Displaying posts categorized under

ANTI-SEMITISM

Britain has abandoned Jews to this savagery The writing was on the wall long before the horror in Manchester. Tom Slater

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/10/02/britain-has-abandoned-jews-to-this-savagery/

Six minutes. That is all it took for Britain to descend to a new low of infamy, in which Jews are slaughtered at synagogues. A nation whose entire postwar sense of self is bound up with the fight against the Nazis – against militarised anti-Semitism – is now a place where Yom Kippur, the holiest day in the Jewish calendar, has become stained in the blood of British Jews, brutally murdered by an assailant dressed all in black.

The attack this morning at the Heaton Park Hebrew Congregation Synagogue in Crumpsall, at the heart of the Jewish community in the north of Manchester, is by turns horrific and horrifically predictable. A car rammed into congregants, a scumbag emerged and stabbed two dead, before being ‘neutralised’ by armed police as he tried to smash his way through a window, while wearing what appeared to be a suicide vest but may well have been a grotesque prop to his barbarous performance.

Words fail me. Because we have failed Jews. The horror in Crumpsall comes after years of anti-Semitism bubbling up from the depths, while the great and good did little more than spray some air freshener, offering warm words about standing with the Jewish community, while doing naff all else. In which Labour continues to prattle on about ‘Islamophobia’ or the ‘racism’ of Nigel Farage’s visa proposals, while the world’s oldest hatred has staged a barbaric comeback on our streets.

Even before 7 October in Israel – the most deadly assault on Jews since the Holocaust, two years ago this week – British Jews could see what was coming. Even before Hamas sent its killers and rapists into kibbutzim and dance parties, even before Western capitals erupted in jubilation about those apocalyptic incursions, British Jews made up 0.5 per cent of the population and a quarter of the victims of religious hate crimes. Jewish pensioners would be suckerpunched in north London. A Jewish cemetery in Kent was desecrated eight times in 10 years. Security around schools and synagogues became a grim fact of British Jewish life. Meanwhile, we had TV debates about whether it was racist for Boris Johnson to mock the burqa, or Adele to wear her hair in braids and wave a Jamaican flag during Notting Hill Carnival. It shames us.

Stoking Antisemitism by Linda Goudsmit

https://goudsmit.pundicity.com/28892/stoking-antisemitism

 goudsmit.pundicity.com  and website: lindagoudsmit.com 

The controversy over Tucker Carlson’s antisemitic remarks at Charlie Kirk’s memorial service on September 21, 2025, demands answers to two foundational and separate questions:

1. Who gains from the assassination of Charlie Kirk?

2. Is Tucker Carlson advocating antisemitism?

To answer these questions, we must first examine the Judeo-Christian tradition itself. Our Founding Fathers were Christian men whose ethics and morality derived from their Judeo-Christian roots and then provided the infrastructure for our founding documents including the United States Constitution. So, who are the Jews and who are the Christians who still represent the originating Judeo-Christian tradition of our Founding Fathers?

Charlie Kirk was a born-again Christian who preached faith, family, and flag––the original triptych of commitments that support individualism and freedom in America’s constitutional republic, Canada, Western Europe, and Israel. The political assassination of Charlie Kirk had three tactical objectives:

1. To stop Turning Point USA (TPUSA), the American non-profit organization founded by Charlie Kirk in 2012, and end its mission of promoting the nation’s return to our Founding Fathers’ conservative policies and principles.

2. To stop Charlie Kirk from speaking and end his iconic “Prove Me Wrong” events on college campuses.

3. To stop young people from embracing Americanism and returning to their historical Judeo-Christian roots.

I speak as an American citizen, but what I am saying applies to Canada, Western Europe, and Israel. The world is at war: Globalism vs. Nationalism:

Globalism is a replacement ideology that seeks to reorder the world into one singular, planetary Unistate, ruled by the globalist elite. The globalist war on nation-states cannot succeed without collapsing the United States of America. The long-term strategic attack plan moves America incrementally from constitutional republic to socialism to globalism to feudalism. The tactical attack plan uses asymmetric psychological and informational warfare to destabilize Americans and drive society out of objective reality into the madness of subjective reality. America’s children are the primary target of the globalist predators. (Linda Goudsmit, Space Is No Longer the Final Frontier––Reality Is, 2024)

Jew-Hatred on Display, Even in America By Lynne Lechter

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/09/jew_hatred_on_display_even_in_america.html

In the 1950s, a golden age for Jewish people in America had arrived. 

