Displaying posts published in

February 2025

The New York Times Spreads Misinformation About Extreme Weather Deaths By David Seidemann

https://www.nationalreview.com/2025/02/the-new-york-times-spreads-misinformation-about-extreme-weather-deaths/

If one views warming as an existential threat, it’s easy to assume that extreme heat is deadlier than extreme cold. The data say otherwise.

For many, the New York Times and the various federal and international agencies that it often cites are trusted sources for information on climate change. But on one of the risks of climate change — deaths by extreme weather — that trust is misplaced. The following examples from the last two years illustrate that, often enough, those sources spread false or misleading information on that issue.

The science regarding worldwide deaths from extreme weather is clear: Deaths caused by extreme cold are between nine and 17 times higher than those caused by extreme heat, according to peer-reviewed studies published in The Lancet in 2024, 2021, and 2015. The Times, however, has reported otherwise: “Heat waves cause more deaths globally than all other natural disasters combined.” The Times claim is unsourced, so its justification is unclear, but it clearly contradicts the scientific evidence — something that the paper usually notes is a trait of misinformation.

In another example, this Times article reports a conclusion of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), a U.N. agency, that extreme heat is the deadliest of all weather events. Although that claim appears to be backed by scientific research cited in a WMO report linked to the article, it isn’t. Remarkably, the very Lancet study that the WMO report cites (in footnote 5), as evidence that extreme heat is the world’s No. 1 weather-related killer, concludes that extreme cold is ten times deadlier. Both the WMO staff and a Times reporter missed the contradiction between their claim and the evidence — resulting in both sources spreading misinformation.

Similarly, both this Times article and the Environmental Protection Agency web page that it links to missed the contradiction between the evidence cited and their assertion that heat is the leading weather-related killer in the United States. Death certificate data posted on the EPA’s website show that far more people died directly from extreme cold nationally (19,000 between 1979 to 2018) than from extreme heat (11,000 between 1979 to 2018). (The EPA pages that I cite — including the one that the Times article linked to — are archived versions that were available when the Times article was published.)

Why The Palestinian Authority Will Not Be Able to Control Gaza The US Must Cut Ties with Qatar, Designate the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organization by Khaled Abu Toameh

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21371/palestinian-authority-gaza-hamas-qatar

The failure of the Palestinian Authority’s security operation against the Jenin gunmen shows why the PA cannot be trusted to assume control over the Gaza Strip, where thousands of Hamas and PIJ terrorists continue to operate, especially after the recent US-brokered ceasefire-hostages deal between Israel and Hamas.

Like Abbas, no Arab country will invest in or get involved in the Gaza Strip as long as Iran’s Islamist proxies continue to dominate it. Given the recent return of hundreds of convicted terrorists released from Israeli prisons to the streets in exchange for hostages — many of whom are dead — the possibility of another October 7-style atrocity against Israelis is still all too real.

President Donald J. Trump’s envoy, Steve Witkoff, may have the best of intentions, but unfortunately appears to have placed his trust in his real estate business associate, Qatar, which is a major funder of Hamas.

Witkoff, who regrettably took a terrible, ready-to-wear deal from the Biden administration… is proving an unfortunate embarrassment to Trump.

From the beginning, the deal should have been, as then-President-elect Trump put it, that all the hostages must be released before his inauguration or “all hell will break out.” Such a warning presupposes that all the hostages, dead and alive, are placed at the border, on a certain date at a certain time. No negotiations, no return of hundreds of terrorists to Gaza, nothing ….It would be interesting to know how Trump’s strong, original vision got so badly derailed.

“Qatar is at the top of funding terrorism worldwide, even more than Iran.” — Dr. Udi Levi, retired head of Mossad’s Economic Warfare Division, ynetnews.com, April 18, 2024

Qatar’s plan undoubtedly is to see that Hamas, one of its preeminent clients, remains in power. As the mouthpiece for the Muslim Brotherhood through its vast television empire Al Jazeera, Qatar cannot want to see Israel in the region any more than Hamas does.

There is only one viable way to address the Gaza Strip’s problems: discard Qatar as a supposedly honest broker – it is not — designate the Muslim Brotherhood a Foreign Terrorist Organization – it is — disarm all the terrorist groups, and oust Hamas completely from power.

