WHY WERE FORT HOOD SOLDIERS UNARMED?

Posted By on November 20th, 2009

FORT HOOD IS A GUN FREE ZONE
 
http://www.army.mil/usapa/epubs/pdf/r190_14.pdf
 
12 MARCH 1993  SUMMARY OF CHANGE  PARAGRAPHS 2-6
“LIMITS AND CONTROLS THE CARRYING OF FIREARMS BY DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY MILITARY AND CIVILIAN PERSONNEL.”

: http://chinaconfidential.blogspot.com/2009/11/israelis-baffled-by-news-of-defenseless.html

Israelis Baffled by News of Defenseless US Soldiers

 

Many Israelis want to know: why didn’t the soldiers attacked by a U.S. Army major-turned-terrorist return fire? 

When a Muslim goes, well, Muslim in Israel he is typically shot to death by someone–say, a reserve soldier–within seconds of screaming “Allah Akbar.”

In contrast with the Israeli experience, it took 10 minutes before a civilian police officer at Fort Hood was able to shoot and stop Muslim fanatic Nidal Malik Hasan. 

How could that happen?  How could so many people trained in the strategies and tactics of modern warfare be so defenseless? 

The answer–and this may astonish many Americans–is that the victims were unarmed.  U.S. soldiers are not allowed to carry guns for personal protection, even on a 340-acre base quartering more than 50,000 troops. 

So it goes in brain-dead, liberal America . 

Fort Hood is a “gun free” zone, thanks to regulations adopted in one of the very first acts signed into law by anti-gun President Bill Clinton in March, 1993.  Click here for the file.

 

 
 
 
 
Categorized under: BOOKS.
Tagged with: no tags.

Comments are closed.