Displaying posts categorized under

MEDIA

Wall Street Journal Fuels Sanders Socialism Plus, Harvard, Yale endowments try selling off some private equity Ira Stoll

https://www.theeditors.com/p/wall-street-journal-fuels-sanders-socialism-gabriel-zucman-billionaires?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_

My morning Wall Street Journal had a box on the front page with a graphic headlined “The Rich Get Even Richer,” teasing a news article inside under the headline “Richest of Rich Gain $1 Trillion.”

That eight-paragraph article on page two included six paragraphs that contained mention of or attribution to Gabriel Zucman, an economist at the University of California, Berkeley. The page-two graphic, which is bigger than the story, is also attributed, in fine print, to “Gabriel Zucman, analysis of Forbes, Fortune, and Federal Reserve data….”

This is garbage on so many levels it’s hard to know where to start.

For one thing, Zucman is just one economist of many, and he’s not super-credible. The New York Times reported in 2020: “Other economists, including some who held top jobs under past Democratic presidents, have attacked Mr. Zucman and Mr. Saez over their research methods, their policy conclusions and their data. Conservative economists say their proposals would cripple economic growth. Last year, the faculty at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government voted to offer Mr. Zucman, 33, a tenured position. But Harvard’s president and provost nixed the offer, partly over fears that Mr. Zucman’s research could not support the arguments he was making in the political arena, according to people involved in the process.”

For another thing, the present tense of the front-page and page-two headlines isn’t supported by this year’s reality, at least to date. The richest of the rich have taken a hit this year so far owing to the stock market downturn related to the Trump tariffs, Congress’s slow motion on a tax cut bill, the Federal Reserve’s decisions to stop cutting interest rates since Trump’s inauguration, or whatever else you want to blame it on. Zucman wants to talk about how much richer the rich got in 2024 because it supports his policy agenda of raising taxes, but he doesn’t want to talk about how these same people saw their wealth plunge in 2025 because so much of their assets are at risk, tied up in stock of companies that they built. The Journal items would have been good headlines four months ago. Now, they read like old news. And anyone who has been on one of those Forbes lists can tell you how reliable or unreliable they are. They are not exactly chacarterized by super-high high precision. When I was at the New York Sun we once figured out that Forbes was counting Michael Bloomberg as worth $5 billion when the real number was more like $20 billion. In its prime, the Wall Street Journal did its own research on this stuff, rather than rely on some left-wing economist’s regurgitation of numbers from Forbes. Garbage in, garbage out, as they say in social science research.

I rolled my eyes and put the newspaper away. The editorial page is so strong—Ruth Wisse!, etc.—that I cut the news columns some slack.

Then I opened up X on my phone and saw Bernie Sanders, the socialist senator from Vermont, making a talking point out of the Journal story.

“Today in America, the rich are getting richer & working families are struggling. What is Mr. Trump doing about this? He’s getting ready to give tax cuts to billionaires while making it harder for Americans to access the Medicare, Social Security & veterans benefits they earned,” Sanders posted, with a screenshot of the Journal story and the “WSJ” logo.

Larry David Mocks Trump as Hitler in the NY Times Now, But the Paper Fawned Over Adolf in ’33 The dopiest, sleaziest, most tone-deaf Times article since their fawning puff piece on the actual Hitler. by Robert Spencer

https://www.frontpagemag.com/larry-david-mocks-trump-as-hitler-in-the-ny-times-now-but-the-paper-fawned-over-adolf-in-33/

“Imagine my surprise,” writes left-of-Stalin-himself “comedian” Larry David in a New York Times op-ed Monday, “when in the spring of 1939 a letter arrived at my house inviting me to dinner at the Old Chancellery with the world’s most reviled man, Adolf Hitler.”

Although Larry has looked about 105 years old for the last couple of decades and could be even older, he wasn’t actually reporting on something that happened to him. He was mocking and indirectly excoriating his fellow leftist Bill Maher for meeting Trump and speaking honestly about the meeting, telling the world that Trump really wasn’t the evil monster of leftist propaganda.

Yeah, wow, what an amazing new comedic idea: Trump is Hitler! Larry, how did you ever come up with this fantastic analogy that no one on planet Earth has ever thought of before? As PJM’s own Scott Pinsker put it, Larry David’s op-ed was “astonishingly tone-deaf” as “became the 500 millionth member of the left to think it’s clever, witty, and daring to compare President Trump to Adolf Hitler.” Scott called it (correctly) the “dopiest, sleaziest NYT op-ed in years.”