Qatar and Egypt are now spearheading efforts to bring the Palestinian Authority (PA) back to the Gaza Strip. The two countries are apparently trying to persuade the US administration to back the idea.

A Complete Unknown is more than a Bob Dylan biopic James Mangold’s film captures the sense of freedom that animated 1960s America. Michel Crowley

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/02/02/a-complete-unknown-is-more-than-a-bob-dylan-biopic/

The new Bob Dylan biopic, A Complete Unknown, is a film distinguished by extraordinary performances. Edward Norton shines as folk-singer Pete Seeger. Elle Fanning enlivens the role of Sylvie Russo, a character based on Dylan’s actual partner at the time, Suze Rotolo. And then there’s Timothée Chalamet whose depiction of the young Dylan at times borders on the miraculous.

Directed by James Mangold, A Complete Unknown is based on Elijah Wald’s 2015 book, Dylan Goes Electric! Newport, Seeger, Dylan and the Night That Split the Sixties. It focusses on Dylan’s early career in the 1960s, from the moment he arrives in New York City as a 19-year-old to his eventual rise to folk stardom and beyond.

The film’s narrative is divided into two parts. In the first we follow Dylan from his arrival in Greenwich Village in 1961 as he tries to work his way into the New York folk scene. This period culminates in the release of his second album, The Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan in 1963 and, with it, stardom.

The second chapter follows Dylan’s departure from the folk scene – its music, ideology and entourage – and the recording of his sixth album, Highway 61 Revisited, in 1965. Parallel to his prodigious songwriting, this self-styled inscrutable vagabond weaves a love triangle with Russo and Joan Baez, played by Monica Barbaro.

Chalamet’s portrayal of Dylan moves effortlessly from the naïve newcomer to the older, conflicted artist and sorrowful lover. Much of the film is shot in close-up, and the most compelling scenes involve Chalamet listening rather than speaking. Norton’s Seegar is the personification of the social-justice arm of the folk scene. What Dylan has in charisma, Seegar has in piety. It’s Seeger’s folk-musical sanctimony that Dylan kicks back at. And when Dylan turns electric in defiance of Seeger, the folksy audience turns into a mob.

Trump’s win was a call for law and order after the Dems’ constant demonization of the police By Heather Mac Donald

https://nypost.com/2025/02/02/opinion/trumps-win-was-a-call-for-law-and-order-after-the-dems-constant-demonization-of-the-police/

“Maybe this will end in another week,” sighed the cashier at a CVS store on the Upper East Side, seven days after President Trump’s inauguration. A young male, clutching a black plastic garbage bag, had just darted out the door.”Maybe this will end in another week,” sighed the cashier at a CVS store on the Upper East Side, seven days after President Trump’s inauguration. A young male, clutching a black plastic garbage bag, had just darted out the door.

The thief had wandered the premises unchallenged, despite being a member of the predominant shoplifting demographic and openly carrying a receptacle for his heist. After his rushed escape, no one called the police. The employees knew the precinct’s officers weren’t likely to come — and nothing would happen if they did.

I, meanwhile, had had to summon a clerk to gain access to the store’s calcium pills, locked behind plexiglass shields.

So much for the invidious racial profiling that former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden routinely accused the country of engaging in.

The cashier nodded wearily toward a rack of batteries in the front of the store — a target of this latest heist — oddly not behind lock and key.

The clerk’s long gray corkscrew curls, beard and heavy Puerto Rican accent did not mark him as a stereotypical Donald Trump voter. Yet here he was, assuming that his reference to “another week” was clear and that I would share his hope for a political sea change.

Miranda Devine Trump is sending the Deep State to the outhouse as he cleans house at the FBI and DOJ

https://nypost.com/2025/02/02/opinion/trump-is-sending-the-deep-state-to-the-outhouse-as-he-cleans-house-at-the-fbi-and-doj/

It’s galling to hear sleazy Democrats like Rep. Jamie Raskin and self-serving government bureaucrats whine about “due process” as Donald Trump sets about cleaning house in the out-of-control administrative state.

Last time Trump was president, he and his appointees were sabotaged and obstructed by Machiavellian Deep-Staters who perverted concepts such as “due process” into protective shields around wrongdoers and turned them into weapons against their adversaries — that is, anyone trying to carry out the wishes of the democratically elected president.

