Displaying posts categorized under

MEDIA

Jenny Holland Why the media ignored the North Carolina train murder 10th September 2025 A toxic empathy with miscreants and ‘victim’ groups has wrecked liberals’ moral compass. Jenny Holland

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/09/10/why-the-media-ignored-the-north-carolina-train-murder/

A brutal murder on a train in Charlotte, North Carolina has shocked social-media users – but only, it seems, those on the right. And that is because, despite the horrific video of the attack on a defenceless young woman going viral, much of the mainstream American media did not deign to cover the story.

Why? I submit it is because the perpetrator – a homeless, mentally ill, African American man with a history of repeat offending – belongs to one of the liberal media’s victim-identity groups. He is therefore beyond criticism – or, at the very least, an awkward case to discuss, given he may well have been roaming the streets because of the witless, soft-on-crime policies of today’s liberals. Indeed, in January, a North Carolina magistrate judge allowed Brown to remain free ‘on a written promise’ that he would return for his next court appearance, according to the Daily Mail.

The footage recorded on 22 August shows Iryna Zarutska boarding a train in Charlotte, after finishing a shift at the pizzeria where she worked. She takes a seat in front of a man identified as Decarlos Brown Jr. Moments later, he takes out a knife, stands up behind her and raises his arm to attack, as she sits with her back to him, completely unaware. After he stabs her, Brown is then shown walking down the aisle of the train, leaving a trail of blood as he goes. Zarutska died at the scene. She was 23 years old, and had fled Ukraine for safety in the US after the Russian invasion in 2022.

Zarutska’s terrible and senseless murder has further revealed just how divided the US is. Liberal progressives and conservative right-wingers are now not just politically alienated from one another – they also live in two separate realities, with worldviews that are fed by two entirely different news ecosystems. As many, including Elon Musk, have commented on X, the lack of coverage in the national papers stood in stark contrast to their feverish reporting on similar incidents in which the victim was black.

After days of social-media commentary, some mainstream outlets did decide to cover the reaction to the event – but not the event itself. They effectively dismissed the actual murder as a crime story of local interest only.

N.Y. Times Admits: Hamas Lies by Rafael Medoff

https://jewishjournal.com/commentary/opinion/383577/n-y-times-admits-hamas-lies/

So Hamas does lie, after all.

    Reporting on Israel’s elimination of another senior Hamas terrorist in Gaza on September 1, the Times noted, in the article’s second paragraph: “Hamas has rarely acknowledged the deaths of its leaders in real time, often taking weeks or months to concede their demise.”

    Weeks or months! The Times is, in effect, admitting that for weeks or months at a time, Hamas spokesmen lie—claiming that one or another of its leaders is alive, when in fact they’re dead.

    But how, then, does one explain this sentence in the thirteenth paragraph of the very same news article: “More than 60,000 people, including thousands of children, have been killed by the Israeli campaign in Gaza, according to local health officials…”

    The so-called “local health officials” are, in fact, officials of Hamas’s own Health Ministry. They serve an international terrorist organization, which is a crucially important fact because it goes to the question of their credibility as sources of information.

    Terrorist organizations routinely lie to the news media. They believe that telling lies is justified in order to advance their cause. A terrorist group that is in the midst of active warfare has even more incentive to lie, because its lies help stoke international pressure on the enemy.

    In the case of Gaza, the terrorist spokesmen have even less credibility (if that’s possible), because their lies already have been exposed, repeatedly, in this war. To cite just one example, Hamas told the international news media on October 17, 2023, that Israel bombed the Al-Ahli Hospital in Gaza City, killing 471 people and wounding 342. Major media outlets dutifully reported that claim.

    A few days later, however, the truth came out, and even the New York Times admitted it: The explosion was caused by a misfired Palestinian Islamic Jihad rocket, not an Israeli air strike. The area that was struck was not the hospital, but an adjacent parking lot. And the actual number of dead at Al-Ahli was in the dozens, not the hundreds.

