Deadly Environmentalism in Alaska The Alaskan crisis President Obama is ignoring. By Ian Tuttle

http://www.nationalreview.com/node/423412/print

The wildly disproportionate agreement – in terms of raw acreage, the federal government would add to Izembek more than 200 times what it relinquished — was intended by the people of King Cove to be a show of good faith, a demonstration that they understood the gravity of what they were asking for: the first congressionally approved road through a federally designated wilderness. But Sally Jewell, given final authority to determine whether the land exchange (and so the proposed road) was “in the public interest,” was unmoved. The Obama administration (like the Clinton administration before it) has no plan to be the administration that set that precedent.

RELATED: The Environmentalists’ Civil War

Yet neither the administration nor environmentalists will admit that the precedent, in effect if not in statute, already exists – and in the disputed territory itself. The Izembek National Wildlife Refuge, including its wilderness areas, is already crisscrossed by 50 miles of roads, left over from the days of rattling Army trucks (which, rest assured, took no great precautions on behalf of the eelgrass). Rather than relinquish those roads to the vicissitudes of nature, the federal government has chosen to maintain them – not to save the lives of local residents, but to serve the large populations of hunters who fly to the refuge yearly to shoot game or waterfowl. In fact, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service advertises Izembek’s “world-famous” hunting opportunities on its website; the eager sportsman can pursue moose, brown bear, and several species of duck. You know what else you can hunt in Izembek? The Pacific black brant goose.

President Obama at the Bear Glacier. (Mandel Ngan/AFP/Getty)

Alaska, by dint of distance, has always harbored a temperamental antipathy toward the powers that be in Washington. Alaskans have been frequently unwilling to trust that a far-off government is able to recognize, and pursue, their best interests. Alaska’s native peoples, who hunted the land long before America’s legal apparatus was erected upon it but who have nonetheless been cut out of many land-designation decisions, have been even more distrustful. In its dealings with King Cove, the federal government has validated that skepticism. Whether under a Republican or a Democratic administration, the federal government has prioritized the preservation of wilderness over the protection of its citizens. And when the very people in danger sought help, the federal government used the opportunity to wring concessions from them.

In King Cove, when the clouds gather, so does fear. “The transcendent law of nature and of nature’s God,” James Madison wrote in Federalist 43, “declares that the safety and happiness of society are the objects at which all political institutions aim.” But in King Cove, Alaska, where federal authorities have put wildlife ahead of human life, neither safety nor peace of mind is to be found. “You pray every day,” says Kuzakin, “that nobody has a life-threatening injury.”

— Ian Tuttle is a William F. Buckley Jr. fellow in political journalism at the National Review Institute. A version of this article appeared in the June 22, 2015, issue of National Review.

Comments are closed.