RUTHFULLY YOURS

https://issuesinsights.com/2025/09/26/left-wing-terrorism-has-been-unleashed/

For years, we were told by government officials and outside “experts” that the terrorists in our midst were mostly right-wing fanatics – a list that under the Biden administration came to include parents who spoke up at local school board meetings and Catholics who like the Latin mass.

But even the left is now admitting what everyone else already knows.

Namely, that despite their constant bleating about tolerance and peace, it’s leftists who pose the greatest threat to Americans.

This week, the Trump-hating Atlantic magazine published an article titled “Left-Wing Terrorism Is on the Rise,” written by scholars at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS).

“We found that left-wing terrorism has increased since President Donald Trump’s rise to political prominence in 2016. Indeed, 2025 marks the first time in more than 30 years that left-wing attacks outnumber those from the far right.”

By early July, “far-left extremists had already been responsible for five terrorist attacks and plots, putting 2025 on pace to be the left’s most violent year in more than three decades.”

And their list doesn’t include the killer who slaughtered two children in a Minneapolis church, the gunman who shot up ABC10 in Sacramento, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, the killing in a New Hampshire restaurant by a gunman who shouted “free Palestine,” or the attempted assassination of ICE agents in Dallas by a shooter who engraved bullet casings with “Anti-ICE” (but who ended up killing an illegal immigrant). All of these political attacks were committed by leftists — in just the past month.

https://amgreatness.com/2025/09/25/the-crudity-of-the-obsessive-compulsive-left/

Donald Trump just visited the United Nations to offer a customary annual presidential address.

Before he arrived, there were reports that UN staffers had joked about shutting down the escalator to chastise Trump for cutting out aid to some UN programs.

Upon arrival, as if on cue, Trump was met by a series of mysterious coincidences.

As soon as he and First Lady Melania mounted the escalator, it suddenly froze—forcing them to walk up.

Other escalators worked fine. Shortly afterward, the supposedly broken escalator was just as mysteriously running again.

When Trump went to the podium, his teleprompter mysteriously quit—and his alone.

As he delivered his speech from a text, the amplification in parts of the assembly was mysteriously lowered to near imperceptible levels.

Despite UN denials, all three “accidents” were too closely tied to Trump to be coincidences.

But they remind us that the left-wing hatred of the president has gone global—even after two near-successful assassination attempts.

The House of Representatives recently offered a resolution honoring the life and legacy of the conservative organizer Charlie Kirk, murdered by a leftist assassin.

The left both feared and hated Kirk. Why?

He had been singularly successful in redirecting youth’s natural rebelliousness against the status quo onto the ruling, ossified liberal establishment.

Kirk was winning over a new generation of young Americans to be counter-culturalists and counter-revolutionaries.

He urged them to question the entire left-wing orthodoxy of higher education, the corporate media, and popular culture—the ruling institutions that the baby boomers had enshrined as the current establishment.

His singular success may be why the terrified left attacked him as much after death as they had while he was alive.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/25-suspects-rob-california-jewelry-store-stealing-1/story?id=125892829

A group of nearly 25 people ransacked a jewelry store in San Ramon, California, this week, stealing an estimated $1 million worth of merchandise, police confirmed to ABC News.

Seven suspects have been detained, so far, and some of the jewelry has been recovered, the San Ramon Police Department said.

The group looted Heller Jewelers, located at the City Center Bishop Ranch shopping mall, on Monday afternoon and was armed with at least three guns, according to police. Video obtained by ABC News’ San Francisco station ABC7 shows the masked mob storming the store and smashing displays with crowbars and pickaxes before being locked inside by automatic closing doors.

This is the second time in two years Heller Jewelers has been targeted in a massive heist, when a group of seven masked men similarly broke into the store on St. Patrick’s Day in 2023 and took $1.1 million worth of jewels. The suspects were later apprehended due to a GPS tracking device hidden inside a stolen Rolex, according to local reports at the time.

On Monday, a member of the group fired upon the door to escape before the thieves fled into six getaway vehicles in the valet area of the shopping mall — several of which were reportedly stolen, police said.

https://lizpeek.com/news/22-million-in-taxpayer-funds-exposed-biden-admins-shocking-fetal-tissue-experiments/?utm_source=newsletter.lizpeek.com&utm_medium=

Efforts to rein in the “mad scientist” culture fostered under President Joe Biden and Dr. Anthony Fauci are gaining traction, with new revelations about taxpayer-funded experiments involving aborted baby body parts and animals.

