RUTHFULLY YOURS

List of Democrats who signed the J Street anti-Israel letter.

THANKS TO VICTOR SHARPE INCLUDING THOSE WHO OPENLY SUPPORT HAMAS

Steve Cohen (TN-9) Jewish
Gerald Connolly (VA-11)
John Yarmuth (KY-3) Hamas
Tammy Baldwin (WI-2) Hamas
Earl Blumenauer (OR-3) Hamas
Suzanne Bonamici (OR-1)
Bruce Braley (IA-1) Hamas
Lois Capps (CA-23) Hamas
Michael Capuano (MA-8) Hamas
Andre Carson (IN-7) Hamas
Hansen Clarke (MI-13)
William Lacy Clay (MO-1)
Emanuel Cleaver II (MO-5)
John Conyers, Jr. (MI-14) Hamas
Jim Cooper (TN-5)
Danny Davis (IL-7)
Susan Davis (CA-53)
Peter DeFazio (OR-4) Hamas
Diana DeGette (CO-1)
Rosa DeLauro (CT-3)
John Dingell (MI-15) Hamas
Lloyd Doggett (TX-25)
Mike Doyle (PA-14)
Donna Edwards (MD-4)
Keith Ellison (MN-5) Hamas
Anna Eshoo (CA-14)
Sam Farr (CA-17) Hamas
Chaka Fattah (PA-2) Hamas
Bob Filner (CA-51) Hamas
Charlie Gonzalez (TX-20)
Raul Grijalva (AZ-7) Hamas
Luis Gutierrez (IL-4)
Martin Heinrich (NM-1)
Maurice Hinchey (NY-22) Hamas
Rush Holt (NJ-12) Hamas
Jesse Jackson, Jr. (IL-2)
Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30)
Hank Johnson (GA-4)
Ron Kind (WI-3)
Barbara Lee (CA-9) Hamas
John Lewis (GA-5)
Dave Loebsack (IA-2)
Stephen Lynch (MA-9)
Edward Markey (MA-7)
Betty McCollum (MN-4) Hamas
Jim McDermott (WA-7) Hamas
Jim McGovern (MA-3) Hamas
Brad Miller (NC-13)
George Miller (CA-7) Hamas

James Moran (VA-8) Hamas
Eleanor Holmes Norton (DC)
John Olver (MA-1) Hamas
Ed Pastor (AZ-4)
Chellie Pingree (ME-1) Hamas
Jared Polis (CO-2)
David Price (NC-4) Hamas
Charles Rangel (NY-15)
Laura Richardson (CA-37)
Lucille Roybal-Allard (CA-34)
Bobby Rush (IL-1)
Jan Schakowsky (IL-9)
Kurt Schrader (OR-5)
Louise Slaughter (NY-28)
Adam Smith (WA-9) Hamas
Pete Stark (CA-13) Hamas
Mike Thompson (CA-1)
John Tierney (MA-6) Hamas
Paul Tonko (NY-21)
Nydia Velazquez (NY-12)
Chris Van Hollen (MD-8)
Melvin Watt (NC-12)
Henry Waxman (CA-30)
Peter Welch (VT-AL)
Lynn Woolsey (CA-6) Hamas

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/45996

America Elected an Ignoramus Alan Caruba, NMJ.us

I do not write unpleasant things about Barack Hussein Obama because he is a Democrat, a far-left liberal ideologue, a confirmed liar, or the sock-puppet of whatever cabal that chose him long ago to be the President. I write unpleasant things because he is all of these things, but also because he is the most stupid man to have ever held the office of President.

As far back as January 2, 2010, I wrote that Obama had “an imaginary life” because there was no proof that anything he claimed in his two memoirs, written by the age of 45, was true. His resume listed “community organizer”, an amorphous term that could mean anything, as his primary occupation. By October 2010 the Washington Times published a commentary of mine that said “millions of Americans are beginning to ask: Is President Obama just a moron?”

Even prior to his election, he had ensured that his entire paper trail of birth certificates, passports, college records, and other items most people can produce in under five minutes were “sealed” from public review, despite the fact that most modern presidents have had to submit their personal records, short of a colonoscopy exam, for examination. Among his first executive orders was one issued on January 21, 2009, to ensure none of these records saw the light of day.

