Displaying posts categorized under

MEDIA

The Media’s Sins of Omission Are Getting Worse By Becket Adams

https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/09/the-media-sins-of-omission-are-getting-worse/

NBC botches the coverage of a ‘Free Palestine’ shooter and an ICE encounter.

There’s a real problem in the media industry with reporters who prefer not to report.

Just as bad are the reporters who don’t know how to report.

These are issues we’ve covered in the past, but things aren’t getting any better. If anything, they’re getting worse.

Consider, for example, NBC News’ tortured handling last week of a deadly shooting at a wedding reception in New Hampshire.

The relevant facts, which were known at the time of NBC’s coverage, are that the alleged gunman, 23-year-old Hunter Nadeau, shot and killed one wedding-goer, 59-year-old Robert Steven DeCesare, and injured two others.

Just before opening fire on the wedding party, Nadeau reportedly said, “The children were safe,” and then shouted, “Free Palestine!”

Yet, as was first brought to my attention by Charlie Cooke, NBC practically had to be bullied into acknowledging accounts of the gunman’s reported words.

The shooting occurred on September 20 at roughly 9 p.m. By midnight, a local ABC News affiliate, WMUR, published an eyewitness account that claimed Nadeau had shouted, “Free Palestine!”

British tabloids were not far behind.

Bill Maher says to bring back ‘old America,’ the left must tone down their radical progressivism ‘Real Time’ host listed issues from men in women’s sports to immigration that damage party’s reputation with average Americans By Marc Tamasco

https://www.foxnews.com/media/bill-maher-says-bring-back-old-america-left-must-tone-down-radical-progressivism

On Friday’s episode of “Real Time with Bill Maher,” host Bill Maher argued that to get back to what he called “old America,” Democrats must scale back their more radically progressive ideology.

“If we are ever going to get back to the old America, that’s got to be the Democrats’ part of the bargain. Stop coming up with radically new and often terrible ideas and then, in the next breath, insist there be no debate about any of it,” Maher said.

The “Real Time” host began the segment by criticizing some Democrats’ support for men competing in women’s sports, adding that there’s “a lot of stuff like that on the left.”

“And when conservatives see it, they say, ‘I’m sorry. We’re just not going to go along with reinventing society, often pointlessly, even if we have to cancel democracy to do it,'” he said.

Maher continued, firing off a list of issues he argued are damaging the Democratic Party’s reputation with the average American.

“Transing kids by self-diagnosis with no age limit, no parental notification, and no acknowledgment of social contagion. Not doing it. Asylum now covers any reason for anyone to come to America. Not doing it. Homelessness is a lifestyle. Natural immunity doesn’t count anymore. Whiteness is toxic. Penises in women’s prisons. Welcoming the intifada. We’re not doing it,” the late-night host railed.

Another issue Maher raised is Democrats’ unwillingness to debate these topics with Republicans, often dismissing anyone who disagrees as “bad, stupid, and deplorable.”

Charles Lipson Jimmy Kimmel is back But let the public – not the FCC – decide what to watch

https://thespectator.com/topic/jimmy-kimmel-is-back/

Jimmy Kimmel’s broadcast has made a lot more news off the air than on it. The latest is that ABC will resume the show Tuesday night and that some 400 Hollywood celebrities have signed a petition supporting their friend. Stop the presses! Today’s celebrities support leftist politics! So does ABC’s corporate parent, Disney, the folks who lost a fortune by remaking Snow White as a progressive wet dream.

It would be a cruel joke to add, “If another 53 celebrity’s sign up to support Kimmel, his audience will double.” Actually, he will get a lot of viewers on his first night back. After that, viewers will remember why they didn’t watch.

The joke about Kimmel’s small audience may be cruel, but it captures two points. One is that Kimmel’s audience, like that of his mainstream peers, is a shriveled replica of Johnny Carson’s huge numbers. The second is that celebrity culture, represented by those 400 signatures, is badly out-of-touch with a broad swath of the American public and clueless about the most important lesson in marketing: don’t insult your audience. When you do that, the audience walks away, as they have from Miller Lite beer, Jaguar cars, and Cracker Barrel restaurants.

It’s even dumber to alienate your viewing audience when the media environment is as tough as it is today. With the internet and stream content, the market has grown more and more fragmented. As it has, the profitability of late-night shows has shrunk. Their traditional format has also grown stale. After the host finishes a short monologue, he sits behind a desk and talks with one guest at a time. The guests are familiar faces, fresh from Botox, promoting their latest ventures.

