Bill Maher says to bring back ‘old America,’ the left must tone down their radical progressivism ‘Real Time’ host listed issues from men in women’s sports to immigration that damage party’s reputation with average Americans By Marc Tamasco

https://www.foxnews.com/media/bill-maher-says-bring-back-old-america-left-must-tone-down-radical-progressivism

On Friday’s episode of “Real Time with Bill Maher,” host Bill Maher argued that to get back to what he called “old America,” Democrats must scale back their more radically progressive ideology.

“If we are ever going to get back to the old America, that’s got to be the Democrats’ part of the bargain. Stop coming up with radically new and often terrible ideas and then, in the next breath, insist there be no debate about any of it,” Maher said.

The “Real Time” host began the segment by criticizing some Democrats’ support for men competing in women’s sports, adding that there’s “a lot of stuff like that on the left.”

“And when conservatives see it, they say, ‘I’m sorry. We’re just not going to go along with reinventing society, often pointlessly, even if we have to cancel democracy to do it,'” he said.

Maher continued, firing off a list of issues he argued are damaging the Democratic Party’s reputation with the average American.

“Transing kids by self-diagnosis with no age limit, no parental notification, and no acknowledgment of social contagion. Not doing it. Asylum now covers any reason for anyone to come to America. Not doing it. Homelessness is a lifestyle. Natural immunity doesn’t count anymore. Whiteness is toxic. Penises in women’s prisons. Welcoming the intifada. We’re not doing it,” the late-night host railed.

Another issue Maher raised is Democrats’ unwillingness to debate these topics with Republicans, often dismissing anyone who disagrees as “bad, stupid, and deplorable.”

Comey Indictment: Retribution or Justice? James Comey’s indictment marks a turning point, raising the question: is Trump seeking revenge on his foes—or finally delivering long-denied justice? By Roger Kimball

https://amgreatness.com/2025/09/28/comey-indictment-retribution-or-justice/

In the matter of James Brien Comey Jr., how finds the court? I do not mean a court of law. I mean the tribunal of history.

Granted, we will be hearing from a Virginia court of law about JBC quite soon. On Thursday, Comey became the first former FBI director in history to be indicted by a grand jury for a felony. The charges? Lying to Congress and obstructing justice. (For the legal eagles among you, the statutes in question are USC 18 §1001 and USC 18 §1505.)

Call it karma, irony, or just good old-fashioned just desserts: whatever your literary preference, there is a delicious symmetry in the fact that USC 18 §1001—which prohibits making “any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement” to a government official—was the statute under which Comey tormented and bankrupted General Mike Flynn, Donald Trump’s National Security Advisor for a few weeks in 2017.

Comey later entertained a live audience with an account of how that went down. It wasn’t typical, Comey admitted, but it was early days in an administration that looked disorganized. So he just called Flynn, said he wanted to send over a couple of agents, told him he needn’t bother having legal counsel around, and the rest was filed under “entrapment.”

Connoisseurs of narcissistically infused bathos will find much to savor in James Comey. No sooner was he indicted than the author of A Higher Loyalty, starring James Comey, took to Instagram to emit a moist declaration of his innocence, his defiance, his . . . well, his “higher loyalty.”

That bizarre clip is saturated with emetic, self-righteous sentimentality. Do not be disarmed. James Comey is an object lesson in the psychological truth that cloying sentimentality can easily cohabit with a malign vindictiveness. That aspect of Comey’s character was on view in 2023 when he sat down with Jen Psaki to talk about the hundreds upon hundreds of people rounded up in the aftermath of the January 6 outing at the Capitol. “Get them all,” Comey snarled. “Find everybody who went into that building. Find them all. . . . We will punish everyone who went in there. . . . We will hunt you to the end of the earth, even for a misdemeanor, and make you pay.” I wonder if it is true that Comey’s favorite reading is that sermon by Jonathan Edwards, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God”?

US policy on Iran – Waking up to Reality? Yoram Ettinger

http://bit.ly/4nr3zOg

*As far as Iran’s Ayatollah regime is concerned – notwithstanding US statements, and independent of Israel’s existence – the war against “the infidel” West, “The Great American Satan” and the “apostate” Sunnis is not over!

