RUTHFULLY YOURS

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/obamas-enormous-climate-lies?f=puball

Putting aside Obama’s intention to further reduce our nuclear arsenal as articulated in his June 19 speech in Berlin, he has solidified his position as the World’s Greatest Liar with his statements about climate change, aka global warming, which he called “the global threat of our time.”

Let us stipulate that the global threat of our time is the rise of Islamic fanaticism in its pursuit of a worldwide caliphate. It threatens some six billion of the world’s population that represent other faiths. It is on the rise throughout the Middle East and into northern Africa’s Maghreb. It has cells in South America and it threatens the lives of millions of Americans if the jihadists acquire nuclear arms.

Regarding the President’s call for nuclear disarmament, veteran journalist Bill Gertz observed that “The president is using a new term to support his earlier disarmament call back in 2009 in Prague, and it’s called ‘peace with justice’ which has a very Marxist-Leninist ring to it. All the rhetoric of the communist groups around refer to peace with justice, (and) now the president has employed it for the first time.”

Obama continues to conjure up global warming despite overwhelming evidence that it does not exist. Dubbed “climategate”, revelations in 2009 made clear that a small group within the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) were deliberately falsifying their climate models.

There is nothing that humans can or should do regarding the Earth’s climate. It is a force that is so vast and powerful that calls for renewable energy, energy conservation, and a “carbon tax” on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions are utterly false, a danger to human life, a threat to global economic development, and the work of scoundrels and charlatans.

http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/detail/womens-rights-in-saudi-arabia-from-622-2013 Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah recently made history with a royal decree, declaring a new era in politics and in social culture. The Monarch appoints 150 Majlis al Shura Council members as his advisors in areas such as education, health, Islamic affairs, economy and finance. King Abdullah appointed 30 women to the council.  Appointed women […]

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/davidhornik/the-bleak-prospects-for-europes-jews/print/ PERHAPS THEY SHOULD GO TO ISRAEL AS AUTHOR DAVID HORNIK DID….READ HIS BOOK “CHOOSING LIFE IN ISRAEL” A new report by Dr. Dov Maimon of the Jerusalem-based Jewish People Policy Planning Institute paints a bleak picture for European Jewry. As Maimon puts it delicately, “European Jewish life has quite possibly reached a negative inflexion […]

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/jamie-glazov/the-last-israelis/print/ Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Noah Beck, a frequent columnist on Middle East issues and author of the book, “The Last Israelis,” the second edition of which was released last spring. FP: Noah Beck, welcome to Frontpage Interview. Congratulations on releasing the second edition of your book, which our readers should know is available […]

http://frontpagemag.com/2013/fjordman/my-life-as-a-public-enemy/print/

I am currently completing a book about the Anders Behring Breivik case and how I got dragged into it against my will. The working title is Witness to Madness, with the subtitle How I Became Public Enemy Number Two. I was considering dropping the reference to being a “public enemy,” as it might be seen as hyperbole. Yet after the reactions I’ve received since the beginning of June 2013, this title actually seems warranted.

On Friday June 14, I announced on my Twitter account, in Norwegian, that I’d just been awarded a grant of 75,000 kroner to support the completion of my upcoming book about the Breivik case. This grant came from Fritt Ord, which is Norway’s largest and most well-funded free speech organization by far.

I was quite happy to receive it, as it had not at all been certain that I would get it. The decision was bound to cause some controversy, given how controversial I am in Norway, but the mass media reactions once again exceeded anything I had truly expected. A full week after my tweet, the debate had still not died down. A Member of Parliament representing the ruling government coalition blasted the decision and me personally on the state broadcaster NRK. The crux of the debate is: Does freedom of speech apply even to truly loathsome creeps like Fjordman?

The controversy was mentioned in the other Scandinavian countries, too, for instance on Denmark’s public broadcaster DR, as well as in national newspapers in Sweden such as Aftonbladet and Expressen.

The good news is that quite a few individuals have taken a principled stand in favor of free speech. The support that meant the most to me personally was that of the long-time publisher William Nygaard. He was the Norwegian publisher of Salman Rushdie’s novel The Satanic Verses and was nearly killed outside his own home in Oslo in 1993. In other words, this is a man who has personally paid a price for doing what he does, and who probably also genuinely disagrees with many of the things that I write, but who nevertheless supports free speech as a matter of principle. He is also not alone in doing this, which is encouraging.

  http://frontpagemag.com/2013/arnold-ahlert/defending-an-islamofascist-with-u-s-troops/print/ In yet another remarkable display of Obama’s determination to secure the Middle East for Islamofascists, 400 U.S. troops will reportedly be deployed to Egypt to augment the police force of Islamist President Mohamed Morsi. They will be part of a 13-country force stationed in Egypt in anticipation of protests, scheduled for June 30th, calling for the […]

http://pjmedia.com/jchristianadams/2013/06/25/supreme-court-buries-section-5-of-voting-rights-act/?print=1

The Supreme Court has decided Shelby v. Holder. It is one of the most important decisions in decades.