That won’t be happening again. It’s called democracy.

The FBI raided Trump’s home and rummaged through his wife’s underwear drawer. They tried to lock him up and bankrupt him. They rounded up his supporters and advisers and threw them in jail.

He was forced to spend 60% of his time and tens of millions of dollars fighting the lawfare waged against him.

So don’t talk about “due process” to Trump.

Ten Problems with DEI That Frighten the Public DEI policies are facing scrutiny amid recent disasters, raising concerns about their impact on competence, meritocracy, and public safety. By Victor Davis Hanson

https://amgreatness.com/2025/02/03/the-problems-with-dei-that-frighten-the-public/

The diversity, equity, and inclusion project, often seen as a major element of the so-called “woke” creed along with green fanaticism, keeps popping up as a possible subtext in a variety of recent tragedies.

In the case of the Los Angeles fires, Mayor Karen Bass, who cut the fire department budget, was warned of the mounting fire dangers of the Santa Anna winds and parched brush on surrounding hillsides. No matter—she junketed in Uganda. When furor followed, on cue, her defenders decried a racialist attack on “a black woman.”

Her possible stand-in deputy mayor for “security” was under suspension for allegations that he called in a bomb threat to the Los Angeles city council—a factor mysteriously forgotten.

The fire chief previously was on record mostly for highlighting her DEI agendas rather than emphasizing traditional fire department criteria like response time or keeping fire vehicles running and out of the shop.

One of her deputies had boasted that in emergencies, citizens appreciated most of all that arriving first responders looked like them. (But most people in need worry only whether the first responders seem to know what they are doing.) She further snarked that if women allegedly were not physically able to carry out a man in times of danger, then it was the man’s fault for being in the wrong place.

The Los Angeles water and power czar—culpable for a needlessly dry reservoir that could have provided 117 million gallons to help save Pacific Palisades—was once touted primarily as the first Latina to run such a vital agency. But did that fact matter much to the 18 million people whose very survival depended on deliverable water in the otherwise desert tinderbox of greater Los Angeles?

Woke Grammys Show How Out of Touch Entertainment Industry Is Who cares? by Daniel Greenfield

https://www.frontpagemag.com/woke-grammys-show-how-out-of-touch-entertainment-industry-is/

Every entertainment industry awards show can be reduced to ridiculous outfits and woke special pleading acceptance speeches in which millionaires impassionately proclaim their love for drag queens, illegal aliens or Hamas, and in which most of the country (except for their deranged fan bases) look at them like clowns.

The Grammys, probably the first major awards show since Trump took office (unless I missed one), was no exception, celebrating its out-of-touchness by thumbing its nose at country music fans and then platforming Shakira and Lady Gaga to attack Trump and stand by illegal aliens and transgender activists.

The sum of it though would add up to ‘who cares’.

Kamala tested the power of celebrities and found them wanting at best. The public will spend a fortune going to see Taylor Swift lip sync but doesn’t care whom she endorses. The last time anyone effectively used celebrities in a political context was Barack Obama and he did it by appearing to become one of them.

Celebrities couldn’t help Kerry or Hillary, and it’s not at all clear that they can help any candidate at all.

Somehow celebrity culture has become an even stranger echo chamber over the years. A showcase for the mentally disturbed, (so of course Kanye West showed up), and for the just plain grotesque.

Mounting Disobedience in Our Schools School discipline is declining – and the education establishment is clueless. by Larry Sand

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm-plus/mounting-disobedience-in-our-schools/

In a December Education Week poll, teachers and administrators disclose that student behavior is worsening. Since pre-pandemic 2019, “there’s been a pronounced spike in behavior problems, ranging from minor classroom disruptions to more serious student fights broadcast on social media.”

The survey results reveal that 72% of educators say that students in their classroom, school, or district have been misbehaving either “a little” (24%) or “a lot” (48%) more than in the fall of 2019, the last semester before the COVID-19 shutdowns began.

The problem in Los Angeles is particularly grim. In the 2023-2024 school year, the district’s School Experience Survey shows that just 58.5% of elementary students, 55.2% of middle school students, and 51.6% of high school students reported feeling safe in their schools—a significant drop from previous years. Their fears are justified as “fighting and physical aggression increased by 16.8% from the 2022-2023 school year to 2023-2024, while threats surged by 28.5%.”