    If that episode was not enough to make one doubt the reliability of Hamas’s numbers, one should consider the fact that Hamas spokesmen routinely describe the Holocaust as a hoax. How can anything that comes from the mouth of a Holocaust denier be considered reliable? 

    Moreover, Article 32 of the official Hamas Charter cites The Protocols of the Elders of Zion as proof that there is a global Jewish conspiracy. How can any claim made by antisemitic conspiracy lunatics be considered truthful?

    Yet the New York Times still parrots Hamas’s casualty figures in Gaza—even in an article which elsewhere acknowledges that Hamas lies about the deaths of its leaders. What explains the decision by the Times and other media outlets to believe Hamas?

Despite Nasty Media Coverage, Voters Still Give Trump Solid Grades For His Leadership: I&I/TIPP Poll Terry Jones

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/09/03/despite-nasty-media-coverage-voters-still-give-trump-solid-grades-for-his-leadership-ii-tipp-poll/

With ongoing efforts to halt the Russia-Ukraine war, interest-rate fights with the Fed, and continued talks over tariffs, among other things, President Donald Trump is one of the busiest chief executives ever. But how’s he doing? Republicans like his leadership, but Democrats don’t, and independents are lukewarm, the latest I&I/TIPP Poll shows.

Each month, I&I/TIPP asks the following question about Trump’s leadership: “Overall, is your opinion of Donald Trump generally favorable, generally unfavorable, or are you not familiar enough to say one way or the other?”

In September’s national online I&I/TIPP Poll, taken from Aug. 27-29 by 1,362 adults, 43% of Americans described Trump’s leadership as favorable, while another 47% called it unfavorable. Another 10% said they were either “not familiar enough to say” (6%) or “not sure” (4%).

The poll has a margin of error of +/-2.9 percentage points.

But the responses were, as often, politically fragmented.

Republicans, for instance, gave Trump 78% favorability, just 15% unfavorable. Democrats were almost perfectly opposite: 16% favorable, 78% unfavorable. Independents were again in between (but still negative) at 31% favorable, 53% unfavorable.

The New York Times: Still Dishonest After All These Years Why does so much of the world still fall for manipulated news? by Jeff Davidson

https://www.frontpagemag.com/the-new-york-times-still-dishonest-after-all-these-years/

The New York Times recently published an article and an accompanying picture showing a child so emaciated that his spine is rippling through the back of his skin. The article claimed that Israel intentionally is starving Palestinians, particularly Palestinian children.

In truth, the young child had a pre-existing condition, apparently cerebal palsy. This was unrelated to the conflict with Israel. Curiously, the boy’s mother and brother were of normal weight and appeared healthy. The Times subsequently had to admit the “error.”

No Concern for Truth

Here is the part that they chose to ignore: Israelis have prepared hundreds of thousands of meals for Palestinians who are caught in the treacherous combat between Israel and Hamas. Did the Times deign to report on that, or simply offer more lies? Hamas steals food and supplies and, when Palestinians attempt to flee, Hamas shoots them and then blames Israel.

If Times editors had any dignity they’d strive to publish accurate articles, especially after deceiving America and the world for four years about the health and capabilities of Joe Biden. They’d feel ashamed about perpetually pushing the Trump ‘Russiagate story’ that has been thoroughly disproven.

Alas, Times editors have no concern about whether or not they’re being truthful, except when they’re caught. Compare, for instance, their treatment of the presidential offspring. The Times forsook countless possible stories on the veracity of Hunter Biden’s laptop, drug abuse, virulent racism, sexual escapades, pay-for-play schemes, and shady deals. Any Trump offspring involved in 1% of Hunter’s transgressions would yield endless coverage.

Terror at the Top 

In the last 95 years has anything changed at the alleged newspaper of record? In 1932 and 1933, the Joseph Stalin-loving Times deliberately buried the news of the “Terror-Famine,” which killed at least 3.9 million Ukrainians, but perhaps as many as 7.0 million, equal to one in eight Ukrainians, or possibly one in four.

