http://www.frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/lynching-free-speech/ The end of free speech will not necessarily come when there are soldiers in the streets, secret police in the alleyways and a mustachioed man screaming at you on a television set that can’t be turned off no matter how hard you turn the knob or click the buttons. Some of these things existed […]
http://www.newsmax.com/newswidget/haley-governor-gun-christmas/2013/12/26/id/543872?promo_code=EB8D-1&utm_source=National_Review&utm_medium=nmwidget&utm_campaign=widgetphase1
South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley got just what she wanted for Christmas — a nice, new handgun.
The Republican governor, who is a fierce advocate of the Second Amendment, revealed on her Facebook page that one of the gifts under her tree was a Beretta, according to South Carolina’s The State.
Haley, who has a concealed gun permit, posted a picture of the weapon on the social media site and said, “Our family had a wonderful Christmas together! I must have been good, Santa gave me a Beretta PX4 Storm.” The posting had received 86,000 “likes” by midday on Thursday.
On the official “On the Issues” governor’s website, Haley declared that she’s a strong advocate for the right to bear arms. “Few things are as clearly defined as the right of individual Americans to own and use firearms,” she wrote under the headline, “Make Concealed Weapons Permits Easier.”
She added, “I hold a Concealed Weapons Permit myself, and in this state we have issues that make it difficult for CWP holders to carry. As governor, I will continue to fight against any government infringement on the Second Amendment.”
Just before the holidays, the governor’s husband, National Guard Capt. Michael Haley, returned from a year-long deployment to Afghanistan, where he had narrow escapes in two bomb scares.
The daughter of Indian immigrants, Haley was swept into office on a tide of tea party support in 2010 when she was a junior state legislator. She is standing for re-election next year. Democrat state Senator Vincent Sheheen is expected to be her main challenger.
http://www.americanthinker.com/printpage/?url=http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/../2013/12/environmentalism_as_fundamentalism.html
Read more on this subject: Roosters of the Apocalypse: How the Junk Science of Global Warming is Bankrupting the Western World (New, Revised… by Rael Jean Isaac (Nov 25, 2013)
Most environmentalists I know consider themselves non-religious, even anti-religious. A few subscribe to “new” religious denominations such as Unitarianism, which I have heard described as “church for atheists with children.” None, as far as I know, would take kindly to being described as practitioners of fundamentalist, Bible-thumping, “ol’ time religion”.
The irony, here, is that contemporary environmentalism and fundamentalist religion have so much in common.
Take the most basic assumption of contemporary environmentalist doctrine. Individual environmentalists and environmental organizations, alike hold that the one and only way to solve the problems they address is to “protect” the environment. Who they would protect it from, of course, is us, based on the further assumption that everything that goes wrong with the environment — desertification, species extinction, invasion by non-native plants, etc. — is the result of human misuse or overuse or just plain use of “nature” or the ecosystem, or whatever you choose to call our surroundings.
http://ejewishphilanthropy.com/fostering-a-culture-of-philanthropic-giving-in-israel-part-ii-micro-donations/?utm_source=Wed+Dec+25&utm_campaign=Wed+Dec+25&utm_medium=email
[This is the second segment of an article on fostering a culture of philanthropic giving in Israel. Part one of the article, which focuses on organizations and initiatives that promote organized and strategic giving by Israeli philanthropists, can be found here. These articles are part of a series on Israeli philanthropy.]
by Frayda Leibtag
In 2006, Sammy and Aviva Ofer withdrew a proposed $20 million donation to the Tel Aviv Museum of Art after other donors and many members of the Israeli public vociferously objected to renaming the museum for them. Following the public campaign against renaming the museum, the couple placed advertisements in local Israeli newspapers with the headline, “Excuse us for wanting to make a donation.”
Seven years later, public perceptions and expectations of philanthropy seem to be changing. Part of this transformation may be attributed to efforts to extend the world of giving beyond the purview of Israeli’s affluent elite. Organizations such as Keren Baktana, Takdim, IsraelGives and Igul Letova (“Round-Up Israel”) offer different models of micro-donation that share the common objective of promoting a national culture and ethos of giving and making philanthropy accessible to the Israeli public at large.