According to a recent investigation by the White Coat Waste Project (WCW), the Biden administration’s National Institutes of Health (NIH) advanced 17 grants—totaling roughly $22 million—for animal experiments using aborted human tissue. These grants worked against a 2019 Trump-era ban meant to curb such research.

“For years, White Coat Waste has been fighting to ensure taxpayers aren’t forced to foot the bill for nightmarish NIH experiments that crudely implant fingers, scalps, and other human fetus parts into animals,” WCW founder Anthony Bellotti said. “Thanks to our newest investigation exposing active Biden-era funding for these sickening animal experiments—and to swift action from the Trump administration—they won’t be.”

The NIH responded to Breitbart News, acknowledging the controversy and pledging not to renew the Biden-era grants. “NIH takes this issue very seriously and remains committed to the highest ethical standards in research,” the agency said. “We are actively reviewing these matters and will take all necessary steps to ensure our policies reflect that commitment.”

While the Trump-appointed NIH Director, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, underscored a focus on “valuing human life,” many of the controversial projects approved under Biden were said to trace back to Fauci before his 2022 retirement. Some were funded through 2026.

Not everyone welcomed the shift. Hideyuki Okano, president of the International Society for Stem Cell Research (ISSCR), defended fetal tissue research as a “cornerstone of biomedical progress since the 1930s.” He credited the practice with advances in studying infertility, neurodegenerative diseases, and even vaccine development for illnesses ranging from polio to COVID-19. He argued the work is carried out under a “robust ethical and legal framework.”

https://thespectator.com/topic/dallas-shooting-was-a-political-act/

Although we are still learning the details of the lethal assault on the ICE facility in Dallas, we already know some important things, thanks to transparency from the Dallas police and the FBI. We know the shooter’s name; we know he committed suicide as police closed in; we know he fired indiscriminately at the ICE facility, killing at least one detainee but no ICE officers; and we know the assassin had a political motive, encoded on unfired rifle shells. He hated ICE.

We also know exactly what politicians from each side will say. They’ve said it so many times before. The Republicans have a much stronger, more convincing message here than Democrats.

Republicans will say, “This targeted violence against law enforcement and immigration officers has to stop. We have to do more than condemn it. We need to understand that the violence is not just a series a unconnected incidents. We have to name the sources behind it. If the violence is organized, we have to find and prosecute the organizers and the funding sources. We think it is fueled by vile rhetoric, a lot of it from elected Democrats and still more from their media allies. Their fulminations inflame passions and fuel violent demonstrations and deadly attacks. We know that some of this violence is organized. We need the FBI to find out who is doing that and who is funding it. And we need the Department of Justice to prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law.”

Democrats will respond, “This is just more senseless gun violence. We need to talk with each other, not shoot at each other. All of us condemn this violence. Of course, we bear no responsibility for any of it. So, both sides need to calm down.”

Democrats are losing this argument. Polls show voters strong favor Republicans on both law-and-order and immigration enforcement. Democrats’ response rings hollow with voters because it ignores their reasonable demand for closed borders, strict immigration enforcement and better protection against urban violence. Democrats are seen as opposing all those.

If voters support those positions, why do Democratic politicians find it so hard to fall in line? Because the party’s activist base and its left-wing donors would crush them in the primaries, before they reach the wider electorate in November. They would also face the obvious question: why are you changing your positions now, after years of saying just the opposite?

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/former-fbi-director-comey-indicted-192939067.html

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Prosecutors are expected to ask a grand jury to indict former FBI Director James Comey in the Eastern District of Virginia in the coming days, two sources briefed on the matter told Reuters on Wednesday.

The exact charges remained unclear, and it was uncertain whether the grand jury would return an indictment against one of Trump’s longtime political antagonists.

Comey served as FBI director from 2013 until Trump fired him in 2017, and Trump has since regularly assailed Comey’s handling of the FBI probe into contact between Trump’s 2016 campaign and the Russian government.

Any charges against Comey would mark the starkest example of the Trump administration using its law enforcement authority against a prominent critic – after the president promised retribution in his election campaign.

One of the sources said some prosecutors within the Eastern District of Virginia have presented new U.S. Attorney Lindsey Halligan with a memo explaining why charges should not be filed, saying the case lacked evidence to show probable cause that a crime was committed.

A representative for Comey declined to comment.

At least one of the potential charges being considered would accuse Comey of lying to Congress during his testimony in 2020. The statute of limitations to bring charges against Comey in connection with that testimony would expire on Tuesday.

Since Trump returned to power in January, the Justice Department has been examining Comey’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, when he addressed Republican criticisms of the Russia investigation and denied he had authorized disclosures of sensitive information to the media.