It could, in fact, be the dopiest, sleaziest, most tone-deaf New York Times article of any kind since July 9, 1933, just over five months after Hitler became the chancellor of Germany, and years after his virulent antisemitism and propensity for violence had become notorious worldwide. On that day, the New York Times published a fawning puff piece on Hitler that rivals even today’s media adulation of Kamala Harris during her campaign and of Old Joe Biden during his presidency. It bears more than a little resemblance to Larry David’s imaginary dinner with Hitler, but it is all too real.

Pulitzer Prize-winning “journalist” Anne O’Hare McCormick traveled to Berlin to become the first reporter from an American news outlet to interview the new chancellor, and she turned out to be an intriguing choice for the Times editors to make to conduct this interview, for she appears to have been something of a Hitler fan. In the presence of this man whose name has become today synonymous with evil, she was decidedly starry-eyed: “At first sight,” McCormick gushed, “the dictator of Germany seems a rather shy and simple man, younger than one expects, more robust, taller. His sun-browned face is full and is the mobile face of an orator. A shock of straight hair falls over his forehead.”

The Press Is Back In Full Frenzy Mode, But This Time Nobody Is Listening

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/04/23/the-press-is-back-in-full-frenzy-mode-but-this-time-nobody-is-listening/

You’d think the mainstream press would have learned a lesson or two after committing so many embarrassing mistakes in its effort to “get” Donald Trump and cover up for Joe Biden over the past eight years. But no. It’s already back to its old and terrible habits.

Shortly after the election, Vanity Fair published a story that led with this admonition to the press: “Every outrage and insult can’t be a five-alarm fire, as it’s critical for the media to stay focused on the most serious threats to America’s democratic institutions.”

Former New York Times editor Jill Abramson cautioned her colleagues to “watch and restrain headlines on stories that are needlessly hyperbolic or over-the-top negative.”

Brian McGory, former Boston Globe editor, said it’s “time to cover his actions and policies, his successes and his failures. To do it through as conventional a lens as possible, while not normalizing mayhem, and a willingness to acknowledge when things go well.”

But instead of heeding this advice, the mainstream press went right back to its frantic Trump-hating roots.

When Pundits go off Half-Cocked Raff Champion

https://quadrant.org.au/news-opinions/doomed-planet/when-pundits-go-off-half-cocked/

Almost exactly 100 years ago in France, Julian Benda wrote The Treason of the Intellectuals to challenge the intellectuals to cease and desist from stoking the violent political passions that were dividing the Republic. At present public intellectuals in the quality press have the opportunity to set the example for critical thinking about difficult and divisive issues, à la Benda.

Responsible public intellectuals will engage with the signature issues of the time to establish one or more areas of competence where they have well-informed opinions.  They can provide invaluable guidance on those matters because they have access to the best brains in the country to help them to explain and clarify scientific and technical matters to facilitate informed public debate. If they do their homework in their areas of competence they can be taken seriously, although on other topics they can only recycle what they regard as reliable opinions offered by other people.

Paul Kelly is a leading public intellectual on the basis the circulation of The Australian, his books, and the years that he has spent reading, observing and writing about Australian politics. That is his area of competence, as he demonstrated in his appraisal of the prospects for nuclear power. In The Australian (10/11/2021) he described the idea of conservatives winning an election with a promise of nuclear power as “a grand fantasy” because, he argued, it will take years to achieve bipartisan support at the federal and state levels: “It would never be established amid an energy policy war between the Coalition and Labor.”

Contrast that considered opinion with his position on climate change and net zero. He apparently accepts that the science is settled in favour of warming alarmism despite the empirical evidence that the warming in modern times has been unequivocally beneficial and that we are still short of the temperature during the Roman warm period, which was even more favourable for life on earth.

Larry David skewers Bill Maher-Trump meeting in satirical Hitler essay Brendan Morrow

https://www.aol.com/larry-david-skewers-bill-maher-185528885.html

Larry David doesn’t sound happy about Bill Maher’s dinner with President Donald Trump.

The “Curb Your Enthusiasm” star, 77, published a satirical essay in The New York Times on April 21 that appeared to be a response to Maher’s recent meeting with the president at the White House.

USA TODAY has reached out to representatives for Maher and David for comment.