With this reduced viewership and dull format comes reduced profitability. The only winner has been a show with a different format and a different political angle. Fox News’ Greg Gutfeld is funny and snarky, but he never takes himself too seriously. He sits in a circle of chairs, talking with a group of guests, some of them regulars, some new for that episode. The goal, which has been wildly successful, is to draw in younger, more conservative viewers, who already like Fox News, and, according to polling, are shifting from Democrat to Republican.

Gutfeld, unlike Jimmy Kimmel and Stephen Colbert, is performing on a conservative cable channel, not a mainstream network meant to appeal to all viewpoints across a wide demographic. Kimmel and Colbert seem to have missed the point, turning their mainstream broadcast slots into tendentious political platforms, mimicking MSNBC and CNN just as those cable networks were imploding.

Kimmel and Colbert’s decision to alienate half their potential audience is far different from the older, blander days of late-night talk shows, when the hosts poked gentle fun at both sides. Their goal was to appeal to the Upper Midwest as well as the Upper East Side and to provide calming entertainment to a broad national audience as they eased into bedtime. It’s not rocket science, and they knew it.

No one understood this logic better than Johnny Carson, by-far the most successful late-night host of all time. “Tell me the last time that Jack Benny, Red Skelton, any comedian, used his show to do serious issues. That’s not what I’m there for. Can’t they see that?” he told CBS’ Mike Wallace in 1979. “It’s a real danger. Once you start that, you start to get that self-important feeling.”

The Left’s Reaction to Jimmy Kimmel’s Firing Is Funnier Than He Ever Was

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/09/22/the-lefts-reaction-to-jimmy-kimmels-firing-is-funnier-than-he-ever-was/

It’s been amusing to watch the left’s reaction to ABC giving the boot to Jimmy Kimmel.

Not because of their rank hypocrisy when it comes to censorship. Or their claim that firing a low-rated late-night “comic” means “authoritarianism has arrived.” Or the fact that they are far more outraged that Kimmel lost his time slot than that Charlie Kirk lost his life over things they said.

What’s most amusing is how blissfully ignorant they are about how the news and entertainment industry works these days.

First, let’s dispense with the censorship ruse. ABC is a private company and is entitled to hire or fire whomever it wants. Networks do this all the time, usually without a peep of protest.

Last year, CBS fired veteran reporter Catherine Herridge – and seized her belongings – for unknown reasons. (She’d been investigating the Hunter Biden laptop scandal.) Also in 2024, NBC News fired former Republican National Committee chair Ronna McDaniel shortly after hiring her as a commentator. There was no handwringing about the death of democracy.

If Kimmel’s ratings hadn’t been in the toilet, the network might have been willing to put up with his flagrant lying about Kirk’s alleged assassin, and his plan to double down on that lie the next night. ABC decided he wasn’t worth the hassle.

The ghoulish dishonesty of Jimmy Kimmel Liberal America is finally waking up to the cruelty of cancel culture. Jenny Holland

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/09/20/the-ghoulish-dishonesty-of-jimmy-kimmel/

If you hear a strange, high-pitched screeching sound blowing in from the west on the salty Atlantic winds, it’s probably the keening of Blue America. Spare a thought for these souls – they are collectively finding out what it feels like to be on the receiving end of cancel culture. Turns out, it doesn’t feel great.

The most significant example of this new front in the culture war has been ABC’s decision on Wednesday to suspend late-night talkshow Jimmy Kimmel Live! ‘indefinitely’. On Monday night’s show, Kimmel had made false comments about the supposed Republican leanings of Tyler Robinson, the man alleged to have killed Charlie Kirk. Brendan Carr, the chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which licenses TV stations, said Kimmel had ‘directly misled the American public’. He also suggested that unless ABC ‘can find ways to change conduct to take action, frankly, on Kimmel… there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead’. This barely concealed threat seems to have prompted ABC’s decision to take Kimmel off air.

There were also market factors at play. According to the Wall Street Journal, the move came after executives at Sinclair and Nexstar, owners of more than 60 local ABC stations, told ABC management that they did not want to carry the show after Carr’s comments. This will have caused a major headache for ABC and its parent company, Disney.

The Kimmel cancellation perfectly captures how deeply divided America has become. Sinclair and Nexstar, corporations that own the local channels in flyover states, effectively broadcast to folks in America’s blue-collar heartlands. Their Kimmel decision shows that people in those states are done with being slandered and attacked by ultra-wealthy, talentless clowns who have long since stopped entertaining.