Now, federal preclearance of state election procedures seems to be forever dead and buried. While some congressional Republicans had vowed to enact new legislation to “fix” any coverage formula deemed unconstitutional, the opinion today offers almost no room to do so. They would have to decide what’s more important: the Republican Party, or the Constitution?

Section 5 required states to obtain preclearance approval for any change involving elections — any change, even moving a polling place 20 feet. Only 15 states were covered by Section 5, including hotbeds of Jim Crow like Michigan, New York, and Alaska.

Over the years, the Justice Department unit enforcing Section 5 has had hundreds of thousands of dollars in court sanctions imposed against it for abusing the Section 5 process. They even demanded that Alabama submit felon DNA testing to the Justice Department for approval, a law which had nothing to do with elections.

Now, voter ID laws in Texas, Alabama, and Mississippi are in effect after a delay of years. Section 5 is dead and gone, and congressional Republicans, no matter how much racialist false witness is lobbed at them, simply have no ability to resurrect the law. Will the GOP defend itself against the already-commenced false racial attacks following the decision, or will they cave?

http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2013/06/26/sheikh-who-okd-killing-americans-in-iraq-gets-white-house-reception/?print=1

Editor’s Note: PJ Media contributor Patrick Poole is the author of the Middle East Review for International Affairs (MERIA) article “Blind to Terror: The U.S. Government’s Disastrous Muslim Outreach and the Impact on U.S. Middle East Policy,” which was published earlier this month.

Steve Emerson and John Rossomando of the Investigative Project reported last night that Sheikh Abdullah bin Bayyah, vice president of the International Union of Muslim Scholars (IUMS), was received by senior Obama administration officials in the White House on June 13:

Bin Bayyah’s website claims that he met June 13 with senior Obama administration officials at the White House.

Nonetheless, it was the Obama administration which sought the meeting with Bin Bayyah, his website’s account said.

“We asked for this meeting to learn from you and we need to be looking for new mechanisms to communicate with you and the Association of Muslim Scholars (another name used for the IUMS),” Gayle Smith, senior director of the National Security Council, reportedly said.

http://pjmedia.com/blog/why-snowden-picked-ecuador/?print=1

ECUADOR’S PRESIDENT RAFAEL CORREA WAS , ALONG WITH BOLIVIA’S MORONIC PRESIDENT EVO MORALES A MEMBER OF HUGO CHAVEZ’ THREE “BOLIVARIAN” STOOGES….ANTI AMERICAN POP SOCIALIST THUGS WHO AMONG THEM CONTROL CRITICAL ENERGY SUPPLIES….ECUADOR AND VENEZUELA HAVE ABUNDANT OIL AND BOLIVIA HAS THE WORLD’S LARGEST SUPPLY OF LITHIUM……RSK

Edward Snowden says [1] that he leaked classified information about National Security Agency surveillance programs because he believes those programs represent a major threat to civil liberties. Ironically, Snowden has now requested asylum in a country — Ecuador — where civil liberties are routinely trampled by an elected autocracy.

As of this writing, he is apparently still in Moscow [1], awaiting a formal response from the Ecuadorean government. If Quito approves his asylum request and Snowden successfully makes it to Ecuadorean territory, he will be the second high-profile leaker to take refuge there over the past year. The first, of course, was WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who entered Ecuador’s London embassy last June and officially received asylum [2] in August.

Why did Snowden pick Ecuador? Like Assange, he recognizes that President Rafael Correa is an anti-American leftist who has repeatedly clashed with Washington and has eagerly embraced U.S. adversaries. Indeed, Correa is a Hugo Chávez acolyte who reportedly received money from Colombian FARC terrorists [3] during his 2006 presidential campaign; who in 2009 expelled [4] a U.S. embassy official named Armando Astorga and forced the U.S. military to leave Manta air base [5] (which had been used for anti-drug operations); who in 2011 expelled [6] U.S. ambassador Heather Hodges; who in 2012 withdrew [7] Ecuadorean troops from the U.S.-based Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation and also threatened to expel [8] USAID from Ecuador; and who boycotted [9] the 2012 Summit of the Americas to protest the exclusion of Cuba. His government has also strengthened ties with Iran [10], and there is compelling evidence that the Iranians have used their close relationship with Ecuador to evade international sanctions and access the global financial system [11]. Ecuadorean foreign minister Ricardo Patiño has called Iran a “strategic partner [12],” and Correa has defended [13] the Iranian nuclear program.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/352009/gops-immigration-debacle-jonah-goldberg I don’t know how Democrats do it. The immigration-reform proposal wending its way through the Senate is tearing the Republican party to pieces. Poor Senator Marco Rubio (R., Fla.), once the golden boy of the Tea Party and the conservative movement, is being treated like a guy who wants to leave a gang but […]