“To Whom, or to What, Do We Owe the Phenomenon that is Donald Trump?” Sydney Williams
http://www.swtotd.blogspot.com
Donald Trump is like a battery-operated Hyper Pet Critter Dog that runs helter-skelter around the floor. As long as its battery is charged it will annoy most everyone except its owner. Trump’s battery life appears inexhaustible, but is it, and who or what is responsible?
Since January 6, 2021, it has become common for Democrats to claim democracy is under attack, with Donald Trump as prima facie evidence. In a speech on November 2, 2022, shortly before the midterms, President Biden said: “In our bones, we know democracy is at risk.” Just over two months ago, and citing the January 6 attack, he repeated the warning: “We know how damaged our institutions of democracy – our judiciary, the legislature, the executive – have become in the eyes of the American people, even the world, from attacks within, the past few years.” It is a message that resonated with voters in 2022. Will it succeed again in 2024? In that same 2023 speech, he warned that democracies “can die when people are silent – when they fail to stand up or condemn threats to democracy.” While he did not refer to him by name, he was speaking of Donald Trump.
The impetus for his remarks was January 6, and the “attack” on the Capital by Trump supporters. But in both remarks Biden failed to mention that democracy did survive – that the only fatality was that of Ashli Babbitt who was shot dead by a Capital policemen and that Vice President Michael Pence certified the election results, which made Joe Biden President. Nor did he acknowledge that the people were not silent – that the “attack” was condemned by Democrats and Independents – and by many Republicans – and all of mainstream media. More than 1,100 rioters have been charged with close to 300 having been given prison sentences, ranging from six months to eighteen years. The people have not been silent about January 6.
In the months since, Trump has been charged with ninety-one criminal counts, enough to keep his name in the news continuously, and for his supporters to gather strength from continued insults to their hero and to their intelligence. One asks: Is the phenomenon of Trump an unintended consequence of progressive intemperance?
While I am not a fan of Mr. Trump, I voted for him twice because I believed, right or wrong, that he was better for the country than alternatives. I am a fiscal conservative, socially liberal in the classical sense, and one who is concerned about a degradation in the values that have made this country unique among nations – reverence for family, respect for the law and for others, personal responsibility and pride in our nation.
In 2016 disaffected voters felt that government had become too elitist – too distant from the common man. The Tea Party, which called for smaller government, was deemed extremist, as was the House Freedom Caucus. And progressives’ calls for DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) were seen by those on the right as hypocritical, as universities, big corporations, mainstream and social media, and tech companies had no interest in diversity of opinion or inclusion of those who did not conform to the accepted progressive narrative. As Amir Taheri wrote recently for the Gatestone Institute: “…Trump has given voice to millions of voiceless Americans who feel uncomfortable with the status quo and harbor fears, genuine or imagined, about the future.” It is understandable what made him attractive in 2016. What is less comprehensible is why the left now gives him so much free press.
In their determination to minimalize Trump, Democrats instead elevated him. Presumably this was done because they thought that since Biden had beaten him in 2020 he could do so again in 2024. Trump was (and is) the nominee Democrats prefer. But Trump recognizes the wisdom attributed to Phineas T. Barnum, that all publicity is good publicity. Progressives in Washington and their lackeys in mainstream media, both blinded with hatred for Trump, have served, unwittingly, as his re-charging stations. Mr. Trump benefits every time a rioter from January 6 is jailed, or when another criminal charge is filed against him. Mr. Trump is on social media, on networks’ and cables’ evening news, and in the headlines. “Exposure to a candidate’s name…can lead to an increase in the candidate’s likeability,” is the wisdom from Wikipedia.
It is true that democratically elected leaders can become dictators. In 1921, Fascist Benito Mussolini was elected to Italy’s Parliament and a year later was handed ultimate power by King Victor Emanuel. In July 1932, Adolph Hitler was elected to the Reichstag. Six months later, as leader of the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, he was appointed Chancellor by President Von Hindenburg. For an American President to assume dictatorial control, he or she would need the backing of the military and the intelligence agencies, and support from the press. That was never going to happen to Mr. Trump, as we know from the way he was treated when President, especially by the intelligences services and the media. Keep in mind, extremists inhabit both ends of the political spectrum. And it is the left that is unguarded by watchdogs of democracy.
……………………………………………………………
Both Mr. Biden and Mr. Trump, but particularly Trump, agitate emotions rather than reason. We need citizens educated in the basic principles of democracy. Eleven years before the Declaration of Independence, in 1765 John Adams wrote that “…liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge among the people.” Today, if knowledge of civics were required to vote, many of the electorate would be disenfranchised.
Nevertheless, the country has faced challenges in the past – many more severe than what we now face. Men like Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, and Ronald Reagan appeared when needed, and the nation had a course correction. The American actress Ilka Chase reputedly once said: “Democracy is not an easy form of government, because it is never final; it is a living, changing organism, with a continuous shifting and adjusting of balance between individual freedom and general order.” She was right.
Was Trump the best answer to the concerns so many had seven years ago? Perhaps not, but there was a sense that government had become too elitist, too distant from people and their traditional beliefs in faith and family, a concern that has intensified over the past three years. Yet, the man who has been pilloried has been kept alive by the very people who detest him the most. Mr. Trump craves attention. And the media gives it to him: publicity-seeking prosecutors seeking criminal charges and a never-ending rehash of the January 6 saga. If he were ignored, he might fade away. But the media realizes he drives viewers and eyeballs, more than the failing Mr. Biden. And woke progressives cannot help themselves, so the public is constantly exposed to him. It falls to conservatives – not Mr. Trump – to save our republic. Enter stage right (I hope), Nikki Haley.
Comments are closed.
