Islam, Rape and Western Capitulation Eileen F. Toplansky
European nations, to their eternal shame, continue to ignore the Islamic religious dictates about ongoing rapes of infidel women. Consequently, women and young girls in Germany, France and Britain have paid a grievous price over the years.
In Cologne, Germany in 2016 during a New Year’s celebration, migrants ended up molesting over 1,000 women. In Britain, grooming gangs composed largely of Muslims maintain that rape of the infidel women is acceptable in their culture and part of the religious requirement.
Christian girls in predominantly Islamic lands, i.e., Pakistan are also abused because “. . . , it is not even a crime as Muslims regard the girls as spoils of war.”
Yazidi women were told that their rapes “please God.” And there are other victims as well.
Hindu girls are not exempt either.
The depressing accounts of these Hindus showed . . . how inhumanely religious minorities are treated in Islamic countries [.] While speaking with the media, many said that they had fled Pakistan after becoming victims of rape and kidnappings.
The Koran verses 4:3 and 4:24 permit Muslim men to have sexual relations with as many women as “their right hand possesses” — meaning as many women – all non-Muslim … as they are able to take captive during a jihad.
The incomparable Raymond Ibrahim continues to spotlight the reality of Muslim teachings. In his piece “Are slave girls in Islam equivalent to Animals” he explains that
Oddly enough, the Arabic relative pronoun used to indicate these captive women is “ma”: ma [what] malakat [possess] aymanukum [your right hands], literally, “what your right hands possess” (see Shakir’s acclaimed English translation which most literally translates this). In Arabic, when one refers to a rational being (i.e., a human), the word used is man, which means “who(ever)”; ma, on the other hand, refers only to things or animals—trees, rocks, dogs and cats—very much similar to the English “it.” Thus, in proper Arabic the phrase might have been man malakat aymanukum: “who(ever) your rights hands possess.”
For long I assumed this was but a stylistic matter. However, the highly revered Islamic scholar al-Qurtubi (d.1273) also makes this observation in vol. 5, p.12 of his authoritative 20-volume Tafsir Al Koran (Exegesis of the Koran). He points out that members of the human race should be referred to with man (who), whereas only “inanimate objects” or “brute beasts” should be referred to with ma (what).
Does this suggest that the Koran’s Arabic—touted as the most perfect Arabic—is flawed? Of course, no Muslim would allow for that. Nor need they, as this phenomenon (portraying concubines as non-human) accords well with a number of hadiths that place females and animals in the same category. Musnad Ibn Hanbal (vol. 2, p. 2992), for example, records Muhammad saying “Women, dogs, and donkeys annul a man’s prayer.” Indeed, in Qurtubi’s same Tafsir (vol.15, p.172), after examining such hadiths, he writes, ‘A woman may be likened to a cow, horse, or camel—for all are ridden.’
While many Muslims just want to lead quiet lives, there are far too many who terrorize and destroy the new lands they now occupy. Sex slavery is a booming business. And European leaders have acquiesced in the spirit of multiculturalism – but in actuality, it is sheer cowardice.
If the brutal rapes of young women do not move leaders of a country to act to protect its people, especially women, then all law and order dictates disappear, i.e., property rights become meaningless as well.
Consequently, in the Netherlands, there is an epidemic of bicycle theft and the thieves are Muslim migrants. But will they be arrested? Will they be charged with a crime? Will they be held accountable?
According to Hugh Fitzgerald,
the authorities realize that to deal with the problem in the traditional way will not work. After all, it costs a great deal to find the thieves, to put them on trial, and to then lock up offenders. Every stage of the criminal justice system costs money, far more than the stolen bicycle is worth. Now Dutch authorities in the town of Dronten have hit on another way to end bicycle theft. The municipality will simply provide Muslim migrants with good bikes at very low prices — $20 each – in the hope that that will greatly decrease, and perhaps eliminate altogether, this bicycle thievery.
Daniel Greenfield extends this scenario of lunacy and opines.
So bicycles that were stolen from Dutch residents whose owners weren’t found will be offered for sale to Muslim migrants for between around $20 to $50.
The migrant officials claim that the migrants didn’t steal the bikes, just bought them from the bicycle thieves, who for some reason, entirely unrelated to the migrant invaders, began stealing bikes in the area.
The already gargantuan fortunes being expended on the migrant invaders will be supplemented with a bike center and a bunch of heavily discounted bikes.
Geert Wilders has some thoughts. ‘Will they also give millions to potential bank robbers to prevent bank robberies?’
‘Insanity. I say stop asylum & close the borders.’
That eminently sensible policy is as much off the table in the Netherlands as it is in America. Instead, the Dutch have learned to give danegeld or danebikes to the new Vikings. And I’m sure those bikes will be put to good use… stealing other bikes. And then those stolen bikes can be resold to the migrants yet again.
If Western leaders are this indifferent about law and order and civil society, surely, the migrants will expect that if they steal jewelry or sneakers or iPhones that eventually the various government idiots will
[p]rovide those chains, those sneakers, those iPhones to Muslims not at low prices, but for free, in exchange for — what? For a ‘promise’ that they will stop their street muggings as long as they are supplied with the following: one gold necklace or chain, at least two feet in length, every six weeks; a new or gently used pair of Nike or Adidas sneakers four times a year; one new or refurbished 4G iPhone every six months, with a prepaid calling plan, as well as a steady supply of rings, bracelets, and wristwatches.
And to make sure the plan works, and ends Muslim robberies and burglaries, don’t charge even a nominal amount; make all those items absolutely free for any adult Muslim male that demands them. That should end the Muslim crime wave, and spare the government the cost of more police, more prosecutors, more court-appointed lawyers, more judges, more prison guards, and more prisons. In the end, the Dutch government will pay less out-of-pocket, and the Muslim migrants will no longer have to take the risks that robbery and burglary inevitably entail. It’s a classic win-win situation.
And in this modern day “Modest Proposal” world of madness and perversity, let us circle back to those horrific and ongoing sexual assaults. Following the spineless leaders “logic” a solution presents itself.
In order to decrease the number of sexual assaults on, and rapes of, Dutch girls and women, the government could provide Muslim males with coupons, good for a fixed number of sexual encounters with the paid ladies who advertise their wares in the Red Light districts of Amsterdam and Rotterdam.
It is a surefire way to watch rates of violence, robbery, rape, criminality, and assault plummet – don’t you think?
Comments are closed.