Gaza Part Two: The Global Political Fallout Western elites, from academia to media, keep amplifying Hamas propaganda—fueling unrest abroad and eroding their own nations’ credibility. By Thaddeus G. McCotter and Andrew Zack

https://amgreatness.com/2025/08/23/gaza-part-two-the-global-political-fallout/

This is the second installment of a three-part series on the Gaza situation, political fallout, root causes, and real-world ramifications.

The United States and the European Union have rightly designated Hamas a terrorist organization. Yet one would be hard-pressed to know it, given the global political fallout regarding Gaza.

Literally, the day after Hamas invaded Israel—killing, raping, and kidnapping innocent civilians—and weeks before Israel counterattacked, there were pro-Hamas demonstrations throughout the United States and Europe. Some Hamas supporters denied outright that the designated terrorist organization had committed their atrocities, claiming it was all fabricated Israeli propaganda. Still, other Hamas supporters accepted that Hamas had committed the terrorist atrocities but argued they were justified by Israel’s purported “occupation” of Gaza. Both sets of Hamas supporters tendentiously alleged Israel was a genocidal, racist Western colonial power oppressing “people of color,” i.e., the Palestinians.

In the U.S., pro-Hamas activists took over parts of many American college campuses, denouncing Israel and chanting “from the river to the sea, Palestine must be free” and “globalize the intifada.” Both slogans are barely disguised demands that Israel be destroyed and its Jewish citizens be expelled or, more likely, slaughtered. Pro-Hamas supporters also chant them to seek to instill fear and intimidate Israel’s supporters, especially American Jews, into silence. Pro-Hamas supporters assaulted American Jews, notably by physically harassing students. College administrations, many of whom are sympathetic to Hamas and its aims, did nothing to quell these acts. Nor did the Biden administration. Seeing no pushback to end the intimidation and abuse of Israel’s supporters, in particular, and Jews, in general, professional associations took it as a green light to demand a U.S. boycott of Israel (along the lines of their continued Boycott, Divest, and Sanction campaign), and, yes, to continue to make American Jews feel unwelcome.

Such assaults and batteries against Jews are not limited to the United States. Antisemitism in Europe, already rising before Hamas attacked Israel, has sharply increased. Israelis have been assaulted in Europe, including the pogrom against Jews in Amsterdam earlier this year. Jewish restaurants in Europe (and the U.S.) have been damaged, and their patrons have been harassed. Israeli cruise ships have been prevented from landing at European ports by gangs of pro-Hamas demonstrators. Predatory acts against Israelis and Jews seemingly abound worldwide with apparent impunity and abetment.

Christopher F. Rufo The New Yorker’s Racialism Problem Prestige media has turned “antiracism” into a farce. It’s time to move beyond it.

https://www.city-journal.org/article/new-yorker-doreen-st-felix-sydney-sweeney

It seems that all of the conventional opinion of America’s chattering class is condensed and printed once a week in the pages of the New Yorker. In normal times, this process yields some good writing and reporting. In certain periods, the magazine has produced some magnificent work. But we have not lived in normal times for the past decade. The conventional opinions of the chattering classes have ranged from delusional idealism to racialist fever dreams, and worse.

The most recent illustration of this trend is an essay by New Yorker staff writer Doreen St. Felix, who penned a screed about the blonde starlet Sydney Sweeney. Sweeney, St. Felix mused, represents a fantasy “Aryan princess” to some of her fans, with her much-discussed breasts placed in dark contrast with “the Black man’s hunger for ass.”

This is not the New Yorker of the past; it is something different. What is it, exactly? Beginning a decade ago, the New Yorker, like many of its peers, jumped on the “diversity and inclusion” bandwagon and declared itself an “anti-racist” institution. The magazine, owned by Condé Nast, set explicit racial quotas in hiring and pledged to “talk about racism” at every opportunity.