Gone were the obstacles to higher education and the impediments to corporate employment. No longer were boycotts on suburban home purchases. Law firms opened to Jewish  attorneys. 

Nobody yelled when they saw a group of Jews: “OMG, here comes a group of young Jewish kids or men — quick! run to the other side of the street.”

Jewish people studied hard, and worked hard. They weren’t big drinkers.  They played sports but rarely professionally. For them, the  preferred professional apex was to become an attorney or a doctor.

In those days, parents were usually strict with girls. They did not go out without a male escort. They did not go to bars. They rarely played sports. Adult Jewish women, if they worked, mostly did so as secretaries, nurses or teachers. If they became pregnant, they did not work. Family life was everything.

These cultural standards evolved as both sexes went into other areas of employment, and women independently went to bars and traveled alone. For many, nabbing a husband was no longer their main concern.

All the time the golden age of America for Jews was expanding, within a few decades, a silent influx of Arab money was starting to fund academic chairs in leading private universities. The chairs were funded to create Arab studies departments.

Critical mass was reached in approximately the early 2010s when books emerged regarding lists of safe colleges and universities for Jewish students. But most Jewish parents and students ignored the warnings.

Concomitantly, many inner cities were experiencing growth of mosques, conversions from Christianity to Islam, and Islamic influence in public schools and universities.  Most ignored it. After all, that was the ideal of America.

What Kneecap said is far worse than you think The collapse of their case is good news, but we still need to talk about their unhinged Israelophobia. Brendan O’Neill

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/09/27/what-kneecap-said-is-far-worse-than-you-think/

I’m glad the terror case against Kneecap has been thrown out. No one, not even tossers in tea cosies, not even crap rappers in Provo fancy dress, should be dragged to the dock for what they say. Yes, even if what they’ve said is ‘Up Hamas, up Hezbollah’. Freedom of speech must include the freedom to gush over neo-fascists. The liberty to utter is meaningless if it doesn’t cover the liberty of lowlifes to sing the praises of armies of anti-Semites. It’s gross, I know, but speech often is. Better that we trust ourselves to handle vile ideas than that we invite the state to infantilise us by reprimanding those we find offensive.

Here’s the main reason I’m happy the case collapsed: because now the court with real moral authority – the court of public opinion – can do its job. We don’t need wizened judges to tell us which ideas are ‘good’ and which are ‘bad’. We can decide for ourselves, through free, frank debate. And in the case of Kneecap, that’s exactly what we should do. The state’s case against them may have withered on a technicality, but the court of public opinion’s judgment upon these darlings of the Israelophobic bourgeoisie should be ferocious indeed.

It was band member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh (aka Mo Chara) who found himself in court. He was charged with expressing support for a proscribed terror group following the emergence of footage showing him holding up the Hezbollah flag at a gig in London in November 2024. Footage also showed the band hollering ‘Up Hamas, up Hezbollah!’ to the glee of the Israel-hating rich kids in their audience. Today, the chief magistrate at Woolwich Crown Court decreed that the charges against Mo Chara were ‘null’ because they were not brought within the statutory time limit.

Now that the state has finally butted out of this speech-related scandal, we the people can have our say. I’ll kick it off: what Kneecap said is even worse than you think. They didn’t just wave the Hezbollah flag, which would have been sickening enough given Hezbollah is an avowedly racist movement devoted to violently excising the ‘cancerous’ Jews from the Middle East and pushing them back to ‘Germany, or wherever they come from’. No, they also smiled – smiled – following the worst mass murder of Jews since the Holocaust.

For two years now, Kneecap have openly flirted with the ideologues of violent Israelophobia. On 8 October 2023, just hours after Hamas raped and butchered more than a thousand Jews in southern Israel, they posted a beaming pic of themselves on social media. ‘Solidarity with the Palestinian struggle’, they said, sporting wide grins and with a Palestine flag hanging in the background. As Jewish grandmothers were being dragged into dank tunnels in Gaza, as the blackened corpses of young Jews were being disentangled by early responders, Kneecap were smiling. They saw a pogrom and they said ‘Solidarity’.

