Displaying posts categorized under

MEDIA

Media, Please Grow Up- Climate Skeptics and Lukewarmers are Never Given Equal Time

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/03/31/media-please-grow-up/

When did high school newspaper editors take over Western media? Decades ago, of course, and we’re unhappy to report that it seems they’re never going to grow up. The latest evidence? The early peak bloom of the cherry blossom trees along Washington’s Tidal Basin is being blamed on global warming.

The press has latched onto the man-made global warming narrative and it won’t let go.

The Washington Post couldn’t wait to inform its tell-us-what-to-believe readership that this year’s “peak occurred several days earlier than the long-term average, as human-caused climate warming hastens the onset of spring flowering.”

To its credit, the Post noted that reader comments “reflect a mix of opinions on the impact of climate change on the timing of cherry blossoms reaching peak bloom in D.C. Some commenters acknowledge that climate change, particularly the Urban Heat Island Effect, is causing earlier blooms, while others express skepticism or frustration with the focus on climate change.”

Maybe that’s the owner’s influence.

Meanwhile, ABC News said early last week that “in recent years, the peak bloom date for the cherry trees at the Tidal Basin reservoir is occurring earlier than it did in the past. Seasonal shifts, including milder, shorter winter seasons and spring warmth beginning earlier due to human-amplified climate change, are impacting when the cherry trees reach peak bloom, data shows.”

The data show no such thing. Anyone can infer from the numbers that “human-amplified climate change” is to blame (or credit, depending on the point of view), but they prove nothing.

Rhetoric, Lies, and the Media: A Quintilian Perspective on Modern Journalism The media distorts reality, twisting Trump’s actions into tyranny while excusing its own abuses—an artful exercise in deception and bias. By Roger Kimball

https://amgreatness.com/2025/03/30/rhetoric-lies-and-the-media-a-quintilian-perspective-on-modern-journalism/

Where’s Quintilian when you need him? The author of the twelve-volume Institutio Oratoria (c. AD 95) knew all there was to know about rhetoric, “the art,” as Aristotle said, “of persuasion.” Quintilian’s chief concern was with turning out able and virtuous orators. But in the course of his inquiries, he also analyzed the workings of deceitful or fraudulent oratory. What a rich hunting ground our dishonest media today would have given the old Roman!

It is amusing to speculate on what Quintilian might have made of The New York Times, for example, a recent story in our former paper of record titled “Elon Musk Is South African. We Shouldn’t Forget It.” Musk left his native South Africa in the late 1980s. He never looked back. But according to the Times, Musk was irredeemably tainted by the racial policies of South Africa. He is, the Times  informed its readers, “a distinctly ideological figure, one whose worldview is inseparable from his rearing in apartheid South Africa.” Really?

What follows is an extraordinary web of half-truths, innuendo, and outright lies. Quintilian would have delighted in explaining how it all works.

He would also have found much to work with in “Trump’s Assault on Elites Encompasses Almost Every Aspect of American Life,” Stephen Collinson’s recent essay for CNN. Considered simply as an exercise in mendacious rhetoric, it deserves some sort of prize. I think of it as Mary McCarthy thought of Lillian Hellmann. When asked by Dick Cavett what she found to be dishonest about Hellmann, McCarthy said, “Everything. I once said in an interview that everything she writes is a lie, including ‘and’ and ‘the.’”

So it is with Collinson’s flaccid but scuttling effort to attack Donald Trump.

Trump Secured Border for Only 0.2% of the Cost of the Border Crisis Media hypes cost of securing border, refuses to discuss the cost of open borders. by Daniel Greenfield

https://www.frontpagemag.com/trump-secured-border-for-only-0-2-of-the-cost-of-the-border-crisis/

The media has some big news.

Southwest border mission has cost $330M so far — with over $40M for Guantanamo Bay alone – ABC News

Interesting. Let’s even for the moment assume that those numbers are accurate. What was the cost of the border crisis?

The House Budget Committee estimated the cost of the crisis at $150 billion. Others put it at $200 billion or even higher.

$330 million would be around 0.2% of $150 billion.

Some estimates set the annual cost of illegal migration at $150 billion as well.

To put that $330 million into context, under Biden, DHS allocated $380 million for migrant-infested areas through FEMA in August 2024.

We’re spending a fraction on an ounce of prevention here to secure the border.

The media hypes the cost of securing border, but refuses to discuss the cost of open borders.

Good News! The New York Times Has Found Its Candidate for 2028! A perfect choice considering the source. by Robert Spencer

https://www.frontpagemag.com/good-news-the-new-york-times-has-found-its-candidate-for-2028/

It’s early yet. A great deal is going to happen before the actual choosing of the 2028 Democratic presidential candidate that will upset any calculations that are being made now. Nevertheless, that isn’t stopping Democrats and non-Democrats alike from speculating as to who will emerge as the nominee of the Party of Enforced Insanity.