On December 31, 2013, IsraelGives will be launching GivingTuesday Israel, a national campaign that aims to set the record for the biggest day of online donations in Israeli history. The campaign is part of a larger effort taking place across Israel to encourage the Israeli public to open up their wallets and give. Initially conceptualized by New York’s 92nd Street Y in 2012, GivingTuesday has evolved into an international campaign to encourage philanthropy on a small scale. Recognizing that the cultures of giving in the United States and Israel are very different, the organizers of GivingTuesday Israel are partnering with companies and philanthropists to create incentives that will encourage Israelis to contribute. They are also promoting awareness about the donation tax-credit in Israel that only 10 percent of Israelis are currently taking advantage of. In 2009, Israelis donated NIS 10.5 billion to nonprofits, but only NIS 1 billion was reported for tax-deduction purposes (about 10 percent of all donations). Nearly 50 percent of the claims came from companies and businesses. According to GivingTuesday Israel, 95 percent of Israelis that make donations to recognized public charitable institutions are not taking advantage of the deduction that they are eligible for, a loss that adds up to billions of shekels every year.
This is a translation from French…..rsk
http://www.dreuz.info/2013/12/bethlehem-24-decembre-une-messe-de-minuit-en-presence-de-tueurs-de-chretiens-et-de-juifs/
I do not know if the images of the Midnight Mass on Christmas Eve will be broadcast from Bethlehem .
It is very likely. I do not know if comments accompany the images. But it is also very likely , and it is very likely therefore that the reviews talk about the “sadness” of the “Palestinians” face a ” peace process” that never led to the creation of a “Palestinian state” . The description of the “Palestinians” as people oppressed by Israel will not need to follow : it will be implied. The idea that Christians are free to practice their faith in the land of Judea governed by the Palestinian Authority does not have to be emphasized: the existence of a church in Bethlehem, the presence of priests and faithful and a midnight mass happen any subsequent explanation. We perceive no doubt Mahmoud Abbas and some of his acolytes in position of prayer and contemplation.
None of those who see any pictures and hear the comments that accompany not discern that this is propaganda and falsification , so that it will act as though this, and nothing else.
The truth is that if the “Palestinians” have reason to be sad , they take what keeps them in the condition that is theirs, and making hostages of an entity that continues to inject in their minds hatred, racism and appetite for destruction and therefore prevents them from living a normal life : the very existence of the Palestinian Authority is a crime against humanity. Not only because the Palestinian Authority continues to incite anti- Jewish genocide , but also because it reduces the “Palestinians” to a lifetime of facing the prospect and desire to genocide. Which, if images are shown, say what the Palestinian Authority and making it a criminal organization ? Person , of course.
The truth is that there is ( do I remember yet) no peace process, but a war against Israel’s existence led by other means, and that this war , we are constantly see, decade after decade, not intended for the creation of a “Palestinian state” alongside Israel , but the destruction of Israel. Who can say that there has never been a peace process and that no “Palestinian” leader wants a “Palestinian state” alongside Israel ? Person , of course .
The truth is that the “Palestinians” are oppressed , yes, but by their own leaders , which squeeze their brains , turning them into assassins and suicide are monsters against which Israel must take defensive measures .
http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Columnists/Leibler-on-settlements-Right-diagnosis-wrong-prescription-336290
To avert disaster, Netanyahu must… seize the moment to develop a coherent and consistent government policy… to commit to intensifying construction in those areas over the Green Line which would unquestionably be retained by Israel. But in isolated settlements primarily located in the disputed territories… a status quo in relation to expansion should be maintained.
– Isi Leibler, Jerusalem Post, December 21
Any territory evacuated by the IDF will become a base for terrorist assault on Israel’s civilian population. Israel’s mistake has always been its willingness to return land acquired in wars of self-defense “for peace,” rather than put forward our national right… to live in the land of Israel.
– Steve of Mevaseret, in a Talkback to Leibler, December 21
Isi Leibler is a columnist of considerable talent. His analyses are perceptive and penetrating, and as a rule I find myself largely in agreement with his assessments of the political events in the Middle East and beyond.
Common misperceptions & misunderstandings
Yet despite my esteem for him and his work – or perhaps, because of it – I feel compelled to take issue with him over his recent column (“It is crucial Netanyahu creates a coherent settlement policy,” December 21).
Let me underscore that I am taking up this matter because the points in dispute are of general relevance for the debate on what Israel’s policy should be with regard to the Palestinian issue, particularly in light of Israel’s tarnished international image.
With all due respect to Leibler, several of the policy prescriptions that he urges Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu to adopt reflect misperceptions/misunderstandings prevalent among those who deem themselves “right of center,” i.e. those who reject the Left’s unmitigated concessions but still feel that some durable agreement might be hammered out that will leave certain portions of Judea-Samaria (such as the large settlement blocs) and east Jerusalem under Israeli sovereignty.
These misconceptions and misunderstandings are highly detrimental because they perpetuate the illusion that continued efforts will somehow bear fruit and a reasonable pact can be forged to end the conflict with “two states living side-by-side in peace and prosperity.”
