https://www.nationalreview.com/2024/11/biden-harris-doj-is-poised-to-end-lawfare-pursuit-of-trump/
Hopefully, the feds’ example will influence the progressive Democratic state prosecutors to stand down.
I confess to being pleasantly surprised by reports this afternoon that Biden-Harris Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith will end DOJ’s two cases against President-elect Donald Trump: the so-called January 6 (J6) case in Washington, D.C., and the Mar-a-Lago documents case in Florida (currently on appeal to the Eleventh Circuit).
Pleasantly surprised . . . but not shocked.
As I tried to explain in a column we posted a short while ago, the expungement of the cases — whether by pardon or dismissal by the Justice Department — is deeply in the interests of President Joe Biden and the Democratic Party.
Biden, of course, will soon be pardoning his son, Hunter, pre-election avowals to the contrary notwithstanding. In a vacuum, extinguishing the felony gun and tax convictions would be seen as corrupt self-dealing. But once the Trump cases are dismissed, the Hunter pardon will be seen as part of a clemency package that moves the country away from the era of lawfare — the Biden-Harris administration’s exploitation of the government’s law-enforcement apparatus as a weapon against their chief political adversary.
Democrats, moreover, must comprehend that the lawfare campaign against Trump was deeply unpopular outside Trump-obsessed circles. It was regarded as un-American by much of the country. Further, it lulled Democrats into a false sense of security that made them think they could win a presidential campaign based on sheer anti-Trump animus and with a vapid candidate — Vice President Kamala Harris — who tried to run on vibes rather than substance and policy (having turned away from the woke-progressive ideas she held until about five minutes before the nomination was handed to her).
In addition, Biden would not be giving up much by dismissing the federal Trump cases. If it were pursued, it would take years to get the J6 case to trial. The same goes for the Mar-a-Lago case, assuming DOJ wins its appeal of Judge Aileen Cannon’s dismissal of the indictment (on finding that Smith’s special-counsel appointment violated the Constitution’s appointments clause), which is no sure thing.