When he finally produced a birth certificate, forensic analysts deemed it a forgery.

So, what really occurred on Election Day in 2008 was that a majority of voters, guided by an adoring mainstream press, elected an enigma. He rewarded their obsequiousness by being the first President since Grover Cleveland to not attend their annual Gridiron dinner.

Since then, anyone paying any attention has had to conclude that Americans elected an ignoramus, based solely on his own words and actions.

http://www.canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/46013
The West should be prepared–metaphorically speaking–to start stockpiling on heavy winter clothing. An Islamic ice age is about to descend upon us. Be prepared.

The much vaunted and praised “Arab Spring,” which took the world by surprise in December 2010, is slowly but surely turning into an Arab winter, which will inexorably become an Arab Islamic Ice Age in the near future. Already, the icicles of pan-Islamism are beginning to form throughout the Maghreb (North Africa), and the West best come to terms with the reality that the mantra of “free and fair elections” does not translate into Arabic as Western-style democracy.
Tunisia

Ironically, it is the birthplace of the “Arab Spring”—Tunisia—which is already in the midst of turning from Arab secular tyranny, into Arab Islamist domination. The largest party in the Tunisian parliament is the “moderate” Islamist party known as Ennahda (Hizb an Nahda), meaning the “Renaissance Party.” When elections were held in October 2011, the party gained a plurality of 90 seats in the 217 member Constituent Assembly.

Ennahda was formed by Rashid Ghannouchi, who after 22 years in exile, returned to a hero’s welcome in January 2011, after the overthrow of Zine El Abidine Ben Ali. Mr. Ghannouchi, who has been described as a “moderate” by many political pundits, has already called for the“end of Israel.” He has compared his party with that of Turkey’s Islamist AKP (“Justice and Development Party”) led by the Prime Minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, who has practically turned Turkey into a de facto Islamic republic and brought relations with Israel to the brink of severance. Alas, the much hailed (and perhaps failed) “Jasmine Revolution” might well have paved the way for the beginning of Arab “Islamocracies.” That is, Islamic republics replacing secular pan-Arab socialist regimes, via “free and fair elections
Algeria

To the west of Tunisia is the People’s Democratic Republic of Algeria, which almost became the first Islamic republic in

http://www.prudenpolitics.com/index.php/pruden/full_column/the_big_day_for_swiss_cheese

Life is unfair, as John F. Kennedy famously observed. That might not have been the most memorable thing he ever said, but it’s probably the most quoted, and when better to repeat it than on the last day for Americans to file their federal income tax returns.

Jimmy Carter, who has mercifully all but disappeared down the memory hole, called the U.S. tax code “a disgrace to the human race.” Hitler, cancer, and the designated hitter follow closely, but we take Mr. Jimmy’s point. How the government confiscates our money, like a root canal without anything to kill the pain, is not very nice. But like a village dentist armed with only a pair of greasy pliers, the government gets the job done.

This is not a good year for a taxpayer to cut corners in calculating how much he owes, because the new director of the Internal Revenue Service decreed no more Mr. Nice Guy.

The Devil We Don’t Know — on The Jamie Glazov Show, Tuesday, April 17, 8pm Pacific
by Jamie Glazov
Nonie Darwish coming on Frontpage’s radio show to discuss her new book and to take your calls for the full hour.

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/04/17/the-devil-we-don%E2%80%99t-know-on-the-jamie-glazov-show-tuesday-april-17-8pm-pacific/

Stalked by Stupidity Posted By Roger Kimball

URL to article: http://pjmedia.com/rogerkimball/2012/04/15/stalked-by-stupidity/

As regular readers of Roger’s Rules know, I do not often read our former paper of record. The only time I tend to encounter the New York Times in propria persona is when I visit friends in Northwest Connecticut. Being an early riser, I motor down to a local emporium to collar the papers and the needful for breakfast. Since this happens only every few months, my view of the paper’s devolution is dramatized by a sort of time-lapse effect. If you were subjected to the paper day in and day out, I reckon you wouldn’t notice the degradation quite so vividly.

