IN DHIMMI ALBION….SOME CLARITY ABOUT THE ISLAMIC ENEMY WITHIN THE USA
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/6516619/Fort-Hood-shooting-an-attack-by-the-enemy-within.html
THE BRITS SEE THIS CLEARLY EXCEPT WHEN IT COMES TO ENGLAND WHOSE GREAT INSTITUTIONS INCLUDING THE CHURCH ARE NOW TOTALLY DHIMMIFIED..RSK
By Toby Harnden in Washington
Nov 2009
Fort Hood shooting: an attack by the enemy within
The murderous killing spree carried by Maj Nidal Malik Hasan will be seen by many Americans as a terrorist attack from an enemy within rather than the act of a lone madman.
It will take weeks to assess all the reasons Hasan acted. But the evidence of his devout Muslim faith, antipathy towards women, arguments in favour of suicide bombing and opposition to the Iraq and Afghanistan wars point to a religious and political motivation at least in part.
The United States has grown sadly used to mass shootings. This case, however, is shockingly aberrational. The fact that it was unarmed soldiers cut down on an Army base in Texas makes it an attack on the nation rather than on a group of random victims.
Many of Mr Obama’s supporters were deeply worried that as the first black president he would be especially vulnerable to an assassination attempt by a white racist.
When the issue of his fiery, anti-American former pastor Jeremiah Wright threatened to derail his campaign, Mr Obama was eloquent in addressing the issues of racism, black anger and white fear.
The atrocity at Fort Hood is an altogether more difficult subject for Mr Obama to address.
Mr Obama played down his Muslim background on the campaign trail for fear of being portrayed as un-American. At one point, young Muslim girls in hijabs were moved from a campaign stage to prevent Mr Obama being filmed with them as a backdrop.
Since winning the White House, however, he has referred to himself as “Barack Hussein Obama” as a way of presenting himself abroad as uniquely placed to build bridges with Islam.
While he will rightly want to avoid fuelling any backlash against Muslims and to resist being seen to jump to conclusions, if he avoids any reference to the evidence of religious and political motivation then he will be accused of trying to avoid inconvenient truths.
Relatives of Hasan are already claiming that the ultimate reason – they have stopped short of suggesting it was a justification – for the Army psychiatrist’s action was that he was mocked by fellow soldiers for his Muslim faith.
That claim, when juxtaposed with the apparent reluctance of the military authorities to take action against Hasan despite his praise for suicide bombings, is potentially incendiary and could bolster those Americans calling for a less tolerant attitude towards Islam.
Comments are closed.
