UN Nuclear Watchdog Admonishes Iran for Denying Access to Two Sites
The UN watchdog policing Iran‘s troubled nuclear deal with major powers admonished Tehran on Tuesday for failing to answer its questions about past nuclear activities at three sites and for denying it access to two of them.
Reuters first reported on Monday that the IAEA planned to issue a second report in addition to its regular quarterly update on Iran‘s nuclear activities, rebuking Iran for less than full cooperation in general and for failing to grant UN inspectors access to one or more sites of interest.
The regular report showed Iran‘s stockpile of low-enriched uranium nearly tripling since November to more than a ton, as Tehran continues to breach key limits of its steadily eroding nuclear deal in response to renewed US sanctions against it since Washington pulled out of the accord in May 2018.
The extraordinary second report delved into the International Atomic Energy Agency’s open questions and Iran‘s denial of access to sites which a senior diplomat said are believed to have been active in the early 2000s.
“Iran has not provided access to the agency to two locations … and not engaged in substantive discussions to clarify agency questions related to possible undeclared nuclear material and nuclear-related activities,” the second confidential IAEA report to member states said.
“The director general calls on Iran to immediately cooperate fully with the agency, including by providing prompt access to the locations specified,” said the report, seen by Reuters, referring to new IAEA chief Rafael Grossi of Argentina, who took office in December.
What exactly is thought to have happened at the three sites, none of which the IAEA has visited before, is unclear.
They are also different to the site in Tehran to which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu drew attention in 2018, calling it a “secret atomic warehouse,” where the IAEA later found uranium traces.
Discussions with Iran aimed at explaining those traces of uranium that was processed — but not enriched — are ongoing, despite the agency previously encouraging Iran to do more.
Sanitizing
The second report said the IAEA’s open questions include whether natural uranium was used at one of the three sites, one that the IAEA has yet to say it wants to visit.
At one of the other two the agency has seen activities “from early July 2019 onwards that were consistent with efforts to sanitize part of the location,” it said.
The term “sanitize” is often used to denote construction or demolition work intended to remove traces of nuclear material.
Diplomats who tipped off Reuters about the second report said the agency was looking at sites which — like the Tehran one where uranium particles were found — were mentioned in a trove of data on Iran‘s past nuclear activities that Israel calls the “atomic archive,” which it says its agents seized in Iran.
US intelligence agencies and the IAEA believe the Islamic Republic had a secret, coordinated nuclear weapons program that it halted in 2003, long before the 2015 deal.
That is also roughly the time at which an exiled Iranian opposition group exposed the existence of Iran‘s underground uranium enrichment complex at Natanz. The revelation raised international alarm about Tehran’s covert nuclear activities, which it later declared to the IAEA.
Tuesday’s second report also said Iran had informed the IAEA that it “will not recognize any allegation on past activities and does not consider itself obliged to respond to such allegations.”
While the 2015 deal drew a line under Iran‘s past atomic activities, the IAEA’s non-proliferation mandate must also account for all nuclear material and activities. If previously unknown items come to light, it investigates.
The deal, which lifted international sanctions against Tehran in exchange for limits on its uranium enrichment and other nuclear activities, is aimed at keeping Tehran at least a year away from accumulating enough fissile material for an atomic bomb if it sought one.
Comments are closed.