The fictional piece was written from the perspective of a person who had dinner with Adolf Hitler in 1939 and came away impressed that the Nazi leader was so personable, despite having been a “vocal critic of his on the radio from the beginning.”

David, who is Jewish, never mentioned Maher or Trump in the article, but the language he used closely mirrored the way the “Real Time” host spoke about his dinner with Trump.

“I found the whole thing quite disarming,” David’s essay read. “I joked that I was surprised to see him in a tan suit because if he wore that out, it would be perceived as un-Führer-like. That amused him to no end, and I realized I’d never seen him laugh before. Suddenly he seemed so human.”

Media Sneers as Trump Meets With European Leader Who Vows to ‘Make the West Great Again’ A harrowing reminder of what will happen if leftist elites reestablish their hegemony. by Robert Spencer

https://www.frontpagemag.com/media-sneers-as-trump-meets-with-european-leader-who-vows-to-make-the-west-great-again/

Donald Trump was re-elected president in 2024, vowing to resume his struggle to end the hegemony of the leftist political elites and restore the government to the people. Those leftist elites aren’t in Washington alone; they’re also in Brussels, London, Paris, Berlin, and most of the other capitals of Europe.

There is, however, a handful of notable exceptions: several European countries have leaders who care as much about their own people as Trump does about Americans, and who are working to end the left’s dominance and restore sane government. One of them, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, came to the White House last Thursday and had a cordial meeting with Trump.

Despite the fact that the U.S. visit of a European leader who declared herself to be entirely in agreement with Trump’s guiding philosophy was a significant event, establishment media coverage was sparse. What there was of it was notable for being even more sneering and condescending than usual.

The Washington Post focused its coverage before the Trump-Meloni meeting on the assumption, which turned out to be false, that Meloni was in Washington to conclude a trade deal with Trump on behalf of the European Union; its Wednesday story on the planned meeting was headlined “Europe pins trade hopes on Italy’s Meloni, its Trump whisperer.” Because, you see, the president of the United States is like an animal who can’t be communicated with in any ordinary way; a person with special talents for communicating with dumb beasts has to be called in. That’s how the left sees Trump.

Fact Check: Video does not show Harrison Ford making a pro-Palestinian speech (May 2024)

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/video-does-not-show-harrison-ford-making-pro-palestinian-speech-2024-05-08/

A video showing actor Harrison Ford talking about climate change at a United Nations summit in 2019 has been miscaptioned online as him making a pro-Palestinian speech.

The clip was falsely captioned online as students in universities across the U.S. protested, demanding a ceasefire in Gaza and divestment from companies linked to Israel.

A social media post

, opens new tab sharing the video online said: “Harrison Ford is Pro-Palestine.”

VERDICT

Miscaptioned. The video shows Harrison Ford talking about the young people who want to protect the environment at the UN Climate Action Summit 2019.

This article was produced by the Reuters Fact Check team. Read more about our fact-checking work.

Leavitt Holds Powerful White House Press Briefing, Leaves the Media Stunned Sarah Anderson

https://pjmedia.com/sarah-anderson/2025/04/16/leavitt-holds-powerful-white-house-press-briefing-leaves-the-media-stunned-n4938974

There are some things that just leave you speechless, and what happened in the White House Press Room today is one of them. And it didn’t just leave me speechless — it left the reporter pool stunned, too. 

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt announced that she’d be holding an impromptu press briefing with a special guest on Wednesday afternoon, and if you missed it, it was a doozy.

The topic was Kilmar Abrego Garcia. Well, sort of. Leavitt started by pointing out that Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen was currently in El Salvador, pleading with the country’s government to release one of its own citizens — a member of the foreign terrorist organization MS-13 with a history of violence who was in the United States illegally — so he can smuggle him back into the United States so we can probably deport him again. 

Leavitt began, “Today, we have officially learned Democrat officials still refuse to accept the will of the American people” before, once again, reminding us who the left has spent the last couple of weeks defending so vehemently.  

Maryland Democrat Senator Chris Van Hollen rushed to Dulles Airport this morning to fly to El Salvador, potentially using taxpayer dollars, to demand the release of a deported illegal alien MS-13 terrorist. The Democrats and the media in this room have continually and wrongly labeled Kilmar Abrego Garcia as a ‘Maryland Father.’