Ignoring realities prolongs conflict
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303932504579252770123128660?mod=Opinion_newsreel_2 ‘It is as painful perhaps to be awakened from a vision as to be born,” James Joyce wrote famously in his masterpiece “Ulysses.” I recently had such an experience when my office manager—who protects me from the daily insurance grind of referrals and approvals and pre-certifications and blood drawing—was out sick. Thus the veil […]
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303531204579204201833906182?mod=WSJ_Opinion_LEFTTopOpinion
At colleges today, all parties are strongly incentivized to maintain low standards.
The parlous state of American higher education has been widely noted, but the view from the trenches is far more troubling than can be characterized by measured prose. With most students on winter break and colleges largely shut down, the lull presents an opportunity for damage assessment.
The flood of books detailing the problems includes the representative titles “Bad Students, Not Bad Schools” and “The Five Year Party.” To list only the principal faults: Students arrive woefully academically unprepared; students study little, party much and lack any semblance of internalized discipline; pride in work is supplanted by expediency; and the whole enterprise is treated as a system to be gamed in which plagiarism and cheating abound.
The problems stem from two attitudes. Social preoccupations trump the academic part of residential education, which occupies precious little of students’ time or emotions. Second, students’ view of education is strictly instrumental and credentialist. They regard the entire enterprise as a series of hoops they must jump through to obtain their 120 credits, which they blindly view as an automatic licensure for adulthood and a good job, an increasingly problematic belief.
CHECK OUT ZIONISM 101 ON THE REVIVAL OF HEBREW-http://www.ruthfullyyours.com/2013/09/11/zionism-101-the-revival-of-hebrew/
“Revival of Hebrew” tells the story of how an ancient language used only for study and prayer once again became the common tongue of the Jewish people. Even the father of modern Zionism, Theodor Herzl, did not think it possible.
Eliezer Ben-Yehuda, the man who did more than any other to make the renaissance of Hebrew possible, wrote:
“It flashed before my eyes like lightning… I heard a strange voice calling within me: ‘The resurrection of Israel and its language in the Land of Our Fathers!’”
http://mosaicmagazine.com/picks/2013/12/hebrew-in-crisis/?utm_source=Mosaic+Daily+Email&utm_campaign=ef3877e33e-Mosaic_2013_12_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_0b0517b2ab-ef3877e33e-41165129
This past Tuesday was the 156th anniversary of the birth of Eliezer Ben-Yehuda, who was born on the 21st of the month of Tevet, 5618. Ben-Yehuda is the personality identified with the resurrection of the Hebrew language as a spoken language.
Most notable is the Ben-Yehuda dictionary, with its 16 volumes, which was finished only in 1959 by Naftali Herz Tour Sinai. Ben-Yehuda used the Bible as the basis for his imaginative extensions of the Hebrew language, bringing it up to date with the contemporary needs of his time.
Ben-Yehuda did not have an easy time. He was criticized severely by many, including Bialik, Ahad Ha’am and other Zionist luminaries, who thought that some of his linguistic inventions went too far. The idea that one could resurrect a language was ridiculed by professional linguists. The fact is that Zamenhof’s Esperanto failed where Ben-Yehuda’s Hebrew succeeded.
http://mosaicmagazine.com/picks/2013/12/some-apartheid-state/?utm_source=Mosaic+Daily+Email&utm_campaign=ef3877e33e-Mosaic_2013_12_27&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_0b0517b2ab-ef3877e33e-41165129
If Israel is an apartheid state, why do so many Africans flock here?
Here is a question for those who accuse Israel of apartheid: Why would an apartheid country attract massive illegal immigration from Africa, and why would Africans put up a huge fight to stay in an apartheid regime? As opposed to Eyad El Sarraj, a Palestinian BDS activist who boycotted Israel and yet was treated in Israeli hospitals for his leukemia, those illegal African immigrants did not trespass Israel’s southern border for medical treatment. They came to Israel because they know exactly where in the Middle East there is freedom. They know what their fate would be in Arab countries whose language uses the same word (“Abed”) for “slave” and “African” – a reminder of the Arab slave trade in Africa.
The phenomenon of mass illegal immigration from Africa to Israel started reaching large-scale proportions in 2007. Most illegal immigrants came from Eritrea, Sudan, Ethiopia, and Somalia. By 2012, there were an estimated 60,000 illegal African migrants in Israel (nearly one percent of its total population). Israel managed to put an end to this flood by building a physical barrier on the Egyptian border, but it still has to find a solution for those already here, most of whom live in southern Tel Aviv and in the Red Sea port city of Eilat. The level of crime in those cities has increased exponentially, with residents complaining that their daily life has become an ordeal.
Like every sovereign state, Israel has the right to accept or decline immigration applications, and it has the right to deport illegal migrants. So why doesn’t it do just that?