Lies, Damned Lies, And Leftist Media Lies About An Assassin

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/09/19/lies-damned-lies-and-leftist-media-lies-about-an-assassin/

Given the national anguish and pain over the assassination of Charlie Kirk, you might think that the leftist big media would at least be treading softly right now, especially given the overwhelming evidence that’s already been made public about Kirk’s alleged assassin. But you would be wrong.

We’ve already addressed the lies and exaggerations told about Kirk to somehow justify his murder. Now the left is trying to come up with a counter-narrative about his assassin. Kirk wasn’t murdered by an unhinged leftist; he was killed by a MAGA adherent. It’s a lie on stilts.

Let’s start with what we know:

Tyler Robinson, the 22-year-old accused assassin, had a deep hatred for Kirk, apparently for his muscular Christian beliefs and his espousal of traditional family values.

We also know that Robinson plotted for a week. Premeditated, cold-blooded.

He inscribed bullets with obscure gamer verbiage and extreme-left shibboleths, like “Hey, fascist, catch!” Sound like a right-winger to you?

His parents, while themselves conservative. told the police that their son had adopted far-left beliefs in the past few years. Would they lie about that?

A relative said the following: “He hates conservatives and Christians,” the relative said. “He hated us. He was not raised that way, but he, over the years, has become really detached (and) been radicalized.”

There are, in fact, no indications whatsoever that Robinson was, as popular leftist substack writer Heather Cox Richardson (hat tip: Dylan on X) falsely described him: “a young white man from a Republican, gun-enthusiast family, who appears to have embraced the far right, disliking Kirk for being insufficiently radical.”

ABC pulls ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ indefinitely after offensive Charlie Kirk comments By Connor Surmonte and Victor Nava

https://nypost.com/2025/09/17/entertainment/abc-pulls-jimmy-kimmel-live-indefinitely-after-charlie-kirk-comments/

Jimmy Kimmel is taking an involuntary hiatus.

ABC said it is pulling the comedian’s late-night talk show off the air “indefinitely” following his controversial comments about the killing of Charlie Kirk.

“Jimmy Kimmel Live will be pre-empted indefinitely,” an ABC spokesperson confirmed to The Post Wednesday, Sept. 17.

Kimmel, 57, faced backlash after he said Monday night that the “MAGA gang” was trying to score political points off Kirk’s murder after the conservative activist was shot dead on the campus of Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah, Sept. 10.

“We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang trying to characterize this kid who killed Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them,” Kimmel said during his monologue.

Nexstar Media Group, the major broadcast company that serves as a primary affiliate for ABC, confirmed that it would “preempt” Kimmel’s program in the wake of his remarks.

“The company’s owned and partner television stations affiliated with the ABC Television Network will preempt ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ for the foreseeable future, beginning with tonight’s show,” Nexstar said in a press release.

“Nexstar strongly objects to recent comments made by Mr. Kimmel concerning the killing of Charlie Kirk and will replace the show with other programming in its ABC-affiliated markets,” it continued.

THE ABSURD CONDEMNATIONS AND DISTORTED MEDIA COVERAGE OF ISRAEL’S ATTACK ON HAMAS LEADERSHIP IN DOHA “News” and Reality Often Have Little In Common Eric Levine

https://ericlevine3.substack.com/p/the-absurd-condemnations-and-distorted

There has been no shortage of professed outrage at Prime Minister Netanyahu’s decision to attack Hamas leadership in Doha, Qatar. The more one parses through the criticism, the more one becomes convinced the decision to kill the 5-star-hotel-dwelling, jacuzzi-enthusiast terrorists was not just morally justified, but tactically brilliant.

Many critics on the radical progressive antisemitic left believe Israel has no right to exist as a Jewish State and therefore, has no right to defend itself. These voices are rightly ignored.

Equally irrelevant, however, are those, who like the Biden Administration, believe Israel has a right to exist as a Jewish State, but just as a matter of principal think it should never take an offensive posture in defending itself. For them, Israel has every right to protect its citizens but, unlike every other country in the world, should limit its defense to preventing ballistic missiles from falling on its cities. Of course, this strategy allows the terrorists to live and fight another day and ensures an October 7th like attack will occur again.

The alleged more nuanced criticism of the attack in Qatar is that it will make diplomacy with the Gulf Arab States and the expansion of the Abraham Accords more difficult, if not impossible. If this is the best argument critics can muster, Netanyahu clearly made the right call.

