24/7 LATEST NEWS AND BUZZ

Army’s Medevac chopper policy in need of revision
Michael Yon Online
Saturday, February 11, 2012
Commentary
Going unarmed into combat is a bad idea. Going unarmed while wearing a Red Cross to alert the enemy that you are defenseless is dumb. A commander who forces his troops to do this without good cause is at best incompetent. Read more…

Read more at: http://times247.com/

Inside the Beltway: Gingrich gets a ‘dream team’
Jennifer Harper
Newt Gingrich is not done yet, despite gleeful pronouncements by pundits and foes who insist the Republican presidential hopeful is finished, kaput, washed up. As the campaign trail looms in a post-CPAC world, the nimble Mr. Gingrich has assembled a powerful, familiar and possibly remarkable group to see him along the increasingly steep and rocky way. Read more…

Palin still not sold on Romney’s conservatism
Ben Wolfgang
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin on Sunday again questioned Mitt Romney’s conservative credentials but said the Republican presidential front-runner remains in the lead because he’s “a great candidate.” Read more…

Read more at: http://times247.com/

DAVID SINGER: UPDATE ON PETITION TO DEFUND UNESCO….PLEASE READ

http://daphneanson.blogspot.com/
In his latest article (entitled “UNESCO On The Nose”) via the antipodean J-Wire service, Sydney lawyer and international affairs analyst David Singer pinpoints five main reasons for opposition to his petition from some perhaps unexpected quarters, and urges a rethink on the part of those who have proved reluctant to sign. He also draws attention to a group he has set up on Facebook, called “Help Restore UNESCO’s Funding” and urges readers to join.

Writes David Singer:

‘UNESCO seems set to preside over a looming global humanitarian crisis as it continues to struggle in its efforts to cope with the loss of $260 million – 22% of its projected budget – until the end of 2013.
Trying to make up the shortfall – including lobbying America and Israel to resume the payment of their dues and establishing an Emergency Fund to solicit donations from its other 193 member states and the public at large – have clearly failed so far.

UNESCO‘s finds itself in this sorry situation because of its decision to admit “Palestine“ as its 195th Member State on 31 October last.

In an effort to recoup the shortfall – I have proposed to UNESCO that it approach the International Court of Justice for an advisory opinion on whether the requirements of UNESCO’s Constitution were satisfied in admitting “Palestine”.

If the Court rules that the provisions of the Constitution were complied with – then this avenue as a means of recouping the $260 million would be closed – but the provisions of the Constitution would have been judicially interpreted to prevent a repeat of the current controversy when dealing with other applications to join UNESCO in the future.

If however the Court found the decision to be unconstitutional – then the $260 million would start to flow into UNESCO’s coffers immediately and the emerging global crisis impacting on scores of millions of people world wide would be averted.

Faced with continuing UNESCO resistance to discuss my detailed submission to it on 1 December last – I started an online petition on 1 January seeking public support for this proposal – which has so far attracted more than 1000 signatures from people in 26 countries. Please also sign it if you agree with the views expressed in this article.

What has been surprising – and very disturbing – has been the opposition expressed to signing my petition – which I have been able to attribute to five main reasons gleaned from the responses received so far to my proposal:

* Some have expressed their utter contempt for UNESCO and its continued existence – suggesting it has become ineffectual and politicized and should be shut down.
They delight in the financial difficulties being faced by UNESCO – which they see as a self-serving organization that exists to feed an over bloated bureaucracy of overpaid and well travelled employees – rather than spending its budget on helping the hundreds of millions of people world wide who are crying out for some hope to relieve their distressing lives.

* Some Americans are supportive of their country’s decision to stop the payment of its financial dues – automatically suspended as a result of an American law dating back to the 1990’s which prescribed such action should any UN agency act as UNESCO did.

DANIEL GREENFIELD: A TALE OF TWO WARS

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/

There are two possible conflicts on the table in Washington. One is with Iran and the other with Syria. The Iran conflict is the one that Washington doesn’t want. Its most likely trigger at this stage is an Israeli assault on Iran’s nuclear program. Like most of the wars centering around Israel, this one is existential and of no interest to the philosopher kings in D.C. who wage wars with the grand purpose of making the world a better place.
Washington does not particularly care whether Iran gets nukes or doesn’t get nukes. It cares about History. With a capital H. Libya got bombed because it was on the wrong side of history. Syria is about to get bombed because it’s on the wrong side of history. There are people in the administration like Samantha Power who would like to bomb Israel for being on the wrong side of history, but they don’t think that even J Street and Peter Beinart could spin that as a pro-Israel move.

JOHN STEINREICH: CONFRONTING THE TEACHINGS OF ISLAM

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.11411,css.print/pub_detail.asp

Islam is a religio-political doctrine, thus the policies of the State are only half of the intellectual arsenal needed to address its cold war with the West. For our civil society to survive the advance of Islam, we must confront it head on to block its efforts to subjugate all forms of government to Shariah law and to destroy all other forms of faith. We must use both political and religious strategies to successfully defeat Islamic supremacism.
In the domain of politics, there exists an unfortunate failure of imagination by our government elite to confront Islam ideologically. There are a few brave Western politicians who have acknowledged the fundamental threat posed by political Islam, but the large body of our elected officials has, to its discredit, refused to accept the fact that Islam’s codified doctrines promote an incessant march toward world hegemony.

