The Iranian Negotiations That Never End :Daniel Greenfield

The negotiations will only end with a nuclear test.

It is quite possible that no matter how many concessions Obama makes, there will never be a final agreement with Iran. The deadlines have already been extended so many times that the only reliable thing about the negotiations is that somewhere near the edge, the negotiators will declare that they are close and extend the formerly final deadline some more. And then some more again.

There is currently disagreement over the last agreement that was agreed to in order to extend the deadline. If you find that confusing, so does everyone else.

According to the British Foreign Minister, “There are a number of different areas where we still have major differences of interpretation in detailing what was agreed in Lausanne.”

JULY 4 PROPOSAL: Republican Candidates Should Stand Together to Block Iran Deal by Roger L Simon

All the Republican candidates, announced or unannounced, should stop what they are doing and band together over the July 4 weekend to stop the Iran Deal. In so doing, they should reach out not just to their fellow Republicans, but to all Americans, including especially their colleagues on the other side of the aisle. This is an emergency.

Sometimes world events reach a level that petty politics must be put aside and true patriotism come to the fore. September 11, 2001, and Pearl Harbor were such instances. The about-to-be-signed (between June 30 and July 6) nuclear deal with Iran is another. According to the Corker-Menendez bill, Congress only has thirty days to review the deal and (unfairly) needs to muster a two-thirds majority to overthrow it.

VICTOR DAVIS HANSON: HILLARY GUMP

The fictional and cinema hero Forrest Gump somehow always managed to turn up at historic moments in the latter twentieth century. But whereas Forrest usually had a positive role to play at the hinges of fate, the equally ubiquitous Hillary Gump usually appeared as a bit player who made things far worse.

Take the issue of government abuse, ethics, and public transparency. The modern locus classicus of government overreach was the Watergate scandal. Over forty years ago Hillary was there as a young legal intern purportedly advising the House Judiciary Committee during the congressional investigations. She was also reportedly let go by her superiors for unethical conduct — quis custodiet ipsos custodes? From Watergate to Travelgate to Filegate to Whitewater to the current quid pro quos of the Clinton Foundation to her recent destruction of private emails and her private server while serving as secretary of State, Hillary Clinton has been at or near lots of government scandals of the last half-century. Twenty years ago Hillary Clinton was brazenly evading federal law by hiding her legal records from a court-ordered subpoena for documents — in the same fashion that in 2015 she destroyed all traces of her email correspondence on her private server, in violation of State Department protocol and most likely federal law.

Merv Bendle: Jihadis and the Jackbooted Left

Like Islamists, so-called progressives are obsessed with state power and its draconian use against those who decline to conform. That feminists or gay activists say little or nothing about Islam’s intolerance comes as no surprise. They are sub-species of the same statist monster.
Who is doing all the heavy lifting in the escalating battle against terrorism? Who is taking the hard legislative and political decisions? Who is confronting the reality of home-grown jihadism, Islamic fundamentalism, the radicalisation of moronic Muslim adolescents, and the carefully calibrated campaign of global terrorism and Islamist subversion funded by Saudi Arabia, as the recent Wikileaks disclosures reveal, and as I analysed in detail years ago in several articles that led to my persecution and exclusion from academia.

It is certainly not the progressive left, that Green-Left amalgam of radical academics, grandstanding lawyers, moral absolutists, racial supremacists, environmental apocalypticists, radical feminists, old-style Stalinists, LGBTI life-style utopians, rent-a-crowd mobs, media show ponies, union racketeers, political careerists, and born-to-rule bureaucrats entrenched in publicly funded sinecures

The Iran Deal, Then and Now Stephen F. Hayes

One week before the June 30 deadline for a nuclear deal with Iran, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei made a series of demands about the final terms. Among them: He called for an immediate end to all United Nations Security Council and U.S. economic sanctions on Iran; he said Iranian military sites would not be subject to international inspections; he declared that Iran would not abide a long-term freeze on nuclear research; and he ruled out interviews with individuals associated with Iran’s nuclear program as part of any enforcement plan.

The New York Times headline read “Iran’s Supreme Leader, Khamenei, Seems to Pull Back on Nuclear Talks.” That’s one explanation. The more likely one: Khamenei understands that Barack Obama is desperate for this deal and will agree to just about anything to make it a reality. In private remarks caught on tape, top White House foreign policy adviser Ben Rhodes likened the Iran deal to Obamacare in its importance to the administration. And on April 2, the president held a press conference to celebrate the preliminary “historic understanding with Iran” that, he said, was “a good deal, a deal that meets our core objectives.”

