Displaying the most recent of 93530 posts written by

Ruth King

Hamas says, ‘Yes, but’…and the world looks away By Warren H. Cohn

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/10/hamas_says_yes_but_and_the_world_looks_away.html

There’s finally a deal on the table.  Eight Muslim nations signed on.  The Palestinian Authority signed on.  The world is ready to stop the bloodshed.  And yet — predictably, infuriatingly — Hamas shrugs and says, “Yes, but…”

Every time there’s a glimmer of peace, Hamas moves the goalposts.  Another round of haggling.  Another round of delay.  Another chance to keep the chaos going — because chaos is the only currency Hamas knows how to spend.

And here’s the question no one seems to ask: Where are the protesters now?

For months, we’ve seen mobs in the streets screaming, “Ceasefire now!”  They chained themselves to bridges.  They stormed college campuses.  They shouted down Jewish students and politicians.  But now — when there’s actually a ceasefire deal that Israel and the Arab world have signed off on — the silence is deafening.

Why aren’t the protesters outside Hamas’s offices, demanding they accept the deal?  Why aren’t they rallying against the terrorist group that’s blocking peace?  Because it was never really about peace.  It was about blaming Israel.

Hamas survives by saying, “Yes, but.”  It always has.  It feeds on delay, on endless negotiation, on bloodshed dragged out just long enough to buy itself another news cycle.  Meanwhile, innocent families — Israeli and Palestinian alike — suffer while the “resistance” leaders hide in tunnels and play politics with people’s lives.

Bibi Tells the Truth (Again) Israel’s battle against terror isn’t limited to the region. by Cal Thomas

https://www.frontpagemag.com/bibi-tells-the-truth-again/

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s address to the UN General Assembly was partly performance, but mostly profound.

The performance part included a QR code on his lapel which delegates were invited to zoom in with their camera phones and see atrocities committed by Hamas that are too gruesome for TV networks to show. He also arranged for his statement that Israel has not forgotten the hostages to be blasted over loudspeakers set up in Gaza for that purpose.

The profound part included repetition of what he has said before with some twists. Netanyahu reminded the delegates that Israel’s battle against terrorism is not limited to the region, but that the terrorists want to return the entire world to the “Dark Ages.”

A few excerpts from his speech:

“Iran’s aggression, if not checked, will endanger every single country in the Middle East, and many, many countries in the rest of the world, because Iran seeks to impose its radicalism well beyond the Middle East.”

“Hamas steals the (humanitarian aid) and then they hike the prices … and that’s how they stay in power.”

“Israel must also defeat Hezbollah in Lebanon. … It has tentacles that span all continents. It has murdered more Americans and more Frenchmen than any group since Bin Laden. It’s murdered the citizens of many countries represented in this room. And it has attacked Israel viciously over the last 20 years.”

“For 18 years, Hezbollah brazenly refused to implement UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which requires it to move its forces away from our borders. Instead, Hezbollah moved right up to our border. They secretly dug terror tunnels to infiltrate our communities and indiscriminately fired thousands of rockets into our towns and villages.”

“In this battle between good and evil, there must be no equivocation. When you stand with Israel, you stand for your own values and your own interests.”

“We see this moral confusion (about which side is good and which side is evil) when Israel is falsely accused of genocide when we defend ourselves against enemies who try to commit genocide against us. We see this too when Israel is absurdly accused by the ICC Prosecutor of deliberately starving Palestinians in Gaza.”

President Trump Gives the Globalists Another Lesson – But More Are Needed The bad ideas that spawned the UN are deeply entrenched in the West. by Bruce Thornton

https://www.frontpagemag.com/president-trump-gives-the-globalists-another-lesson-but-more-are-needed/

Donald Trump’s address to the UN once again has challenged the failing bloated institution, especially when its damage to our country and its Constitutional order by allowing globalist elites to chip away at our sovereignty in order to serve the “international community” of the “new world order” globalist elites. Much of our foreign policy errors and crises spring from the near century of the UN’s bad ideas and feckless idealism.