*According to the Ayatollah regime, since the June 2025 12-day-war, there is a temporary ceasefire, while Iran persists in its subversive, terrorist and war-like endeavors: attempting to topple the pro-US regimes in Jordan, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Egypt, Morocco; supporting Hezbollah, Hamas and Houthi terrorists; undermining the US strategic posture in Latin America (since 1980) through a tight collaboration with drug cartels, terror organizations and all anti-US governments; and expanding – in collaboration with China and Russia – its network of sleeper cells on US soil.

*Since June 2025, China, North Korea and possibly Russia have been involved 24/7 in restoring and upgrading Iran’s air force, air defenses, ballistic and nuclear capabilities. China has focussed on Iran’s ballistic and air defense capabilities, supplying guidance systems, microprocessors, ground-to-air missiles, components and scientific expertise, paid for by Iranian oil at a discounted price. North Korea has provided Iran ballistic and nuclear assistance, as well as underground infrastructure expertise. Notwithstanding its preoccupation with the war against Ukraine, Russia is partaking (so far, in a limited manner) in the restoration of Iran’s air force and air defense infrastructures, directly and via Belarus.

*The key challenge facing the US is to avoid – rather than repeat – critical blunders, highlighted by the 1978/79 US embrace of Ayatollah Khomeini, which launched the US diplomatic (negotiation) option toward the Ayatollah regime. The 48-year-old self-destructive US negotiation option, which has been accompanied by reversible and by-passable economic sanctions, catapulted the Ayatollah regime from a 2nd class strategic power to a primary regional and global power. It has transformed Iran from “The American Policeman of the Gulf” to the leading epicenter of anti-US Islamic terrorism, drug trafficking and money laundering in the Middle East, Africa and Latin America, the US’ soft underbelly.

*The survival of the apocalyptic, imperialistic Ayatollah regime on the one hand, and the US goal of preventing, minimizing and ending war and terrorism, on the other hand, constitutes an oxymoron.  

*Contrary to the Western state of mind, the Ayatollah regime is not driven by “Money Talks” and enhancing standard of living, but by Shiite (Twelver) Islam and history (e.g., the 680 AD Battle of Kerbala, the 939 AD disappearance of the Hidden 12th Imam, etc.), which have determined the Ayatollah’s vision, Constitution, strategy, tactics, school curriculum and mosque sermons, which have become the most effective production line of anti-US terrorists.

*While the US considers negotiation with Iran as a step towards reconciliation and peaceful coexistence, the Ayatollah regime considers negotiation as a way to avoid further military setback, stalling, restoring capabilities, and resuming efforts to advance a fanatic, apocalyptic, imperialistic vision. 

Abba Eban was wrong about the Palestinians By Ruthie Blum

https://www.jns.org/abba-eban-was-wrong-about-the-palestinians/

Following the Geneva peace talks in December 1973, then-Israeli Foreign Minister Abba Eban quipped that the Palestinians “never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity.”

It’s a clever line that’s been quoted for decades, particularly by those who have agreed to all kinds of deals that they hoped would solve the “conflict.”

But it’s time to put the false rhetoric to rest and acknowledge that the Arabs in Judea, Samaria and Gaza haven’t missed a single opportunity to pursue the goal of eliminating the State of Israel. Groups like Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad make no bones about this objective.

Their rivals in Fatah, Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas’s faction, are sneakier and more patient. They follow PLO chief Yasser Arafat’s “plan of stages,” which involves accomplishing the same mission, but more methodically—by playing the “peace” game. And pulling the wool over the eyes of the West.

In this respect, the P.A. is more dangerous than Hamas. While the latter is designated as a terrorist organization by the European Union and other countries now recognizing a Palestinian state, the former continues to be treated internationally as a legitimate entity and potential partner for peace with Israel.

Not by the Palestinians, of course. They hate and ridicule Abbas, which is why he’s refused to hold elections for the past two decades.
As Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pointed out during his speech on Friday before the United Nations General Assembly—after the P.A. observers and fellow Muslim rejectionists staged a silly walkout, then ran to watch the presentation on TV in another room—”Nearly 90% of Palestinians supported [Hamas’s] Oct. 7 attack.”
He went on to stress to the “leaders of France, Britain, Australia, Canada and other countries [that] unconditionally recognized a Palestinian state” that the Palestinians—”both in Gaza and in Judea and Samaria, the ‘West Bank,’ as you call it”—not only supported the atrocity, but “celebrated [it]. They danced on the rooftops; they threw candies … just the way they celebrated another horror: 9/11.”