They said ‘Up Hamas’ just a year after Hamas killed more Jews in one day than anyone else since the Nazis. They said ‘Up Hamas’ after it had been established that Hamas had thrown grenades at Jewish children, had beaten to death young Jewish women and had boasted to their families back in Gaza about how many Jews they had slaughtered with their own hands. They said ‘Up Hamas’, a movement founded with the express aim of exterminating Israel’s Jews, and which as recently as 2021 was inciting people to buy ‘five-shekel knives’ and ‘cut off the heads of Jews’.

One of the Kneecap trio – the one who’s nearly 40 – posed with a book consisting of the collected speeches of Hassan Nasrallah, the late leader of Hezbollah. This is a book that refers to Jews as the ‘descendants of apes and pigs’.

The ‘Free’ University of Brussels: An Anti-Semitic Madrassa in Europe? by Drieu Godefridi

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21922/free-university-of-brussels

The climate of hatred and intimidation is so pervasive that, according to them, it is impossible to be Jewish on the ULB campus. One cannot speak or express oneself as Jewish — or simply be Jewish. Just being a Jew is condemned and subjected to violence.

Finally, when Alain Destexhe, long-time Belgian Senator, sought to shed light on this choice by pointing to demographic developments at ULB, citing around twenty first names — without surnames — the university immediately, the same day, filed a complaint against him for “incitement to hatred”. It is questionable how the observation of a demographic evolution — neither good nor bad in itself, but simply factual — could be construed as “hateful”. So much for “free inquiry”, the motto of the ULB.

Out of conviction or cowardice, the Free University of Brussels seems to have chosen the path of complicity with Islamist anti-Semitism.

Voices are now calling on the Belgian authorities and the European Union (notably within the Erasmus program) to take the necessary measures, including the complete withdrawal of funding.

The Free University of Brussels (ULB) has been making headlines in Europe. Law students decided to name their class after Rima Hassan, a French Islamist politician known for her anti-Semitic positions and her apologetics for Hamas and other terrorist organizations. That decision came against the backdrop of countless attacks and threats targeting Jewish students on the Brussels campus.

Has the ULB become a breeding ground for Islamist and anti-Semitic hatred in Europe?

1. Anti-Semitic attacks

May 2024 – Physical assaults against Jewish students at the ULB campus. Jewish students, including the president of the Union of Jewish Students in Belgium, were attacked by pro-Palestinian demonstrators. The victims were first insulted, then beaten. Israel’s ambassador to Belgium, Idit Rosenzweig Abu, shared a video of the attack. Incredibly, campus security removed the Jewish students — the victims, not the aggressors — from the premises “for their own safety”, without immediately intervening against the attackers. Hundreds of people then demonstrated to denounce this gratuitous and indiscriminate anti-Semitic violence.

Open season against the Jews The West’s obsessional attack on Israel can only be explained by its assault on its own core values and identity Melanie Phillips

https://melaniephillips.substack.com/account

All bets are off. Clearly, there’s no limit to the world’s attempt to defame, delegitimise and destroy Israel, signalling through this incitement an implicit but unmistakable indication that it’s now open season on Jews wherever they are.

The chants of “Globalise the intifada” and the Arabic cry threatening to slaughter the Jews just as Mohammed did in Khyber in the seventh century CE no longer merely represent troubling activist behaviour on the West’s pro-Gaza demonstrations. Unbelievably, the so-called civilised world is sending out implicit signals that attacking Jews, both in Israel and in the diaspora, is morally justified.

This weekend, Britain’s Starmer government is said to be planning to recognise a state of Palestine. This is in advance of a move led by France, and also including Australia and Canada, to recognise Palestine unconditionally, scheduled to take place at a meeting next week of the UN General Assembly in New York City.

There have been signs, though, that French President Emmanuel Macron may be having second thoughts. In an audio recording obtained by i24 News, he is heard saying: “I will not recognise a Palestinian state without the release of the hostages.”

By its own lights, Palestine recognition is utterly ridiculous. A state can’t be wished into being by others who merely want it to exist. “Palestine,” moreover, has no boundaries or any coherent government.

Recognition of this fantasy state is a cynical move whose purpose is to isolate Israel in world opinion and to create a Potemkin international diplomatic structure to put Israel on a course of destruction.

The consequences of recognition by such prominent Western countries are baleful. It upends international law governing the creation of states, as well as the 1993 Oslo Accords requiring a negotiated settlement of the Israel-Arab impasse.

It also supports the Palestinian genocidal agenda twice over. It rewards Hamas and other Palestinian terrorism, which incentivises yet more Islamic rejectionism, violence and war.

