BARRY SHAW: ISRAEL-RECLAIMING THE NARRATIVE

http://www.israelnarrative.com/

‘ISRAEL – RECLAIMING THE NARRATIVE is a prosecution of Israel’s enemies.

This book is suggested as a valuable resource for Israel’s fight back against the lies and deceit of the Palestinian camp that has succeeded in capturing the high ground in the information war that is an integral part of the Middle East conflict.
This prosecution is an attempt to assist Israel regain its rightful place on the right side of public opinion.”
ISRAEL – RECLAIMING THE NARRATIVE prosecutes Israel’s enemies and defamers by exposing their lies and hypocrisy. From boycotters to replacement theologists, the media, diplomats, a misguided public and, centrally, the Palestinian leadership, are all subject to scrutiny and found guilty of slander, violence, and abuse against the Jewish nation.
The author takes you on a personal journey that allows you to feel the forces and emotions that affect the average Israel.

“Am I hostile to revolutionary Marxism? You bet I am.  Am I hostile to radical Islam? You got it! Aren’t you? Or don’t you care?

If you don’t care, close this book and read something else, something shallow and meaningless. If you are neutral you have no reason to be reading this book. Put it down and buy another one.”
The BDS Movement’s venom is aimed exclusively at Israel. If the principles that it applies solely against Israel were honest why are they not aimed at Turkey, for example?
Here is a country that is guilty of genocide against  the Armenians and is carrying out a war of oppression and genocide against the Kurds.  If occupation is a cause for a boycott then why isn’t the BDS Movement  boycotting Turkey for their occupation not only of Kurdish territory but also northern Cyprus?
If building an illegal wall is reason for a boycott why isn’t the BDS Movement boycotting Turkey for the illegal divide between their occupied part of Cyprus and the rest of the island?
If ethnic cleansing is a reason for a boycott why isn’t the BDS Movement boycotting Turkey for the ethnic cleansing of the Greek Cypriots that they murdered or drove out of their homes in the occupied north of the island?
If it is legitimate to boycott Israel for being racist by calling themselves the Jewish state why isn’t the BDS Movement boycotting the forty member states of the United Nations that formally include “Muslim” or “Islamic”  in their countries names?
It is worth mentioning the methodist,  Protestant, and Anglican churches. Why are they not divesting  from Turkey, Egypt, and the Palestinian Authority for that matter, who are killing and tormenting their fellow Christians and desecrating their churches?”
“An academic boycott is the nadir of intellectual property. It is the pivotal moment when reason becomes dogma. It is the time when enlightenment becomes creed. It is the closing of the mind.  When the brain refuses to tolerate opposing thought it is no longer academia.”
“I hate war but there are circumstances when it is necessary, even inevitable. War in inevitable when your country is attacked not once but ten thousand times as Hamas and Hizbollah did with rockets and mortars against Israel.
When the international community is called upon, a community that pumps billions of dollars into a regime, to stop that regime from launching deadly attacks and it does not do so, war is an inevitable result.”
“It is frightening to Israelis how the Western world made a legend out of a villain.
Yasser Arafat was a White House guest more often (President Clinton met him twenty four times in an eight year period) than any other international figure.
To commemorate his death the United Nations flew its flag at half mast, something it did not do when President Reagan died a few months earlier, and despite the fact that no state of Palestine existed.”

Comments are closed.