https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2022/03/swimming_with_dolphins_ban__regulatory_overreach.html
“The stark arbitrariness of the ban is evident from the following: a) spinner dolphins are abundant around Hawaii, and there is no evidence of a population decline; b) dolphins, as is well known, are friendly and approach humans for benign, exuberant interactions; c) the ban applies only to tourism-related businesses, while the captive dolphin industry is exempt from it; and d) military activities, which might endanger dolphins with shelling, sonar, and underwater explosions, are also exempt.”
Who decides whether you may or may not swim with dolphins? You may think this is determined by some environment-related law, made by elected representatives who constitute the legislature. But the generalities of law are often translated into the specifics of practice through rules and regulations made and enforced by officials. Not all these officials answer to the checks and balances of the democratic process. Therein lies the scope for them to further political agendas or the interests of pressure groups unsanctified by the ballot, which alone represents the will of the people of America. It is for this reason that a landmark lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of an arbitrary ban on human-dolphin interactions in Hawaii gains importance.