Moreover, Palestinian Arabs have never hidden the fact that the purpose of such a state is to provide a launching pad for the extermination of Israel and the murder of Jews. It would put the whole of central Israel within easy range of missiles fired from Ramallah.

Last week, the United Nations adopted a declaration of recognition supported by the United Kingdom, the European Union, Spain and other countries. This called not just for a boycott of Israel and an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, which would leave Hamas in power to repeat October 7-style massacres again and again, but also the resettlement of generations of Palestinian refugees within Israel itself.

The problem is the normalization of hate, not cancel culture Firing those who dissent is troubling. But progressive hate cheering for Hamas and the murder of Charlie Kirk, along with right-wing conspiracy theories, shouldn’t be platformed. Jonathan Tobin

https://www.jns.org/the-problem-is-the-normalization-of-hate-not-cancel-culture/?utm_campaign=

For many readers of The Washington Post who care about the normalization of antisemitism, it was a case of good riddance. Karen Attiah was named the newspaper’s first Global Opinions editor in 2016 and has been a columnist since 2021. This week, she claimed that she was fired over what the newspaper said was a series of posts about the assassination of conservative activist Charlie Kirk, which the paper said were “unacceptable,” and constituted “gross misconduct” and “endangering the physical safety of colleagues.”

Are her posts about Kirk’s murder reason enough to lose her job?

Corrupted institutions

Her publishers’ excuses and disingenuous “safety” language notwithstanding, the real issue with Attiah or any other similar situation isn’t really about cancel culture.

It’s what it says about the Post, The New York Times and other corporate media institutions that employ many people like her. That they thought placing radical hate-mongers like Attiah in charge of influential platforms was a good idea in the first place is the problem.

We should be extremely wary of engaging in a culture war in which the goal is to silence, shame and even hound out of the public square people with whom we disagree. The question we should be asking in the wake of this latest example of political violence is not about how best to punish those who use their social-media accounts to say terrible things. It’s why we have allowed institutions that should be the bulwark of democracy, like journalism, to be so corrupted as to normalize the sort of public discourse from people like Attiah, whose goal is to tear down the foundations of the American republic and Western civilization.

Attiah has every right to say what she likes. And the same goes for anyone else who unfairly and insensitively defamed Kirk after his death. The same applies to those extremists on the far right who sought to exploit the assassination to promote their own brand of conspiracy theories, whether it was the libelous claim that Israel was responsible or other antisemitic insinuations about the crime.

No one should interfere with the ability of those who behave in this fashion to post on social media (so long as they are not directly advocating violence), stand on street corners or march in the streets while spouting their lies, whether about Kirk, other conservatives, or Israel and the Jews. Still, that doesn’t entitle them to a job at the top newspapers in the country, a tenured professorship at an Ivy League university or a position at a private company whose owners want no part of such madness. And it ought not to grant immunity from criticism or legal action when they violate the law or help fund radical groups like Antifa or Students for Justice in Palestine, both of which promote violence and hate.

Britain is now treating Israel as an enemy state Stephen Pollard

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/britain-now-treating-israel-enemy-173126243.htm

Speaking at a press conference last week in which he announced sanctions against Israel, Pedro Sánchez, the Spanish prime minister, bemoaned not having any nuclear weapons – because it meant he couldn’t use them to threaten Israel.

It’s certainly true that neither Sir Keir Starmer nor any member of the British Government has yet threatened the Israelis with nuclear apocalypse.

But every week brings another example of how, under Labour, Israel is now being treated as an enemy state. Today we learn that the Royal College of Defence Studies will no longer accept students from Israel, the first time it has barred Israelis since that nation’s creation in 1948.

As Amir Baram, the director general of Israel’s defence ministry (who studied at the college) put it in a letter to the  Ministry of Defence, the ban on Israelis is “a profoundly dishonourable act of disloyalty to an ally at war” and a “disgraceful break with Britain’s proud tradition of tolerance – and plain decency”.

For decades Israel has been a key ally of the UK and vice versa. Our military cooperation has been intense, to the huge benefit of both nations, and Israeli intelligence has been pivotal in preventing terror attacks here. But while no formal announcement has been made, it is clear that the Government has decided from day one that those decades as allies are now over. 

