There are a few of the usual patterns here in the outrageous attacks on Hussein Aboubakr at Swarthmore College.
1. Muslim activists are given a platform to attack Muslim and ex-Muslims who link Islam to violence as bigots. This is a perverse and irrational position that is not accorded to Christianity. Liberal Christians and atheists who grew up in a Christian family are not demonized as bigots.
This whole thing is yet another reminder that “Islamophobia” is not about protecting Muslims, but about protecting Islam from any criticism even by other Muslims.
2. Muslim activists have adopted the language of social justice to protect their own privilege. And so we see Muslim students claiming to be “triggered” when Hussein Aboubakr, a political refugee who survived torture, speaks on campus.
This same cynical game was used to force out Ayaan Hirsi Ali , who actually had to live in fear much of her life, by activists claiming that she made them feel “unsafe”.
Again this Muslim privilege is not accorded to anyone else. When Muslim Students Associations bring in speakers who attack Jews in the vilest ways, there are no stories or actions taken in response. Anti-Israel students are allowed to promote terrorism, use the signage of terrorist groups without being told to stop because they are making anyone feel unsafe.
Now here’s what happened when Hussein Aboubakr spoke at Swarthmore.