KHALED ABU TOAMEH: JORDAN’S KING ABDULLARD NEED TO WAKE UP- FAST SEE NOTE PLEASE

http://www.stonegateinstitute.org/2846/jordan-king-abdullah-corruption

UNEASY LIES THE THRONE OF PALESTINE’S PHONY RULER….PLEASE ALSO READ: THE HASHEMITES OF JORDAN A ROYAL SCAM THAT KEEPS ON SCAMMING

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.9516/pub_detail.asp

Facing growing criticism over lack of reforms and transparency, Jordan’s King Abdullah has announced an unprecedented crackdown on corruption, sending a number of his former top government officials to prison.But the clampdown has only increased the appetite of the Jordanians, who continue to press for harsher measures against senior officials suspected of embezzling public funds and abusing their powers.

The king’s hitherto unsuccessful attempts to appease the protesters are designed first and foremost to prevent the Arab Spring from infiltrating the kingdom.

For the past several months, Jordan has witnessed weekly demonstrations calling for far-reaching reforms and end to financial corruption. Most of the protests have been initiated by the kingdom’s powerful Muslim Brotherhood organization.

At the beginning, King Abdullah did not take the protests seriously. But when some Bedouin tribes who were known for their loyalty to the monarchy started joining the protests, the king finally began to realize that the situation in the kingdom is much more serious than he had thought.

Over the past year, King Abdullah has dismissed two governments in a bid to calm the situation, but to no avail. His recent decision to appoint Awn Khasawneh, a respected judge of the International Court of Justice, as prime minister, has also failed to put an end to the growing protests.

Although most of the protesters in Jordan have thus far avoided calling for regime change, a former parliament member broke the rules by publicly calling for toppling the monarchy.

ALI ALYAMI: IN SAUDI ARABIA ACCUSATION OF BLASPHEMY MEANS A DEATH SENTENCE….SEE NOTE PLEASE

THESE ARE THE “MODERATE” ALLIES WHO CONTRIBUTE TO AND MANIPULATE THE SYLLABUS OF ALL MIDDLE EAST STUDIES IN AMERICA’S UNIVERSITIES. TIME TO DEMAND DOMESTIC OIL, COAL AND NUCLEAR ENERGY AND RID OURSELVES OF THIS CURSE……RSK http://www.stonegateinstitute.org/2847/saudi-arabia-blasphemy-death-sentence PLEASE HELP? Updates on Hamza Kashgari’s case and what you can do. Forwarded email: “We have news from Hamza’s […]

DANIEL GREENFIELD: PLAYING THE PERCENTAGES

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/

After occupying the headlines for far too long, Occupy Wall Street was dispersed by a combination of inclement weather, mayoral irritation and having served their purpose. Occupy Oakland will go on doing what it can to depress the economy of an already economically depressed city by attacking its ports. The other Occupations are being moved along back to the Starbucks that spawned them.

As committed Warmists, the Occupiers might have expected that temperatures in the northeast and the midwest in November and December would feel just like a day at the beach in Santa Monica. But while the manipulated hockey stick graphs might have been on their side, the weather wasn’t. Neither were the already overstretched urban budgets turned inside out by having to pay for police overtime, electrical generators and cleanup duty. But most of all they had served their purpose as a launching pad for the Obama 2012 campaign.

JEROLD SOBEL: THERE WAS NEVER A COUNTRY CALLED “PALESTINE”….SEE NOTE PLEASE

http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/02/there_was_never_a_country_called_palestine.html

IN THE DIASPORA THE NAME “PALESTINE” WAS ALWAYS ASSOCIATED WITH JEWS. IN LOVELY NEWTOWN, CONNECTICUT THERE IS A BOROUGH NAMED “PALESTINE” BECAUSE IN EARLY 1900s THAT IS WHERE THE JEWS WHO IMMIGRATED FROM NEW YORK CITY LIVED AND THE SYNAGOGUE ADATH ISRAEL STILL STANDS……RSK

Please forget one of the great fallacies of our time: Israel did not steal Palestinian land. It’s not Palestinians’ land; it’s never been their land; it will never be their land. This land was given to the Jewish people, as stated in the Bible, by the Creator, and will remain the homeland of the Jewish people in perpetuity. Despite 27 invasions of Judea and Samaria (erroneously called the West Bank), conquests by many, forced conversions, exiles, massive oppression, generations of Diaspora, and cowardly acquiescence by a cadre of 5th-column Jews themselves, Jews have not only survived in what’s known in Hebrew as Eretz Yisrael (Israel), but they’ve taken a desert wasteland and turned it into a powerful little democracy, the envy of the world.

JEROLD S. AUERBACH: LITIGATING FOR ISRAEL

http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2012/02/litigating_for_israel.html
How an Israeli lawyer with a mission has stymied enemies of Israel.

Ever since Moses received the Ten Commandments, the history of the Jewish people has been interwoven with law. An additional 613 commandments in the Torah were explicated in the Talmud, collected in the 16th-century Code of Jewish Law (Shulchan Aruch) and interpreted and enforced over the centuries by rabbinical courts.

Since 1948 the State of Israel has had its own legal system, populated by the usual array of lawyers and judges. But until recently it lacked what has long been conspicuous in the American legal world: private defense organizations (such as the American Civil Liberties Union) litigating vital constitutional issues.

THE CHURCH OF OBAMA: MARK STEYN

NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE          www.nationalreview.com           By Mark Steyn  Announcing his support for Commissar Sebelius’s edicts on contraception, sterilization, and pharmacological abortion, that noted theologian the Most Reverend Al Sharpton explained: “If we are going to have a separation of church and state, we’re going to have a separation of church and state.” Thanks for clarifying that. […]