From the very beginning of its time in office it has treated Israel not as an ally fighting a proxy war on behalf of the West to defeat Islamist terror, but as a rogue state to be punished. Within weeks it restored UK taxpayer funding to Unrwa, the UN aid body some of whose employees were reportedly found to have taken part in the October 7 2023 Hamas massacre; it blocked the export of some arms to Israel; and it backed the ICC’s arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and Yoav Gallant, the former Israeli defence minister.

And, most perniciously, in July Sir Keir Starmer pledged to recognise a Palestinian state if there was no ceasefire in Gaza – in effect rewarding the terror group for its massacre, and explicitly refusing to make this conditional on the release of the remaining hostages.

Jews are now being persecuted all over Britain by Danny Cohen

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/jews-are-now-being-persecuted-all-over-britain/ar-AA1Mqa8z?ocid=winp2fptaskbarhover&cvid=9809012558ec41b69160fac8398d0013&ei=6

Last week a survey showed that more than one in five Britons now hold or agree with anti-Semitic views. This number has doubled in less than five years.

When it comes to Jew-hate in Britain much of the focus has been on London. You can understand why. It was in London that groups of men gathered to celebrate on 7 October even whilst the Hamas massacre of Jews was taking place. It was in London where mass marches have included those openly waving antisemitic signs and showing support for murderous terrorist organisations. It was in the capital too where Jewish children were advised to hide the insignia on their school uniforms.

Yet more focus is needed on Britain’s smaller Jewish communities dotted around the country. These communities are even more vulnerable and isolated when it comes to the rise of antisemitism.

In Bournemouth last month a Jewish child was shot in the head with an air-gun. Before firing the weapon the suspect is alleged to have shouted obscenities at the child as he walked to a synagogue wearing a skullcap.

Let that sink in for a moment. A child allegedly shot in the head for being Jewish. One might expect a violent incident like this to lead to serious national soul-searching, but it seems that antisemitism is becoming so embedded in British society that an attack of this nature causes little outcry and limited national reporting.

Just down the coast in Brighton, the Jewish community has been experiencing a persistent wave of antisemitic abuse. Local Jewish residents tell me of a poisonous litany of hate crimes and destruction, with a local memorial to victims of the 7 October pogrom under consistent attack.

The memorial has been vandalised over fifty times. Jews visiting the memorial have faced chants of “die die”, with gun gestures pointed at the back of their heads. Faeces has been left on the ‘book of the dead’. Swastikas and Holocaust denial graffiti have been plastered nearby. It is only due to the dedication of the local Jewish community that each time the memorial is destroyed it is re-built with love and care.

Our house is on fire, and the cavalry isn’t coming The responsibility to protect our families and our future is going to fall on us. Charles Jacobs

https://www.jns.org/our-house-is-on-fire-and-the-cavalry-isnt-coming/

The failure of the Jewish establishment—the Anti-Defamation League, American Jewish Committee, Jewish Community Relations Councils and Jewish Federations—to protect and defend the Jewish community against the decades-long build-up and the current surge of hatred in the United States has become a subject of public concern and analysis. The organizations that have claimed to speak for us and guard us against antisemitism have proven unwilling or unable to meet the challenge.

The Jewish Leadership Project, along with others across the country, for years has sought to persuade, pressure, and, when necessary, shame establishment leaders into prioritizing the defense of our community. We believed that if they could be made to see the growing danger with clarity, they would recalibrate and lead. But they have not, even after the explosion of antisemitism following the atrocities of Oct. 7, 2023, and even as their supposed progressive allies turned on us.

Our leaders have refused to pivot. I believe that they will not and cannot.

Many resist this conclusion. It is far easier to cling to the hope that our old structures still work—that the powerful organizations of the past can still deliver security and stability. Abandoning that means accepting that the responsibility to protect our families and future now rests on us all. And the sooner we face this truth, the better.

But first, the community needs to understand why the Jewish establishment won’t change. Effective leadership of any enterprise requires a sober recognition of errors and a concerted effort to analyze why the leadership’s assumptions failed and the courage to chart a new course. It is human nature to resist acknowledging catastrophic mistakes, especially when you have raised hundreds of millions of dollars promoting yourselves as the most competent to do the work. Jewish leaders fear that when the enormity of their errors becomes broadly known, their community support might collapse, their (often) lucrative jobs will be at risk, and they will feel public shame.

Leadership is about knowing the territory so you can develop effective paths forward. Jewish leaders, however, have failed to grasp the obvious tectonic shifts in the American political culture. They assumed—and then placed all our bets on—the notion that classical liberalism, which had for so long protected Jews, would endure.