Wielding his signature straight talk, Trump delivered a much-needed home truth: “What is the purpose of the United Nations?” he asked, and quickly answered, “For the most part, at least for now, all they seem to do is write a really strongly worded letter and then never follow that letter up. It’s empty words, and empty words don’t solve wars.”

In other words, a typical hypertrophied bureaucracy riddled with professional deformation––the chronic abuse that served the institution and its treasonous clerks rather than the alleged purpose for which it was created and financed–– mostly by U.S. taxpayers.

Greed and ambition we’ll have with us always, but the bad ideas that spawned the UN are deeply entrenched in the West. The seed idealistic globalism began with Immanuel Kant’s “Perpetual Peace” in 1795. In it, Kant imagined innovations like a “federation of free states” that could form a “pacific alliance” that would “forever terminate all wars.” Kant understood that the world of his times was not yet ready for such a dream, but he believed that “the uniformity of the progress of the human mind” would reach such a goal.

During the following century the growth of new technologies and global trade seemingly promised a global “harmony of interests,” yet also more lethal and destructive wars too devastating and costly for business, giving impetus to Kant’s ambitious vision. By the outbreak of World War I, numerous downpayments on Kant’s dream had produced multilateral agreements, conventions, and treaties aimed at “establishing and securing international peace by placing it upon a foundation of international understanding, international appreciation, and international cooperation,” as Nicholas Murray Butler said in 1932.

Before then, agreements like the three Geneva Conventions (1864, 1906, 1929) had established collective laws for the humane treatment of the sick and wounded in battle, and later for prisoners. The Hague Conventions had similar ambitions. The first (1899) called for an international Court of Arbitration, and restrictions on aerial bombardment and the use of poison gas. The second (1907) convention expanded restrictions to naval warfare practice and armaments, as well as other changes to slowing down what host Tsar Nicholas II called the “accelerating arms race” that was “transforming armed peace into crushing burdens that weighs on all nations and, if prolonged, will lead to the very cataclysm it seeks to avert.”

“Diplomacy. or Telling it Like it is?” Sydney Williams

“Diplomacy and virtue do not make easy companions.”  Iain Pears (1955-)

                                                                                                            

“Your countries are going to hell,” said President Donald Trump to the UN on September 23. “…you want to be politically correct and you are destroying your heritage.” While he was speaking to the General Assembly, his words were aimed at long-time allies in Western Europe. Post-war Presidents have prided themselves on their diplomacy. Even President Reagan, while demanding that Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev “tear down this wall,” did so without a hint of acrimony in his voice. While I suspect Mr. Trump has never read H.L. Mencken’s Prejudices: First Series, he, nevertheless, followed his admonition: “Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.”

Diplomacy is the art of having people understand and accept your position. In the halls of government power, words are usually best understood when backed by strength. President Theodore Roosvelt advised American Presidents to “…speak softly and carry a big stick.” Will Rogers, American humorist and social commentator, put it differently: “Diplomacy is the art of saying ‘nice doggie’ until you can find a rock.” The American journalist and author Isaac Goldberg wrote in 1927 that diplomacy is the art “to do and say the nastiest things in the nicest way.” At times it is more diplomatic to leave certain things unsaid. Nixon’s Secretary of State Henry Kissinger once said: diplomacy, “is the art of restraining power.” In the end it is the ability to get people to see and do things your way. 

Donald Trump, for all his qualities, is not a diplomat.[1] To his accolades that makes him a hero. On the other hand his bluntness and coarseness can be off-putting. He went beyond just Europe when he asked what the more delicate would have hesitated to ask: “What is the purpose of the United Nations?” According to its Mission Statement, its core mission is to “Maintain Peace and Security – to prevent and remove threats to peace and to suppress acts of aggression through peaceful and just means.” Forty years ago Jeanne Kirkpatrick, Reagan’s Ambassador to the UN, condemned the UN for the “bizarre reversal” of its founding intent to resolve conflicts. Has there been an improvement in the last four decades? In March 2014, Russia annexed Crimea, In February 2022, Putin’s armies invaded Ukraine. On October 7, 2023, Hamas militants slew 1,200 Israelis. Sudan’s civil war (April 2023-present) has killed 150,000 and displaced an estimated 14 million, in a country of under 50 million. Today, what in different circumstances would seem black humor, the military junta that governs Sudan is a member of the UN’s Human Rights Council. Amazing! Why are critics of Israel, including the UN, silent on Sudan?