Kamala Harris has a big lead in the polls, but no one is particularly thrilled about that, least of all the Democrats who jumped off the cliff of Joy with her in 2024, and so the party top dogs are casting around with increasing desperation for someone to pull them out of the hole they’ve dug themselves into.

On Sunday, the New York Times picked its candidate (at least for now): it rolled out a puff piece over 1,500 words long, complete with flattering photos of the anointed candidate and earnest analysis of why she was the right choice for right-thinking people — that is, for the Times, left-thinking people. The choice of the moment for the New York Times is none other than Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-Swizzle Stick).

Yes, it’s really true. The New York Times is touting, as a viable presidential candidate, the congresswoman whose lack of basic knowledge of how the U.S. government works and other matters that you’d think even a bartender would know has made her an enduring object of ridicule among patriots. The congresswoman who has inspired ongoing speculation as to whether the “D” after her name stands for “Ditz.” The congresswoman who is so far to the left as to make Chairman Mao look like a capitalist roader. That Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

It’s precisely because AOC is so very far to the left that the Grey Lady wants our nation to turn its lonely eyes to her. “For the last decade,” the Times puff piece begins, “Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont has been running for president, planning a run for president or pushing former President Joseph R. Biden Jr. to adopt more progressive policies.” By “progressive,” of course, the Times means statist, Washington-centered, federally controlled and authoritarian.

Charles Lipson PBS and NPR should never have received public funding A democratic government should not sponsor news programs

https://thespectator.com/topic/pbs-npr-received-public-funding-hearing/

Congress has been mulling the future of publicly-funded television and radio. Here’s a spoiler alert: that funding is toast.

There is no way a Republican-controlled House and Senate will keep pouring money into networks they believe hate them. They know that hatred is warmly reciprocated.

The debate about partisan bias at PBS and NPR is important – the bias itself is obvious – but that’s not the most important point. What matters most is that democratic governments have no business funding or controlling news channels directed at their own citizens. Those channels should be privately owned and operated. Every single one. They should not only be private: they should be beyond the scope of government censorship and intimidation, the kind the Biden administration exerted on social media giants during Covid.

Why is it important to end public ownership of radio and TV networks? Because that is the best way to encourage robust debate about public policies. In a constitutional democracy like ours, the proper role of a government is to foster that public debate by 

Providing as much information as possible;
Avoiding the suppression of differing views unless they violate the law; and
Letting citizens and their elected representatives control the discourse without government interference, except to enforce the law

To facilitate that debate, public officials have a core responsibility: they should share information that citizens need. They should except only disclosures that would violate personal privacy or harm national security or ongoing law-enforcement operations. No one argues about this exception on privacy grounds. No one says those people abused by Jeffrey Epstein should be harmed again by the FBI releasing their names.

How Are The Media Treating Trump In His Second Term? (Hint: It’s Not Better): I&I/TIPP Poll Terry Jones

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/03/26/how-are-the-media-treating-trump-in-his-second-term-hint-its-not-better-ii-tipp-poll/

President Donald Trump had a rough ride with the media during his first term. Big media and smaller social media alike often treated Trump with open scorn, and peppered him with insulting epithets, calling him “fascist” or even “Hitler.” Is it better this time? Not much: A majority in the latest I&I/TIPP Poll say he’s still being treated the same or worse as back then.

There’s little doubt, even among those on the left, that Trump is deeply reviled by the mostly left-leaning media. His braggadocio, his aggressive leadership style, his creatively unorthodox policies, his personal fearlessness and his overall popularity have kept Trump a media target.

The national online I&I/TIPP Poll of 1,434 adults, taken Feb. 26-28, asked this simple question: “Compared to his first term, how is the press treating Donald Trump?” The possible responses included “Better,” “Worse,” “The same,” and “Not sure.”

A plurality, 40%, said Trump was being treated about the same as the last go-round, while 16% said things had gotten worse. A sizable 31% felt his treatment by the media was better this time, while 12% weren’t sure. The poll’s margin of error is +/-2.6 percentage points.

The New York Times Makes a Stunning Admission About the Democrats Matt Margolis

https://pjmedia.com/matt-margolis/2025/03/22/the-nyt-make-a-stunning-admission-about-the-democrats-n4938177

Liberals are in full-blown panic mode over President Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Democrats in Congress are hysterically crying “constitutional crisis,” while unhinged activists are lashing out at Tesla vehicles and showrooms—all because Elon Musk dares to support cutting government waste. Conservatives have long suspected there’s a deeper reason why the left goes berserk over efforts to rein in reckless spending. Now, the New York Times has accidentally said the quiet part out loud—the left’s political machine is fueled by your tax dollars.

In a stunning admission, the Times wrote:

Executive actions intended to cripple top Democratic law firms. Investigations of Democratic fund-raising and organizing platforms. Ominous suggestions that nonprofits aligned with Democrats or critical of President Trump should have their tax exemptions revoked.

Mr. Trump and his allies are aggressively attacking the players and machinery that power the left, taking a series of highly partisan official actions that, if successful, will threaten to hobble Democrats’ ability to compete in elections for years to come.

