RUTHFULLY YOURS

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2012/04/02/New-York-Times-Follows-NBC-With-Selective-Edit-of-Zimmerman-911-Call
Today’s front-page article in the New York Times on the Trayvon Martin case repeated NBC’s attempt to cast George Zimmerman as a racist by selectively editing his 911 call.

Here is the 911 call transcript:

ZIMMERMAN: This guy looks like he’s up to no good, or he’s on drugs or something. It’s raining and he’s just walking around, looking about.

911 DISPATCHER: Okay. And this guy, is he white, black, or Hispanic?

ZIMMERMAN: He looks black.

And here is what the Times reported:

“Hey, we’ve had some break-ins in my neighborhood,” Mr. Zimmerman said to start the conversation with the dispatcher. “And there’s a real suspicious guy.”

This guy seemed to be up to no good; like he was on drugs or something; in a gray hoodie. Asked to describe him further, he said, “He looks black.”

The Times, like NBC and MSNBC, leaves out the fact that it was the dispatcher, not Zimmerman, who first raised the issue of race.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/04/02/Obama-war-Supreme-Court

THIS IS FROM THE HUGO CHAVEZ PLAYBOOK….CHAVEZ, AFTER A DEMOCRATIC ELECTION, IMPLEMENTED HIS RULE BY DESTROYING THE JUDICIARY….RSK
Today, President Obama effectively declared war on the Supreme Court. Speaking from the Rose Garden, he suggested that the “unelected” Supreme Court must avoid the “extraordinary … unprecedented” measure of striking down his unconstitutional Obamacare regime:

Ultimately, I am confident that the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress …

This is not the first time Obama has threatened the Supreme Court. Back in January 2010, in his State of the Union Address, he dramatically misrepresented the Supreme Court’s stance on campaign finance, and explained, “Last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law to open the floodgates for special interests – including foreign corporations – to spend without limit in our elections.” Justice Alito shook his head and mouthed, “Not true.” That’s because it wasn’t true – but Obama’s interpretation of Constitutional law is lacking at best, deeply dishonest at worst.

Jihadist Infiltration Posted By David Meir-Levi URL to article: http://frontpagemag.com/2012/04/02/jihadist-infiltration-they-are-winning/ Judging from the progress that anti-Israel “Lawfare” and pro-Shari’a movements have made in advancing the “Palestinian Cause” and Shari’a compliant programs in a distressingly vast array of our society’s institutions over the past decade, one must conclude that the Muslim jihadist forces working to infiltrate […]

Obama Leaks Israel’s Attack Plan? URL to article: http://frontpagemag.com/2012/04/03/obama-leaks-israels-attack-plan/ Last week Mark Perry—a writer with a long anti-Israeli pedigree—published a much-talked-about article in Foreign Policy. It claimed Azerbaijan had granted Israel use of some airbases for an Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities—thereby helping Israel solve problems of refueling its planes and making an attack […]

Obama Welcomes Brotherhood Run for Egyptian Presidency Posted By Ryan Mauro http://frontpagemag.com The Muslim Brotherhood swore up and down that it wouldn’t seek the Egyptian presidency as proof of its desire for a pluralistic society. At the last minute, the Brotherhood nominated Khairat el-Shater. According to the New York Times, State Department officials actually look […]

http://www.israelnationalnews.com/Articles/Article.aspx/11471

Perhaps the theatre people should bone up on their British history. The writer helps them along…

The Guardian, Thursday 29 March 2012

Open Letter by Members of the U.K.’s Theater and Film Industries: “We notice with dismay and regret that Shakespeare’s Globe Theatre in London has invited Israel’s National Theatre, Habima, to perform The Merchant of Venice in its Globe to Globe festival this coming May. The general manager of Habima has declared the invitation “an honourable accomplishment for the State of Israel.” But Habima has a shameful record of involvement with illegal Israeli settlements in Occupied Palestinian Territory.”
Writing this letter is a good way for me to discuss your denial of facts and the disrespect that you bestow on your British people’s history.