In his attack on Western governments, President Trump, in his immutable way, focused on what he called a double-tailed monster: “Immigration and the high cost of so-called green energy is destroying a large part of the free world and a large part of our planet. Countries that cherish freedom are fading fast because of their policies on these two subjects. Both immigration and their suicidal energy ideas will be the death of Western Europe.”

Should Comey Be Convicted? by Alan M. Dershowitz

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21947/should-comey-be-convicted

Lawfare and selective prosecution are fundamentally wrong. It would be best if neither side misused the legal system to “get” their enemies. The Trump administration obviously believes that asking nicely is not likely to work, and that those who distort the legal system by turning it into “lawfare” must be held to account in order to stop it.

The ink was not even dry on the US Department of Justice’s hastily drafted two-count indictment of former FBI Director James Comey when partisans chose sides.

Most on the “left” insisted that this was a revenge lawfare indictment with no basis in law or fact. Many on the “right” saw nothing amiss, arguing that the defendant did in fact lie to Congress.

The nonpartisan reality is that it is too early to make a full assessment of the merits or demerits of the case. The other reality is that the indictment raises several distinct if overlapping issues.

First and foremost is whether it properly alleges crimes. Put another way, if there is evidence to establish the allegations, would that evidence be sufficient for a conviction? In order to convict, the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant intentionally and under oath lied or deceived legislators about a material fact. So if a jury were to conclude that Comey knew that he had authorized an FBI assistant to leak material, his negative answer to a material question from Senator Ted Cruz might well be found to be a crime. Complicating matters, the assistant apparently referenced now denies that Comey was aware of the leak. Perhaps someone else was involved, such as a law professor through whom Comey allegedly laundered leaks. In any event, factual issues are for juries to resolve.

Second, Comey’s lawyers are sure to argue that even if Comey did cross the line into criminality, he would not have been indicted if he had not alienated President Donald J. Trump.

Trump’s peace plan is the Western left’s worst nightmare By turning the screws on Hamas, Trump has exposed who’s really responsible for this dreadful war. Brendan O’Neill

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/09/30/trumps-peace-plan-is-the-western-lefts-worst-nightmare/

Has the prospect of peace ever been greeted with such gloom? No sooner had President Trump unveiled his peace plan for Israel-Gaza than the opinion-forming classes were frantically sowing cynicism. The possibility that the ghastly war in Gaza will be brought to a close gave rise not to optimism but to sarcasm, suspicion, even an eerie grumpiness unbecoming of a deal that might save thousands of lives. From the BBC to Sky News to the Israelophobic swamp of social media, the cry went up: ‘It’ll never work.’

I’m sure some of this haughty scepticism springs from the faint strains of Trump Derangement Syndrome that linger in elite circles. Hence, the BBC’s focus was less on the lives that might be preserved in Gaza than on Trump’s ‘hyperbole’ and his ‘exotic overstatement’. The Beeb preferred to rip the piss out of Trump for probably thinking this was ‘one of the greatest days in the history of civilisation’ than to ponder on a better future for Gaza. Nice moral priorities you have there.

Sky’s analysis positively dripped with derision. What happens when the ‘applause dwindles’, it wondered, and either Hamas or the Israeli ‘far right’, with all its ‘spitting fury’, rejects the plan? You would think a media empire that has convinced itself the war in Gaza is a ‘genocide’ would be more sanguine about a deal that might bring the ‘genocidal’ horrors to an end. You would be wrong.

A strange melancholy likewise descended on the digital haters of the Jewish State. They noisily gnashed their teeth over the ‘problematic’ small print in the deal, which is a weird way to respond to something that might bring to an end what they claim (insanely) to be an Auschwitz-level calamity. ‘The Palestinians must reject this surrender deal’, said Roshan M Salih of the Islamic website 5Pillars. So let the ‘genocide’ continue? It’s an original rallying cry, I’ll give him that.