Netanyahu proceeded to excoriate the leaders recognizing a Palestinian state for conveying the “very clear message [that] murdering Jews pays off.”

He continued, “When the most savage terrorists on earth are effusively praising your decision, you didn’t do something right; you did something wrong. Horribly wrong. Your disgraceful decision will encourage terrorism against Jews and against innocent people everywhere. It will be a mark of shame on all of you.”

What Kneecap said is far worse than you think The collapse of their case is good news, but we still need to talk about their unhinged Israelophobia. Brendan O’Neill

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/09/27/what-kneecap-said-is-far-worse-than-you-think/

I’m glad the terror case against Kneecap has been thrown out. No one, not even tossers in tea cosies, not even crap rappers in Provo fancy dress, should be dragged to the dock for what they say. Yes, even if what they’ve said is ‘Up Hamas, up Hezbollah’. Freedom of speech must include the freedom to gush over neo-fascists. The liberty to utter is meaningless if it doesn’t cover the liberty of lowlifes to sing the praises of armies of anti-Semites. It’s gross, I know, but speech often is. Better that we trust ourselves to handle vile ideas than that we invite the state to infantilise us by reprimanding those we find offensive.

Here’s the main reason I’m happy the case collapsed: because now the court with real moral authority – the court of public opinion – can do its job. We don’t need wizened judges to tell us which ideas are ‘good’ and which are ‘bad’. We can decide for ourselves, through free, frank debate. And in the case of Kneecap, that’s exactly what we should do. The state’s case against them may have withered on a technicality, but the court of public opinion’s judgment upon these darlings of the Israelophobic bourgeoisie should be ferocious indeed.

It was band member Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh (aka Mo Chara) who found himself in court. He was charged with expressing support for a proscribed terror group following the emergence of footage showing him holding up the Hezbollah flag at a gig in London in November 2024. Footage also showed the band hollering ‘Up Hamas, up Hezbollah!’ to the glee of the Israel-hating rich kids in their audience. Today, the chief magistrate at Woolwich Crown Court decreed that the charges against Mo Chara were ‘null’ because they were not brought within the statutory time limit.

Now that the state has finally butted out of this speech-related scandal, we the people can have our say. I’ll kick it off: what Kneecap said is even worse than you think. They didn’t just wave the Hezbollah flag, which would have been sickening enough given Hezbollah is an avowedly racist movement devoted to violently excising the ‘cancerous’ Jews from the Middle East and pushing them back to ‘Germany, or wherever they come from’. No, they also smiled – smiled – following the worst mass murder of Jews since the Holocaust.

For two years now, Kneecap have openly flirted with the ideologues of violent Israelophobia. On 8 October 2023, just hours after Hamas raped and butchered more than a thousand Jews in southern Israel, they posted a beaming pic of themselves on social media. ‘Solidarity with the Palestinian struggle’, they said, sporting wide grins and with a Palestine flag hanging in the background. As Jewish grandmothers were being dragged into dank tunnels in Gaza, as the blackened corpses of young Jews were being disentangled by early responders, Kneecap were smiling. They saw a pogrom and they said ‘Solidarity’.

They said ‘Up Hamas’ just a year after Hamas killed more Jews in one day than anyone else since the Nazis. They said ‘Up Hamas’ after it had been established that Hamas had thrown grenades at Jewish children, had beaten to death young Jewish women and had boasted to their families back in Gaza about how many Jews they had slaughtered with their own hands. They said ‘Up Hamas’, a movement founded with the express aim of exterminating Israel’s Jews, and which as recently as 2021 was inciting people to buy ‘five-shekel knives’ and ‘cut off the heads of Jews’.

One of the Kneecap trio – the one who’s nearly 40 – posed with a book consisting of the collected speeches of Hassan Nasrallah, the late leader of Hezbollah. This is a book that refers to Jews as the ‘descendants of apes and pigs’.

The Blind Leading the Dumb—and the Hateful America’s schools are collapsing not from lack of funding but from a teacher pipeline that churns out ideology instead of knowledge—leaving students functionally illiterate. By Stephen Soukup

https://amgreatness.com/2025/09/27/the-blind-leading-the-dumb-and-the-hateful/

About three decades ago, when I was part of the Washington research team of a now-defunct brokerage house, I worked (with my then-boss) on a report about the state of the American education system. The results—unsurprisingly—were not good. The system was in disarray, with towns, cities, and even the federal government spending more and more tax dollars on education every year and getting worse and worse results. The educational and political establishments had convinced the American people that the problem with education was that they simply weren’t spending enough money on it and that, if they did, the people who broke the system in the first place could fix it and, by extension, could fix the country as well. Unfortunately, the data showed definitively that this was untrue.