The Increasing Clout of a Terrorist Force Quds Force: The Other Iran Threat By Mike Rogers & Arthur L. Herman

‘We welcome war with the U.S., as we believe that it will be the scene for our success to display the real potentials of our power.” So said Brigadier General Hossein Salami, the lieutenant commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), via state-run Iranian television last month.

What makes Salami so confident about going up against the world’s most extensive military? Maybe it’s the increasing clout of IRGC’s elite terrorist division, the Quds Force, in the Middle East, including its very public involvement in the fighting against ISIS in Iraq — as America’s influence lessens in that conflict.

The Strategic Consequences of “Grexit” by Peter Martino

Last January, ISIS revealed that it is smuggling terrorists into Europe by hiding them among the immigrants leaving Turkey.

“If Europe leaves us in the crisis, we will flood it with immigrants, and it will be even worse for Berlin if in that wave… there will be some jihadists of the Islamic State, too.” — Panos Kammenos, Defense Minister of Greece

Greece is a member of NATO. The whole world witnessed how the Defense Minister of one NATO country was threatening other NATO members with unleashing Islamic terrorists on them.

A Greek exit will lead to a power vacuum in the southeastern corner of Europe, which Russia (and China) will be only too eager to fill. The Chinese are currently negotiating with the Greek government to acquire an even larger part of the port of Piraeus.

DISPATCHES FROM TOM GROSS

CONTENTS
1. Jihadi against jihadi, as ISIS behead al-Qaeda
2. The BBC’s hypocrisy over terrorism
3. “Liking” the Tunisia attack on YouTube
4. The Guardian writes of a “massacre,” a “slaughter,” and of “terrorism”
5. Jihadi accused of French beheading, previously arrested for assaulting Jewish teen
6. French beheading suspect sent “selfie” with severed head, to Canadian contact
7. Vigil for beheading victim
8. Meanwhile activists in the West are targeting… Israel
9. “Love Among the Ruins” (By Bari Weiss, Wall Street Journal, June 27, 2015)
10. “After Tunisia, Kuwait and France we should not be afraid to call evil by its name” (By Jonathan Freedland, The Guardian, June 27, 2015)

***

THE JEWS OF VIENNA: BEFORE AND AFTER BY MYRNA KATZ FROMMER AND HARVEY FROMMER

About the Authors: Myrna Katz Frommer and Harvey Frommer are a wife and husband team who successfully bridge the worlds of popular culture and traditional scholarship. Co-authors of the critically acclaimed interactive oral histories It Happened in the Catskills, It Happened in Brooklyn, Growing Up Jewish in America, It Happened on Broadway, and It Happened in Manhattan, they teach what they practice as professors at Dartmouth College.

Paul Chaim Eisenberg, Chief Rabbi of Vienna, is a small, rotund man, about 50 years old with a wispy, rather untended short beard — gray but shaded with streaks of reddish blonde, and china blue eyes that are a perfect match to the open collared shirt he wears. His overall demeanor is lively, even jolly, punctuated with a handy repertoire of Jewish-related jokes of the kind that would stand a Catskill comic in good stead. (Example: A couple are on a cruise. The steward says, “Mr. & Mrs. Rubinstein, the captain wants to invite you to eat at his table tonight.” The wife turns to her husband and says, “Ach, I knew they were anti Semites. Because we’re Jewish, we have to eat with the crew.”)

Laughter comes easily to this rabbi. His eyes, however, are sad. Perhaps that is because the subtext of our conversation is as dark as the deserted street outside his office this rainy November night. Vienna’s Jewish Center is close by Kartnerstrasse, the city’s major pedestrian thoroughfare. But we walked up and down the streets in the cold drizzle unable to find it until two uniformed police officers actually escorted us to the front door of a narrow, inconspicuous building in a row of others of identical size and style.

Iran’s Guardian Council Endorses Majlis N-Bill To Safeguard Nuclear “Achievements”…..and Remove Sanctions

TEHRAN, Jun. 25 (MNA) – Iranian Guardian Council approved the bill passed in Majlis to require protection of Iran’s nuclear achievements.According to Mehr correspondents, the Majlis bill to obligate the Islamic Republic Administration to safeguarded nuclear achievements was approved by Guardian Council on Thursday. Iran’s Guardian Council discussed the bill thoroughly and found it in compliance with the Iranian Constitution and Islamic laws.

Gaining the yes vote of the Iranian lawmakers a day earlier, the bill requires the diplomatic leg of the Executive branch to observe some concerns of the MPs including the immediate removal of imposed sanctions on Tehran over its nuclear program upon the enforcement of the Iran-Sextet deal in prospect.

In the second article of the bill, the MPs dismiss giving any extra-conventional permission to IAEA to inspect Iran’s highly sensitive military and security sites.