Media And U.N. Portray Mahmoud Abbas As A World Leader Despite Lack Of Elections Moshe Phillips

https://thej.ca/2025/09/29/media-and-u-n-portray-mahmoud-abbas-as-a-world-leader-despite-lack-of-elections/

ABC News coverage of Abbas’s Sept. 25 U.N. address drew criticism for calling him a world leader while he remains in office well past his elected term and faces allegations of failing to uphold Oslo commitments.

Mahmoud Abbas was elected to a single four-year term as chairman of the Palestinian Authority well over 20 years ago. Several journalists at ABC News, in their reports on Abbas’s speech (given via video to the UN General Assembly on September 25), referred to him as a “world leader” and otherwise skewed their coverage of the man who has been chairman of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) since Yasser Arafat died in 2004.

This is significant, since the official emblem of Abbas’s PLO still features a map of “Palestine” that leaves no room for any State of Israel—”from the river to the sea.”

When Abbas looks around him, he must be astonished at how news outlets and the international community have acquiesced to his brutal dictatorship and unwillingness to hold elections.

Here are some direct quotes from the ABC News staffers:

Shannon Kingston breathlessly reported that it was “remarkable to see Abbas … say that… he would work with him (Trump) and that’s because the two leaders have a lot of bad blood in the past.” It is disturbing that Kingston would draw any such comparison between an elected U.S. president and the leader of the murderous PLO.

Kyra Phillips (no relation) called Abbas the “leader of the war-torn region.” What’s worse, she said, “(Abbas) also called for the release of all hostages on both sides.” Israel does not hold any hostages; it has prisoners and detainees.

You’ll Totally Believe Who’s Secretly in Charge of the Gaza ‘Relief’ Flotilla

https://pjmedia.com/vodkapundit/2025/09/30/youll-totally-believe-whos-secretly-in-charge-of-the-gaza-relief-flotilla-n4944291

Surprise! That Sumud “relief” flotilla crossing the Mediterranean to the Gaza Strip is actually a Hamas operation, according to secret documents just uncovered by Israeli forces operating in Gaza.

As I reported earlier this month, Greta’s Gaza blockade-buster flotilla is perhaps the largest effort of its kind. The most recent reports indicate that the flotilla consists of more than 50 vessels from 44 countries. Its sponsors include the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, Global Movement to Gaza, Maghreb Sumud Flotilla, and Sumud Nusantara.

Ostensibly, the flotilla is supposed to make its way to Gaza City, where it will provide relief, end the war, and allow everybody to live happily ever after.

In reality, Sumud’s mission is far more sinister — an attempt at Hamas “enlarging” its way out of a deadly impasse. I’ve read it all so that you don’t have to, but you do need to take a quick look at the evidence.

OSINT investigator Eitan Fischberger has all the boring details on X, including copies of the original documents and their English translations. But the quick and dirty version is that Greta & Co. are nothing more than the Western face of “Hamas Abroad,” as Fischberger described Hamas’s overseas branches, which run the flotilla “through the PCPA [Palestinian Conference for Palestinians Abroad].”

“A second document lists flotilla operatives, including Zaher Birawi (UK), longtime flotilla leader, and Saif Abu Kashk (Spain),” Fischberger continued. And how about that, Hamas bigwigs openly operating in Britain and Spain? I’ll give you a moment to pretend to pick your jaw up off the floor.

Aside from that, I’ll keep light on the paperwork details because they’re not of much interest to anyone outside the intel community…

…but what they reveal is fascinating.

If we set the Wayback Machine to Oct. 7, 2023, to re-witness the unimaginably cruel Hamas terror invasion of southern Israel — don’t worry, I won’t actually ask you to watch any of that again — it requires no imagination at all to infer what Hamas was up to.

I mean, aside from setting babies on fire, raping women to death, and taking hundreds of hostages. That was all in Hamas’s idea of good fun, I suppose, but the methods were not the goal. The goal was to provoke the kind of murderous response-in-kind from Israel that would isolate the Jewish state completely, even from its allies in America.