Did you know that your government was the leading force among the fifty-one member countries – the entire League of Nations – that unanimously declared on July 24, 1922:

“Recognition has been given to the historical connection of the Jewish People with Palestine and to the grounds for reconstructing their National Home in that country.”

Did you know that Britain as Mandatory became the official administrator and mentor over Jewish Palestine, the territory between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea, where the “Mandate for Palestine” clearly stated as follow:

Article 5: “The Mandatory shall be responsible for seeing that no Palestine territory shall be ceded or leased to, or in any way placed under the control of the Government of any foreign power.” The territory of Palestine was exclusively assigned for the Jewish National Home.

Article 6: “The administration of Palestine … shall encourage … close settlement by Jews on the land, including State land and waste land not required for public purpose.”

Jewish settlements are legal, and there are no “Occupied Palestinian Territories.”

Did you know that your country’s hero Sir Winston Churchill had that to say about Jewish “Occupation” of Palestine:

“When it is asked what is meant by the development of the Jewish National Home in Palestine, it may be answered that it is not the imposition of a Jewish nationality upon the inhabitants of Palestine as a whole, but the further development of the existing Jewish community, with the assistance of Jews in other parts of the world, in order that it may become a centre in which the Jewish people as a whole may take, on grounds of religion and race, an interest and a pride.”

My friend, the British world of culture: It is not “The settlements” nor is it the “Occupation” that Arabs reject. They reject the internationally recognized lawful right of Israel to exist as a legitimate, secured, Jewish political entity –

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.11715/pub_detail.asp
Recently, FSM ran an article from The American Dream entitled “Obama: ‘We Have a Moral Obligation’ to…Neuter America?” The article ends by saying, “Most people that will read this article will choose to believe that a nuclear attack on America is absolutely impossible.
I wish that were true.”

I wish it were true too. Unfortunately, those who pass for our leaders today seem hell bent on destroying America as I, and many others, have known it all of our lives. And yet so many people seem to have no clue as to what is really going on. Is it that we really don’t believe that President Obama is morally (immorally?) capable of giving away the store? Or that we don’t want to believe it?

Well, believe it.

* VIDEOS * TODAY’S HOT PICKS *

1. VIDEO: Cold as ice? Parents want to ban ice cream trucks from park – No kids screaming for ice cream?
2. VIDEO: Conservative, Christian film scores BIG at box office
3. VIDEO: Coulter slams Van Jones during ObamaCare debate
4. VIDEO: Administration’s Homeland Security Video Features ‘Terrorist’ Wearing Hoodie
5. VIDEO: Jerusalem Dateline Show: Europe’s Anti-Semitism
6. Al-Qaeda ‘plotting another 9/11′ from Afghanistan – We have killed all the slow and stupid ones. But that means the ones that are left are totally dedicated…
7. BREAKING VIDEO: Bill Ayers: ‘I Get Up Every Morning and Think…Today I‘m Going to End Capitalism’
8. Military Atheists Hold Army-Sponsored ‘Rock Beyond Belief’ Festival
9. The top 10 Hollywood hypocrites
10. VIDEO: VP Biden downplays Russian threat: ‘This is not 1956

http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/

The verdict is in on the Tolouse killings of Jewish children and the villain is that old standby, “Failure to Integrate”. What it comes down to is that Mohammed Merah did not kill Jewish children because he hated Jews, because he had breathed in the foul poisonous vapors of a creed which believes Jews to be subhuman devils whose destruction must come to pass before the golden age of Islam finally arrives. Mohammed Merah killed Jews because he was unhappy and it was France that made him unhappy.

Murder across religious and ethnic boundaries in Europe is inevitably a crime against multiculturalism. If someone kills a Muslim, it’s an assault on multiculturalism. If a Muslim kills someone, it’s also an assault on multiculturalism. Whoever ends up in the morgue, the incident becomes a clarion call for recommitting ourselves to more multiculturalism.

http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/p18957.xml One of the most important challenges we face as a free people is understanding the true nature of – and threat posed by – a totalitarian, supremacist Islamic doctrine its adherents call shariah. So, it would seem to be good news that a $3 million public education campaign is being launched nationwide to “clarify” […]