Based on our research, we concluded that something more obvious—and more uncomfortable—than funding was the real root of the problem with American education. It was obvious because… well… it just was. It made perfect sense. It was uncomfortable because it hit close to home. We knew that what we had learned would likely be taken as insulting or, at the very least, overly provocative by a number of our clients and other readers, including friends and even family. My mom was a teacher. We both had friends who were teachers or whose spouses and/or kids were teachers. Like almost everyone, we had fond memories of that one (or more) special teacher who, when we were kids, helped us in some unique way or influenced us profoundly. Teachers are, for good reason, heroic figures in much of American history. And yet, everything we read and heard and studied indicated that teachers were an enormous part of the problem with American education.

To be clear, the main culprits in our story were teachers’ colleges, not individual teachers. Still, the colleges were a problem because they were churning out inferior products, which, of course, meant that many of the teachers in the American education system were not up to the job—the absolutely imperative job of preparing the next generations of Americans for intellectual and professional life.

In our report, titled “The Dumb Leading the Blind,” we noted the difficult truth that the nation’s education schools had largely become a dumping ground for college students who couldn’t hack it in any other degree program. That wasn’t—and isn’t—to say that all students who wanted to be teachers were dumb. Far from it. Most were smart and earnest and dedicated and resembled the heroic teachers of American lore. At the same time, however, what they were being taught was mostly nonsense: bland, simplistic, often trite twaddle that was disguised and legitimized as “educational theory.” Ed. School curricula were so preposterous and so lacking in academic rigor that almost anyone could—and did—pass without much effort. A multi-decades-long effort by educational “reformers” to shift the focus of teacher instruction away from subject matter and to cognitive theory and epistemology had meaningfully dumbed down the curricula. In turn, students who failed out of other colleges ended up earning degrees in ed. schools because it was shockingly easy to do so. Meanwhile, smart and earnest students were denied a proper education by their instructors, who taught down to the lowest common denominator.

All of this, we argued, suggested that American K-12 education would, in the long run, grow even worse, even more expensive, and even more controversial. And that could only bode ill for the nation as a whole.

Thank You, President Trump: Turning Decades of Iranian Impunity Into Accountability by Majid Rafizadeh

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21924/trump-iran-accountability

Oil sales are a lifeline for the Iranian economy, funding both domestic governance and external operations, including support for proxy militias. If these funds were curtailed, the regime would struggle to maintain its internal stability while simultaneously attempting to sustain influence abroad. Such an economic squeeze would heighten domestic discontent, increase political pressure on leaders, and force Tehran to consider its options in a more constrained and exposed position than ever before.

Iran is apparently aware that it faces an administration under Trump that is determined to maintain the pressure until meaningful, verifiable changes occur. Tehran’s desperation underscores the effectiveness of the strategy: when authoritarian regimes are confronted with coordinated, uncompromising pressure — duress — they are forced to confront their vulnerabilities and recalibrate their behavior.

Understanding the “language” of authoritarian regimes has been a critical factor in Trump’s success. Maximum pressure is not subtle; it is a direct communication that dictators understand. It combines visibility of consequences, clarity of demands, and the credible threat of continued escalation. For Iran, this has meant that there is no ambiguity about the costs of pursuing nuclear weapons, maintaining proxy operations, or destabilizing the region. Force, coordinated international sanctions, and strategic diplomacy have created an environment where the regime cannot rely on its previous strategies of coercion or intimidation. This approach demonstrates that sustained, multidimensional pressure can achieve outcomes that decades of negotiation and partial agreements could not.

The future for the Iranian regime, under continued maximum pressure, depends on the EU maintaining a firm stance as well. Iran’s nuclear program must be dismantled entirely, financial and military support for proxy groups curtailed, and no concessions offered that could weaken the credibility of the strategy.

This historic moment represents an opportunity to reshape the region, limit the threats posed by Iran, and reinforce the principle that force, when applied strategically, remains a decisive tool in addressing state-sponsored aggression and nuclear proliferation – also in countries other than Iran.

