RUTHFULLY YOURS

https://mailchi.mp/da197e976039/shinzo-abe-japans-indispensable-conservative?e=7f5d6321a5

Shinzo Abe, who was assassinated today while electioneering, was his country’s indispensable man. Prime minister of Japan for much of this century, from 2006 to 2007 and 2012 to 2020, Abe’s stature on the world stage eclipsed that of other post-war Japanese leaders, just as his time in office surpassed them all.

For a taste of the shock of his murder, look back to the surprise and incredulity which met his resignation from office in the pandemic’s worst days. Plagued by a debilitating health condition which had earlier caused him to leave office in 2007, Abe concluded he did not have the stamina left to rule.

Outside observers of Japan — who had watched Abe consolidate domestic power, develop a new economic regime, and increasingly come to personify his country in foreign capitals — were left almost speechless. “What will his country do now?” they asked at that time.

For some, that might seem an absurd question. Japan is politically decorous, and notably stable. It is not normally beholden to rancor and political violence. Abe’s successors should have counted upon stable institutions and political deference to  give them the chance to run the country in their own ways.

https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/18660/europe-scientists-china-military

“Western universities need to understand that Chinese military scientists have only one client, and that is the People’s Liberation Army.” — Meia Nouwens, researcher at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), Politiken, May 19, 2022.

“[T]here is an attempt to take as much knowledge as possible from our research communities back to China. In my home country, the Netherlands, there are researchers who have been working on artificial intelligence with Huawei instead of with NATO. It’s the world turned upside down.” — David van Weel, NATO’s Assistant Secretary General for Emerging Security Challenges, Politiken, May 23, 2022

In one Danish case… a Chinese military engineer, saying that he came from a Chinese research institute that turned out to not exist, collaborated with Aalborg University in Denmark on advanced radar technology. The engineer was, instead, from the People’s Liberation Army Information Engineering University…. [T]he university did not take steps to vet the Chinese engineer’s credentials. — Politiken, November 30, 2021

“If you look at… 40 years ago, [the CCP] had zero satellites… They had no ICBMs… They had no nuclear weapons… They had no navy…. Look at what they have today…. We’re witnessing one of the largest shifts in global geostrategic power that the world has witnessed.” — General Mark Milley, Chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, breakingdefense.com, November 4, 2021.

British universities have accepted £240 million from Chinese institutions, many with links to the military, including £60 million from institutions sanctioned by the US government for supplying the Chinese military with fighter jets, communications technology and missiles. In… just six years, the number of research collaborations between scientists in the UK and Chinese institutes with deep connections to the country’s defense forces tripled to more than 1,000. — The Times, February 4, 2022.

[O]ne of the UK’s “foremost” high-tech weapons experts, Professor Clive Woodley at Imperial College London – one of the British universities that has received the most funding from China — had been freely working with China for years…. Most of Woodley’s research has been funded by the Ministry of Defence…. He has advised the MoD about many of its key lethal systems.” — David Rose, investigative journalist, Unherd, May 21, 2022.

“Adapting to a world affected by the rise of China is the single greatest priority for MI6” — Richard Moore, UK’s spy chief, head of MI6, Sky News, November 30, 2021.

New research done by Follow the Money, a Dutch platform for investigative journalism, and ten other European media outlets, found that European scientists have “shared militarily sensitive knowledge with the Chinese army on a large scale.”

The project, known as the China Science Investigation, collected a staggering 353,000 scientific collaborations between Europe and China and found that, of these, 2,994 have taken place with the Chinese military, defined as, “studies where scientists from Western European universities collaborated with Chinese colleagues directly linked to an institute that is part of the Chinese army.”