Leon Pinsker: A bicentennial marking an early modern Zionist – opinion What was Pinsker’s movement really like and what did it stand for? By Moshe Phillips
Not many Jews today know of the 19th-century Jewish leader who wrote a booklet that inspired young Jews to move to the Land of Israel. The man at first believed passionately in assimilation as an answer for Jews but later, due to what he saw as rising antisemitism, advocated a new idea that eventually became known as Zionism. He met with notables all over Europe to advance his plans. The booklet made an impact and led to his chairing a movement that convened a groundbreaking convention of Jews who came from all over Europe to speak about practical ways to spark a mass Return to Zion.
If you are thinking the man was Theodor Herzl, the book was The Jewish State (1896), the convention was the First Zionist Congress, and the movement was the World Zionist Organization, you are wrong.
This Jewish leader died five years before Herzl wrote The Jewish State, his name was Leon Pinsker, and this year is the bicentennial of his birth. Pinsker’s booklet was titled Auto-Emancipation: A Warning of a Russian Jews to His Brothers, and was published in 1882. The 1881 pogroms that followed the assassination of Czar Alexander II had caused Pinkser, a physician, to rethink his dedication to the idea that assimilation was the best hope for the Jews of Russia. He was recruited to the Hibat Zion (“Fondness For Zion”) movement and chaired its 1884 conference in Katowice, Poland, a result of which was that the various parts of the movement united as Hovevei Zion (“Lovers Of Zion”).
There was a time when anyone who was an educated Zionist knew who Pinsker was, had familiarity with his ideas, and understood the importance of Hovevei Zion to Zionist history. Over the years, the Zionist narrative became simplified and little room was left to recall those who came before Herzl. As a result, we have nearly lost part of our heritage.
Beyond simply correcting the record and restoring Pinsker’s place in the story of Zionism, there is much to be learned from his work that has serious implications for what Zionism was, is, and can be.
British Chief Rabbi Immanuel Jakobovits, in his book If Only My People… Zionism in My Life, stressed Pinsker’s importance. “Political Zionism was born and sustained out of negative factors: the intolerable conditions of Jewish homelessness. Pinsker’s Auto-Emancipation (1882) was sparked by the Russian pogroms in 1881. The seeds of Herzl’s Judenstaat were planted at the Dreyfus trial in Paris, and even Jabotinsky was only converted to Zionism at the age twenty-three by the Kishinev pogrom in 1903.”
The eminent HISTORIAN Walter Laqueur, in his A History of Zionism, labeled Pinsker’s book “a milestone in the development of Zionist thought.”
What was Pinsker’s movement really like and what did it stand for?
Jewish unity was a key idea of Hovevei Zion. Their Katowice conference brought together less than three dozen delegates, but they traveled from France, Britain, Germany, Russia and Romania to attend. What’s also important to note is that the delegates included numerous Orthodox rabbis who had central roles in the movement while Pinsker was not observant, and yet they all found common ground and strived to work together.
It is a misrepresentation of history to say that Zionism was a secular movement and that Orthodox rabbis opposed early Zionism. But all too often that is what we are told. In reality, nothing could be further from the truth. It is simply impossible to understand the early development of modern Zionism without studying the ideas, activism and impact of rabbis such as Kalischer, Alkalai and Mohilever.
Part of what Pinsker and his colleagues did was generate direct financial support for the new Jewish communities that were already in development throughout the Land of Israel in the last several decades of the 1800s.
The Israel-bashers of our time continue to promote the slander that if not for the Holocaust, then there would be no Israel.
Pinsker and his colleagues put the idea of the return to Zion into the consciousness of European Jews so that when Herzl arrived on the scene there was already something serious to work with. The first agricultural school in pre-state Israel was built in what is now the Tel Aviv area. It was called Mikveh Israel and was founded in 1870, even though Tel Aviv itself would not be founded until nearly 40 years later in 1909.
Throughout the era, Jews had to contend with laws the Ottoman Turks enacted that prohibited Jews from buying property. If not for these immoral laws, perhaps millions of Jews would have left Europe for Jerusalem, the Galilee, Hebron and the Tel Aviv area before Hitler ever came to power.
Despite the challenges to obtain real estate, and many other obstacles, the early Zionist pioneers blazed a solid path. And that perhaps is the single most important lesson to learn from Pinsker and his contemporaries, in addition to the vital need for Jewish unity. However serious the challenges may be, the work of Zionism must go on.
The writer is national director of Herut North America’s US division. Herut is an international movement for Zionist pride and education. herutna.org
Comments are closed.