The magazine was capitulating to critical race ideologies. It snapped up writers, like St. Felix, who is black, to provide “representation” not only of favored demographic groups but also of a certain flavor of opinion.

After St. Felix’s Sweeney essay, a colleague sent me a link to one of her posts on X. “I hate white men,” the post read in part.

My Say: Pictures and Propaganda

An Allegedly Armless Lebanese Child, Wounded by Israeli Bomb, Actually Has Both Arms Intact August 23, 1982

The difference today is that President Donald Trump has Israel’s back and is fighting antisemitism while Ronald Reagan turned away and abstained in the vicious UN response to Israel’s bombing  of  the Osirak nuclear research reactor being built near Baghdad. rsk

https://www.jta.org/archive/an-allegedly-armless-lebanese-child-wounded-by-israeli-bomb-actually-has-both-arms-intact

An allegedly armless child, whose picture is reportedly displayed on President Reagan’s desk as a symbol of suffering in Lebanon, turns out to be a boy, not a girl as alleged, with both arms intact. The child, identified as four-month-old Eli Massou, whose mother is 16 years old, was discharged from the hospital a few days after the picture was taken.

According to the caption accompanying the United Press International photo distributed throughout the world, it was a picture of a baby girl swathed in bandages after both arms had been blown off by a misdirected Israeli bomb. The child was seen held in the arms of a nurse.

After a news report that Reagan had publicized the picture as a symbol of suffering in the Lebanon war, the Israel medical corps started to track down the infant and the nurse holding him.

The nurse and the doctor who treated the baby were found, and sworn depositions were taken from them. The child was tracked down along with his mother in a Lebanese village where they had taken refuge after they were both released from the hospital.

According to the medical report, one of the infant’s arms was broken in a bombing raid. The arm and his face were also slightly burned. His mother was also slightly injured in the raid and his father was killed. Doctors said the child was completely swathed, as shown in the UPI photo, because that is the standard procedure of dealing with an infant whose arm has been broken to prevent unnecessary movement during medical treatment.

Photographs of the apparently now healthy baby were published in Israeli papers today. Copies have been sent to the Israel Embassy in Washington, which presumably sent a copy to the White House to replace the incorrectly-captioned picture on the President’s desk.

Another Al-Jazeera Reporter Was a Hamas Terrorist; Al-Jazeera Should Be Designated a Foreign Terrorist Organization by Bassam Tawil

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21832/al-jazeera-terrorist-organization

The television network al-Sharif worked for, Al-Jazeera (Arabic), has always served as the official mouthpiece of the Muslim Brotherhood organization and its affiliates, including Hamas.

Al Jazeera is owned by the government of Qatar, the Gulf state that has long been endorsing the Muslim Brotherhood and providing shelter for the leaders of Hamas.

A press badge or vest is not — and should not be — a shield for terrorism.

Even the BBC, widely known for its bias against Israel, has acknowledged that al-Sharif worked for Hamas.

“Hamas’s entire defense system relies on disguising its fighters—posing as health workers, journalists, or ordinary civilians. That’s their weapon. They never admit that anyone killed was a Hamas member; it’s always ‘civilians,’ as if Israel never kills Hamas fighters.” — Brother Rachid, X, August 12, 2025.

When it comes to Qatar’s Al-Jazeera, it should come as no surprise that another one of its employees has been exposed as an Islamist terrorist.

The IDF has disclosed intelligence information and countless documents found in Gaza confirming the military affiliation of six Al-Jazeera journalists with Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad…. The documents provide unequivocal proof… of the integration of Hamas terrorists within Qatar’s Al- Jazeera media network.

Al-Jazeera (Arabic) is not — and never was — a real news organization. Since its founding, the television network has been promoting radical Islam and glorifying terrorism against Israel.