Britain’s Most Shameful Hour Since Before World War II Rivaling in its immorality and stupidity Chamberlain’s betrayal of Czechoslovakia in 1938. by Hugh Fitzgerald Leave a Comment

https://www.frontpagemag.com/britains-most-shameful-hour-since-before-world-war-ii/

Now Keir Starmer has gone and done it: he’s broken with decades of his country’s foreign policy and, in synchronicity with two other appalling leaders, Mark Carney of Canada and Anthony Albanese of Australia, who have made the same announcement at the same time, has announced his country’s recognition of a “state of Palestine.”

Starmer hasn’t offered any hint as to the borders of this new state, nor explained why he thinks the 3,500-year history of the Jews in Judea and Samaria (which is where most of that new state would be located) should be ignored, or why he thinks he can simply forget about the League of Nations’ Mandate for Palestine, that in 1922 assigned all the territory “from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea” to be included in the area subject to the Palestinian Mandate, which would in time become the Jewish state of Israel. Nor has he shown any awareness of UN Security Council Resolution 242 — written largely by the British representative to the U.N. Lord Caradon — which allowed Israel to retain territory it won in the Six-Day War that it deemed necessary to hold onto if it was to have “secure and recognized borders.”

Nor has Keir Starmer said anything about what would happen, in this “state of Palestine,” to the 500,000 Israelis who have been living in Judea and Samaria for decades, or to the 200,000 Israelis now living in east Jerusalem, all three areas having been claimed by the most “moderate” of Palestinians to become part of their state. The non-moderates, of course, lay claim to all of the land “from the river to the sea,” by which they mean the disappearance of Israel, the expulsion or killing of all of its Jewish inhabitants, and its replacement by a twenty-third Arab state.

Jake Wallis Simons casts a cold eye on Keir Starmer’s betrayal of an ally here: “Starmer’s shame,” Jake Wallis Simons, September 21, 2025:

…Polling published yesterday revealed that 90 per cent of Britons thought it a bad idea, and for once the majority view is the right one. For evidence of this, one need look no further than Hamas, which has responded with unbridled glee and has wholeheartedly congratulated Starmer.

Rewarding Oct 7 Will Globalize Oct 7 And the next Oct 7 attacks may happen in Paris, London or New York City. by Daniel Greenfield

https://www.frontpagemag.com/rewarding-oct-7-will-globalize-oct-7/

On July 23, 1968, the era of terrorist airline hijacking and hostage taking went into full swing when terrorists from the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) hijacked an El-Al flight originating in London’s Heathrow Airport and headed out of Rome on the way to Israel.

What became the world’s longest hijacking lasted for forty days. The PLO’s UN observer bragged that the hijackings had “awakened the media and public opinion much more” than its political propaganda. France paid a $7.5 million ransom and the hijackers were flown out to their destination of choice after Israel released 16 terrorists with blood on their hands.

Notes from the Johnson administration had initially expressed its concern “over serious blow(s) to international civil air transport which likely arise if hijacking of El Al aircraft permitted to stand… this incident, if not quickly redressed, might stimulate competitive hijacking attempts.”

And indeed it did.

The hijacking by a Marxist-Islamist group backed by the USSR and trained by its proxies in Egypt and Syria, spurred a new wave of Cuba hijackings by leftist sympathizers in the U.S, who had been briefly active earlier in the decade but whose attacks had fallen off, by the PFLP,  by the North Koreans, the Japanese Red Army, Pakistanis and other members of the Red-Green Alliance. What had been the behavior of the occasional madman became a wave of terrorism.

The copycat leftist terrorists include a Black Panther who hijacked a TWA flight out of Oakland after murdering a police lieutenant and was able to live out the rest of his life in Cuba.

When PFLP terrorists were arrested, their allies attacked other airplanes, took more hostages and traded them for the hijackers. Governments that had formerly condemned the attacks, negotiated, made deals and paid out millions, freeing and financing the terrorists attacking them.

When Israel struck back at the states harboring the hijackers, it was condemned by the UN in resolutions like Resolution 262 while the State Department warned Israel that “we simply cannot have this kind of violence in the Near East.” Not by the terrorists hijacking Americans. By Israel.

On September 9, 1970, the PFLP hijacked four planes headed for New York City in the largest airplane hijacking campaign of the time that would prefigure and inspire September 11.