The Iranian regime finds itself in a situation it has never faced in its more than 40 years of ruling. The pressures it is now under are the result of a coordinated and relentless approach by President Donald J. Trump, whose policies are systematically targeting every pillar of the Iranian state that supports its nuclear ambitions, regional influence and financial stability.

The strategy, often described as “maximum pressure,” is applying economic, military, and diplomatic force in a way that previous administrations, despite decades of involvement in Middle Eastern affairs, could not or did not. This approach has forced the Iranian leadership to confront the consequences of its actions while leaving no room for misinterpretation about the seriousness of U.S. resolve. The result is an Iranian regime that is significantly weakened, isolated, and desperate for relief, yet it faces the U.S. under the Trump administration and Israel united in maintaining the pressure until its nuclear program is completely dismantled and its destabilizing influence curtailed.

Greta’s flotilla has exposed the suicidal stupidity of Islamo-leftism Why is anyone surprised that Allah-fearing Koran-bashers and genderfluid Westerners are struggling to get along? Brendan O’Neill

https://www.spiked-online.com/2025/09/25/gretas-flotilla-and-the-suicidal-stupidity-of-islamo-leftism/

Remember when leftists chanted, ‘Yemen, Yemen, make us proud / Turn another ship around!’, goading the medieval anti-Semites of the Houthi movement to bomb merchant ships in the Red Sea? Well, now those same people are blubbing like babies because Israel allegedly pumped some ABBA on to their flotilla of boats heading to Gaza. So it’s fine for a racist militia to rain missiles on the hard-grafting men of merchant ships, but heaven forbid that the Jewish State subject the lily-handed activist class to a bit of ‘Dancing Queen’. Bombing commercial ships is resistance – making the West’s privileged, preening haters of Israel listen to some Seventies bangers is a war crime.

They don’t like it up ’em, do they, to quote Lance Corporal Jones. A fitting line to cite because, when you think about it, these flotilla fools are the Dad’s Army of the high seas, only younger and a lot more sinister. A gaggle of social misfits that fancies itself as a force for good. A mob of inept muppets that hilariously fantasises it will save the world from evil – from Nazism in the case of Dad’s Army, from Zionism in the case of the ABBA-oppressed TikTokers on those dumb boats sailing into a warzone. Rarely has the woke left’s toxic combination of grating self-pity and depthless self-regard been so starkly exposed as it has by the latest melodramas from these white-saviour ships in the Med.

It’s hard to figure out exactly what’s going on with the flotilla. We know 52 boats are involved. We know Greta Thunberg is on one of them. We know they intend to ‘smash’ Israel’s naval blockade of Gaza. We know they’re carrying food parcels for Gazans. We know that in the six weeks or so that they’re at sea, Israel will have handed out around 40million meals in Gaza. And we know this will do sweet FA to dislodge the latest hip libel about the Jewish State ‘starving Palestinians to death’.

But everything else is unclear. The boat folk claim their communications systems have been targeted. ‘They’re jamming our radio!’, cried one as ABBA blasted in the background. Is it wrong that I laughed? They say drones have flown overhead. They say some of the drones have dropped items on to the boats, possibly including ‘noise grenades’, which are designed to disorientate people without injuring them. They say it’s all Israel’s doing, though the Italian authorities, in whose waters these things reportedly happened, pointed the finger at ‘unidentified perpetrators’. Israel is staying schtum. It refuses to comment on the very serious accusation that it is committing the war crime of winding up Swedish Greta with some Swedish pop.

The flotilla’s keffiyeh-adorned flag-shaggers are shocked that someone seems to be targeting them. I’m shocked these people are that dumb.

Michael Finch’s Riveting ‘A Time to Stand’ The President of the Freedom Center delivers a masterpiece. by Bruce Bawer

Patriot. Philosopher. Prophet. Poet.

Let’s start with this. Michael routinely, and reverently, reaches back into American history, contrasting today’s corrupt and mediocre political class – and the preposterous cultural elites who support them – with our brilliant Founders and the greatest of our presidents, military heroes, artists, and authors. In an era of grubby race hustlers, insane transgender ideologues, appalling apologists for Islamic jihad, and miscellaneous merchants of madness, Michael patiently reminds us, time after time, that our beloved country is the product of the strenuous efforts of millions of men and women who, over many generations, and with a quiet nobility and extraordinary sense of self-sacrifice, settled the land, worked the land, and, when called to do so, took up arms for the land.