As such, Al-Jazeera, like the Muslim Brotherhood, should be designated a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

Anas al-Sharif, the Palestinian “journalist” who was killed by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) this week, never concealed his affiliation with the Iran-backed Hamas terror group. Before and after his death, photos of al-Sharif continually socializing with top Hamas leaders appeared on social media platforms. Al-Sharif was also known for his public support for terrorism against Israel.

The television network al-Sharif worked for, Al-Jazeera (Arabic), has always served as the official mouthpiece of the Muslim Brotherhood organization and its affiliates, including Hamas.

The media’s Ponzi scheme of lies Al Jazeera is the Islamists’ principal weapon in the war of information to destroy Israel and the west Melanie Phillips

http://melaniephillips.substack.com

In the Gaza war, journalism has become a veritable Ponzi scheme of lies. It uses terrorists posing as journalists to tell lies, it lies about the evidence that they were terrorists and it lies about those lying about the lies.

Israel said it had conducted a targeted killing of the al Jazeera ‘‘journalist” Anas al Sharif because he was also a Hamas commander. It produced screen shots identifying al Sharif as a leader in a Hamas rocket-launching squad and member of the Nukhba force, the stormtroopers who led the depraved attack on Israelis on October 7 2023. It showed that he had joined Hamas in 2013 and even revealed his military ID number.

It further emerged that al Sharif was named in a lawsuit by American victims of October 7 against al Jazeera for providing “substantial assistance” to Hamas. The lawsuit quotes messages al Sharif posted on Telegram on October 7 as the massacre of 1200 Israelis developed. He wrote in one message:

Nine hours later and the heroes are still roaming the country, killing and capturing… God, God, how great you are.

He wrote in another:

It is a jihad, a jihad of victory and martyrdom. Allahu akbar and thank God.

Before the attack, Sharif posted photos of himself smiling alongside Hamas leaders, including the eliminated October 7 mastermind Yahya Sinwar.

None of that cut any ice with Western media outlets that vilified Israel for targeting a journalist. Instead, the media dismissed all this evidence with declarations that Israel’s claims couldn’t be verified and that it had provided “no proof”.

In other words there is simply no evidence, however overwhelming, that is allowed to challenge the foundational lie pumped out by the media echo-chamber that the Israelis are brutal killers mowing down the innocent for daring to resist.

So the media went into mourning for their slain champion of “truth”, presenting that view of al Sharif as unchallengeably correct while ignoring or rubbishing as an Israeli cover-up the evidence that he was a senior Hamas operative.

The Press Is Lying About D.C. Crime

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/08/13/the-press-is-lying-about-d-c-crime/

We’ve come to expect that no matter what President Donald Trump says or does these days, the mainstream press will rush out to say he’s wrong. So, we weren’t the least bit surprised when, after Trump said crime in the nation’s capital is out of control and called in the National Guard, news outlets immediately dismissed his claims.

But who is doing the lying here?

Crime in D.C. “is getting worse, not getting better,” Trump said. Nonsense came the chorus of press reports, with headlines such as:

“Fact check: Violent crime in DC has fallen in 2024 and 2025 after a 2023 spike” said CNN.
“Trump Takes Control of D.C. Police, Citing ‘Bloodthirsty Criminals.’ But Crime Is Down.” said the New York Times
“FACT FOCUS: Trump exaggerates, misstates facts on Washington crime” said AP

The implicit message is that Trump is making up a crime problem to flex his authoritarian muscles.

These and countless other stories all cite the same set of police department statistics showing the rate of violent crime in D.C. on the downtrend.

So, case closed, right?

Not so fast. Just a few weeks ago, the local NBC affiliate reported that:

A D.C. police commander is under investigation for allegedly making changes to crime statistics in his district.

The Metropolitan Police Department confirmed Michael Pulliam was placed on paid administrative leave in mid-May … Pulliam — the former commander of the 3rd District that patrols Adams Morgan and Columbia Heights — was placed on leave with pay and told he was under investigation for questionable changes to crime data, five law enforcement sources familiar with the investigation told News4.