RUTHFULLY YOURS

http://www.andrewbostom.org/blog/2012/06/12/mohammed-zuhdi-jassers-koran/

THE GREATLY HOPED FOR MOSLEM “REFORMATION” WILL NEVER WITHOUT UNVARNISHED TRUTH AND HONEST APPRAISAL. JASSER DISSEMBLES TOO MUCH OF THE TIME TO BE A REAL “REFORMER.”RSK

Ignorant or Deceitful Regarding the Koranic Doctrines of Jihad and Dhimmitude?

Mohammed Zuhdi Jasser has just released his first book [2] with the understated title, A Battle for the Soul of Islam: An American Muslim Patriot’s Fight to Save His Faith.

Dr. Jasser’s egomania aside, the striking disingenuousness which characterizes the book is epitomized by his summary comments [2] on the Koran which glibly dismiss multiple verses that sanction the jihad conquest of non-Muslims, including their subjugation and justified humiliation for a myriad of so-called “offenses.”

The Qur’an…is not actually a text that was written with the idea of conquering those of other faiths. Throughout the Qur’an, the debt to Christians and Jews, for their teachings and prophets, is acknowledged over and over again in their common origin from the God of Abraham.

First, Koran 3:67 and its classical exegesis (interpretation) thoroughly debunks Jasser’s uninformed or mendacious claim about ecumenical Islamic “indebtedness” to the shared Judeo-Christian ancestry of the Biblical Abraham. The seminal Koranic commentary Tafsir Al-Jalalayn [3] of Suyuti (and al-Mahalli), provides this definitive gloss on verse 3:67—notwithstanding Jasser’s ecumenical burbling—which affirms Islam’s triumphant supersessionism, vis a vis both Judaism and Christianity:

http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/13/china-owes-america-billions/?print=1 Neither President Obama nor Speaker John Boehner have said a word about the hundreds of billions of dollars that China owes America. Don’t they know about it? They arm-wrestle over the budget, the deficit and the debt ceiling, but they ignore a quick fix: get communist China to pay its debt to American citizens […]

http://www.camera.org/index.asp?x_print=1&x_context=2&x_outlet=54&x_article=2254 On Friday, June 8, 2012, The Wall Street Journal ran an op-ed by Maen Rashid Areikat, “The Time for a Palestinian State Is Now,” so replete with falsehoods that it rightly could be called a work of fiction. According to the code of ethics of the Society of Professional Journalists, “Analysis and commentary should […]

Communist Website Denounces The Glazov Gang
by Frontpagemag.com
ThePeoplesCube.com praises “comrade” Tommi Trudeau and calls Jamie Glazov, Dwight Schultz, and Nonie Darwish “capitalist running dogs.”

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/06/14/communist-website-denounces-the-glazov-gang/

http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/3104/kuwait-death-penalty-blasphemy So what should international human rights organization regard as the threat: the Quran, Quranic instructions, or the people who are just following its recommended path? Kuwaiti lawmakers have passed a legal amendment authorizing the death penalty for Muslims who curse their God or the Quran, or who defame their Prophet Mohammed or his wife. […]

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2012/06/escape_from_a_north_korean_prison_camp.html The question has been asked many times: “Why didn’t the Allies bomb the death camps or at least the railway lines leading to Auschwitz?” According to classified papers released in 1978, American and British governments knew what was happening to the Jews in Europe and ignored the pleas of rabbis and others to destroy […]

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/winston-churchill-father-of-the-anglosphere?f=must_reads

In many conservative circles, particularly in the United States, Winston Churchill is beyond criticism. Mention his errors – the Gallipoli debacle, the return to gold at the pre-1914 rate, the contracting out of domestic policy to the Left after 1940, the second premiership – and you provoke a Bateman cartoon scene.

Fair enough. Winnie got the big calls right. His popularity on the other side of the Atlantic is appropriate, for he is perhaps the supreme Anglosphere politician – apostle, champion, exemplar and historian of English-speaking unity.

What makes the Anglosphere special? I’m taken with Mark Steyn’s observation that the list of countries on the right side in both the world wars and the cold war is short, but it contains the main English-speaking democracies. What made them all pile in? Was it linguistic solidarity, anidentification with kith-and-kin? Yes, partly. But that’s not all it was. Those mighty struggles were not simply ethnic conflicts, bloodier versions of the Hutu-Tutsi wars. The Anglosphere peoples believed, because their institutions had taught them to believe, that individual liberty, limited government and the rule of law were worth preserving – with force of arms if necessary.

Churchill played a brave role in all three great twentieth century conflicts, fighting in the first, leading the democracies to victory in the second and defining the third. The transition from victorious leader to Cold Warrior can be traced to one speech, delivered on 5 March 1946 at Fulton, Missouri. That speech, the subject of a newly published book by Philip White, is remembered for this sentence:

From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic an iron curtain has descended across the Continent.

White conjures atmosphere beautifully. Here is a detailed account of the place where the speech was given, and the timbre of the times. The USSR, so recently an ally, had occupied the countries for which Britain had gone to war in the first place, and any hope that the United Nations would be a guarantor of a peaceful post-fascist world had been dashed.

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/only-if-the-wind-is-blowing I’ll bet you didn’t know that June 15th is Global Wind Day. Wind is part of the Earth’s atmosphere and, depending on whether it is blowing gently or strongly, there isn’t a darn thing anyone can do about it. Except for measuring its velocity and direction, wind like clouds remains largely a mystery to […]

The Washington Times http://www.danielpipes.org/11436/syria-intervention As the Syrian government makes increasingly desperate and vicious efforts to keep power, pleas for military intervention, more or less on the Libyan model, have become more insistent. This course is morally attractive, to be sure. But should Western states follow this counsel? I believe not. Those calls to action fall […]

A BDS Call for Disarmament in the Middle East

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/06/13/a-bds-call-for-disarmament-in-the-middle-east/print/

Editor’s note: The article below is written by Dr. Richard Cravatts, the author of Genocidal Liberalism: The University’s Jihad Against Israel & Jews, a book published by the David Horowitz Freedom Center. To order a copy, click here.

The eleventh-hour June 5th vote by Arizona State University’s student government to divest holdings in targeted companies that supply military equipment to Israel is part of a troubling trend that exposes dangerous radicalism on campuses by BDS proponents, disguised as an effort to achieve social justice for the Palestinians. In May, for instance, the student government at University of Massachusetts, Boston voted on a similar resolution to demand “that the UMass Foundation, Inc. divest its funds from Boeing Company and other entities that perpetuate and profit from war crimes and/or human rights violations,” those illegal acts, naturally, being perpetrated by Israel.

In November of 2011, the New York University chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine, in the same ideological vein, submitted an “Open Letter to TIAA-CREF CEO and President Roger W. Ferguson from NYU Faculty and Staff,” signed by over 70 members of the NYU community, which had as its purpose “to pressure TIAA-CREF into divesting its holdings in 5 key companies which profit from the illegal Israeli occupation and oppression of the Palestinians.” The effort signaled a shift in the tactics of the BDS movement away from simply boycotting academics, theatre groups, or humus, and instead attempting to strip Israel of its ability to defend itself, militarily, from those foes who are clearly more concerned with the extirpation of the Jewish state than they are with Palestinian human rights and nationhood.