Nevada is ineptly dealing with the issue by moving problem kids to another school, and a former paraprofessional is suing the Washoe County School District over claims that “the system shuffles dangerous students between schools without adequately alerting staff about their behavior and terminated him in retaliation.”

A North Carolina school district tried to improve discipline by implementing a policy for which it paid a non-profit over $800,000 to help it create. Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools had fewer short and long-term suspensions for the school year and no expulsions, part of a broader shift toward “equitable discipline.”

14 years in limbo: A journey from Darfur to building a life in Israel

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/14-years-in-limbo-a-journey-from-darfur-to-building-a-life-in-israel/ar-AA1yfg87?ocid

When Mahmoud Usman was 25 years old, the war in Sudan was already years under way. Situations had grown dire in his native Darfur, Sudan, so much that he uprooted his life and fled for fear of what was to come.

After navigating treacherous borders and enduring uncertainty, Usman reached Israel in search of safety. Fourteen years later, in 2024, his asylum application was tentatively approved, allowing him to remain in a country where he has built a new life.

By 2010, the conflict showed no signs of abating. Entire villages were destroyed, and millions of civilians were forced into refugee camps or exiled from their homeland. Usman, like many young men from Darfur, faced the harrowing reality of either conscription into militias or becoming a target of ethnic cleansing campaigns.

More than a decade after he fled his home, conflict raged on. In 2023, Sudan descended into chaos once again, as conflict erupted between the Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces, a mercenary group with roots in the Janjaweed militias responsible for atrocities in Darfur. The violence in Khartoum and other regions has led to further displacement and devastation. Attacks by militia groups on civilians were ever increasing.

In 2010, Usman had been watching atrocities being committed in his community. There were frequent explosions and famine, and he knew that staying put could be fatal. At this point, he became a refugee, as had 700,000 others from Sudan since the early 2000s. Darfur had faced total devastation, and Usman knew that if he didn’t leave with the resources he had managed to provide for himself, his life could be cut short.

On his treacherous overland journey from Darfur to Israel, Usman headed north, through Egypt, his first stop in the asylum process that ultimately acted as a six-month layover on his way to Israel.

Trump’s Executive Orders Have Solid Voter Backing: I&I/TIPP Poll Terry Jones

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/02/03/trumps-executive-orders-have-solid-voter-backing-ii-tipp-poll/

President Trump entered the White House for the second time with a bold agenda, which included a spate of executive orders on a wide range of issues. Even the media had trouble keeping up with the changes. But how was Trump’s flurry of orders received by average Americans? They liked it, with the exception of Democrats, the latest I&I/TIPP Poll shows.

The online I&I/TIPP Poll queried 1,478 adults across the nation on their view of 12 key Trump executive orders, intended to kick-start his second term in office and set a new direction for U.S. policy. The poll has a margin of error of +/-2.6 percentage points.

The question posed was “Do you support or oppose the following executive orders signed by President Donald Trump in his first week in office?” Each question was followed by a description of Trump’s action, with those answering having a choice among the following responses: “Support strongly,” “Support somewhat,” “Oppose somewhat,” “Oppose strongly,” and

Even amid Democrats’ strong doubts, four of the 12 issues managed to receive solid majorities in support.

They included: “Deploy the U.S. military to secure the southern border,” receiving 57% “support,” 33% “oppose; “Ban federal funding for gender identity programs and recognize only biological sex,” 53% support, 36% oppose; “Require federal workers to return to the office full-time,” 56% support, 30% oppose; and “Speed up deportation of illegal immigrants,” 54% support, 35% oppose.

A handful of other Trump moves garnered pluralities, but not absolute majorities.

This group included “End birthright citizenship for children of illegal aliens,” 49% support, 41% oppose; “Declare a national energy emergency to boost oil and gas production, while excluding wind and solar energy,” 46% support, 39% oppose; “Eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs in the federal government,” 45% support, 42% oppose; “Make it easier to fire federal workers by removing job protections,” 44% support, 42% oppose; and “Pause for 75 days on a law banning TikTok,” 44% support, 31% oppose.