In some moods, to be sure, Michael is capable of expressing the view that the America that some of us are old enough to remember and were brought up to revere – the America of hard work and high principle – is slipping through our fingers, or is lost already: as he puts it, to Americans “over a certain age, this America, this culture, this society have become beyond foreign. It is not the country we grew up in and it is not the country we want to die in. It is alien.” More often, however, Michael is a man of hope and faith who is quick to assure us – and himself – that in spite of everything that the bad guys, the soulless self-seekers, have done to despoil it, our America “is still out there, that America that we remember, the one that was proud and strong, but also assured, humble — the one that embodied a quiet patriotism that didn’t need boasting.”

Indeed, in a time when we are subjected constantly to the inane bombast of despicable political careerists and unscrupulous media lackeys, Michael reminds us that the nobility of our immigrant and settler ancestors was, indeed, overwhelmingly a humble nobility. And if he is so extremely effective in reminding us of this, it is because he himself embodies that same kind of humble nobility, speaking to us, in most of his essays, not in a hectoring tone but in a gentle yet urgent voice that commands attention because it is speaking fundamental truths – home truths – about who we, as Americans, were, once upon a time, and who we can be again.

Yes, Michael can lay it on the line with the best of them, asking in one essay, with a richly justified asperity, “When did this war on race begin, where did this sudden hatred of white people come from?  What is a white person anyway?  Am I supposed to have more in common with say, a Bulgarian than with my Mexican-American neighbor or a black man that has roots in America going back almost four centuries?  What foolishness is this?” In 2016, when some Trump supporters were “running for the hills” after the release of NBC’s infamous Access Hollywood recording of Trump saying a single vulgar word, Michael was able to work up genuine anger at these “quislings” and to mount an eloquent and stirring – and deeply wise and well-informed – defense of the future president:

As conservatives, we love to think of America being founded, and for 240 years, run by nothing but pious Christian pilgrims. But, this is just fantasy. We have had very pious men in our history, but also very many rogues, drunks, gamblers, womanizers, etc., lead our country, fight our wars, and create our industries. We may not want to admit it, but the very same traits required to take risks, to lead men, to create and build, often coalesce with some of the traits that we find so morally repugnant.

The ‘Free’ University of Brussels: An Anti-Semitic Madrassa in Europe? by Drieu Godefridi

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/21922/free-university-of-brussels

The climate of hatred and intimidation is so pervasive that, according to them, it is impossible to be Jewish on the ULB campus. One cannot speak or express oneself as Jewish — or simply be Jewish. Just being a Jew is condemned and subjected to violence.

Finally, when Alain Destexhe, long-time Belgian Senator, sought to shed light on this choice by pointing to demographic developments at ULB, citing around twenty first names — without surnames — the university immediately, the same day, filed a complaint against him for “incitement to hatred”. It is questionable how the observation of a demographic evolution — neither good nor bad in itself, but simply factual — could be construed as “hateful”. So much for “free inquiry”, the motto of the ULB.

Out of conviction or cowardice, the Free University of Brussels seems to have chosen the path of complicity with Islamist anti-Semitism.

Voices are now calling on the Belgian authorities and the European Union (notably within the Erasmus program) to take the necessary measures, including the complete withdrawal of funding.

The Free University of Brussels (ULB) has been making headlines in Europe. Law students decided to name their class after Rima Hassan, a French Islamist politician known for her anti-Semitic positions and her apologetics for Hamas and other terrorist organizations. That decision came against the backdrop of countless attacks and threats targeting Jewish students on the Brussels campus.

Has the ULB become a breeding ground for Islamist and anti-Semitic hatred in Europe?

1. Anti-Semitic attacks

May 2024 – Physical assaults against Jewish students at the ULB campus. Jewish students, including the president of the Union of Jewish Students in Belgium, were attacked by pro-Palestinian demonstrators. The victims were first insulted, then beaten. Israel’s ambassador to Belgium, Idit Rosenzweig Abu, shared a video of the attack. Incredibly, campus security removed the Jewish students — the victims, not the aggressors — from the premises “for their own safety”, without immediately intervening against the attackers. Hundreds of people then demonstrated to denounce this gratuitous and indiscriminate anti-Semitic violence.