anyone needs to apologize, it is Qatar, which has long been financing, hosting, and advocating for Hamas and other Islamist terror groups such as the Islamic State (ISIS) and Al-Qaeda.

President Trump Gives the Globalists Another Lesson – But More Are Needed The bad ideas that spawned the UN are deeply entrenched in the West. by Bruce Thornton

https://www.frontpagemag.com/president-trump-gives-the-globalists-another-lesson-but-more-are-needed/

Donald Trump’s address to the UN once again has challenged the failing bloated institution, especially when its damage to our country and its Constitutional order by allowing globalist elites to chip away at our sovereignty in order to serve the “international community” of the “new world order” globalist elites. Much of our foreign policy errors and crises spring from the near century of the UN’s bad ideas and feckless idealism.

Wielding his signature straight talk, Trump delivered a much-needed home truth: “What is the purpose of the United Nations?” he asked, and quickly answered, “For the most part, at least for now, all they seem to do is write a really strongly worded letter and then never follow that letter up. It’s empty words, and empty words don’t solve wars.”

In other words, a typical hypertrophied bureaucracy riddled with professional deformation––the chronic abuse that served the institution and its treasonous clerks rather than the alleged purpose for which it was created and financed–– mostly by U.S. taxpayers.

Greed and ambition we’ll have with us always, but the bad ideas that spawned the UN are deeply entrenched in the West. The seed idealistic globalism began with Immanuel Kant’s “Perpetual Peace” in 1795. In it, Kant imagined innovations like a “federation of free states” that could form a “pacific alliance” that would “forever terminate all wars.” Kant understood that the world of his times was not yet ready for such a dream, but he believed that “the uniformity of the progress of the human mind” would reach such a goal.

During the following century the growth of new technologies and global trade seemingly promised a global “harmony of interests,” yet also more lethal and destructive wars too devastating and costly for business, giving impetus to Kant’s ambitious vision. By the outbreak of World War I, numerous downpayments on Kant’s dream had produced multilateral agreements, conventions, and treaties aimed at “establishing and securing international peace by placing it upon a foundation of international understanding, international appreciation, and international cooperation,” as Nicholas Murray Butler said in 1932.

Before then, agreements like the three Geneva Conventions (1864, 1906, 1929) had established collective laws for the humane treatment of the sick and wounded in battle, and later for prisoners. The Hague Conventions had similar ambitions. The first (1899) called for an international Court of Arbitration, and restrictions on aerial bombardment and the use of poison gas. The second (1907) convention expanded restrictions to naval warfare practice and armaments, as well as other changes to slowing down what host Tsar Nicholas II called the “accelerating arms race” that was “transforming armed peace into crushing burdens that weighs on all nations and, if prolonged, will lead to the very cataclysm it seeks to avert.”

Britain’s Most Shameful Hour Since Before World War II Rivaling in its immorality and stupidity Chamberlain’s betrayal of Czechoslovakia in 1938. by Hugh Fitzgerald Leave a Comment

https://www.frontpagemag.com/britains-most-shameful-hour-since-before-world-war-ii/

Now Keir Starmer has gone and done it: he’s broken with decades of his country’s foreign policy and, in synchronicity with two other appalling leaders, Mark Carney of Canada and Anthony Albanese of Australia, who have made the same announcement at the same time, has announced his country’s recognition of a “state of Palestine.”

Starmer hasn’t offered any hint as to the borders of this new state, nor explained why he thinks the 3,500-year history of the Jews in Judea and Samaria (which is where most of that new state would be located) should be ignored, or why he thinks he can simply forget about the League of Nations’ Mandate for Palestine, that in 1922 assigned all the territory “from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea” to be included in the area subject to the Palestinian Mandate, which would in time become the Jewish state of Israel. Nor has he shown any awareness of UN Security Council Resolution 242 — written largely by the British representative to the U.N. Lord Caradon — which allowed Israel to retain territory it won in the Six-Day War that it deemed necessary to hold onto if it was to have “secure and recognized borders.”

Nor has Keir Starmer said anything about what would happen, in this “state of Palestine,” to the 500,000 Israelis who have been living in Judea and Samaria for decades, or to the 200,000 Israelis now living in east Jerusalem, all three areas having been claimed by the most “moderate” of Palestinians to become part of their state. The non-moderates, of course, lay claim to all of the land “from the river to the sea,” by which they mean the disappearance of Israel, the expulsion or killing of all of its Jewish inhabitants, and its replacement by a twenty-third Arab state.

Jake Wallis Simons casts a cold eye on Keir Starmer’s betrayal of an ally here: “Starmer’s shame,” Jake Wallis Simons, September 21, 2025:

…Polling published yesterday revealed that 90 per cent of Britons thought it a bad idea, and for once the majority view is the right one. For evidence of this, one need look no further than Hamas, which has responded with unbridled glee and has wholeheartedly congratulated Starmer.