A “news article” in the September 12 edition of Wall Street Journal, written by Jared Malsin, Summer Said and Benoit Faucon, reported:

“The attack in a quiet embassy district of Doha, which killed several Hamas officials and a member of the Qatari security forces, punctuated an already growing realization that Israel has made a strategic decision to secure itself through force of arms even at the expense of its diplomatic ties…”

This purported piece of “news” is absurd on its face.

The Trump Trap If you make everything about Donald Trump, as the press has for ten years, the simplest headlines quickly become tortured Matt Taibbi

https://www.racket.news/p/the-trump-trap

A brief note on headlines inspired by the Charlotte murder of 23-year-old Iryna Zarutska: “A Gruesome Murder in North Carolina Ignites a Firestorm on the Right” by the New York Times, and “How the lives of a Ukrainian refugee and a Charlotte man with a criminal history converged in a fatal stabbing,” by CNN:

When you cover everything in the world through the lens of Donald Trump, and Trump must not only always be wrong but the avatar of ultimate evil, outlets like the Times and CNN are forced forever to find opposing angles to anything he criticizes. A horrific murder can’t just be that, but an “accelerant for conservative arguments about the perceived failings of Democratic policies.” CNN’s account was like the screenplay to Crash, about how “the paths of two people fatally converged,” culminating in an act “decried by the Trump administration and conservative politicians as an example of the violent crime they say plagues many Democrat-led cities.”

Forget about attacker Decarlos Brown’s mental health, these stories (and others, like the Axios report “Stabbing Fuels MAGA’s crime message” and Brian Stelter’s bizarre outburst about the reaction being “baldly racist”) show the press is in the grip of severe monomania and madness. Nothing exists outside of Trump, the subject of every line of every story. Incredible, and unsettling, to watch.

MSNBC Apologizes for Pundit’s ‘Inappropriate, Insensitive’ Remarks About Charlie Kirk By Haley Strack

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/msnbc-apologizes-for-pundits-inappropriate-insensitive-remarks-about-charlie-kirk/?utm_source=recirc-desktop&utm_medium=homepage&utm_campaign=hero&utm_content=related&utm_term=first

MSNBC has apologized for “inappropriate, insensitive” comments made on air about Charlie Kirk in the immediate aftermath of his assassination.

During a segment with Katy Tur, guest Matthew Dowd called Kirk one of the most “divisive” figures who “is constantly pushing hate speech.”

“Hateful thoughts lead to hateful words which then lead to hateful actions,” Dowd said. (He also said, before Kirk’s death was confirmed, “We don’t know any of the full details of this yet — we don’t know if this was a supporter shooting their gun off in celebration.”)

On Wednesday evening, MSNBC president Rebecca Kutler issued a statement condemning his comments:

During our breaking news coverage of the shooting of Charlie Kirk, Matthew Dowd made comments that were inappropriate, insensitive and unacceptable. We apologize for his statements, as has he. There is no place for violence in America, political or otherwise.

Dowd’s statement, though, was hardly the only troublesome treatment of the Charlie Kirk shooting in the media. Even Tur’s comments were out of place: She worried on air that the Trump administration would use Kirk’s assassination as “justification” for further crackdowns on crime. “After one of the DOGE employees was allegedly attacked in Washington, D.C., that’s what Donald Trump used as justification to send federal troops into Washington, D.C., to get things under control — the carjacking situation, he used that. And I know it’s hard to predict the future, but you can imagine the administration using this as a justification for something,” she said.

Charlie Kirk was at Utah Valley University on Wednesday as part of his American Comeback campus tour. Kirk set up a table, as he does at his campus events, and invited students to come forward, ask questions, and prove his opinions wrong. The hellish tragedy that then unfolded was caught on video: Kirk was asked a question about transgender shooters, and when he began to answer, he was shot in the neck.

Democrats, Republicans, media pundits, and the hundreds of thousands of Kirk’s followers who watched the scene have, for the most part, been unified in condemning the attack. But some directed their ire at the wrong target.

Illinois Governor JB Pritzker said in response to Kirk’s murder that Donald Trump’s rhetoric has “fomented” political violence and that January 6 “tripped a new era” of political violence.

A New York Times obituary (“Charlie Kirk Right-Wing Force and a Close Trump Ally, Dies at 31”) of Kirk called him “a fixture in the Trumpian media sphere” who “tweeted relentlessly with a brash right-wing spin, including inflammatory comments about Jewish, gay and Black people. Even some conservatives found his approach distasteful.”