So far, the attacks have been diffuse and sometimes indiscriminate or inaccurate. But inside the administration, there are moves to coordinate and expand the assault.

A small group of White House officials has been working to identify targets and vulnerabilities inside the Democratic ecosystem, taking stock of previous efforts to investigate them, according to two people familiar with the group’s work who requested anonymity to describe it.

Media Rallies Against Deportation of Student Who Urged Taking “Cue” from Hamas “My hatred of the US empire knows no bound” Daniel Greenfield

https://www.frontpagemag.com/media-rallies-against-deportation-student-who-urged-taking-cue-from-hamas/

Momodou Taal had a simple plan. Come to America on a student visa to destroy it from within.

In one post, he wrote, “The end of the US empire in our lifetime in sha Allah.” Months later, he celebrated receiving his student visa, writing, “Student Visa issued. We going to America baby! Alhamdulillah!” Shortly thereafter, he tweeted, “My hatred of the US empire knows no bound. Wallahi.”

“When the enemy is US imperialism, then absolutely anyone the US calls an enemy is my friend,” he posted in July. “My hatred for US imperialism and the global system it reproduces knows no bounds,” he wrote one month prior. “At this point; any movement, nation, people who are working to decrease the impact and effects of US imperialism on the world has my support.”

Any sane country would never have let the likes of Momodou Taal inside. But we let him in and welcomed him in every possible way as he chanted support for Islamic terrorism.

While leading an anti-Israel campus demonstration last year, Taal called on his fellow student protesters to take their “cue from the armed resistance in Palestine.”

That is to say Hamas, Islamic Jihad and other Jihadist groups.

Taal made a similar statement hours after the October 7 attacks, writing, “The dialect demands: That wherever you have oppression, you will find those who [are] fighting against it. Glory to the resistance!”

Dozens of Wikipedia editors colluded on years-long anti-Israel campaign, bombshell ADL report claims By Taylor Herzlich

https://nypost.com/2025/03/18/business/dozens-of-wikipedia-editors-colluded-on-years-long-anti-israel-campaign-bombshell-adl-report-claims/

More than two dozen Wikipedia editors allegedly colluded in a years-long scheme to inject anti-Israel language on topics related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the Anti-Defamation League claimed in a bombshell report released Tuesday.

The rogue editors, at least 30 of them, flooded one of the world’s most popular sites with “antisemitic narratives, anti-Israel bias, and misleading information,” according to the report by the ADL’s Center for Tech and Society.

The alleged bias also extended to pervasive “pro-Hamas perspectives” across Arabic-language Wikipedia content, the report claimed.

“The values of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation reflect our commitment to integrity and accuracy, and we categorically condemn antisemitism and all forms of hate,” a spokesperson for the Wikimedia Foundation, the nonprofit that runs Wikipedia, told The Post in a statement.

Rolling Stone Warns DOGE Staffer’s Family ‘Has Ties’ to Russian Oligarch Activist journalism at its weakest. by Mark Tapson

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm-plus/rolling-stone-warns-doge-staffers-family-has-ties-to-russian-oligarch/

In an exclusive report online, far-Left Rolling Stone magazine, which has arguably the worst track record of any journalism outlet for posting false and defamatory stories that suit its political bias, warns that there is a new staffer at Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) “seeking access to sensitive data at the IRS – and his family has ties to a sanctioned Russian oligarch”! [Emphasis added]

Drawing on stories from other Left-wing propaganda outlets like The Washington Post and The New York Times, Rolling Stone (RS) reports that two DOGE representatives, Gavin Kliger and Sam Corcos, have been at the IRS “seeking private taxpayer information in unprecedented ways that would violate current IRS privacy law” in order to hunt down fraud.

Never mind that Rolling Stone couldn’t have cared less about the Democrat Party under both Barack Obama and Joe Biden violating taxpayers’ rights by weaponizing the IRS against conservatives. But when DOGE digs through IRS information exposing massive bureaucratic fraud, suddenly it’s an invasion of the average taxpayer’s privacy.

RS complains – as if it’s a bad thing – that Musk has led a “blitz” through federal agencies, firing thousands of federal workers, while “demanding sweeping access to sensitive personal data.” The former music magazine, which is fond of glorifying Islamic terrorists on its cover, also tries feebly to diminish DOGE staffers like Gavin Kliger, 25, as “young” and “inexperienced” – as if youth is a drawback in the tech world. As Musk has put it, “Judging an engineer by age is BS.”

The thrust of the “exclusive” investigation is this:

Corcos, 36, founded the health care start-up Levels in 2019 with a former SpaceX lead engineer Dr. Casey Means, a holistic doctor with “ties” (there’s that ominous word again) to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. RS does not elaborate on what those ties are, or on how RFK Jr. is a factor in this dark conspiracy. But it notes that Levels received seed funding from Andreessen Horowitz, a venture capital firm led by Trump donor (gasp!) Marc Andreessen and Ben Horowitz, son of Freedom Center founder David Horowitz (gasp!).