Consider “Young, Black, Male, and Stalked by Bias,” [1] an op-ed by Brent Staples. Here’s how the piece opens:

The door to the subway train slides open, revealing three tall, young black men, crowding the entrance, with hooded sweatshirts pulled up over downward-turned faces; boxer shorts billowing out of over-large, low-slung jeans; and sneakers with the laces untied.

Your response to the look — and to this trio on the subway — depends in part on the context, like the time of day, but especially on how you feel about young, male blackness.

If it unsettles you — as it does many people — you never get beyond the first impression. But those of us who are not reflexively uncomfortable with blackness . . .

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Global_Economy/ND17Dj05.html

The poison drip never stops. Last week, regulators in the United States fined Goldman Sachs US$22 million for failing to prevent research analysts from feloniously advising favored clients of changes to stock recommendations. And federal prosecutors reportedly will offer immunity against a back-office manager of the busted commodities firm MF Global in return for testimony against its former chief, Jon Corzine, who ran Goldman Sachs before becoming senator and governor in New Jersey.

Corzine allegedly signed off on the improper transfer (that is, theft) of customer funds to meet margin calls for the firm’s own account.

A $22 million fine for research violations sounds like a slap on the wrist for a technical violation, to be sure, but it points to a red thread which, if we follow it carefully, will illuminate flaws in the American economy that are no fault of Goldman Sachs. The Corzine case is straightforward: either he stole the money or he didn’t, and either the Justice Department will press the matter upon a former Democratic senator and governor, or it won’t.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/profiles/sayeeda-warsi-the-baroness-with-bad-news-for-the-old-guard-7646623.html?printService=print

Baroness Sayeeda Warsi is standing, surrounded by large sacks of African chillies, having an animated conversation with a former nuclear submarine engineer about his new range of hot sauces.

Since we met five hours ago, we’ve already launched the Tories’ Welsh local government election campaign in Newport; visited the first “wireless” town centre in Monmouth; and toured a women’s refuge in Cardiff.

But for the moment, as we sample the Hot Diggidy Dog sauces (“You just can’t take the spice,” Warsi jokes), Simon Llewellyn, the firm’s boss, wants to bend her ear about bank lending.

“You can only get a loan now if you’re already successful enough not to need it,” he laments. She listens, suggests a new government scheme which might help him, and when he still seems downbeat promises to personally deliver a letter of complaint to the Treasury.

http://www.jewishideasdaily.com/content/module/2012/4/16/main-feature/1/poison-pen/e

Nobel Prize-winning German novelist—a former SS soldier, no less—accuses the state of Israel of seeking to exterminate an entire people, and the literary republic yawns. But when Israel bars its accuser from entering the country, because ex-Nazis have no place in the Jewish state, the cries of “bullying” and “censorship” nearly drown out the original accusation.

Günter Grass, the 84-year-old German writer best known for his 1959 novel The Tin Drum, published a poem earlier this month in the Süddeutsche Zeitung (a Munich daily), which was generally described as critical of Israel. “What Must Be Said,” a 69-line poem written as a first-person confession in Grass’s own voice, “breaks a long standing German taboo and publicly criticizes Israel,” Al-Jazeera cheered.

Running on Empty: The Cliché Candidacy of Barack Obama

URL to article: http://pjmedia.com/blog/running-on-empty-the-cliche-candidacy-of-barack-obama/

The last few weeks have been disastrous ones for the Obama re-election effort. The evidence for this is in several areas, including public opinion surveys. The Rasmussen daily tracking survey, one of the very few to use a likely voter screen at this point in the cycle, now has Mitt Romney leading Obama [1] by five points. A new Fox survey of registered voters has Obama with his lowest approval number to date at 42%, trailing Romney [2] head-to-head by 2%.

On the issue front, the Obama team has suffered many severe blows. It turns out that several members of the Supreme Court, maybe even a majority, think the issue of the constitutionality of the individual mandate in ObamaCare is a serious one. The liberal commentariat from Jeffrey Toobin to Linda Greenhouse, caught in their tight cocoon that ignores alternative views, had assured themselves before the Court took up the matter that the constitutionality of the mandate was a trivial concern. After a few days of oral arguments, during which the Obama administration’s lawyers were badly outclassed by the attorneys for the states challenging the law, public support for the law dropped to its lowest level and support for the Supreme Court rose.