There is no ‘Maryland Father.’ Let me reiterate: Kilmar Abrego Garcia is an illegal alien, MS-13 gang member, and foreign terrorist who was deported back to his home country. And when Kilmar Abrego Garcia was originally arrested, he was wearing a sweatshirt with rolls of money covering the ears, mouth, and eyes of presidents on various currency denominations. This is a known MS-13 gang symbol of “Hear no evil, speak no evil, see no evil.” Abrego Garcia was also arrested with two other well-known members of the vicious MS-13 gang, and two separate judges found that Abrego Garcia was a member of MS-13, and that finding has never been disputed.

And just this morning, it was revealed through Maryland court documents that Abrego Garcia’s wife petitioned for an order of protection against him for two instances of domestic violence in May of 2021. And here is the order right here. The court ordered that “The respondent committed the following acts of abuse.” Once in May of 2021, “Assault in any degree,” and on May 4th of 2021, he punched and scratched his wife, ripped off her shirt, and grabbed and bruised her.

Washington Post’s Clinging to Fake Story Reminds Us What the Media Really Is Robert Spencer

https://pjmedia.com/robert-spencer/2025/04/13/washington-posts-clinging-to-fake-story-reminds-us-what-the-media-really-is-n4938874

There couldn’t possibly be a clearer example of media perfidy and dishonesty: back in May 2017, the Washington Post published a story about how President Trump supposedly urged Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats and National Security Agency Director Adm. Michael S. Rogers to deny that there was any evidence that he had colluded with Russia during the 2016 presidential campaign. There was just one catch: the story was false, and Rogers said as much to the FBI as far back as June 2017. Yet not only did the Post not take the story down; it’s still up, eight years later and long after the Russian Collusion hoax has been definitively debunked.

The story was one of many in the Post about Trump’s much-publicized collusion with Russia that won the Post the Pulitzer Prize. And apparently that was all that mattered. Truth? Accuracy? Integrity? Come on, man! 

The story, along with the rest about the alleged Russian Collusion, sold papers, and made the WaPo seem as if it was once again on the cutting edge of investigative journalism. The Post was even fearlessly taking on a president of the United States, recalling the heady days of Watergate when Woodward and Bernstein bearded the wily Tricky Dick, became Redford and Hoffman, and made the Post into one of the leading newspapers in the left’s constellation of propaganda organs.

The opportunity to relive the glory days was apparently too much for the Post, and overrode all other considerations. As Matt Margolis noted Sunday, “it’s unclear whether the Post knew Rogers disputed their report before publishing it, but Rogers made it clear to investigators shortly afterward that the story was false.” 

Did Rogers, or the FBI, notify the Post also that the story was false? That is unclear, but the WaPo should have made it its business to know. It was, after all, a newspaper, and not just any newspaper, but one that was leading the covering of the allegations of collusion against the sitting president. Did the Post have no contact with Rogers despite the fact that its story was about him? Did it have no contacts in the FBI? Or was the story just too good, too damning of Trump, for the Post to be all that concerned about accuracy? 

Media, Please Grow Up- Climate Skeptics and Lukewarmers are Never Given Equal Time

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/03/31/media-please-grow-up/

When did high school newspaper editors take over Western media? Decades ago, of course, and we’re unhappy to report that it seems they’re never going to grow up. The latest evidence? The early peak bloom of the cherry blossom trees along Washington’s Tidal Basin is being blamed on global warming.

The press has latched onto the man-made global warming narrative and it won’t let go.

The Washington Post couldn’t wait to inform its tell-us-what-to-believe readership that this year’s “peak occurred several days earlier than the long-term average, as human-caused climate warming hastens the onset of spring flowering.”

To its credit, the Post noted that reader comments “reflect a mix of opinions on the impact of climate change on the timing of cherry blossoms reaching peak bloom in D.C. Some commenters acknowledge that climate change, particularly the Urban Heat Island Effect, is causing earlier blooms, while others express skepticism or frustration with the focus on climate change.”

Maybe that’s the owner’s influence.

Meanwhile, ABC News said early last week that “in recent years, the peak bloom date for the cherry trees at the Tidal Basin reservoir is occurring earlier than it did in the past. Seasonal shifts, including milder, shorter winter seasons and spring warmth beginning earlier due to human-amplified climate change, are impacting when the cherry trees reach peak bloom, data shows.”

The data show no such thing. Anyone can infer from the numbers that “human-amplified climate change” is to blame (or credit, depending on the point of view), but they prove nothing.