https://amgreatness.com/2024/12/29/a-critical-look-at-elaine-pagels-religious-scholarship/
Over at Instapundit, Mark Tapscott called my attention to an interview in our former paper of record that Times journo Nicholas Kristoff conducts with Elaine Pagels, the celebrated (by some) Princeton historian of religion. Tapscott cites the commentator Erik Manning, who subjects Pagels’ new-age, secular-lite responses to withering criticism in a delicious column called “The New York Times And Ivy League Professor Team Up To Debunk Christmas.” At bottom, Manning shows, Pagels’s position is
“I like Christmas and some of the moralizing parts of Christianity, but miracles are nonsense, biblical scholarship has it all figured out, evangelicals are too dogmatic, and Jesus was probably a rape baby.” Great backhanded patronizing to stick it to the fundies on Christmas, New York Times. Very cool. Much editorializing. Muh scholarship.
I hadn’t thought about Elaine Pagels for many years, but Manning’s gimlet-eyed analysis reminded me of a longish column about Pagels I wrote many years ago. As a public service, I reprint it here with a few minor tweaks and updates.
I called the essay “Trouble in Paradise: the Gospel According to Pagels.”
It was only to be expected [I wrote] that Elaine Pagels’ book, temptingly entitled Adam, Eve, and the Serpent: Sex and Politics in Early Christianity, would be showered with all manner of adulation when it appeared in 1989. When her previous book, The Gnostic Gospels, appeared in 1979, it too was greeted by a chorus of critical and popular acclaim. It scooped up both the National Book Critics Circle Award and the National Book Award in 1980, became something of a best-seller, and greatly boosted the reputation of its thirty-seven-year-old author, then chairman of the department of religion at Barnard College. The following year, 1981, Pagels was visited by grace in the form of a MacArthur Prize Fellowship, a grace soon compounded by an offer from Princeton University, where she is currently the Harrington Spear Paine Professor of Religion. How could Adam, Eve, and the Serpent fail to be declared (as it promptly was) a “masterpiece?”