Israel’s vilified majority isn’t swayed by the protests : Ruthie Blum
https://www.jpost.com/opinion/article-731824
Most reports on the protests in Israel include the assertion that participants hail from “across the political spectrum,” with aerial shots of mass rallies to prove it. The implication is that the bulk of the public is united in opposition to Justice Minister Yariv Levin’s plan to clip the wings of the Supreme Court in favor of the legislature.
Anyone pointing out that the demonstrators decrying the ostensible onset of a fascist dictatorship are in the minority – as the results of the November 1 Knesset elections illustrate – is met with two conflicting claims.
The sophistry is impressive, but not surprising. After all, the movement to stage a coup against the new government in Jerusalem is rife with members of the educated elite who are well-versed in the art of turning a phrase.
The hypocrisy on display is also par for the course. Had the current coalition’s detractors garnered the lion’s share of the vote, they’d be lauding “majority rule” and insisting that their success at the polls was a sign of democracy in action.
Not only that. If the predominant part of the populace suddenly jumped on the protest bandwagon, the word “majority” would miraculously cease to be dirty.
AT THE moment, President Isaac Herzog is attempting to broker a judicial-reform compromise between the government and the opposition. Under normal circumstances, negotiations on the matter would have been conducted between Netanyahu and opposition leader Yair Lapid.
But the prime minister was barred by Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara from involvement in anything related to judicial reform. The A-G (who, unfathomably, dictates to rather than advises the government as its lawyer) determined that, due to Netanyahu’s ongoing trial, any “direct or indirect guidance through other parties, as far as the promotion of the [judicial reform] initiatives are concerned” would constitute a “conflict of interest.”
It was a magnanimous gesture on Rothman’s part, since he’s not the obstacle to discussion on the reforms. It’s the oppositionist MKs who’ve been shunning serious dialogue, opting instead to disrupt committee meetings by throwing abusive tantrums.
Then there’s Lapid. As he made clear to Herzog, he’s not willing to talk to Levin and Rothman unless his numerous preconditions are met.
These are aimed at halting the reforms without his having to go through existing democratic channels – you know, the ones he and the protesters keep screaming about wishing to preserve. This moral perch hasn’t prevented him from spewing hate-filled rhetoric at every opportunity.
On the contrary, it’s in his interest to back calls for civil war to “rescue Israeli democracy” from the clutches of “corrupt criminals” like Netanyahu and “theocrats” such as National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. Indeed, it’s the bubbling violence that keeps him minimally relevant in his official role.
Ironically, he’s not even leading the demonstrations. Former defense minister Moshe “Bogie” Ya’alon has taken on that job with a vengeance, and financial help from the radical leftist New Israel Fund.
Just as a reminder: This is the guy whose switcheroo after the 2019 elections – the removal of his party from the Netanyahu-bloc side of the pie chart – started the stalemate cycle that resulted in another four rounds in three years.
WHICH BRINGS us to what the protesters “of all stripes” really have in common, and it has nothing to do with the redistribution of power between the judicial and legislative branches of government. No, the shared vision of an otherwise disparate bunch of politicians, academics, artists, hi-tech entrepreneurs and physicians is an Israel without Netanyahu.
The diversity is genuine. The depiction of the disgruntled hordes as “Israelis from all walks of life,” thus, is accurate.
And though they didn’t wish for another impasse, they thought it might force Netanyahu to vacate his seat, or that his party would push him aside. They certainly didn’t anticipate that their worst nightmare was about to materialize.
STILL, IT wasn’t judicial reform that they harped on; it was Ben-Gvir and Smotrich. Laser-beam focus on the two religious right-wingers was so constant that they became household names around the globe. Warnings poured in from world capitals that there would be no contact whatsoever with the dangerous duo.
The “homophobe” Avi Maoz then became a cause for frenzy. His highlighted infamy placed the imagined trampling of LGBTQ rights front and center. Again, judicial reform was barely mentioned.
Once those specks of dust had settled, the defeated camp turned its attention to Levin. Doing so infused energy, as well as cash, into the protest movement. It also riled up the international and American-Jewish communities, much to the delight of Israel’s enemies.
Unfortunately for Lapid, it hasn’t had the same effect on the fractured back benches of parliament. No wonder he’s so often AWOL from the plenum.
Comments are closed.